Home | Comment & Analysis    Sunday 27 October 2019

Why the SPLM-IO will not be part of the transitional government

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By J. Nguen

First and foremost, we the members of the Sudan People Liberation Movement/Army in Opposition (SPLM/A-IO) applauded and welcomed the position of the Regional and International Special Envoys to South Sudan in a meeting held on Oct 25th to 26th 2019 in Djibouti on the implementation of the R-ARCSS.

The Envoys clearly stated that the implementation of R-ARCSS is lacking behind. For an instant, the critical items such as Security Arrangements and number and boundaries of States and other critical tasks are not met to supports the smooth formation of Transitional Government of National Unity comes 12th of November 2019.

Despite this positive development, we would like to register our position on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC)’s visits to Juba and their subsequent position after meeting with all parties to the R-ARCSS.

In reference to the UNSC’s meeting conducted in Juba with the South Sudanese warring parties on Sunday, October 20th, 2019, to assess the level of political commitments of the parties and to evaluate whether the implementations of the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) is on course and supports the smooth formation of Transitional Government of National Unity comes the 12th of November 2019.

In this regard, we the members of the SPLM/A-IO across the globe takes this opportunity to inform the people of South Sudan, the region and the international community that Security Arrangements and other critical tasks like number and boundaries of states articulated in the R-ARCSS are not met.

That being said, the revitalized agreement implementation is not on course and failing. For example, if the security arrangements and number and boundaries of States and other critical tasks are not addressed, it’s our firm position that the Transitional Government of National Unity will not be formed until such a time that these bear minimums articulated in the R-ARCSS are met.

Also, it’s good to note that the Joint Defence Board (JDB), led by none other than Lt. Gen. Jok Riak of South Sudan People defence Forces and Lt. Gen. Koang Chuol of Sudan people Liberation Army in Opposition, a body responsible for the implementation of Security Arrangements In the R-ARCSS, informed the two principals (president Salva and Dr. Riek) on October 20th, 2019 that security arrangements and other critical tasks will not be completed on time even if 3 months are added after November 12.

In light of this, the SPLM/A-IO see it fits and logical that the Transitional Government of National Unity should not be formed on 12th November 2019 to avoid the repeat of 2016 “dogfight” in the State House in Juba.

Should the regime in Juba insists on forming the Transitional Government of National Unity without security arrangements and number and boundaries state issues resolved, then, the SPLM/A-IO made it abundantly clear that we will not be part and parcel of that government to give peace a chance and allow the people of South Sudan to enjoy the cessation of hostility.

The SPLM/A-IO believes any transition to peace and stability in South Sudan must be genuine and based on sounds practical grounds to avoid the repeat of 2016 “dogfight”. We know our people had enough and the 2016 incident is a stark reminder which must deter us from any hasty formation of Transitional Government of Nation Unity without proper security arrangements in place. In our view, forming the government of national unity without critical tasks in place is a strong endorsement and recipe to violence and for us, this is a nonstarter.

The SPLM/A-IO will not endorse such a shortcut to violence. We stand for sustainable peace and genuine reforms grounded on three independent branches of governance such as judiciary, parliament and presidency. More so, the unified army whose mandate is to protect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of South Sudan and its people. Thus, predicate our position that we are not a seasonal organization, we are for genuine reforms and good governance.

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) can say whatever they want regarding the formation of Transitional Government of National Unity, but we would like to assert that we not be persuaded or manipulated to taking wrong decisions. Knowing the truth, we suspect the UNSC are searching for reasons to justify their covert plan to take over South Sudan on the ground that South Sudanese have been given an opportunity three times to resolve our differences but failed.
The SPLM/A-IO understood this covert plan and we will not allow the people of South Sudan to be misled once again. Our people have had enough and the movement will not accept naked deception from those with ill-informed interior motives.

Against this backdrop, the SPLM/A-IO presents the following reasons why it will not be part and parcel of the Transition Government of National Unity comes 12th of November 2019 if the Juba regime persists on forming the new government:

1. Security Arrangements which include the registration, screening, unification of forces, training and deployment of the unified forces have not yet started;
2. Demilitarization of civilians centres across South Sudan including Juba has not been completed;
3. South Sudan People Defence Forces (SSPDF) refused to declare their parades;
4. The Number and Boundaries of States are not resolved;
5. Amended Transitional Constitutional to would be the Transitional Government of National Unity is not agreed upon by the parties and not passed into law by parliament;
6. Political Space, Juba regime has violently refused to open political space and informed Dr Riek on his visit to Juba on 9th of September that any member of SPLM –IO who attempt to make political rallies in Juba and in the States will be shot at;
7. Political detainees and prisoners of war are not yet released;
8. Funding, the government has refused to release required funding for the implementation of R-ARCSS.

With the above-mentioned outstanding issues not addressed, we want to remind the people of South Sudan that the same issues were the reasons which led to the resumption of war in 2016. Thus, we believe our people are not stupid to repeat the same mistakes. These issues must be addressed to ensure peace and stability in South Sudan.

Also, when we signed the Agreement on the Resolution of Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (ARCSS) in 2015, we like to report people of South Sudan were misled and lied by the grantors which include the IGAD, AU and the International Community to forming the Transitional Government of National Unity which backfired.

For example, the Region and the International community told the people of South Sudan that they would stand with them and protect the agreement and held those who would violate it to account. Regrettably, this has come to past and the grantors did not act to protect the peace agreement or held anyone to account when the agreement was violently violated at will by the government and our country went back to war.

In this regard, it’s our conviction that the people of South Sudan would not be misled once again on false grounds. We know, it’s the same regional and the international community players who are now playing good guys’ card pushing for the formation of Transitional Government of National Unity knowing quite well the critical tasks to the R-ARCSS are not met.

Not again, the people of South Sudan have witnessed and lived through tragic and deadly consequences because the region and international community failed them. As a result, South Sudan slid back to war in 2016 and the entire region of Equatoria was devastated and hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians were killed, women and girls raped and properties destroyed and millions people were displaced both internally and to the neighboring countries.

We are saying never again! The Security arrangements and other critical tasks articulated in the R-ARCSS must be implemented first before the formation of Transitional Government National Unity to ensure a durable peace and stability in South Sudan.

J. Nguen Nyol Public Relations Officer, SPLM–IO Mission in Canada Calgary, Alberta



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


What federal system is suitable for South Sudan? 2019-11-12 11:06:55 By Dr Jacob K. Lupai* Introduction Federalism is seen as a constitutional arrangement for dividing power between different levels of government so that federated states, regions or provinces can (...)

Differences between Sudan government, SRF and FFC are the main issues of concern 2019-11-09 11:17:17 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman As the proverb goes, the difference of opinion does not spoil amity and does not spoil the friendliness issue. On the other hand, mere differences of point of view and (...)

Can women make the world more peaceful? 2019-11-06 11:31:03 By Paulino Akoon Yel Dut A genuine comprehensive analysis shows that involving women in peacebuilding increases the probability that violence will end in an easy manner. Hence we should thank (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.