Home | News    Friday 22 July 2016

Britain’s veto powers at UN Security Council queried: report

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

July 21, 2016 (JUBA) - United Nations officials have reportedly questioned if Britain’s veto-power on the 15-member Security Council still applied, after it withdrew police officers from a peacekeeping mission in South Sudan after the recent violent clashes.

JPEG - 15.5 kb
A United Nations Security Council session (UN)

Britain’s move, Reuters reported, was done without consulting the UN.

Britain, France, United States, China and Russia holds veto powers on the Security Council. The five permanents members of the Security Council are charged with maintaining international peace and security and mandate peacekeeping missions.

According to an internal memo by the UN peacekeeping department, Germany and Sweden also withdrew their police without consultation and the world body has barred all three countries from replacing the officers should the situation in South Sudan improve.

"The departure of the police officers has affected the operational capability of the mission at headquarters level and has dealt a serious blow to the morale of its peacekeepers," the memo, seen by Reuters, reportedly read.

The internal memo, which does not mention Britain and Sweden, said that for the states who are also on Security Council, their withdrawal of police from South Sudan "can be considered a lack of respect to their engagement on peace and security."

British troops arrived in South Sudan last month to take part in the UN peacekeeping mission as it was earlier announced at a UN gathering held in September last year.

Britain, its Defense ministry said then, would send around 300 troops to South Sudan, where tens of thousands of people have died and millions displaced in a bloody civil which broke out in late 2013.

The British forces in the world’s youngest nation were earmarked to carry out engineering work to strengthen the country’s infrastructure.

The UK personnel would reportedly be split into two engineer squadrons to provide "vital engineering work to strengthen infrastructure as well as further advisory support" in the war-torn nation.

Britain remains a large financial contributor to UN peacekeeping missions.

More than 270 people were killed and over 40,000 displaced from their homes when heavy fighting broke out on 8 July between troops loyal to President Salva Kiir and those allied to the country’s First Vice President Riek Machar in the capital, Juba.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 22 July 2016 04:23, by Thyinka

    The British though their officers where coming to have jobs in South Sudan but not to fight to keep civilians safe or keep peace. They don’t want any of their officers to die.

    repondre message

    • 22 July 2016 05:34, by Bazinguaboy

      The UK and indeed the UN police personnel are not sent to fight but to play an advisory role to the national police. That’s their job against which they are being accused of abandoning, not fighting.

      repondre message

    • 22 July 2016 05:36, by Bazinguaboy

      And BTW,they do have good paying jobs in their countries.

      repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


South Sudan Conflict: SPLM is the problem and the solution 2017-06-23 23:55:36 By Tor Madira Machier, Since its inception more than 30 years ago, the fractured Sudan People's Liberation Movement, the SPLM has been the reason for the suffering the South Sudanese have been (...)

The Nile Basin Cooperative Framework Agreement: The impasse is breakable! 2017-06-22 04:51:22 By Salman M.A. Salman A summit of the head of states of the Nile Basin countries is planned for June 22, 2017, in Entebbe, Uganda, to discuss the impasse over the Nile Basin Cooperative (...)

Sudan, Libya, and Support for Radical Islamic Militants: A Vignette 2017-06-21 23:24:54 By Eric Reeves | June 21, 2017 In October 2014, I analysed some of the implications of minutes reflecting the deliberations of the most senior military and intelligence officials of the National (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


HRW denounces "collective punishment" in South Sudan’s Wau 2017-04-15 07:06:48 Human Right Watch South Sudan: New Spate of Ethnic Killings Urgent Need for Justice; UN Should Increase Patrols in Wau (Nairobi, April 14, 2017) – Government soldiers and allied militias (...)

Statement by South Sudanese Communist Party on the National Dialoguel 2017-03-22 05:44:42 The Communist Party of South Sudan On the Initiative of the National Dialogue The initiative taken by the President of the Republic of South Sudan declaring a need for a national dialogue is an (...)

An Appeal to President of the Republic of South Sudan 2017-03-15 07:22:45 Dear. Mr. President, I write to appeal to you for the release of political detainees now in the custody of the National Security Service at Jebel and other detention facilities. In doing this, I (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2017 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.