Home | News    Wednesday 22 April 2020

Sudan, SPLM-N Agar agree to include West Kordofan in future peace deal

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

Dhieu Matouk chairs a session of peace talks through videoconference flanked with with the SPLM-N Agar delegation in Juba on 21 April 2020 (SUNA photo)
April 21, 2020 (JUBA) - The peace agreement to be signed between the Sudanese government and SPLM-N led by Malik Agar will include West Kordofan state, revealed Yasir Arman, the Movement’s chief negotiator.

On Tuesday, the two parties held their second teleconference meeting to discuss issues of peace in the Two Areas particularly the wealth-sharing, security arrangements and the situation of the West Kordofan in this agreement.

The West Kordofan state was abolished and merged into South Kordofan State in 2005 as per the provisions of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), but it was re-established in April 2013.

The conflict in the Blue Nile and South Kordofan resumed in 2011 on the backdrop of the non-implementation of the protocol related to the Two Areas in the CPA.

"We agreed with the government side that the would-be signed agreement be applied to the West Kordofan State in all its political and security aspects as well as the power-sharing," Arman told Sudan Tribune on Tuesday.

He pointed out that West Kordofan state will remain with its current geographical borders until the Governance and Administration Conference proposed by the Sudanese Revolutionary Front (SRF) to discuss the re-establishment of the former autonomous regions instead of the current 18 states.

The transitional government and the SRF consider the reestablishment of an amended version of the colonial six (mudiryas) in northern Sudan, which constitute current Sudan, including (Blue Nile, Darfur, Kassala, Khartoum, Kordofan, and Northern).

The then known as southern Sudan was divided into three departments (Bahr el-Ghazal, Equatoria and Upper Nile).

Regarding the wealth-sharing between the centre and the Two-Areas, Arman said that the government delegation responded to the mediation’s proposal with three options giving the Two Areas 50%, 40% or 30% of the locally produced wealth in a way that the number of the years depends on the percentage agreed by the parties.

"But the SPLM is constantly sticking to 40%.," he stressed, referring to the proposal made by the mediator.

The Deputy Chief Mediator Dhieu Matouk told reporters in Juba that the Sudanese government has proposed 50% during six years, 40% for eight years or 30% for 10 years

On Sunday, the South Sudanese mediation proposed that the Two Areas be granted 40% of the wealth produced locally, as the SPLM-N first requested to be given 70%, while the government’s position, was to allocate only 30%.

Further, Arman expected to conclude discussions on the security arrangements next Tuesday, saying they agreed with the government today on issues of command, control, demobilization and troops merger.

He added that they are still discussing the period in which the SPLM-N fighters are incorporated into the regular forces, stressing that it will depend on the progress achieved in the implementation of the political agreement.

The two sides will meet next Tuesday, as the talks on Darfur will take place on Thursday and Sunday.

The government and the SRF groups have agreed to wrap up the negotiations on 9 May. However, the date of the signing ceremony was not yet determined.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 22 April 2020 09:34, by Mayendit

    Yasir Arman policy is very clear that he is favorably any Arabs blood and against the rights of Black African in Sudan. From the beginning of the Sudanese peace negotiations in Ethiopia Addis Ababa, he was avoided to bring up the rights of the Nuba people and people of Blue Nile region respectively but now he is supported West Korudian to be included.

    repondre message

    • 24 April 2020 07:06, by Fathi

      Mayendit,
      What’s next? Are you going to call Malik Agar anti Black African? lol
      They’ve agreed to wealth sharing, broad autonomy, including right self-legislate, are finalizing security arrangements, humanitarian aid assistance, and are trying to reorganize the army to be reflective of Sudanese people.

      repondre message

  • 22 April 2020 09:46, by Mayendit

    Mr.Yasir Arman why now you are bringing up the rights of West Kordofan to be included in to sharing government when you denying the rights of the Nuba people and people of Blue Nile to decide whether or not they will have self determination and separation between church and State?.one day, those Nubian people will gets their rights whether you guys like it or not. Ashamed on you Yasir Arman.

    repondre message

    • 24 April 2020 07:09, by Fathi

      He supports and advocates for secularism but doesn’t believe self-determination should be the alternative.

      repondre message

    • 24 April 2020 07:15, by Fathi

      If you read the article instead of just the title you would know why he brought the rights of people in West Kordofan.

      repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


What Makes an Uprising? 2021-09-03 17:29:45 By: Dr Lam Akol* In an undated article, Hon. Atem Garang de Kuek discussed what was required for an uprising in South Sudan to succeed as did three uprisings in the recent history of Sudan (...)

Is IGAD partly responsible for current confusion in South Sudan? 2021-08-21 09:41:17 By Bol Khan In April 2016, Radio Tamazuj posted and answered questions about the fainting Security arrangements or demilitarization of the capital, Juba as stipulated in 2015's signed ARCSS and (...)

South Sudan People Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) is to create warlords 2021-08-19 11:06:28 By Steve Paterno In South Sudan, where just about everyone has access to guns (tons of them), and almost every ambitious politician is a potential warlord, any slight destabilization of the (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Statemeny bu Hala al-Karib to UN Security Council on women conditions in Sudan 2021-09-15 11:59:16 Statement by Ms Hala Al-Karib to the UN Security Council 14 September 2021 Madam President, Excellencies, My name is Hala Al-Karib and I am the Regional Director of the Strategic Initiative (...)

Joint Communiqué on the visit of H.E. the Prime Minister of the Republic of Sudan to Juba 2021-08-23 11:23:26 19 – 21 August 2021 His Excellency Dr Abdallah Hamdok, Prime Minister of the Republic of the Sudan and Chairperson of IGAD, accompanied by Ministers of Defence, Foreign Affairs, Trade, (...)

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2021 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.