Your second source is not incoherent, but it is, however, ambigious and imprecise, because it states that South Sudan’s arable land is *over* 30 million hectares; it doesn’t unequivocably state that it only has 30 million hectares. You can accuse me of being pedantic, but I am exacting when I analyse information.
The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.
A critique of the IGAD protocol for peace in S Sudan2014-08-30 05:53:03
“A critique of the IGAD protocol on agreed principles on transitional arrangements towards resolution of the crisis in South Sudan”
By David de Chand
August 29, 2014 - First and foremost of all, (...)
IGAD failure to delivering peace for South Sudan!2014-08-30 05:43:48
By Jacob Odong
August 29, 2014- The East African Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD) is concluding a plan to allow for what they are calling a unity government for South Sudan. If (...)