Home | News    Friday 31 August 2018

Opposition PDM rejects final document for peace in South Sudan


Sudan's FM Al-Dierdiry Ahmed meeting South Sudanese parties at a session with Party leaders on the evening of Monday 25 August (Photo Nuur M. Sheekh/IGAD)

August 30, 2018 (JUBA) - The People’s Democratic Movement (PDM) which is a member of the South Sudan Opposition Alliance (SSOA) rejected the draft revitalized peace agreement and recalled its demand for three autonomous regions in the country.

The opposition alliance led by Gabriel Changson Chang Friday along with the SPLM-IO endorsed the document of the revitalized agreement but said their final signing depends on four concerns saying President al-Bashir promised them he will address with the IGAD leaders.

In a statement extended to Sudan Tribune on Thursday evening, the PDM leader Hakim Dario denounced the signing of the draft agreement by Chang and recalled that he has no mandate to sign in their name.

"PDM along with other members have not authorized Mr Gabriel Chanson Chang, the interim Chair, to initial this Agreement in the name of SSOA as an opposition Bloc," said Dario, adding that "initialling and signing of the Revitalized Khartoum Agreement shall be in the name of each constituent SSOA member".

Earlier this month, the opposition group had already rejected the power-governance agreement and underlined that they do not approve the signing by the group leader of the agreement.

Dario further underscored that as a federalist group they demand to implement a "federal system of governance during the transitional period, based on three autonomous regions of Upper Nile, Equatoria and Bahr al-Ghazal with their borders as they stood on 1st January 1956".

On the issue of the number of states, Chang and Machar in their joint statement on the signing of the draft agreement said they want the IGAD leader incorporate a separate annexe in the body of the final peace agreement.

Juba refused the Annexe D which maintains the referendum as a default solution but provide to review the conformity of the 32 states with the tribal border in January 1956.

The opposition groups say that one of the problems caused by the 32 states system that it has allotted the land of some tribes to others fuelling tribal antagonisms.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 31 August 2018 09:02, by jubaone

    Great PDM! That is clearly the position Equatorians want and demand: federalism or kokora. I understand this may invoke bitter memories to the jienges who stubbornly don’t want to develop their areas but rather wait for Equatorians to intial progress. Equatorians can’t be held hostages by either jienges or nyagateen. They all have to go develop themselves and leave Equatorians go likewise. Simple

    repondre message

    • 31 August 2018 10:36, by Kush Natives


      Your hatred attitude towards tribal bases is and will hold you hostage for another 150 years to come, mark my words today. As long South Sudan moving forward. You will definitely exit from that particular region to Uganda, Congo and Kenya period. Otherwise, expect an assimilation. There’s no room for nonsense, if Your traitors or sellout groups failed to abide by peace.

      repondre message

      • 31 August 2018 17:44, by jubaone

        Bush Natives
        I understand your bitterness. The jellaba were equally bitter when Junubin busted their asses. Take courage and play it cool. I’m simply implying that jienges would greatly do SS a favour if they sat down and got their hands dirty. Laziness, thuggery and savagery don’t help. We as Equatorians also want to passionately migrate to jiengelands. This can’t happen if you permanently squat

        repondre message

        • 31 August 2018 17:50, by jubaone

          ..in Equatoria and desert your luaks that regrettably have turned into grazing fields for cows and dying places for those less fortunate jienges. It appears, jienges are on the run 🏃 and none wants to voluntarily remain behind. This is sad. Only when your jienge leaders go back and not idle in Juba can the simple luakjienge also go.

          repondre message

    • 31 August 2018 12:20, by South South


      We have to separate between good system in South Sudan and hating Dinka tribe. These two things stand separately. If we want good peace and justice for South Sudan, then we can achieve that through this peace talk, but if there is hatred toward Dinka tribe, then no one can help those who hate Dinka tribe. Nigeria and Ethiopia are two countries in Africa with FEDERALISM system.

      repondre message

      • 31 August 2018 12:26, by South South

        Let’s take Nigeria FEDERAL system. In Nigeria, all governors are elected by their people in their states, FEDERAL government in Abuja is in charge of police, army and all security bodies. A governor of state can not give orders to the commissioner of police in his/her state, orders MUST come from Abuja, from FEDERAL government. It’s a mess in Nigeria.

        repondre message

        • 31 August 2018 17:29, by jubaone

          South South
          I see your argument and one federal system that works in one country can’t be copy-pasted onto another. There’s no single workable federal as a silver bullet for all countries. We need real power devolution in which our people e.g. determine their fate within a federated SS. I’m happy, if my fellow country people in Aweil, Bor, Juba, Wau, Malkal etc.

          repondre message

          • 31 August 2018 17:35, by jubaone

            all live free, progressive and healthy lives with both national and state govts not interfering much. We want a enfranchised people not at the mercy of worthless and stupid demagogue leaders. A laughing child in Rumbek is as much a heart relieve like one in Kapwata or Yambio. That is federalism. Today, 32 states mean nothing, if we’re not devolved.

            repondre message

  • 31 August 2018 18:26, by Eastern

    PDM is right...! The forthcoming IGAD heads of state summit will endorse the position of the regime in Juba. Dr. Machar would be trapped with no means of escape. The Khartoum peace jokes are just another version of Wunlt 1999 peace conference between Dinka and Nuer....!

    repondre message

  • 1 September 2018 11:08, by Kenyang ll

    Former 3 regions of Bhar Gazal, Equatoria and Upper Nile, 10 States among others were all done by someone else (Khartoum). If anyone is proud of these divisions, I have no doubt he will love 32 or 100 States; give it sometime. You can’t just rewind and hope to walk back to 10 States or 3 regions. Way forward: allow South Sudanese to vote how they want to be governed and how many States.

    repondre message

  • 1 September 2018 20:32, by lino

    The issue of 28/32/33 states will create a future Tribal Wars in Sout Sudan if not handle properly!!! It will be the recipe for country disintegration into Tribes Wars as it happened in Middle Ages History in the Arabian Land which was call “Besos Wars”- All Tribes on one another throats!!!
    Now we are using machines Guns, so causalities will be much bigger!!!

    repondre message

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Who shall be South Sudan Vice President on SSOA’s ticket? 2019-10-17 15:16:16 By Roger Alfred Yoron Modi The Revitalised Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan R-ARCSS provides that President Salva Kiir shall continue as President of (...)

Is Salva Kiir ready to implement peace? 2019-10-17 15:14:11 By Duop Chak Wuol He began his tenure as a leader admired by most South Sudanese. The death of South Sudan’s renowned leader, Dr John Garang de Mabior, in July 2005 opened the door for him to (...)

Is South Sudan’s administrative system an ethnic fragmentation or incoming ethnic federalism? 2019-10-17 05:11:36 By James Gatdet Dak Lampuar October 16, 2019 – I neither claim to be an expert on decentralized system of governance and on federalism, in all its forms, nor a decision-making authority in our (...)


Latest Press Releases

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.