Your second source is not incoherent, but it is, however, ambigious and imprecise, because it states that South Sudan’s arable land is *over* 30 million hectares; it doesn’t unequivocably state that it only has 30 million hectares. You can accuse me of being pedantic, but I am exacting when I analyse information.
The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.
What is wrong with the IGAD peace process?2015-03-29 22:39:56
By Alfred Ladu Gore
1. The Effects of Flawed Methodological Approach on the Fundamental Issues Arising from the Crisis Situation in South Sudan
In the methodological context of this paper, it (...)