Home | News    Friday 22 July 2016

Britain’s veto powers at UN Security Council queried: report

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

July 21, 2016 (JUBA) - United Nations officials have reportedly questioned if Britain’s veto-power on the 15-member Security Council still applied, after it withdrew police officers from a peacekeeping mission in South Sudan after the recent violent clashes.

JPEG - 15.5 kb
A United Nations Security Council session (UN)

Britain’s move, Reuters reported, was done without consulting the UN.

Britain, France, United States, China and Russia holds veto powers on the Security Council. The five permanents members of the Security Council are charged with maintaining international peace and security and mandate peacekeeping missions.

According to an internal memo by the UN peacekeeping department, Germany and Sweden also withdrew their police without consultation and the world body has barred all three countries from replacing the officers should the situation in South Sudan improve.

"The departure of the police officers has affected the operational capability of the mission at headquarters level and has dealt a serious blow to the morale of its peacekeepers," the memo, seen by Reuters, reportedly read.

The internal memo, which does not mention Britain and Sweden, said that for the states who are also on Security Council, their withdrawal of police from South Sudan "can be considered a lack of respect to their engagement on peace and security."

British troops arrived in South Sudan last month to take part in the UN peacekeeping mission as it was earlier announced at a UN gathering held in September last year.

Britain, its Defense ministry said then, would send around 300 troops to South Sudan, where tens of thousands of people have died and millions displaced in a bloody civil which broke out in late 2013.

The British forces in the world’s youngest nation were earmarked to carry out engineering work to strengthen the country’s infrastructure.

The UK personnel would reportedly be split into two engineer squadrons to provide "vital engineering work to strengthen infrastructure as well as further advisory support" in the war-torn nation.

Britain remains a large financial contributor to UN peacekeeping missions.

More than 270 people were killed and over 40,000 displaced from their homes when heavy fighting broke out on 8 July between troops loyal to President Salva Kiir and those allied to the country’s First Vice President Riek Machar in the capital, Juba.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 22 July 04:23, by Thyinka

    The British though their officers where coming to have jobs in South Sudan but not to fight to keep civilians safe or keep peace. They don’t want any of their officers to die.

    repondre message

    • 22 July 05:34, by Bazinguaboy

      The UK and indeed the UN police personnel are not sent to fight but to play an advisory role to the national police. That’s their job against which they are being accused of abandoning, not fighting.

      repondre message

    • 22 July 05:36, by Bazinguaboy

      And BTW,they do have good paying jobs in their countries.

      repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Holding accountable those enabling genocide in Sudan 2016-12-05 05:30:49 Eric Reeves As grim genocide by attrition in Darfur is set to enter its fifteenth year, as Khartoum’s claim of a purely nominal “cease-fire” in South Kordofan is belied by repeated reports of Sudan (...)

Sudan’s Civil Disobedience, a model for political change 2016-12-04 05:23:21 by Mahmoud A. Suleiman According to Gene Sharp of Albert Einstein Institution in his masterpiece book from Dictatorship to Democracy, he quoted Civil Disobedience among the 198 Methods of (...)

Sudan’s Civil Disobedience: Africa’s latest "Hashtag Revolution"? 2016-11-30 06:14:21 by Suliman Baldo November 29, 2016 “Because of the nature of the dictatorship we are under, you are forced to embrace the use of social media, . . . It’s not secure to try and use the tactics (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Conspiracy, rumour mongering and power struggle behind alleged case of corruption in president’s office 2016-12-05 05:36:45 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4 December, 2016 Legal Watch Associates South Sudan has been following up the alleged case of corruption in the Office of the Pesident. The case involved 16 people from (...)

Amnesty urges to investigate chemical weapons Sudan’s Jebel Marra 2016-10-12 12:52:01 Sudan: International chemical weapons investigation urgently needed into horrific Jebel Marra attacksAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL NEWSFLASH 11 October 2016 Sudan: International chemical weapons (...)

UNAMID JSR’s statement read to the media on peace in Darfur 2016-10-10 20:57:56 African Union United Nations Mission in Darfur Though the region of Darfur is relatively peaceful at this time, a small portion of Jebel Marra within Darfur continues to be intermittently (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2016 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.