Home | Comment & Analysis    Tuesday 2 July 2013

Abyei Final Status: An account of indecision by the African Union


By Luka Biong Deng

July 1, 2013 - With the 50 years in existence, the AU and its institutions need a thorough review to assess their institutional and organizational capabilities to deliver better and to meet the aspirations of the people of the continent. In particular the AU Peace and Security Council (AUPSC) that was established as standing decision-making body for the prevention, management and resolution of conflicts may need scrutiny. As the Council will receive report from the AU High-level Implementation Panel (AUHIP) before the expiry of its mandate by the end of July 2013, this will provide opportunities to review progress and learn lessons for maintaining peace in South Sudan and Sudan. I will use the case of Abyei to contribute to such review of AUHIP and the decision-making process in the AUPSC.

On 24th April 2012, the AUPSC adopted a roadmap for South Sudan and Sudan as an effort to put the two countries on track of peace. This Roadmap provides a framework within a time-bound of three months for resolving holistically all the pending issues between the two states including the final status of Abyei. The Roadmap made it very clear that if the Parties failed to agree on any of the pending issues, then the AUHIP will come with proposal that will be endorsed by the Council as final and binding resolution. It may not require any effort to make a judgment about the fate of the AU Roadmap. The nine (9) agreements on the post-secession issues signed on 27th September 2012 have been put to a halt by the unilateral decision of Bashir. The status of claimed and disputed border areas has not been resolved. The final status of Abyei is not as well resolved.

Let me take the way the issue of Abyei has been handled by the AUHIP and AUPSC to elucidate the inaction and inconsistency in the decision-making process and architectures of the AU. When the Parties failed to agree on resolving the issue of Abyei, the AUHIP came up on 21st September 2012 with a proposal on the final status of Abyei. This Proposal is one of the best achievements of the AUHIP as it is well informed and rooted in earlier agreements and above all it is bold in addressing the issues that prevented the conduct of Abyei Referendum on 9th July 2011..

Consistent with the AU Roadmap, the AUHIP presented its proposal on the final status of Abyei to the AUPSC. The meeting of the AUPSC at the level of permanent representatives accepted on 24th October 2012 this proposal as representing a fair, equitable and workable solution to the final status of Abyei, which takes into account existing agreements entered into by the Parties, as well as the needs and interests of the communities on the ground. The Council requested the two countries to engage each other to reach consensus on this proposal within a period of six weeks. The Council also decided that, in the event that the two countries fail to reach agreement on the final status of the Abyei within the six-week period, then the Council will endorse the AUHIP’s Proposal on the final status of Abyei as final and binding, and would seek the endorsement by the UN Security Council of the same.

On 14th December 2012, the AUPSC meeting at the level of foreign ministers reiterated its acceptance of the AUHIP’s Proposal on the final status of Abyei. Despite the refusal of Bashir to the AUHIP Proposal and the deadline set by the Council expired on 5th December 2012 for the two countries to agree on the AUHIP Proposal, the Council failed again to endorse the AUHIP Proposal. Instead the Council referred the determination on the issue of the final status of Abyei to its meeting at the level of the heads of state and government.

On 24th January 2013, a summit between President Salva and Bashir was held in Addis Ababa and the two Presidents failed to agree on the final status of Abyei. President Salva, in his address to the AUPSC meeting on 25th January 2013 at the level of heads of state and government, made it clear that he reached a deadlock with Bashir on the final status of Abyei. Rather than endorsing the AUHIP Proposal as per its commitment in the Roadmap and after the failure of the two Presidents to agree on the final status of Abyei, the AUPSC at its meeting on 25th January 2013 reaffirmed its acceptance instead of endorsing the AUHIP’s Proposal. The Council, paradoxically, strongly urged again the two presidents to resume their negotiations on the final status of Abyei as proposed by the AUHIP. The Council requested the AUHIP, with the support of the IGAD Chair, to continue to assist the two Presidents to urgently resolve this issue of Abyei, and requested the AUHIP to report to the Council in March 2013 to make further determination on the issue of Abyei.

Unfortunately the Council did not meet in March or April to receive report from AUHIP on the status of negotiation of the Parties over the issue of Abyei. With the indecision and delay by the AUPSC to endorse the AUHIP’s Proposal on Abyei, the Ngok Dinka Paramount Chief Kuol Deng, who wanted to see his people to exercise their right of self-determination in a referendum as suggested by African leaders, was assassinated on 4th May 2013 by the government armed Misseryia militia. The Council then reacted by holding a meeting on 7th May 2013 after the assassination of the Ngok Dinka Paramount Chief and urged again the two Presidents to reach agreement on the final status of Abyei.

On 24th May 2013, the two Presidents met in Addis and failed to agree on the final status of Abyei and Bashir made it clear that he rejected the AUHIP Proposal on Abyei. While it became apparent that Bashir rejected the African solution for Abyei issue, the AUHIP instead of reporting the failure of the two Presidents to agree on the final status of Abyei it addressed the two Presidents to form Abyei Referendum Commission as per Abyei Protocol instead of AUHIP proposal and asked the two Presidents to nominate people for drafting Abyei Referendum Bill to be passed by the parliaments of the two countries. In fact the AUHIP seems to backtrack from its proposal as it put the issue of Abyei back to the status before the enactment of Abyei Referendum Act, 2009.

The AUHIP was not expected to come up with a new proposal but it was expected to report to the AUPSC whether the Parties agreed on the AUHIP Proposal so that the Council can take further decision. In fact the AUHIP Proposal on the final status of Abyei has become the AU Proposal and not that of AUHIP as it has been accepted by the AUPSC meetings at level of permanent representatives, foreign ministers and heads of state and government.

This trajectory of indecision and inconsistency in the decision-making process in the AUPSC over the final status of Abyei has contributed towards sacrificing the safety, security, and livelihoods of the Ngok Dinka for the sake of other concerns and interests. The most recent iteration of this indecisiveness of the AU came when the Ngok Dinka Paramount Chief was assassinated and this will have far reaching repercussion if the AU continues dodging the endorsement of the AUHIP Proposal, particularly the conduct of Abyei Referendum in October 2013. This lukewarm position by the AU over Abyei has created an environment that strengthens the Government of Sudan and its armed Misseriyia militia to benefit from the status quo not only by scooping 65,000 barrels of crude oil per day from Abyei area but also by cleansing the area of its Ngok Dinka inhabitants and this will leave Abyei area vulnerable to further instability and unrest.

The days and weeks ahead offer the AUPSC the opportunity to devote concerted diplomatic efforts to protect the safety and security of the Ngok Dinka and ensure that the area does not become a catalyst for further South Sudan-South violence. President Mbeki should be bold enough to report to the next meeting of the AUPSC that Bashir and President Salva have failed to agree on the final status of Abyei and to ask the Council to endorse the AUHIP Proposal on the final status of Abyei as final and binding African solution. In order to save the Roadmap and to restore its credibility and commitment to African solutions for African problems, the AUPSC should endorse in its next meeting in July 2013 the AUHIP Proposal on the final status of Abyei and to call the two countries to implement it fully and immediately as well as directing the Chairperson of the AU Commission to appoint the chair of Abyei Referendum Commission to conduct referendum in October 2013.

Luka Biong is a fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School and a senior member of South Sudan’s ruling SPLM. He can be reached at lukabiong@kushworld.org. This article is also published in the New Nation Newspaper.

The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 2 July 2013 15:14, by julia

    mr. impostor Rommel aka Luka Biong& zionist! we or ve no to blame s.udan or AU! becoz our elders or ur elders of long ago were viosionless to led us in this tragedy desertor live in the hand of non-law abiding people! here i seconded Supper star Johnson Jok. padang of long ago had done we wouldn,t forget in our life! here Dinka,s in Barhelgazal re right in their proverbs, ....

    repondre message

    • 2 July 2013 15:22, by julia

      they said, when u get a dying cow pls try to treat it to survive becoz it will feed u later, but if u get a dying person don,t attempt to recured him/her! Once he/she recovered they first bad atrocity he/she commited would be on u!
      This what is happening Abyei! Messiryia came to Abyei as a guest seeking pasture and water seasonal become a problem now on innocent children/elderly people of Abyei..

      repondre message

      • 2 July 2013 16:42, by Rommel

        What on earth is your problem!? I am not Luka Biong. I am from Jonglei. I am from the second largest sub-section in Twic-east — Ayual. The only Ngok that I share relations with are the Padeng Dinka of Jonglei; Pan Bior -my maternal relatives- are originally from that area in Jonglei.

        repondre message

        • 2 July 2013 18:20, by julia

          ooh sorry mr. Rommel! I don,t ve any problem in planet bro! But mindn,t u! The knowledge u ve isn,t of that impostor u claime to be but to that of Luka Biong Deng de kuol Arop! Second that is the age u claime, isn,t equievielent to the knowdledge u usually feed the forum bro! From today onward! Iwon,t address u so but fact would remaine impostor is that fine gentleman!

          repondre message

        • 2 July 2013 18:24, by julia

          ooh sorry mr. Rommel! I don,t ve any problem in planet bro! But mindn,t u! The knowledge u ve isn,t of that impostor u claime to be but to that of Luka Biong Deng de kuol Arop! Second that is the age u claime, isn,t equievielent to the knowdledge u usually feed the forum bro! From today onward! Iwon,t address u so but fact would remaine impostor is that fine gentleman!

          repondre message

          • 2 July 2013 19:27, by Rommel

            Ah, so I apparently know too much for my age? So I’ve apparently gone beyond the age contingent quota on knowledge? Is this the thematic hinge of your accusatory spiel? Is this what supposedly gave me away? I have yet to reveal to you [discussants on this site] anything truly out of reach to any man-woman with access to the internet. We haven’t even scratched the surface.

            repondre message

            • 2 July 2013 19:55, by Rommel

              I read a great deal and consequently am well informed. That’s generally how it works. You and I [and everyone we hold dear] are individuals; and we shouldn’t be judged as merely indistinguishable members of an age group. A *man* or a woman in their twenties *should* more often than not be regarded and treated as an adult; they shouldn’t be infantilized and consequently expected of less.

              repondre message

              • 2 July 2013 20:13, by Rommel

                Think of any great Nation. Now examine how they became great in their incipient stage; they most assuredly didn’t become great by lowering the bar for their young people. Seventy-two [72]% of our population is under the age of 30. What do you think would happen to our prospects as a Nation [in all spheres] if we lowered the bar for 72% of the population!?

                repondre message

                • 2 July 2013 20:30, by Rommel

                  The Children and youth of the ’West’ are the fortunate recipients, or reapers of fruits planted, and toiled over a period of half a millennia. Their ancestors sacrificed and denied themselves; this is why they can afford to be callow; this is why they can party without any feelings of guilt. We don’t have the luxury to be callow and merry! We have to farm what our children will then reap.

                  repondre message

                  • 2 July 2013 20:42, by Rommel

                    As visionary, intelligent and capable the late Garang was... we will have a generation [or at least a component of that generation] that will comprehensively eclipse the much vaunted capabilities of people like Dr. John Garang. Compile a book list, read, learn and prepare. This Nation doesn’t belong to naïve and supine old men, uninitiated into how the world truly works. It belongs to us!

                    repondre message

                    • 2 July 2013 21:34, by julia

                      Ididn,t mean the vocabularies u use guy but knowledge about policy, cultures, political organisation of s.sudan. I can partially agree , anyway idon,t to continoue, cozs u stop me already not address u in that name! Yes the population is exactly dorminated by 72% but jobless or ren,t put on development to be tomorrow leaders.

                      repondre message

                      • 3 July 2013 09:28, by Peacocktail

                        Luka Biong had track the Abyei issue well very.AUPSC is just a branch of wicked gangs who like to buy times while genocide is taking place in Abyei. Killing of paramount Chief Deng Kuol was the same case of Late Dr.John Garang assassination.foreign forces intervention in African problem become routine.Let us rest first then if no Referendum in October 2013. South Sudan must take it by Force.Abyei

                        repondre message

  • 4 July 2013 03:39, by Zionist

    I am not who you claim I am, Luka Biong, however, it’s my honor that you, ignorantly, get me mixed-up with an intellectual, whom I am not. Infact, your inability to tell, who is who, on this forum is insulting, sickening; and above all, is adding an insult to an injury. Therefore, you need to refrain from your personal attacks on your fellow citizens, and to apologize, then to ask for forgiveness, good luck.

    repondre message

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

What Makes an Uprising? 2021-09-03 17:29:45 By: Dr Lam Akol* In an undated article, Hon. Atem Garang de Kuek discussed what was required for an uprising in South Sudan to succeed as did three uprisings in the recent history of Sudan (...)

Is IGAD partly responsible for current confusion in South Sudan? 2021-08-21 09:41:17 By Bol Khan In April 2016, Radio Tamazuj posted and answered questions about the fainting Security arrangements or demilitarization of the capital, Juba as stipulated in 2015's signed ARCSS and (...)

South Sudan People Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) is to create warlords 2021-08-19 11:06:28 By Steve Paterno In South Sudan, where just about everyone has access to guns (tons of them), and almost every ambitious politician is a potential warlord, any slight destabilization of the (...)


Latest Press Releases

Statemeny bu Hala al-Karib to UN Security Council on women conditions in Sudan 2021-09-15 11:59:16 Statement by Ms Hala Al-Karib to the UN Security Council 14 September 2021 Madam President, Excellencies, My name is Hala Al-Karib and I am the Regional Director of the Strategic Initiative (...)

Joint Communiqué on the visit of H.E. the Prime Minister of the Republic of Sudan to Juba 2021-08-23 11:23:26 19 – 21 August 2021 His Excellency Dr Abdallah Hamdok, Prime Minister of the Republic of the Sudan and Chairperson of IGAD, accompanied by Ministers of Defence, Foreign Affairs, Trade, (...)

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)


Copyright © 2003-2021 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.