Home | News    Monday 26 December 2016

SPLM-IO outraged over UN’s failure to impose sanctions on South Sudan

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Tesfa-Alem Tekle

December 25, 2016 (ADDIS ABABA) - The opposition faction of the South Sudan Peoples Liberation Movement (SPLM-IO) outraged over UN Security Council’s failure to adopt a U.S.-drafted resolution to impose an arms embargo against South Sudan.

JPEG - 23.2 kb
Miyong Kuon SPLM-IO representative to UN (Getty Image)

The armed opposition movement on Sunday said those nations that has voted against imposition of the draft resolution have ignored the atrocities inflicted against innocent civilians by the easy flow of sophisticated weapons into the world’s newest nation.

The UN council on Friday rejected the draft resolution after the vote failed to garner the required 9 votes in favor and no vetoes by council’s permanent member states - US, Britain, Russia, France and China to pass it.

The opposition faction said the people of South Sudan were denied a chance to a peaceful end of the conflict when President Salva Kiir opted to abrogate the August peace agreement by turning guns against his peace partners in July 2016.

"Today the world has denied them [South Sudan people] another chance when the council rejected the arms embargo against South Sudan" Miyong Kuon, SPLM-IO representative to U.S. and UN in New York told Sudan Tribune in an email exchange.

The opposition diplomat stressed that imposing the arms embargo would have saved loss of lives of thousands, deescalated the war and prevented the war ravaged country from disintegration.

Miyong expressed dismay over the Council’s decision saying world leaders have missed the greatest chance to stop civilian killings and mass displacement in South Sudan.

"The decision was unfortunate and it made the world miss the chance to avoid genocide" he added.

The 15-member council secured seven votes including U.S., France and UK in favor while eight countries including Russia, China, Japan as well as the three African Council members -Egypt,Angola and Senegal all abstained.

While commending for the countries that have voted in support of the initiative the diplomat went on to saying that "World leaders should have acted to save the lives of the people instead of the regime"

He further called on the UN Security Council to reconsider the decision and allow the imposition of the arms embargo and all the other proposed sanctions.

Following the failed vote, U.S. ambassador, Samantha Power told the 15-member body that member states who favored against the resolution "are taking a big gamble that South Sudan leaders won’t instigate a catastrophe"

"It is the people of South Sudan who will pay the unbearable price," she added.

The Council’s move has also accommodated condemnation from seven rights organizations including from Human Rights Watch, Amnesty international and Enough project.

Beyond arms embargo, the U.S. drafted resolution calls for rebel leader, Riek Machar, Army chief, Paul Malong and information minister, Michael Makuuei face sanctions of asset freeze and travel ban.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 26 December 2016 06:58, by Gatluak jal

    Mr. Miyong Kuon, I know if you are full understand the language or in simply terms sanction or embargo. what behind to this resolution is, basically targeting Marchar who is still calling for armed resistance in the country. The US, UK, and France trying to implement armed embargo, so that Rick can not smuggle weapons rebel. This resolution is specifically, designed to stop Rick from travelling

    repondre message

  • 26 December 2016 07:46, by Future1

    Me I don’t support sanctions either on rebel leaders, government officials or against our nation. Peace lies South Sudanese hands like referendum. National Dialogue is the last and concrete chance pathway for sustainable peace.Because it paves ways for youths and women to confront these greedy politicians.

    repondre message

    • 26 December 2016 12:13, by Akook

      US looks very confused about South Sudan situation. Doing one today and before long seen tomorrow doing absolutely a different thing. Very confused indeed!

      Can’t blames the rest because they either don’t much about situation on the ground or do not care period!!

      repondre message

  • 27 December 2016 11:39, by Raven

    Miyony,
    UN- resolutions are never meant to give rebels an upper hand against the government. You have already declared the war and fighting vigoriously. Besides, nobody knows who is supplying you with weapons so that it could be sanctioned.
    I think that the reason some country the sanction.

    repondre message

  • 27 December 2016 11:46, by Raven

    That some countries voted against and it was not clear whether rebels would stop fightibg after an arms embargo on the government.

    repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Wedding in Juba - How can you tell if a bridegroom works for Nilepet? 2017-02-24 05:25:41 By Deng Kiir Akok The Nile Petroleum Corporation is a national Oil and Gas Corporation, which engages in oil exploration, production and marketing. Famous for its abbreviation Nilepet has been a (...)

Bashir’s congratulation for Trump remains double-edged sword 2017-02-21 08:47:41 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman This is a note to the readers of this article about my use of the phrase double-edged sword. It means that Omar al-Bashir’s Speedy congratulation offer to Donald Trump (...)

South Sudan: Why ’NO’ for peace and ’YES’ for war 2017-02-20 20:45:12 By Tor Madira Machier The region and the International community has been on a campaign in a bid to end the civil war in South Sudan right after its inception in December 2013, yet the very (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Militias of Bashir’s Regime and the Proxy War (1) 2017-02-08 21:49:09 Sudan Democracy First Group Militias of Bashir’s Regime and the Proxy War (1) War in the Blue Nile: Militias in the hunt of refugees and displaced population Introduction Throughout its rule, (...)

More refugees flee to Uganda than across Mediterranean 2017-01-25 09:15:39 January 25, 2017 Uganda welcomed more refugees last year than the total number of refugees and migrants crossing the Mediterranean into Europe. “Europe should learn from the way Uganda and other (...)

Carter Center welcomes new regulations on humanitarian affairs 2017-01-12 07:53:16 The Carter Center ATLANTA, Januarg 11, 2017 – The Carter Center welcomes the recent regulations issued by the government of Sudan aimed at facilitating humanitarian relief throughout the country (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2017 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.