Home | News    Monday 16 November 2015

EU vows to support Hybrid Court on South Sudan


November 15, 2015 (ARUSHA/JUBA) - The European Union (EU) has welcomed the recent release of the African Union Commission of Inquiry report on human rights abuses in South Sudan and vowed to support the establishment of a Hybrid Court on the world’s youngest nation.

JPEG - 18.9 kb
The second continental judicial dialogue taking place in Arusha, Tanzania on November 5, 2015 (Pan African Lawyers photo)

The EU’s assurance came during the second continental judicial dialogue on “connecting national and international justice” held in Tanzania last week.

The three-day judicial dialogue, among other resolutions, supported the idea to establish a continental network of African judiciaries under the auspices of the African Union to bring together superior courts of the African Union member states.

Both warring factions in the South Sudanese conflict committed war crimes in Juba, Bor, Bentiu and Malakal towns, the African Union Commission of Inquiry said in its report.

It however said most “indiscriminate” and “unlawful” killings of civilians or soldiers in Juba were committed by element of government security forces.

“These attacks resulted in massive killings in and around Juba. The people killed were either found during the house to house search or captured on roadblocks,” partly reads the 318-page report Sudan Tribune obtained.

The five-member commission also said there are reasonable grounds to believe war crimes of rape and torture were committed against civilians in and around Juba, citing evidences that point to state security involvement.

“The evidence collected also suggests that war crime of forced enlisting of children in the army were committed,” says the report from the commission, which was headed by former Nigerian president, Olusegen Obasanjo.

War crimes, it said, were believed to have been committed by government soldiers in Malakal Teaching Hospital through the killings of civilians by some of the soldiers within the South Sudanese national army (SPLA).

“The civilians killed were Nuers who had sought shelter at the hospital at night. About six Nuers were killed on diverse dates between 22nd January and 17th February 2014,” it said. “Some others men women and children were selected, gathered and taken to the river where they were killed”.

There are also various accounts and testimonies on killings said to have been conducted by state security agents in the South Sudanese towns of Juba, Bentiu and Bor.

The five-member commission, established in March last year and tasked to investigate the human rights violations and other abuses committed during the armed conflict in South Sudan, equally attributed war crimes allegedly committed to the armed opposition (SPLA/IO) and the white army forces allied to the country’s former vice president, Riek Machar in Bor.

The commission further considers that there are reasonable grounds to believe that war crimes in relation to massive and indiscriminate attacks against civilian property were carried out in Bor town, reads the report.

“Visible evidence of torched non-military objectives like houses, market place, administration houses, hospital, form the basis to believe that these crimes were committed,” it adds.

The commission, however, said there were reasonable grounds to believe that no crimes of genocide were committed during the mid-December 2013 conflict despite the seeming ethnic nature and dimension the violent war.

It still maintained though that some of the serious violations of human rights could amount to crimes against humanity were committed during the conflict and that further investigations be done to identify those responsible.


Meanwhile, the commission found that the Transitional Constitution of South Sudan gives the presidency too much power amidst a weak institutions and a gap between the judiciary, legislature and the executive.

As such, it said, the South Sudanese president’s power to remove some state officials, often without proper controls, was one cause of instability in the country.

“The Commission recommends that the future Constitution should establish a well-balanced system of separation of powers with adequate checks and balances,” it said.

This, the report further noted, should be achieved through empowering and strengthening the capacity of the legislatures at both levels of government; subjecting major executive appointments to legislative approval; strengthening the judiciary (ensuring structural and financial independence from the political branches) and adherence to separation of powers, cultivating a culture of respect for judicial independence and rule of law.

The commission of inquiry recommended that appointment and removal of the country’s vice president be subjected to the approval of the legislature.


The AU Commission of inquiry, among others, recommended the establishment of a Truth and Reconciliation Commission with a mandate to investigate human rights violations dating back to the agreed cutoff date.

The peace and reconciliation process, it said, should be driven by the commission.

“Such a body should lead to truth, remorse, forgiveness and restitution where necessary, justice and lasting reconciliation being achieved,” it added and that process be established in relationship with ‘hybrid’ mechanisms.

“Such mechanisms would operate under the national mechanism, which should develop guidelines that seek to among others, align the operations of grassroots mechanisms with human rights and other identified ideals”.

The South Sudanese government said it would not shield officials found to have masterminded the killing of members of ethnic Nuer in December 2013 when political differences within the leadership of the country’s ruling party (SPLM) turned violent by spreading into the army.

“The government will not protect officials who will be found to have played roles pointing to facts and evidences that they were involved in the killing of some citizens on the basis of their ethnicity. I repeat if there are credible, reliable and empirical evidences about actions of some people, the government will hand them over to answer the cause of their actions," justice minister Paulino Wanawila told Sudan Tribune last week.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 15 November 2015 22:46, by Mr Point

    It’s clearly proved.

    Kiir has too much uncontrolled power.

    Government forces committed crimes of rape, torture and murder against civilians.

    Kiir bears responsibility for the war on civilians instead of fighting a war on corruption, hunger and disease.

    repondre message

  • 16 November 2015 05:45, by Uncle J

    EU has helped South Sudan in nothing and I don’t see any reason they want to support conviction of those responsible for war crimes in South Sudan. The only thing EU is good at contributing in African nations is making Africa unstable like what they did in Lybia, now thousands people get drown in the sea every day as a result of distablizing stable government of Lybia that was under Gadafi, African have to learn from previous mistakes of trusting westerners too much, EU with their evil intention is not helping at all

    repondre message

    • 16 November 2015 08:06, by hamil

      Uncle J

      In your opinion is South Sudan stable under Kiir or do you see it getting stable? Definitely not Kiir is everything that a good leader is not he has failed South Sudan in every aspect, issued pointless decrees, dragged the nation to economic meltdown, killed, divided south sudanese along tribal lines, violated the constitution, became dictatorial. With him South Sudan is a hopeless Nation

      repondre message

      • 16 November 2015 09:18, by Uncle J

        I am not saying South Sudan is stable under Kiir now but under Riek it will become more unstable country, imagine if Dinka the largest tribe in South take up arms of rebellion against whatever government installed by western countries that are using transtition government as a tool to depost Kiir do you think that government would last for days? It will not happen. Every citizen should support government lead by Dinka because that’s the only stability will come into the country

        repondre message

        • 16 November 2015 14:06, by hamil

          Uncle J

          I don’t mind from which tribe the president of South Sudan comes from whether a Dinka, Nuer, Murle, Shilluk or from any of the Equatorian Tribe. What I care about is the fate of South Sudan and its young generation if you observe critically it is the older generation who are destroying this country at the expense of the younger ones dying. We want someone who can foster unity

          repondre message

          • 16 November 2015 14:12, by hamil

            Someone who thinks ahead of time with a brighter vision someone who is not egoistic and self centered, someone who values humanity and condemns all wrong acts, someone who is ready to change & uplift the face of South Sudan through development. This person can come from any of the biggest or smallest tribes in South Sudan and this person is neither Kiir or Riek. That person was Garang.

            repondre message

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

What Makes an Uprising? 2021-09-03 17:29:45 By: Dr Lam Akol* In an undated article, Hon. Atem Garang de Kuek discussed what was required for an uprising in South Sudan to succeed as did three uprisings in the recent history of Sudan (...)

Is IGAD partly responsible for current confusion in South Sudan? 2021-08-21 09:41:17 By Bol Khan In April 2016, Radio Tamazuj posted and answered questions about the fainting Security arrangements or demilitarization of the capital, Juba as stipulated in 2015's signed ARCSS and (...)

South Sudan People Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) is to create warlords 2021-08-19 11:06:28 By Steve Paterno In South Sudan, where just about everyone has access to guns (tons of them), and almost every ambitious politician is a potential warlord, any slight destabilization of the (...)


Latest Press Releases

Statemeny bu Hala al-Karib to UN Security Council on women conditions in Sudan 2021-09-15 11:59:16 Statement by Ms Hala Al-Karib to the UN Security Council 14 September 2021 Madam President, Excellencies, My name is Hala Al-Karib and I am the Regional Director of the Strategic Initiative (...)

Joint Communiqué on the visit of H.E. the Prime Minister of the Republic of Sudan to Juba 2021-08-23 11:23:26 19 – 21 August 2021 His Excellency Dr Abdallah Hamdok, Prime Minister of the Republic of the Sudan and Chairperson of IGAD, accompanied by Ministers of Defence, Foreign Affairs, Trade, (...)

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)


Copyright © 2003-2021 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.