Home | News    Saturday 3 September 2016

South Sudan president says peace agreement imposed on him

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

September 2, 2016 (JUBA) - President Salva Kiir of South Sudan said the peace agreement he signed in August last year with his former first deputy president, Riek Machar, was imposed on him, and that difficulties in its implementation were not surprising.

JPEG - 36.8 kb
Riek Machar, left, first vice president of the Republic of South Sudan, and Salva Kiir, the president, at the first meeting of the new transitional coalition government in Juba, South Sudan, in April, 2016 (Jason Patinkin/AP)

He however added that despite the imposition of some provisions amidst his reservations at the time of the signature, he and his administration have accepted to implement it.

President Kiir also challenged that there was need for dialogue over the proposed deployment of a third party foreign force to Juba so that their mandate is understood before they could deploy.

“When we accepted to sign the peace, we knew it was not going to be easy because certain provisions were imposed but we accepted because peace was very important and it remains the important thing even today,” he said.

“That is why we are saying that we should learn from mistakes made in the past. That instead of sending protection force, we need first to understand what they are coming to do, when they will come and how long they will stay in the country,” said president Kiir while meeting the head of the United Nations in South Sudan on Thursday, a day before the arrival of the UN Security Council’s members to Juba.

He reiterated that commitment and the readiness of his administration to negotiate with the United Nations Security Council within the framework of the outcome of the summit of the heads of state and government of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in August.

Cabinet affairs minister, Martin Elia Lomuro, a political ally of president Kiir from other political parties allied to the government, confirmed that the government had accepted in principle deployment of the troops but wanted to be involved in technical discussions before actual deployment can take place.

“We accepted in principle the deployment of these additional forces but we underlined that we need to be involved in other aspects, especially in technical discussions relating to their mandate, command, armament, when they will come and how long they will stay. These are things we highlighted in the letter we sent to the Security Council before the resolution was passed,” said Lomuro on Friday.

He said the government remains committed to implementing the peace agreement, adding it is also open for dialogue.

“A government which is not ready for implementation of the peace agreement will have its position clear. We are ready for dialogue on the deployment of the protection force but it should not be a tool to pressuring sovereign state. Dialogue should not undermine the authority and the institutions of a sovereign state,” he said.

UN Security Council in August passed a resolution which authorized deployment of 4,000 strong regional “protection force” to take charge of security and protection of civilians in Juba.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 2 September 2016 22:18, by Mr Point

    Who was it that had the power to impose a peace agreement (which he signed - then broke in every provision) on the president of the sovereign state?

    Can anyone tell me of any agreement that Kiir ever signed then kept?

    In which respects can Kiir be trusted?

    repondre message

  • 3 September 2016 05:43, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    A sovereign state that mass-murder a section of its own citizens is always questionable by the community of the world. Sovereign German state under Hitler was questioned for killing and displacing thousands of Jews, South Sudan is not different either. South Sudan under Jieng Council of Elders needs to asked to why they are killing, raping, stealing properties of innocent citizens.

    repondre message

  • 3 September 2016 07:07, by Eastern

    Where’s that rhetoric of we shall not allow even a single foreign soldier to set foot in South Sudan? Flimsy reasons given by primitive minds in Juba!

    repondre message

    • 3 September 2016 20:05, by King of Nyamlel

      Akook, Kiir is primitive but had liberated you. He has achieved anything more than you. Fuck the shit!!

      repondre message

  • 3 September 2016 09:41, by chuol

    Yes, it is true that ’’Whisky Kiir’’ was not happy for peace and/ or ready for peace implementation that is why he did tried to kill Dr. Riek Machar, but the brave Nuer mighty army fight back in self- defense where they almost captured Juba. The fighting in J1 happened because Whisky Kiir wasn’t committed to peace implementation. The intern’l community can just take from his desperate speeches.

    repondre message

    • 3 September 2016 12:25, by Akook

      Shame shame on Kiir, the only person on earth who openly can claim peace that stop mass slaughtering in the country is "imposed" on him.
      Is continued death what you want sir?! Shame shame... Juba city on earth is the only capital where people go street pretesting coming of peace

      repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Darfur, the most ‘successful’ genocide in a century 2017-04-21 23:16:47 By Eric Reeves The Darfur region of western Sudan has been recognized since 2004 as the site of genocide since 2004 by dozens of political officials and bodies (including the U.S. Congress and (...)

Open Letter to AU and IGAD: Festus Mogae be relieved and JMEC disbanded 2017-04-21 23:12:39 By Dak Buoth It is an opportune time for President Festus Mogae, the Chair of the Joint Monitoring and Evaluation commission (JMEC) to pack and go back where he came from. And if he so wishes to (...)

The Nile Basin In Transformation: research uptake and what’s at stake? 2017-04-20 14:55:55 Mohamed s. M. Yassin (Ph.D) The Nile basin territories have witnessed huge transformation since prehistoric era and continue to be subjected to enormous transformations. The transformations (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


HRW denounces "collective punishment" in South Sudan’s Wau 2017-04-15 07:06:48 Human Right Watch South Sudan: New Spate of Ethnic Killings Urgent Need for Justice; UN Should Increase Patrols in Wau (Nairobi, April 14, 2017) – Government soldiers and allied militias (...)

Statement by South Sudanese Communist Party on the National Dialoguel 2017-03-22 05:44:42 The Communist Party of South Sudan On the Initiative of the National Dialogue The initiative taken by the President of the Republic of South Sudan declaring a need for a national dialogue is an (...)

An Appeal to President of the Republic of South Sudan 2017-03-15 07:22:45 Dear. Mr. President, I write to appeal to you for the release of political detainees now in the custody of the National Security Service at Jebel and other detention facilities. In doing this, I (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2017 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.