Home | News    Friday 13 February 2009

US Senate, advisory body weigh new approach to Sudan crises

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Daniel Van Oudenaren

February 12, 2009 (WASHINGTON) — Even as the US Congress was absorbed in the details of a massive economic stimulus plan, two roundtable events were held Wednesday and Thursday in congressional office buildings, highlighting Sudan’s crises and weighing ways to move ahead with a new, more muscular policy.

Sen. John Kerry (AP)

The congressional scrutiny comes as conflicting reports surface that an arrest warrant has been issued by the International Criminal Court for Sudanese President Omer Al-Bashir, a decision that has raised further debate on the prospects for Sudan’s Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), a deal struck in 2005 between the rival ruling parties of North and South Sudan.

Roger Winter, former special State Department envoy to the Sudan, said Thursday of the CPA, “it is stumbling; it is going to fail,” pausing before adding “a very likely possibility, perhaps growing at this point.”

In recommendations presented on Wednesday, the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) suggested creating security guarantees for Southern Sudan in order to deter a renewal of the North-South civil war. Moreover, the Commission advocated providing the Sudan People’s Liberation Army with “secure radar, communications, and other passive, defensive equipment,” as well as military education and training at US facilities.

“The key to making CPA implementation a reality is to put Southern Sudan in a position where it has leverage,” said Commissioner Leonard Leo in an interview. “In that context, that means creating as strong and economically prosperous a region as possible.”

“I think that some of these things have to happen fairly quickly,” he said, adding that contributions do the SPLA’s passive defensive capacity should have happened already.

Leo, who was appointed by President George W. Bush and led a USCIRF delegation to Juba and Malakal last October, explained that the Commission got involved because it saw the North-South conflict in Sudan as “largely precipitated by religious hostility and differences.”

The Commission, a government agency created by Congress in order to advise the State Department, tendered its recommendations to Secretary Hilary Clinton, the National Security Council and Congress. “Technically it is the National Security Council’s job to coordinate among the various parts of the executive branch. So it is incumbent upon them to try to find a way forward,” said Leo.

Joining the former presidential envoy to Sudan, John Danforth, in calling for the appointment of a new Special Envoy, the Commission recommended someone with “the stature necessary to emphasize the priority of Sudanese peace and stability to the new Administration.”

Four members of congress attended the USCIRF event: Chris Smith (R-NJ), Frank Wolf (R-VA), Donald Payne (D-NJ) and Barbara Lee (D-CA).

SENATE ROUNDTABLE

During a roundtable hosted by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday, Senator John Kerry queried guest witnesses over the feasibility of a no-fly zone proposal over Darfur. “I’m eager to hear the panelists’ thoughts on the pros and cons of a no-fly zone in Darfur,” Kerry said.

Members of President Obama’s campaign team had advocated imposing a no-fly zone, but since taking office administration officials have generally only made oblique reference to the proposed military measure. However, John Prendergast, co-chair of the Enough Project at the Center for American Progress, told Sudan Tribune that the no-fly zone option appears still to be on the table.

But Prendergast noted, “Pentagon reviews of options are a dime a dozen. It will require a political decision by the National Security Council to make the no-fly zone a real possibility.”

The roundtable participants emphasized the need for the US to help lead efforts to implement the North-South agreement. “We have got to get a special envoy on the playing field as quickly as possible,” said Prendergast, as well as a full diplomatic team. “Success depends on hour to hour and day to day bird-dogging of the parties to ensure every detail is addressed. Incentives and pressures should be created to raise the stakes.”

Currently the State Department’s Sudan programs are headed by Tim Shortley, who served as the senior Sudan official since the Bush administration. Shortley was in Addis Ababa with Sudanese President Omer Al-Bashir last week for the African Union conference, and afterwards traveled to Khartoum.

A government-sponsored news service earlier this month disseminated reports that Shortley’s visit aimed to dissuade the rebel Justice and Equality from attacking another Darfur faction that has been aligned with the government since a largely abortive 2006 peace deal, the terms of which the United States supports. He met with the ex-rebel signatory of this deal, Minni Minawi, on February 4.

Though the US embassy denied that these were Shortley’s intentions, he could not be reached to clarify.

Senator Kerry said that he had met with Secretary Clinton that morning and disclosed that she was favorable toward the concept of the no-fly zone and other "concrete steps." He added, "To the degree that anyone is listening, particularly Khartoum, I hope they will understand, no matter what happens with the ICC, that there is a moment here to try to change the dynamics and begin to move responsibly. I am absolutely confident that this administration is going to focus on this issue … and I personally am interested in this no-fly zone concept."

Senator Kerry concluded at the end of the discussion, “It seems to me that right now Darfur is beginning to became a symbol and a reality at the same time of failed multilateralism, failed leadership, absence of capacity of moral nations to translate their outrage into a series of coherent steps that have a positive impact on the lives of innocent victims and citizens of another country.”

Four senators attended the roundtable at some point, Senator Kerry (D-MA), Senator Feingold (D-WI), Senator Cardin (D-MD) and Senator Kaufman (D-DE), according to a Senate aide.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 13 February 2009 12:31, by Gatwech

    Bravo US Senators,

    Every thing seems to be moving towards independence of South Sudan.

    Separatists Oyeee........

    repondre message

    • 13 February 2009 17:06, by Freedom Fighter

      Gatwech,

      US senators are not separatists. They are freedom fighters just like me. Separatists are the best friends of Omer Albashir, they include Dr. Lam Akol, Bona Malual, Gabriel Tingnyang, and all those who believe that Jallaba state can’t be defeated.

      repondre message

  • 13 February 2009 14:12, by Angelo M

    The good thing with US gov’t is that they fight threats before they explode. Khartoum is a threat to all democratic nations afar. One got to visit Sudan to see.

    repondre message

  • 13 February 2009 16:43, by Dinka Aliap Chawul

    I hope OBAMA presidency will gives our nation of Southern Sudan some smiles after the have been left to fight the Arabs countries alone except the Africans neighbiouring support we got from Uganda,TZ,Eriteria,Ethiopia,Kenya and many others during 90`S to present. EMPOWERING SPLA is also a part of solutions because Mr. BASHIR and his Arabs counterpart here bullets much than words......

    repondre message

    • 13 February 2009 23:57, by thomas

      I completely agree with you. Bashir and his cronies entire strategy is intimidation no matter whom. I am glad the US Senate sees him for the small man he is.

      On a serious front they are right however, for all their threats against the CPA, against the UN and against everyone, there is only one answer: we have to build up our deterence. As the senators say "secure radar, communications, and other passive, defensive equipment". They are surprised that isn’t being done already and so am I. We just have to have faith in the SPLA and our leadership that they have a plan.

      repondre message

      • 14 February 2009 02:24, by Samani

        Listen to this summary of Sudan, US and UK

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivblcs4Dy8o&hl=un

        repondre message

        • 14 February 2009 03:50, by thomas

          I respect any civil debate of ideas so I did watch the video. I admit that I don’t know much about LaRouche’s background but he is obviously an intelligent person.

          I assume that important thing you wanted me take note of is his idea that opposition (particularly the UK and US) to the Bashir and his campaign against the people of Darfur is a modern continuation of a long history of western colonialists attempt at subjugating the African continent (particularly the UK in Sudan). LaRouche claims that the NIF (rightly) sprung from the Muslim Brotherhood, linked to the Egyptian and he claims this was all a British Intelligence operation. "From the top down," he says. He claims the Darfur rebellion is also a British Intelligence operation through and through.

          Personally, I really don’t care. This might all be true but it is speculative. People can make claims and claim that other people’s claims other false! Where does leave us? Going around in circles until the window of time to find the truth. This is exactly what the guilty do; shift the subject. It is highly possible that some people aim to topple Bashir for their personal reasons, that’s another matter. But the most important this is people lives and dignity, which has been utterly and savagely destroyed by Bashir. All those refugee camps came from nowhere? All their burnt villages are illusions. Is the poverty an illusion, are all the crimes illusions too? NCP only became interested in developing Darfur yesterday it seems, let’s not even talk about the East. What greater proof than the CPA, the DPA, even the agreement with the Eastern Front: all these the government is either dragging its feet or just ignoring them. Frankly, none of these agreements are that difficult to abide by, they simply are not sincere.

          repondre message

    • 15 February 2009 15:51, by amazed

      Do you have any knowledge at all on who supported the SPLM/A in the 90’s? Really it is better not to comment if you dont understand.

      repondre message

      • 15 February 2009 19:07, by Dinka Aliap Chawul

        Hi Mr Amazed. Your critics,questions and a concerns are so greatful for my success and i`m very delighted to here from you, so as we go back to the history of Sudan/SPLA/M struggles I know which duration did this country gives us supports but was it under which president/party? and which periods does those aide ends. I believe that iam mature in minds that i could not posts what i have no knowledges about it!!!!!!.,?

        repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Peaceful coexistence will prevail in South Sudan’s Jonglei 2020-07-14 18:30:04 By Pal Chol Nyan Previously, I talked and dwelled much on and about the social bonds which had existed among Dinka Bor, Laak, Gawaar, Murle, Anuak, Lou Nuer. This is an incontrovertible and an (...)

A Psychological look into Egypt’s stance on GERD 2020-07-10 15:04:31 By AT Abera AT Abera, a student of Political Science and International relations, political sociology, hydro politics and political psychology argues that the main hindrance to a balanced (...)

South Sudan is still crying 9 year after independence 2020-07-09 11:49:31 By Nhial Gatkuoth Chung South Sudanese in 2011 overwhelmingly voted to have their independent state called the Republic of South Sudan, there were huge hopes that independence would bring peace (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2020 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.