Home | News    Friday 3 June 2016

President Kiir’s advisor says no consensus to review 28 states

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

June 2, 2016 (JUBA) – A senior presidential advisor allied to President Salva Kiir, has denied any consensus reached by the presidency to review the number of states in the country, saying the President had no power to reverse the 28 states as the matter had allegedly been in the hands of the people.

Tor Deng Mawien (ST Photo)

In an exclusive interview with Sudan Tribune on Thursday, Presidential Advisor on Decentralization and Intergovernmental Linkages, Tor Deng Mawien, a relative to President Kiir, said the committee agreed on Wednesday by the presidency to be formed will only work on the boundaries of the 28 states but not to temper with their numbers.

Mawien totally dismissed the joint spoken statement which First Vice President, Riek Machar and Vice President, James Wani, issued to the public on Wednesday after the presidency meeting.

In the joint statement to the press by the two deputies after the meeting, a committee of 15 members will be constituted from all the parties to the August 2015 peace agreement and from the international partners to come up with recommendation on the number of new states and determine their boundaries.

“We discussed the issue of the 28 states. We decided to tackle this through a committee. That committee will be composed of 15 members…So that they can work on the number of states, review them and they come up with recommendation on the number of the states and this will be within 30 days. Within 30 days this work will be done,” said First Vice President, Riek Machar, in a press statement to the media, also broadcasted on the South Sudan TV (SSTV) on Wednesday evening.

Machar said the 15 members of the committee will include 10 South Sudanese from the parties in the peace deal and 5 others from the international partners. He added that they would ask South Africa and Tanzania to bring in two members from their countries.

He also said the presidency agreed to release prisoners of war and to budget for establishment of cantonment areas for the forces across the country.

Also, Vice President, James Wani, who held the joint spoken statement with Machar, confirmed the outcome of the presidency meeting with President Kiir’s participation.

“Really, I have nothing to say further, what the First Vice President has just articulated is absolutely in place. These are the issues we agreed on,” Vice President Wani said.

“But one would want to underline the fact that the meeting of today by the three of us has been one of the most successful meetings,” Wani added.

However, the presidential advisor, Mawien, who did not attend the presidency meeting, said reviewing the number of the states was not agreed in the presidency.

“As far as I know there were only three important issues which the President with First Vice President and the Vice President have discussed and reached a consensus. The meeting of the three leaders which took place yesterday afternoon was very important. It resolved that cantonment sites for SPLM-IO forces will be established in the country. This means some places will be identified as areas of assembling points in Equatoria and other places in the country. The meeting also resolved to release prisoners of war and to lift the state of emergency. These were the issues which were discussed. There was no consensus on the number of states,” presidential advisor, Mawien, said on Thursday when asked to comment on the latest political development.

Mawien further explained that the issue of the number of the states was no longer in the hand of the president for him to decide whether to reverse the order or not.

“I think the issue of the states is no longer with the president. It has left his hand and it is now owned by the people themselves. If there are people who still want this issue to be discussed again, or if they want the number of states to be reduced or expanded, they should now talk to the people and see what the people will say in this regard. What the committee will do is to review borders and make necessary recommendations on how issues relating to borders can be resolved amicably,” explained Mawien.

The decision of the three leaders has also received mixed reactions from the public with opposition figures insisting on the revocation of the establishment order, asserting that the agreement was signed on the basis of ten states in addition to the fact that the decision itself was not constitutional in the first place.

Onyoti Adigo, the Minority Leader in the national parliament from Democratic Change party, said Thursday his party would continue to reject the implementation of 28 states because it violated the peace agreement.

“I understand that political parties will be represented in the committee. For us, we will not nominate a member to participate unless the terms of reference are clarified. We need to know the work of the committee itself first and when it will start work. When this is clarified, we will nominate,” said Adigo.

The opposition figure asserted that the establishment order unilaterally issued by Pesident Kiir to expand the number of states to 28 from 10 was issued without carrying out studies so that the views of the people at the grassroots levels were incorporated.

“No studies were carried out. It was a decision of certain people who wanted to sabotage South Sudan like now. There are problems caused by the 28 states. The current economic crisis is one of them. As we speak there are people who did not get salaries for three months, four months and two months, it is a problem of 28 states,” he said.

“There is no money. If there is no money to pay employees where will the budget come to establish all these states? It is not economically a viable decision.”

He said his party has not stopped rejecting the creation of more states, adding that they will stick to the 10 states.

“Of course we are still rejecting it until now, we will not accept 28 states, now there is no room for 28 states or 13 states or 50 states, and we demand 10 states according to the agreement,” he added.

President Kiir on 2 October 2015 issued an establishment order announcing the creation of 28 states. He later issued another order appointing governors to run the new states even after he signed the peace agreement based on 10 states with the armed opposition faction under the leadership of Machar.

Critics say the 28 states, which gave the ethnic Dinka almost half of the country’s states, is meant to grab other communities’ lands in Upper Nile and Bahr el Ghazal regions and annex them to the Dinka lands.

Proponents however argue that the decision was made in accordance with the will of the people.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 2 June 2016 23:41, by Native Boy

    Ohh God!! may you save this country from all the mess we are going through to day? Shall we one day live totally in peace like other civilized nations where issues that have grave effect to the current and future generations is first of all given to faithful technocrats to study before a decision is prematurely reached?
    What political and economic tangible good is truly seen in these 28 states?

    repondre message

    • 3 June 2016 00:03, by Native Boy

      A part from 1. Popular demand 2.increasing number of geographical constituencies in a particular region for re-election of these same leaders into power to start the same business in new way (self/section-enrichment since 2005 after the vision bearer had left with his notebook)3.great and brave leader 4.President’s right.
      I truly demand more comrades to understand what was behind 28 TOUCH-ME-NOT?

      repondre message

    • 3 June 2016 00:28, by Force 1

      Now you guys see the facts; no one in Juba; either in the government or in the opposition has the power to reverse the 28 states! You guys need to forget it; that train has already left the station. Good luck reversing the train that had already left.

      repondre message

      • 3 June 2016 05:47, by Eastern

        That adage of the "the train has left the station......" is now obsolete; the train can certainly be stopped. The Dinka project of 28 ethnic enclaves will be stopped. The ARCISS can not be implemented on the bases of any number states but 10. This is clear in the text of the agreement which is not open to any market place or indeed cattle camp discussion!

        repondre message

  • 3 June 2016 06:29, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    The world should now know who is responsible for the death, famine and suffering of the poor people of South Sudan. Two vice presidents come to press with news about the outcome of presidential meeting and a non-participant man comes up with another news, what does that indicate. To me it is lack of leadership at the highest rung of government. People need a break on this type of politics.

    repondre message

  • 3 June 2016 06:36, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    South Sudanese should not give political platform for destroyers of the country to continue with their scheme of destroying the country. Name it whether it is Jieng Council of Elders or Close relatives of the so called President. Decrees are not peoples’ demand because it is a decision made by dictators. One wonders when was a referendum or a decision by parliament made on this issue of 28 states.

    repondre message

    • 3 June 2016 08:20, by Kenyang

      Jur,
      Same question you raised can apply to former 10 states. There was no referendum held or debate by parliament on it.
      The fact that there are no strikes over the country show majority are happy with 28 states.
      If you don’t like your new state and want go back to your former state, you are minority.
      If you disagree, let stop wasting time and leave it for popular vote.

      repondre message

  • 3 June 2016 09:59, by Gabriel KK

    Referendum is the only solution to this issue.

    repondre message

    • 3 June 2016 15:35, by Frak Cho

      Why on earth is everything geared towards tribal line! The media people are the one destroying South Sudan.

      repondre message

  • 3 June 2016 14:54, by lino

    Haha!!! Former President of Sudan Nemarie was not wrong when he divided South Sudan into 3 big regions prior to war in 1983, but it became one of the reason for rebellion at the time.

    repondre message

  • 4 June 2016 08:46, by doot

    Issue of 28 states is clear.people of have to decide.The decision is left to people. If the donot want what the got now, it is upto them to say so.No more waste of resources this time around. Ethinic RIEK should Stop playing Ethinic game . Now then ever he is trying to persue his Ethnic interest by all mean.Twenty eight states is settled period!. people are tired of this Ethnic Riek !

    repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Sudan’s legitimate request for UN assistance: the opponents their interior motives? (2-3) 2020-06-05 12:29:45 By: Trayo A. Ali To expose and preempt the plot these opposing forces to the UN are hatching, the tricks and tactics using, the ploys they are crafting and ulterior motives they harbour and the (...)

We neither Forget nor Forgive the 3 June 2019 Massacre 2020-06-04 06:41:26 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman Today Wednesday, June 3rd 2020 comes as the great epic of redemption at the dawn of the third of June 2019, whose memory will remain immortal in the history book, (...)

The untold crisis of health system in South Sudan 2020-06-03 06:49:09 by Dr Jok Gang The South Sudanese war began in 1955 at the time when people of the region began to feel a lack of representation in the government and therefore the absence of the crucial (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2020 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.