Home | News    Monday 18 January 2010

Sudan’s Constitutional Court turns down ban of SPLM-DC

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

January 17, 2009 (KHARTOUM) – The Sudanese Constitutional Court ruled today that the semi autonomous government in Juba cannot ban the political activities of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-Democratic Change.

JPEG - 10.9 kb
Fomer minister of foreign affairs, Lam Akol

The Splinter SPLM-DC has been prohibit by the First Vice President Salva Kiir Mayadrit when he directed as President of southern Sudan government, on November 9 to not hinder the activities of the political parties "except the so called SPLM-DC"

The SPLM-DC leader Dr. Lam Akol said this presidential decision violates the fundamental rights of his party granted by the interim constitution of 2005.

"This letter is incompatible with articles 29, 31, 33, 40 of the Transitional Constitution" dealing with fundamental rights, akol said following the ban, adding that the SPLM-DC is demanding the constitutional court to declare null and void the contested decision because of its unconstitutionality.

The Southern Sudan ruling party, SPLM, said Akol’s party is an armed movement causing unrest in the region.

The former foreign minister is nominated by an alliance of southern political parties for President of South Sudan, where he will run against SPLM chairman Salva Kiir Mayadrit.

"This is a victory for constitutionality," Akol said of the court ruling.

The southern Sudan ruling party, SPLM, is accused by opposition parties and the National Congress Party of intimidating and arresting their membership as well as hindering their political work.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 14 January 2010 11:57, by Dr Advisor

    It is very wonderful decision from the court by granting the SPM-DC a political ground in Southern Sudan

    repondre message

    • 14 January 2010 12:07, by Black tiger

      Dr. Advisor,

      It is sounded wonderful in your narrow thinking but still Dr. Lam will remain ban with his party in the South because he is sneak in the green grass.
      Too, per Dr. claimed that his political right has been denied, he has also sold the rights of Southerners to the Notherners, therefore treat the fire with the fire.

      repondre message

      • 18 January 2010 15:26, by Nuerfudinka

        my friends for getting about sneak,this guy used the Arab’s slogan saying that you can fuck the government,but you can’t show your finis.this time no body could denies the southerners choince for the self-determin,if you are a real Doctor’s just open yourself a clinic in khartoum.Don’t think of hijucking the presidence seat in south it is belonging to Dinka’s royal family man,but is a good try and make sure you votes for no Unity for the up coming referendum.

        repondre message

        • 18 January 2010 18:02, by man-of-his-words

          He is a phd holder not a medical doctor.so he doesnt need to open any clinic Mr blind man nuerfdinka.

          repondre message

      • 19 January 2010 07:35, by Abyei

        Dear Tiger

        Your are right Black Tiger,as you had claimed thier right of South Sudan his party has functioning at the south the way he speech he is tallking like some one was sold by NCP Regime in th north,No matter how he claim at that position.

        repondre message

    • 19 January 2010 01:55, by samuel_kur@yahoo.ca

      That is Lam Akol who is a candidate for south Sudan presidency is saying on sudanile.com the Arabic website. That the decision of accepting referendum bill is wrong, he continued that separation as the suicide for south Sudan ever. Therefore, if he is saying that what will happen when he is a president for a south, he will cancel the CPA and that what Lam Akol is looking for, because he lost his Fashoda agreement due he is jealous for CPA success.

      repondre message

  • 14 January 2010 12:02, by Raan

    Congratulations Dr.Lam Akol

    Defeat this illiterate guy democraticlly, we are behing you and Dr. Riek Machar

    repondre message

    • 19 January 2010 10:36, by Ayok

      "We are not there please"
      Leave along Dog Lam what did he know from the South.
      Man of $$$ only.
      You congratulate him for nothing but he will not defeated Kiir. the man of justice & equality.

      Long live South Sudan.
      Long live SPLM.
      Long live Salva Kiir.
      Long live Central Dinka Power (Warrap-Gogrial West).

      repondre message

  • 14 January 2010 12:06, by John Boy

    SPLM should allow the other parties like SPLM-DC to carryout thier compaign in Southern states since they were nominated Arman to represent Southerns things has got no difference.

    repondre message

    • 18 January 2010 12:30, by kumkan

      Although, Dr. Akol might not have enough supporters to boost up his candidacy for Presidency of the South. I’m thinking that in few months to come, he should be able to gain an adequate popularity among Southerns because Mr. Salva along with his comrades are not doing what they supposed to be doing. Therefore, chances are Dr. Akol would have enough time to specified his ground.

      repondre message

      • 18 January 2010 15:02, by Dinka Boy

        Mr.Kumkan,

        You guy can preached and preach evil spirit.But that will not harm the SPLM/A objection since from the start.SPLM/A is a tool to bring a demaratic society.It can not be demacratized right.Secondly, the so called sharia law it has been there since.Even if they allowed DC to exercised it political in the south, the CPA will still ruled it out.So you are a dead dreamer.Thank

        repondre message

  • 18 January 2010 15:05, by James Okuk Solomon

    Congratulations to SPLM-DC and Dr. Lam Akol for defeating 1st Lt. Gen., Salva Kiir, in the Court of Law. Now the time for another victory is approaching when Dr. Lam who is now the candidate of the Alliance of South Sudan Politcal Parties for GoSS Presidency shall defeat the SPLM in the ballot boxes.

    The bullets shall not count any more and whoever thinks he can force people’s confidence by threat of bullets rather than gaining their confidence by ballots is going to regret his politcal foolishness.

    Kiir has dug his own grave and he is now falling into its heat forever. Let him grind his teeth and bite his fingers for the defeat. Gone is the era of totalitarianism and military dictatorship in civilian affairs.

    Long live the Constitutional law, long live the savvy politicians who respect the rule of law and long Live the power of the people through democratic elections!!!

    repondre message

    • 18 January 2010 18:01, by majak garang

      Lam Akol Ajawin intellectual ability is beyond describtion he has wrote three books all about south sudan one of them is .Colonialism,Resistance and Autonomy.southernes are smart People they know who is the right man for the job
      .Not like that Salva Kiir who received more then nine billion Dollars in cash from the oil.No develobment,Schools,hospitals ,roads,three months no salarys and yet siting ther in Juba with he,s gang like Vultures waiting for more money to be deliver from Kahrtoum and still complaining arab this and arab that.this Salva has no respect for the law of the Country nor the costitution.therfor the Constitutional Court has right to protect her citizen.

      repondre message

    • 18 January 2010 19:22, by murlescrewed

      TRAITORS,

      It does not matter what the constitutional court verdict is. What matters is whether Southerners have a stomach to listen to a traitors and a political prostitute like Lam. He is in for a rude shock if he really thinks he can win in the South.

      repondre message

    • 18 January 2010 19:52, by mack waweru

      Mr. James Okuk,

      Yes, the so-called constitutional court has favored your party, but don’t forget that it’s an Arab court. Lam knows them well for what they did to his FASHODA PEACE AGREEMENT. Do you think the rule is a victory to Lam? No, far from it. It’s a victory to turn southerners against each other under the pretext of freedom- which is," kill a slave with a slave in the Arab mindset", although we are not slaves to them.
      No Southerner has an interest in the party which was formed in Khartoum with the Arab enemy funds.
      SPLM/A has never used bullets against innocent Southerners, but history knows the real killers and culprits who have inflicted so much damage and setback to us than the Arabs.

      Mack Awer

      repondre message

  • 18 January 2010 18:23, by Time1

    Despite my respect to Dr Lam Akol, i think he is a visionless leader and lack critical thinking, because no matter how much you think you want to be a leader, you cannot jeopardise the security and stability of your country, Lam akol is a greedy leader only after money and power, he is not here to serve the people, shame on you Lam akol, you fail to understand the proper route to leadership.

    repondre message

    • 18 January 2010 19:05, by majak garang

      Well u should ask that messeger boy Pagan Amum who give away Shilluk Land to Dinka as aprice for Dinka Woman?I hope he will explain to u way Lam is on,t going to South?If our granfather Nyikang would have know.We would have not...... with slave like (.....)

      repondre message

      • 19 January 2010 03:56, by kuminyandi

        Once again, North is ruling South.

        repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


A renewed call on states of South Sudan 2020-01-21 07:06:29 By James Gatdet Dak First of all, I hope that our able leaders (peace partners) shall politically resolve the number and boundaries of states in the Republic of South Sudan. Or whoever is to (...)

Sudan’s Peace: putting the cart before the Horse 2020-01-12 18:35:24 Putting Peace in the rear after the Sudanese Revolution is Akin to putting the cart before the Horse By Mahmoud A. Suleiman This article comes against the backdrop of the indifference and the (...)

Environmental effects of oil spills in South Sudan’s Unity (2-2) 2020-01-09 06:35:08 By Peter Reat Gatkuoth When pipelines are built, regulated, controlled and maintained as necessary by international and national legislation, they can be safe environmentally according to (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2020 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.