Home | News    Friday 22 July 2016

Britain’s veto powers at UN Security Council queried: report


July 21, 2016 (JUBA) - United Nations officials have reportedly questioned if Britain’s veto-power on the 15-member Security Council still applied, after it withdrew police officers from a peacekeeping mission in South Sudan after the recent violent clashes.

JPEG - 15.5 kb
A United Nations Security Council session (UN)

Britain’s move, Reuters reported, was done without consulting the UN.

Britain, France, United States, China and Russia holds veto powers on the Security Council. The five permanents members of the Security Council are charged with maintaining international peace and security and mandate peacekeeping missions.

According to an internal memo by the UN peacekeeping department, Germany and Sweden also withdrew their police without consultation and the world body has barred all three countries from replacing the officers should the situation in South Sudan improve.

"The departure of the police officers has affected the operational capability of the mission at headquarters level and has dealt a serious blow to the morale of its peacekeepers," the memo, seen by Reuters, reportedly read.

The internal memo, which does not mention Britain and Sweden, said that for the states who are also on Security Council, their withdrawal of police from South Sudan "can be considered a lack of respect to their engagement on peace and security."

British troops arrived in South Sudan last month to take part in the UN peacekeeping mission as it was earlier announced at a UN gathering held in September last year.

Britain, its Defense ministry said then, would send around 300 troops to South Sudan, where tens of thousands of people have died and millions displaced in a bloody civil which broke out in late 2013.

The British forces in the world’s youngest nation were earmarked to carry out engineering work to strengthen the country’s infrastructure.

The UK personnel would reportedly be split into two engineer squadrons to provide "vital engineering work to strengthen infrastructure as well as further advisory support" in the war-torn nation.

Britain remains a large financial contributor to UN peacekeeping missions.

More than 270 people were killed and over 40,000 displaced from their homes when heavy fighting broke out on 8 July between troops loyal to President Salva Kiir and those allied to the country’s First Vice President Riek Machar in the capital, Juba.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 22 July 04:23, by Thyinka

    The British though their officers where coming to have jobs in South Sudan but not to fight to keep civilians safe or keep peace. They don’t want any of their officers to die.

    repondre message

    • 22 July 05:34, by Bazinguaboy

      The UK and indeed the UN police personnel are not sent to fight but to play an advisory role to the national police. That’s their job against which they are being accused of abandoning, not fighting.

      repondre message

    • 22 July 05:36, by Bazinguaboy

      And BTW,they do have good paying jobs in their countries.

      repondre message

Comment on this article


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

52nd Anniversary of the glorious October 21, 1964 Sudanese revolution 2016-10-21 12:43:46 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman Friday the 21st October 2016 will mark the 52nd Anniversary of the Glorious Sudanese October 21, 1964 Revolution. On that date, my memories go far back to the unique (...)

Chemical Weapons Use in Darfur: The World walks away 2016-10-18 22:12:17 By Eric Reeves Despite overwhelming evidence of Khartoum’s use of chemical weapons in the Jebel Marra region of Darfur (western Sudan), the international community seems to be quietly walking (...)

Resources grabbing in the Nile Basin 2016-10-17 22:57:47 MISUSE, MISMANAGEMENT AND MISINVESTMENTS By Mohamed S. M. Yassin Ting Fa Margherita Chang Luca Iseppi Abstract. Historically the Nile constituted the major source of life for million of (...)


Latest Press Releases

Amnesty urges to investigate chemical weapons Sudan’s Jebel Marra 2016-10-12 12:52:01 Sudan: International chemical weapons investigation urgently needed into horrific Jebel Marra attacksAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL NEWSFLASH 11 October 2016 Sudan: International chemical weapons (...)

UNAMID JSR’s statement read to the media on peace in Darfur 2016-10-10 20:57:56 African Union United Nations Mission in Darfur Though the region of Darfur is relatively peaceful at this time, a small portion of Jebel Marra within Darfur continues to be intermittently (...)

Sudan: No justice for protester killings 2016-09-23 08:03:30 (Nairobi, September 22, 2016) – Sudanese authorities have yet to provide justice to victims of a violent crackdown on anti-austerity protesters in Khartoum in September 2013, the African Centre (...)


Copyright © 2003-2016 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.