Home | Comment & Analysis    Thursday 6 November 2003

"Enabling Peace in Sudan: The Task at Hand"

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

{}

"Enabling Peace in Sudan: The Task at Hand"

Eric Reeves

November 6, 2003 — The $87 billion supplemental foreign operations bill sent to President Bush this week contained $20 million for "famine relief" in Sudan. This is a shockingly small part of the largest such appropriation in US history, and appears even smaller when we consider just how urgent are the impending needs in Sudan as a peace agreement grows closer. US diplomatic support for the peace process has of course been vital, but the reality of peace in Sudan is that it can be sustained and strengthened only with substantial financial commitment.

As this brutalized country attempts to make the arduous transition from twenty years of devastating war to a productive peace, transitional aid will be of critical importance, on all fronts. Humanitarian assistance, especially for returning displaced persons and the ravaged peoples of the oil regions; a fully adequate peacekeeping operation; the reconstitution of effective and accountable civil society structures; the demobilization of military forces; the democratizing of political power: these are immense tasks, and costly in the near term. But the only way to prevent a renewed outbreak of war---with all its terrible costs in human suffering and destruction, as well as the staggering expenditures and terrible difficulties of humanitarian assistance in the midst of intense fighting---is to insure that peace takes hold. Certainly, in the longer term, peace is much less expensive than war in all senses.

The US must accept the financial responsibility, ultimately the moral responsibility, for peace in Sudan. This requires that the Bush administration come up with an emergency supplemental appropriation plan for Sudan by January 2004, the expected deadline for a peace agreement. As a benchmark for a minimal commitment, the Congress should consider the European Union’s commitment last month to 400 million Euros for reconstruction and transitional aid in Sudan. Given the stakes in Sudan, and the long-term financial prudence of supporting peace now, this amount seems on the parsimonious side. But it gives us a sense of how completely inadequate is the $20 million in this week’s Iraq/Afghanistan supplemental bill.

Nor should the US Agency for International Development (AID) appropriation for the current fiscal year be seen outside the context in which it was originally conceived, i.e., to provide humanitarian assistance in present circumstances in which neither peace nor war prevails. We must keep in mind that the need for humanitarian assistance will be even greater in the immediate wake of a peace agreement, especially in responding to what will be the immense and urgent needs of returning populations. With as many as 5 million Internally Displaced Persons and refugees, southern Sudan faces almost inconceivably large challenges in accommodating the return of even a quarter of this population in the first six months of peace (a very real possibility).

The logic is so compelling, the moral imperative so clear, that those working for peace in Sudan simply must not allow the US Congress, or the Bush administration, to refuse to see this country’s desperate needs. Letters, faxes, telephone calls, and (less importantly) emails must make the case that supporting peace in Sudan is a US priority.

In addition to the White House and State Department, it is especially important that members of both the House and Senate Foreign Operations Committees hear from the constituents for peace in Sudan. Also important are members of the House International Relations Committee and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, as well as the political leadership in both the House and Senate. Of course especially important are those with whom US constituents have most influence, individual Senators and local Representatives in the Congress. (But nothing should prevent citizens of other countries from weighing in with their views of American responsibilities on this critical international issue.)

The message is simple: "A sustainable peace in Sudan requires real budgetary commitment by the US; not to accept this fundamental reality of the transition from twenty years of war to a tenuous peace greatly increases the likelihood that a peace agreement will not hold, and that there will be a return to war---with all its hideous costs. We have but one chance to help peace take root in Sudan: we must seize it now. Not to do so risks far greater and less productive expenditures of wealth in the long term, and unforgivably greater human suffering and destruction."

*The writer, a professor of literature at Smith College, has written extensively on Sudan.



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


s
Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Sudan’s removal from terror list taints U.S. values 2018-11-10 08:34:32 November, 9th, 2018 The Honorable Michael Richard Pompeo Secretary of State U.S. Department of State 2201 C St NW, Washington DC 20520 USA RESPONSE BY SUDAN LIBERATION MOVEMENT (SLM/A-AW) TO (...)

R-ARCISS: A Peace that divides the signatories and non-signatories 2018-11-10 07:58:28 By Tito Awen, Juba-South Sudan I keep wondering if peace can divide or unite the partners. I am not so young nor unmindful not to have known what happened after signing of the Comprehensive (...)

U.S. Move Ignores Sudan’s Abuses Against its Own People 2018-11-09 06:56:11 U.S. Considers Lifting Sudan’s ‘Terror State’ Designation By Jehanne Henry With all eyes on mid-term elections in the United States, almost no one noticed that on the same day the US State (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Progress observed at end of second month of R-ARCSS implementation 2018-10-22 06:44:02 Press Release 21 October 2018 South Sudanese government released 24 detainees in the implementation of the revitalized peace agreement said the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (...)

4th Annual Tony Elumelu Foundation Entrepreneurship Forum Announced for 25th October 2018 2018-10-15 12:38:14 PRESS RELEASE OCTOBER 14, 2018 Africa’s leading entrepreneurship-focused philanthropic organisation, the Tony Elumelu Foundation (TEF), has announced October 25, 2018, as the date for its (...)

Unity State community in Kenya supports Khartoum peace agreement 2018-08-17 08:33:21 PRESS STATMENT 14th Aug, 2018 Re: We shall Rally behind Khartoum Peace Agreement The Unity State Community Association in Kenya was established in 2010 to organize and mobilize the people of (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2018 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.