Home | News    Saturday 19 March 2011

AU’s opposition to military intervention in Libya ignored by UNSC, Obama


March 18, 2011 (WASHINGTON) – The African Union (AU) panel tasked with seeking a peaceful solution to the crisis in Libya is set to meet in Mauritania on Saturday as prospects for military airstrikes became all but certain.

JPEG - 25.1 kb
U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a statement about Libya in the East Room of the White House March 18, 2011 in Washington, DC (AFP)

The commission consists of presidents from Uganda, Mauritania, South Africa, Democratic republic of Congo (DRC) and Mali as well as the Chairperson of the AU Commission Jean Ping.

On Thursday the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) adopted resolution 1973 authorizing sweeping military actions to protect civilians against advancing forces of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Gaddafi has lost control over large parts of his country after widespread ant-government demonstrations that started in mid-February turned into an armed rebellion.

The African Union (AU) has been slow to issue a response to the events in Libya which came in the form of a statement on March 10 expressing "deep concern" over the violence in Libya saying it poses "a serious threat to peace and security in that country and in the region as a whole, as well as to the safety and dignity of Libyans and of the migrant workers, notably the African ones, living in Libya".

The AU’s Peace and Security Council (PSC) also expressed solidarity with Libya and rejected "any foreign military intervention, whatever its form".

This was in sharp contrast to positions of the Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) which called for the imposition of a No-Fly Zone over Libya. Gulf Arab countries had also said Gaddafi’s government was no longer legitimate.

Western countries and NATO have initially insisted they will not intervene militarily in Libya without approval of regional organizations such as the Arab League and the AU and a UNSC clear mandate.

However, references to AU’s prior consent were later dropped and Western officials only spoke of Arab League decision.

Three African countries sitting on the UNSC including Nigeria, South Africa and Gabon supported the council’s resolution on Libya authorizing the no-fly zone over Libya and "all necessary measures" to protect civilians. Five other countries abstained namely Russia, China, Brazil, Germany and India.

The same countries also endorsed resolution 1970 imposing comprehensive sanctions on Libyan leader and his henchmen as well as referring the crimes committed to the International Criminal Court (ICC), an organization routinely criticized by the AU.

The AU said in a statement that the panel will seek in today’s meeting to determine the ways and means of implementing its mandate.

“Following this meeting, the members of the Committee will undertake to engage the Libyan parties and assess the situation in Libya,” the AU statement added. It will also seek "the adoption and implementation of the political reforms necessary for the elimination of the causes of the current crisis" in Libya.

However, world powers appeared to have closed the door in front of any attempt for political mediation.

U.S. president Barack Obama, delivering an ultimatum to Gaddafi on Friday, said his administration would work with its partners to enforce UNSC demands for a ceasefire. He again made reference to position of the Arab League but ignored that of the AU.

"Yesterday, in response to a call for action by the Libyan people and the Arab League, the U.N. Security Council passed a strong resolution that demands an end to the violence against citizens.," Obama said at the White House today.

"All attacks against all civilians must stop," Obama said, vowing to enforce the UNSC resolution.

Ironically South African officials expressed doubt whether the AU panel would be impartial and even questioned wisdom of sitting on it.

"There are concerns here at home about this panel and whether South Africa should be part of it. It’s almost a given what they will say, given their relationship with that man [Gaddafi]," a senior government official told the Mail & Guardian newspaper based in South Africa.

The newspaper said that Government officials in Johannesburg are worried that should the panel return with a recommendation to the AU that favors Gaddafi, it will spoil the image president Jacob Zuma wants to portray on the continent — that of himself as a statesman who believes in brokering peaceful solutions that do not merely serve its strongmen.

It was later confirmed that Zuma will not travel with the panel as planned to Libya.

South African president came under fire in his country last week over a call he made to Gaddafi. Libyan TV quoted Zuma as telling his counterpart that that the AU should investigate the “conspiracy” against him and the world should not believe what foreign media were saying about Libya.

Zuma’s office issued a statement at the time saying the Libyan TV report had been “distorted”. It pointed out that South Africa had voted for UNSC sanctions on Libya and that Zuma had condemned Libya’s killing of civilians while he was in France.

The Ugandan government on Thursday said it opposes “foreign interference” in Libya and declared it will not freeze Libyan-owned assets in the country.

In an interview to be fully published by Daily Monitor, Uganda foreign Minister Sam Kutesa also urged Gaddafi to stop killing his people and use available avenues to restore peace to his country.

“He should not kill his people… [but] ought to look at reforms and legitimate demands of his people,” Kutesa said adding that “we do not want foreign interference. We think that there should be an African solution to this”.

Kutesa said that Uganda will try to impress it upon the Libyan leader that “it is revolutionary to be democratic”.

“[Being] a revolutionary, I think, you are trying to serve the larger interests of society and that includes people’s freedoms and wellbeing,” he said. “I don’t know whether anybody should say that being a revolutionary excludes being democratic. I don’t think so.”

Responding to a question whether Gaddafi, who has ruled for 42 years, is part of the problem or solution for the North African country, Uganda’s top diplomat said he could be both.

“Because if he is still there and has not allowed reforms, then he is part of the problem. But if he can join the others and they make reforms, then he is part of the solution”.

Last week, some experts said that the AU’s credibility is at stake over its reaction to the Libyan crisis.

"I think the AU credibility is a bit on the line," said Laura Seay, an Africa specialist at Morehouse College in Georgia to Voice of America (VOA).

"Whether they are going to be able to formulate effective and coherent responses, and saying that violence against civilians is unacceptable to the African Union. That’s going to make a big difference on whether they have credibility not only on the international scene, but also with their own people."

Delphine Lecoutre, a researcher with the French Center for Ethiopian Studies, pointed to the AU’s weak statement as an example of the PSC timidity in facing up to the behavior of its leaders.

"There was a Peace and Security Council meeting on Libya, which resulted in a cosmetic communiqué hardly condemning the violence in Libya and putting it in a [clever] way, loss of human life and destruction of property, but nothing regarding the political situation in the country," said Lecoutre. "It is difficult for the AU to deal with that case."


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 19 March 2011 14:28, by Jamjamez

    African Union and the Arab League are nothing but just a sham union for Lunatics and old brainiac with mentality of 14th century.
    What is the use of African Union if civilians are being kill by its members but does not voice any concerns or any action on that? African Union has loss legitimacy and should be dissolved. They are nothing but a bunch of money baggers from other countries initiating corruption in African countries.

    New African Union should be form with Effective roles and action in place. It should not just be a name but a name with some impositions behind it. There has to be a line drawn or all this stupid acts are endless.

    Same applies to the Arab league.

    repondre message

    • 19 March 2011 14:42, by Yoyo

      i support AU,there’s need of action maybe this rebel are consist of tororist,what happen to a peace demontration

      repondre message

      • 19 March 2011 14:49, by DeltaBravo

        It is true bro. How did they took alot of Country weapon, they should match peacefully like anyothers Countries in North Africa.

        repondre message

    • 19 March 2011 16:41, by Pal Ruei

      Africa Union does not show the responsibility for the farewell of people of Africa. Million of people accross continent die yearly. Africa Union just block the action of heartfeel people who have understanding of humanity.

      Mr.Gadafi brutalized his people for forty-two year; he turned the country oil money into personal ownership. when the people of Libya voice out to oust the brutal guy, and world hear their crying for help; Africa Union come and try to block people who want to stop murderer from murdering more people in Libya.

      It is an Africa Union tendency to protect killer like Bashir who killed thousands of people of Durfar. Africa leaders are always stand for nothing, they just hang on power for life without giving what the citizen needs

      repondre message

      • 19 March 2011 21:46, by harry

        This is imperialism at its best. Do not be fooled that Obama and his cronies are protecting civilians but they are protecting their interests and securing the oil.

        What’s happening now in Libya is civil war. Gaddafi have the right protecting his regime from this war morons. If Obama and his cronies were there because of civilians, then why they did not do the same to people of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia who are facing almost the same situation.

        As matter of facts, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia uprisings are more peaceful than that of Libya.

        Obama has disappointed many people around the world. He was talking about changes that he promised American people with, but so far nothing happened.

        He followed the typical imperialism hegemony policy of the West against third world countries. Yes, Gaddafi ruled Libya for 42 years, but do you know that Libya is number 1 in Africa and Arab world in terms of living standards.

        Under Gaddafi, Libyans developed and got the best standards of living compared to previous regimes that ruled them including Italy. AU will always be ignored by imperialist states, and that’s not new news, but old ones because if they were there due to humans factors, then why they did not intervene militarily to Sudan, Somalia, and Ivory Coast to stop killing of civilians as they claimed. Thanks.


        repondre message

    • 20 March 2011 07:13, by Deng Ateny Lueth

      Today people of African continent received another shamful slap in the face. i for one has understand today, that there are two continents existing in Africa. there are Arabs and African of sub sarahan nation. nations of north Africa have been faking the rest of sub sarhan Africa all along saying the are part of AU, or the then called OAU. Arabs nations of north Africa have been eating with both hands on both continents of africa and middle east. i believe when our time comes north will be made to choose whether the should be part of Arab League or Stand still Under African Union in which they are Georgraphically located right now. the will have to choose one master to serve because there is no such thing call dual Union or membership in two Different continents. maybe allies will be next connection. Western world show us the different today when the acted up Arab league mandate over that of AU. It definely tells me arab are different people from us. Arab league members called for the destruction of Connel Gaddafi today because of his Tight with Black people of Sub-sahran Africa. they hate him because General Gaddafi refused to be racise,and he wanted to reunite African.

      repondre message

  • 19 March 2011 15:53, by Phil

    Sudantribune’s Editor,
    Erroneous reporting is frequent here, why? Please check if UN’s sanctions on Libya were imposed in 197o.



    repondre message

  • 3 April 2013 20:30, by dennishobson

    uZMi2rFOmJhhwOvvSbgYeOJbhhWldPcarros ssanyong deck madeira plastica composite decking I’d have to check with you here. Which is not something I usually do! I enjoy reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comme

    repondre message

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

What Makes an Uprising? 2021-09-03 17:29:45 By: Dr Lam Akol* In an undated article, Hon. Atem Garang de Kuek discussed what was required for an uprising in South Sudan to succeed as did three uprisings in the recent history of Sudan (...)

Is IGAD partly responsible for current confusion in South Sudan? 2021-08-21 09:41:17 By Bol Khan In April 2016, Radio Tamazuj posted and answered questions about the fainting Security arrangements or demilitarization of the capital, Juba as stipulated in 2015's signed ARCSS and (...)

South Sudan People Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) is to create warlords 2021-08-19 11:06:28 By Steve Paterno In South Sudan, where just about everyone has access to guns (tons of them), and almost every ambitious politician is a potential warlord, any slight destabilization of the (...)


Latest Press Releases

Statemeny bu Hala al-Karib to UN Security Council on women conditions in Sudan 2021-09-15 11:59:16 Statement by Ms Hala Al-Karib to the UN Security Council 14 September 2021 Madam President, Excellencies, My name is Hala Al-Karib and I am the Regional Director of the Strategic Initiative (...)

Joint Communiqué on the visit of H.E. the Prime Minister of the Republic of Sudan to Juba 2021-08-23 11:23:26 19 – 21 August 2021 His Excellency Dr Abdallah Hamdok, Prime Minister of the Republic of the Sudan and Chairperson of IGAD, accompanied by Ministers of Defence, Foreign Affairs, Trade, (...)

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)


Copyright © 2003-2021 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.