Home | News    Friday 22 October 2010

Chinese companies among bidders for Juba-Lamu oil pipeline: WSJ


October 21, 2010 (WASHINGTON) – Chinese companies are among those that are competing to win a contract for building a pipeline that would pump oil produced in South Sudan through a Kenyan port, according to a report on the Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

JPEG - 21.1 kb
FILE - Chinese President Hu Jintao (R) meets with South Sudan president Salva Kiir Mayardit at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, capital of China, July 19, 2007 (Xinhua)

The controversial project would enable the landlocked South to avoid transporting its main export through the pipeline that runs through the North until it reaches Port Sudan.

"China is one of the parties that has been invited to participate," Alfred Mutua, a Kenyan government spokesman told WSJ.

Most analysts believe southerners will vote to secede from the north in an emotional referendum on independence due in less than three months, the culmination of a 2005 north-south peace deal ending Africa’s longest civil war.

But the North is wary of letting the oil-rich South go without arranging for a wealth sharing formula that would prevent an economic collapse in post-referendum Sudan. Currently the North and the South are splitting the proceeds of crude in accordance with the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) signed in 2005.

The Government of South Sudan (GoSS) has frequently accused the North of underpaying its share in oil revenue through concealment of true export figures.

About 75 per cent of Sudan’s proven reserves of 6.3bn barrels are in the south but the pipeline that carries the oil to export terminals and refineries runs through the north.

Sudan exports 60% of its oil to China. Sudanese production accounts for 7% of China’s annual consumption. Beijing therefore has a vested interest in ensuring that the South Sudan referendum goes smoothly so as not to threaten its multi-billion dollar investments in the East African country.

The Wall Street Journal said that China has recently dropped its opposition to South Sudan secession which was based on long-standing ideology which is against independence movements abroad, for fear that it embolden separatist sympathies at home.

Beijing has cracked down, often violently, on independence protests in Tibet and Xinjiang. Beijing also considers Taiwan a breakaway province and seeks reunification, by force if necessary.

"It is a delicate issue for China," said Dru Gladney, an expert on Chinese minorities at Pomona College in California. China has until now portrayed itself as a leader of developing countries, he said. But its own rapid development has changed that relationship. "Encouraging a so-called separatist movement is one that is going to complicate that [noninterventionist] position very much."

China has a pragmatic reason for tolerating a potentially independent south: It is home to 80% of Sudan’s oil reserves, including most of the China National Petroleum Corp.’s four oil concessions, granted to it by Khartoum. Beijing’s stake amounts to 40% of Sudan’s oil industry.

GoSS last week assured China that its investments would be protected should the South vote for separation from the North.

"The largest investment in southern Sudan today is Chinese. They have invested billions of dollars in the oil sector, and have a large number of Chinese workers in the oil fields," said Pagan Amum, secretary general of the south’s ruling Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM).

"We have given assurances to the Chinese leadership delegation to protect the Chinese investments in southern Sudan, and are desirous to see more investment in the future," he further said.

Anne Itto, south Sudan’s minister of agriculture, and SPLM deputy secretary general told reporters after her return from China last August that the Chinese government fears that its assets in Sudan’s oil would be “a waste” if the south opts for secession.
"A lot of wild rumors have been getting to them, that if the south separates, there will be insecurity, and if there is insecurity, their assets worth billions of dollars in the form of pipelines and so on will have been a waste," she said.

Itto added that she had told Chinese officials that "if they want to protect their assets, the only way is to develop a very strong relationship with the government of Southern Sudan, respect the outcome of the referendum, and then we will be doing business".

In 2008, China opened a consulate in Juba, the south’s capital, an unusual move for China in a place with separatist aspirations. Last week, a Chinese Communist Party delegation visited southern officials. Top officials from the south have also visited China, said Li Baodong, China’s U.N. ambassador, in an interview during a United Nations Security Council diplomatic mission to Sudan this month.

Mr. Li said the referendum is "their internal affair and we are not getting into it. We respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of this country."

WSJ said that until early this year, Beijing staunchly opposed independence in Sudan’s south. But that stance has appeared to shift as the international community has pushed the vote.

"I don’t think anyone believes that the referendum process can be stopped," said Fabienne Hara, an Africa specialist in New York for the Brussels-based International Crisis Group. "It is pragmatism."

While it is caught between its stance on separatism and its economic-self interest, Mr. Gladney of Pomona said Beijing had reluctantly made its choice. "It’s whichever cat catches mice—and in this case, the cat that supports a separatist, Christian group will catch more mice for China," he said.

China has provided shield to the Sudanese government, dominated by the National Congress Party (NCP), from sanctions at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) and remains Sudan’s major seller of weapons.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 22 October 2010 07:36, by Young Nation

    The Chinese government and oil companies/sectors should genuinely avoid the politics of dilemma when it comes to investing on South Sudan’s petroleum sector. The political bet in relation to the outcome of South Sudan referendum is clearly in favor of South Sudan secession.

    The point I’m trying to put a cross here is that, Chinese government officials and oil company owners should politically and economically ally with Juba rather than Khartoum in order to be on the safe side in terms of Petro-investment.

    Young Nation is s student of International Relations/Political Science at The University Of Queensland, Australia

    repondre message

    • 22 October 2010 08:12, by JOHN CHOL

      Chinese government can not have the same interest in the North and South Sudan at ago.For Chines to do good business in the South, they must refrain from supplying weapons in exchange of oil to the North.They should recognize and respect the outcome of refendum in Sudan.

      repondre message

      • 22 October 2010 19:46, by Covert

        Southern Administration should be very careful not to get bamboozle by the north to transfer their own Chinese debt that they incurs over the last 25 year to build Khartoum to be Southern Sudan responsibility after referendum.

        repondre message

  • 22 October 2010 08:11, by Anyang

    China has to change its rhetoric,incase the are really serious about becoming a future investor in Southern Sudan,otherwise the are likely to misse out.

    repondre message

    • 22 October 2010 08:31, by Lokorai

      Hey, who says its a controversial project? Mind your keyboard, hoo!


      repondre message

  • 22 October 2010 08:51, by Biliu

    If business will has to go on with China..then they will have to stop selling Arms to the North!

    repondre message

  • 22 October 2010 09:05, by telfajbago

    I believe that China’s explicit role in the ongoing Genocide in Darfur and shielding a regime that excelled in cleansing Sudanese of African origin should not be given a chance to construct such schemes because they can’t be constructors and destroyers at the same time; can they?.To highlight China’s direct complicity in Darfur genocide here are some points:-
    first:- China a abstained from UN Security Council Resolution 1706;compromising international support for a critically needed peace support operation in Darfur, and recently China a abstained also to vote for a resolution to renew the mandate of a panel of experts that monitor the observance of sanctions imposed on Darfur; after it drastically failed to block U.N report which gives a detailed counts of China’s doing on it’s culpability in the ongoing genocide in Darfur, in terms of arms and war machinery support to the regime in Khartoum.
    Second: - China has repeatedly and uncritically supported Khartoum’s claims of baseless National Sovereignty and thus emboldens the regime in its defiance of the UN and international community.
    Third: - In pursuit of Sudan’s oil riches, China has for many Years ignored massive human right a buses and crimes by Khartoum regime throughout Sudan, not to mention the massacres and forcible removal committed on oil rich areas of South Sudan during 1990’s by Chinese weapons.
    Fourth: - China has been and still Khartoum’s leading weapons supplier defiantly ignoring UN’s arm’s embargo imposed on Sudan.
    Fifth:- China had provided Khartoum with needed political and diplomatic leverage to continue the genocide in Darfur and to renege any signed peace agreement so long as Chinese military arsenal is there to provide the needed human destruction tools in return of taking it’s price from the oil riches.

    Beijing and Chinese leadership must be made to understand that; African bloods are not so cheap; so that they can have a direct role in genocide on one hand and seeking building multi-billion Dollars scheme on the other. Therefore; I call upon ,SPLM/A, South Sudan leadership and off course our African brothers in Kenya and east Africa to show their proper solidarity to the people of Darfur by denying China to take building such pipeline or acquire any a foothold in Africa.

    repondre message

  • 22 October 2010 10:00, by tokwaro okeny okello

    There are saying Like "if you turn your worst Enemy to be your friend, He will be your friend forever,"
    But Bussiness has no Friendship, Therefore, No matter what, China Should not be offered the Contract in any Oil Sector in South Sudan, Let them only be given Contracts in Agriculture, Technologies, Trade etc. Sectors.

    De Okeny

    repondre message

  • 22 March 2013 15:00, by dennishobson

    YKJ4ZTHByAd1aAf1nmI252QzY5MhrAssangyong madeira plastica plastic lumber Your place is valueble for me. Thanks!…

    repondre message

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

What Makes an Uprising? 2021-09-03 17:29:45 By: Dr Lam Akol* In an undated article, Hon. Atem Garang de Kuek discussed what was required for an uprising in South Sudan to succeed as did three uprisings in the recent history of Sudan (...)

Is IGAD partly responsible for current confusion in South Sudan? 2021-08-21 09:41:17 By Bol Khan In April 2016, Radio Tamazuj posted and answered questions about the fainting Security arrangements or demilitarization of the capital, Juba as stipulated in 2015's signed ARCSS and (...)

South Sudan People Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) is to create warlords 2021-08-19 11:06:28 By Steve Paterno In South Sudan, where just about everyone has access to guns (tons of them), and almost every ambitious politician is a potential warlord, any slight destabilization of the (...)


Latest Press Releases

Statemeny bu Hala al-Karib to UN Security Council on women conditions in Sudan 2021-09-15 11:59:16 Statement by Ms Hala Al-Karib to the UN Security Council 14 September 2021 Madam President, Excellencies, My name is Hala Al-Karib and I am the Regional Director of the Strategic Initiative (...)

Joint Communiqué on the visit of H.E. the Prime Minister of the Republic of Sudan to Juba 2021-08-23 11:23:26 19 – 21 August 2021 His Excellency Dr Abdallah Hamdok, Prime Minister of the Republic of the Sudan and Chairperson of IGAD, accompanied by Ministers of Defence, Foreign Affairs, Trade, (...)

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)


Copyright © 2003-2021 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.