Home | News    Tuesday 9 August 2016

South Sudan says UN draft proposal not consistent with IGAD communique


August 8, 2016 (JUBA) - South Sudanese government on Monday said they were disappointed by a new development in New York in which a United Nations (UN) draft proposed deployment of protection force but with responsibility of intervention force to take charge for the security of Juba, including the Juba International Airport.

JPEG - 49.5 kb
The United Nations Secretary General, Ban Ki Moon handshake with the President of the Republic of South Sudan, Salva Kiir at Presidential Palace, J1 in Juba capital on February 25, 2016 (UNMISS photo)

The draft proposal circulated to members of the United Nations Security Council by the United States on Sunday said the UN would also determine the armament of the force.

But South Sudanese officials said the draft is different from the understanding reached in the summit of the heads of state and government of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) which released a communique on Friday in Addis Ababa on deployment of a Protection Force.

“The draft proposal we are hearing is inconsistent with the IGAD communiqué,” South Sudanese cabinet affairs minister, Martin Elia Lomuro, an ally of President Kiir, told Sudan Tribune on Monday.

The regional communique, according to minister Lomuro, allows the government to participate in discussions related to mandate, armaments, funding and the size of the force to be deployed.

However, the surfaced proposed deployment on Sunday indicated that the United Nations Security Council should authorize a 4,000-strong force to ensure peace in Juba.

It urged the council to approve a regional protection force to be deployed in Juba with the mandate “to use all necessary means, including undertaking robust and active steps and engaging in direct operations where necessary," to secure Juba and protect the airport and other key facilities.

The draft proposal also threatened to impose an arms embargo should the South Sudanese government fail to cooperate.

The protection force, if approved by the Security Council, would be part of the United Nations mission in South Sudan which has been on the ground since the country gained independence from Sudan in 2011.

The protection force commander, whose role will be defined by the revised new mandate, would be subordinate to the overall force commander of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS).

The council will vote on whether to impose an arms embargo if UN Secretary-General, Ban Ki-Moon, reports within a month of adoption of the draft resolution that South Sudan’s transitional government is obstructing deployment of the protection force.

Heavy fighting involving tanks and helicopter gunships erupted in Juba for several days last month between troops loyal to President Salva Kiir and those backing former First Vice President, Riek Machar, raising fears of a return to full-scale civil war in the world’s newest nation.

Hundreds of people were killed and the United Nations said government soldiers and security forces executed civilians and gang-raped women and girls during and after the outbreak of fighting. South Sudan government denied the accusations.

The East African regional bloc, IGAD, said on Friday that South Sudan had agreed to the deployment of a regional force, which has been a key demand of Machar, who left Juba in the wake of the violence. Kiir has since appointed a new first vice president, Taban Deng Gai, but IGAD wants him to step down.

The draft resolution "urges member states in the region to expedite contributions of rapidly deployable troops to ensure the full deployment of the Regional Protection Force as soon as possible."

The draft text would extend the mandate for UNMISS until 15 December. The Security Council needs to adopt the draft by Friday, when the current UNMISS mandate expires.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 9 August 01:23, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    Lomuro please stay out of this. Loka is chaos, Lanya is in total trouble. If you mind about Pojulu’s lives and your uncles Kakwa, you would not be talking like a Gogrial man. Let UN rain sanity in South Sudan so that people can once more live in harmony. As I write Madi, Acholi, Latuko, shilluk, Balanda and Nuer are experiencing a hell form your masters.

    repondre message

    • 9 August 09:30, by Akuma

      South Sudan will never and ever be under threat by UN, Once South Sudan accept their threat that will be a time for UN agencies and UNMISS to leave South Sudan. South Sudanese people are tired of UNMISS.

      repondre message

  • 9 August 06:54, by Eastern

    ....the kleptocrats are at it again. They want to appear relevant to South Sudanese when their hands are dripping with the blood of innocent people. Kiir has been told multiple times that protection and intervention are intertwined. Kiir’s legitemacy has gone down with the collapse of the ARCISS!

    repondre message

  • 9 August 08:52, by Dengda

    South Sudan is not bigger than UN, IGAD and even EAC, joining bodies for sake of getting hand out or free dollars has a lot of consequences. How many times you been told to embrace ACRSS as the only chance to free from Intervention or regime change your nightmare but failed to listen. You are not smart than the world bodies, relying on M7 is very naïve. M7 has case of abusing Dr. Besigie and is

    repondre message

    • 9 August 09:02, by Dengda

      time bombing. You displaced massive civilians, what I often heard the same politicians calling on humanitarian for urgent relieves. Why you don’t calls for peace? South Sudanese were not born refugees or would remain refugees for long-term as result of man-mad disaster or greedy, if you don’t know the role of the international bodies, why we call for food and not security and peace of the civilia

      repondre message

      • 9 August 09:08, by Dengda

        The Dinka, I was born to and raise and grown up, is not the Dinka I have seen now. Off course it shame on us. The dinka I know, you can’t feed yourselves first before kids, visitors, the dinka I know you put other people interest first not yours. Being majority doesn’t grabbing from minority. If you we know ourselves as majority why worrying? elephant never mind fox. Intervention 200% I welcome.

        repondre message

Comment on this article


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

52nd Anniversary of the glorious October 21, 1964 Sudanese revolution 2016-10-21 12:43:46 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman Friday the 21st October 2016 will mark the 52nd Anniversary of the Glorious Sudanese October 21, 1964 Revolution. On that date, my memories go far back to the unique (...)

Chemical Weapons Use in Darfur: The World walks away 2016-10-18 22:12:17 By Eric Reeves Despite overwhelming evidence of Khartoum’s use of chemical weapons in the Jebel Marra region of Darfur (western Sudan), the international community seems to be quietly walking (...)

Resources grabbing in the Nile Basin 2016-10-17 22:57:47 MISUSE, MISMANAGEMENT AND MISINVESTMENTS By Mohamed S. M. Yassin Ting Fa Margherita Chang Luca Iseppi Abstract. Historically the Nile constituted the major source of life for million of (...)


Latest Press Releases

Amnesty urges to investigate chemical weapons Sudan’s Jebel Marra 2016-10-12 12:52:01 Sudan: International chemical weapons investigation urgently needed into horrific Jebel Marra attacksAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL NEWSFLASH 11 October 2016 Sudan: International chemical weapons (...)

UNAMID JSR’s statement read to the media on peace in Darfur 2016-10-10 20:57:56 African Union United Nations Mission in Darfur Though the region of Darfur is relatively peaceful at this time, a small portion of Jebel Marra within Darfur continues to be intermittently (...)

Sudan: No justice for protester killings 2016-09-23 08:03:30 (Nairobi, September 22, 2016) – Sudanese authorities have yet to provide justice to victims of a violent crackdown on anti-austerity protesters in Khartoum in September 2013, the African Centre (...)


Copyright © 2003-2016 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.