Home | News    Tuesday 27 January 2015

US security advisor against arms ban on S. Sudan: report


January 26, 2014 (JUBA) – The United States security advisor, Susan Rice has for months resisted appeals from key allies, including Britain and France, to push for a weapons bans on South Sudan, diplomats, human rights advocates and congressional officials told Foreign Policy (FP) magazine.

JPEG - 18 kb
US national security advisor Susan Rice (Photo: Craig Ruttle/AP)

President Barack Obama’s national security team, US secretary of state John Kerry and its ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, want an arms embargo imposed on South Sudan.

Both Power and Kerry have reportedly argued internally that South Sudan’s Salva Kiir has ignored Washington’s diplomatic appeals to halt the killings in the ongoing conflict, calling for more coercive measures, including an arms embargo on the young nation.

Violence broke out in South Sudan over a year ago, pitting president Kiir’s Dinka tribe against Nuer, the country’s second largest ethnic group to which his former deputy, Riek Machar belongs.

Since then, tens of thousands of people have been killed and nearly two million displaced in South Sudan’s worst-ever violence from the time it seceded from neighbouring Sudan in July 2011.

Last year, the US, European Union and Canada imposed sanctions on military generals from both sides of the South Sudanese conflict for allegedly obstructing talks mediated by regional leaders.

There have also been several calls for an arms embargo on South Sudan from activists, local and international human rights groups.

Rice reportedly argued that an arms embargo would undermine a democratically-elected government’s ability to defend itself against an insurgency led Machar, also accused blamed for mass atrocities.

Rice also is concerned that an embargo would be ineffective because South Sudan’s neighbor and military ally, Uganda, would not enforce it even if one were imposed, sources told FP.

“I understand that the blockage came from NSC,” one UN Security Council diplomat was quoted as saying, referring to the White House National Security Council.

“Both Power and Kerry are much more open to sanctions, possibly even including an arms embargo, than the NSC. We have the sense here in New York that they wanted to move forward but they were hampered by Washington.”

The diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity given the confidential nature of the deliberations, reportedly said Washington recently indicated its willingness to consider such measures on Juba.

South Sudan’s rival factions, despite pressure from the international community, recently signed a re-unification agreement seeking to address root causes of the conflict destabilising the country.

An arms embargo, analysts say, would be a leeway for both warring parties to consider peace options, instead of military confrontations.

Last week, Washington reportedly sent a draft resolution to the UN Security Council members Britain, China, France, and Russia, that threatens to impose an asset freeze and a travel ban on top government and rebel leaders responsible for committing atrocities or thwarting regional efforts to strike a peace deal.

The resolution, a senior US official hinted, would also open the door to the “prospect” of an arms embargo at some time in the future.

But the draft which threatens to impose unspecified additional penalties on the warring parties for continuing violence, includes no specific reference to an arms embargo,” diplomatic sources reportedly said.

It remains unclear whether China and Russia would allow an arms embargo to pass as South Sudanese continues to lobby against it.

A coalition of 29 South Sudanese and international human rights groups recently warned of new attacks on civilians, citing the import of new weapons into South Sudan, a country already awash with weapons.

“An arms embargo would help to halt the supply of weapons to individuals and groups who have committed serious violations of human rights, war crimes and crimes against humanity, and protect civilians at grave risk,” reads the 7 January letter to Obama.

Last week, the UN peacekeeping department reportedly presented the Security Council with a confidential white paper documenting efforts by South Sudan to impede international efforts to protect civilians.

It reportedly said South Sudan government had blocked and delayed the delivery of vital military equipment for peacekeeping contingents from China, Ethiopia and Kenya.

That, in turn, has delayed those nations from deploying security forces to protect civilians, the confidential paper reportedly stated.

According to FP, Washington’s failure to act so far on UN sanctions has exposed its long-standing criticism that it applies double standards on human rights, punishing its enemies while letting its friends get away with mass murder without any consequences.

“They have been threatening to impose sanctions for a long time,” said Philippe Bolopion, the UN representative for Human Rights Watch, which has been pressing US to back an arms embargo against the South Sudanese government and the rebels.

“The threats are getting old and harder to take seriously now,” he added.

South Sudan could lose between $22-28 billion if its ongoing conflict continues for the next one to five years, the London based Frontier Economics warned in its latest report.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 27 January 2015 14:00, by Hardlinner

    How would west impose arms embargo on rebels. Sudan supply them with weapons and yet you have never talked about sudan hidden game of proxy. I know west is backing riek but one thing they don’t seem to understand is fact the dinka civilians don’t like riek at all.so your policies will never work. Backing riek is similar to backing genocide on dinka civilians.

    repondre message

    • 27 January 2015 20:30, by Eastern

      Hardliner (aka Softliner) the dinks civilians you talk of are South a Sudanese. Dinka civilians cannot dictate how South Sudan can be governed.

      Continue splitting cow dung in your villages for the welfare of your cows, that’ll much value. Stay out out of national issues; your brains are way below that!

      repondre message

  • 27 January 2015 14:06, by Ayuen deng

    UN and US should find ways to stop Riek rebellion and encourage him to start campaigning for coming general elections which is the only way to get in to Power not Banning South Sudan from buying weapon to defend its integrity and borders, If realities are to be said then there is no need of wasting UN money and time ,when the Solution to South Sudan power struggle will be sovl through election.

    repondre message

  • 27 January 2015 14:59, by Mr Point

    The current crisis started when those pressing for political reform were imprisoned or at risk of being murdered.

    The rebellion only started after the murder of Nuer civilians.

    What are the safeguards to protect any returning from rebellion to take part in peaceful politics?

    Does Kiir allow peaceful dissent?

    repondre message

    • 27 January 2015 18:19, by Michael Miyom Minyiel

      The arm embargo would not work as it the waste of time and resources trying to lobby on it.
      America has to read between the lines wisely.
      Getting to go by it would be a disastrous in its nature on the sides of other civilians.

      repondre message

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

What Makes an Uprising? 2021-09-03 17:29:45 By: Dr Lam Akol* In an undated article, Hon. Atem Garang de Kuek discussed what was required for an uprising in South Sudan to succeed as did three uprisings in the recent history of Sudan (...)

Is IGAD partly responsible for current confusion in South Sudan? 2021-08-21 09:41:17 By Bol Khan In April 2016, Radio Tamazuj posted and answered questions about the fainting Security arrangements or demilitarization of the capital, Juba as stipulated in 2015's signed ARCSS and (...)

South Sudan People Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) is to create warlords 2021-08-19 11:06:28 By Steve Paterno In South Sudan, where just about everyone has access to guns (tons of them), and almost every ambitious politician is a potential warlord, any slight destabilization of the (...)


Latest Press Releases

Statemeny bu Hala al-Karib to UN Security Council on women conditions in Sudan 2021-09-15 11:59:16 Statement by Ms Hala Al-Karib to the UN Security Council 14 September 2021 Madam President, Excellencies, My name is Hala Al-Karib and I am the Regional Director of the Strategic Initiative (...)

Joint Communiqué on the visit of H.E. the Prime Minister of the Republic of Sudan to Juba 2021-08-23 11:23:26 19 – 21 August 2021 His Excellency Dr Abdallah Hamdok, Prime Minister of the Republic of the Sudan and Chairperson of IGAD, accompanied by Ministers of Defence, Foreign Affairs, Trade, (...)

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)


Copyright © 2003-2021 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.