Home | News    Tuesday 19 July 2016

South Sudanese rival spokespersons express disagreement over recent violence


A sign celebrating five years of South Sudanese independence on a bullet-damaged wall opposite to the presidential palace in Juba on 15 July 2016 (AFP Photo)
July 18, 2016 (JUBA) – Two rival spokespersons belonging to President Salva Kiir and First Vice President, Riek Machar, blamed each side for the recent upsurge of violence and could not also agree on the proposed deployment of a third force in Juba.

Ateny Wek Ateny, President Kiir’s spokesperson and James Gatdet Dak, First Vice President Machar’s spokesman, could not agree whether it was necessary to deploy a third force from the region to help restore peace and security to the capital, Juba, after fighting erupted at J1 palace on 8 July.

“We don’t want a third force,” said Ateny, during a 40-minute debate with his rival, Dak, on Aljazeera English TV Stream program on Monday night.

Meanwhile Dak said there was need to deploy a third force under the mandate of the current United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), saying President Kiir had failed in his leadership or to control his forces, which he blamed for triggering the fighting in Juba.

Ateny however said the fighting at J1 was started by Machar’s bodyguards who accompanied him with 20 military trucks full of soldiers and then tried to “take the government by force.”

When asked whether it was possible to remove the two leaders from the political leadership in South Sudan and bring another neutral person to take charge of the country, Ateny said President Kiir should be given another five years term in office so that he could now focus on development and services delivery in the country.

He accused Riek Machar of being a problem to President Kiir, making it difficult for the president to focus on the development of the young nation.

On the other hand, Dak said President Kiir is a “failed leader” who has squandered his chance in office, but added the two should implement the peace agreement.

Dak argued that the difference between the two leaders emerged seriously when Machar in 2013 tried to advise President Kiir to resolve about six issues which included “corruption and tribalism.”

He said “it would be unfair” to share blame and call for removal of the two leaders together. He likened it to “throwing away both good and bad apples just because they happen to be in the same basket.”

He argued that Machar is a visionary leader unlike President Kiir and should be given chance to lead, adding that there is nowhere to find “an angel” to lead South Sudan and that another third person besides Machar “maybe as bad as President Kiir.”

While Ateny blamed Machar for failure in the government between 2005 and 2011 when President Kiir was the First Vice President of the Sudan before the split and Machar was his deputy in the then Government of Southern Sudan (GoSS), Dak dismissed the accusation, saying President Kiir was the head of the southern government and was responsible for “appointing corrupt people” to essential government institutions without consultations with Machar.

Dak also accused President Kiir of making many of his current bad decisions based on the advices given to him by a tribal organization, called the Jieng [Dinka] Council of Elders (JCE), which membership he said is composed of ethnic Dinka intellectuals and prominent government officials.

Ateny denied the accusation and said the Dinka tribal council had never advised President Kiir, and instead accused Machar of tribalism, saying 90% of members of his current army of the SPLA-IO are from the Nuer ethnic group.

Dak also said the current crisis is to blame on President Kiir whom he said is not committed to peace and wants to dismantle it in implementing his “reservations” he made during the signing of the August 2015 peace agreement.

The two sides however only agreed to one point, that the only option to restore peace to the country is to fully implement the peace agreement.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 19 July 09:31, by choldit

    Congratulations cde James Gatdet for showing the dogs a door for exit. He denied even the Jieng council of elders, JCE. If thier role can’t be admitted why taking thier advices in the first place. Kiir started wars he can’t win with illegal army.

    repondre message

  • 19 July 10:03, by Eastern

    Excellent! I like it when the problem of South Sudan is taken to the international media. The Dinka led government in Juba loves to keep the evil things they do on South Sudanese under wraps. SPLA-io expose them. Expose those liars in Washington including their American friends doing Kiir’s biding!!!

    repondre message

  • 19 July 13:53, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    The sequence of events in South Sudan is very clear as to whom started the animosity. Mr James Gatdet you do not to waste your rhetoric energy to explain things. The killing of Gismalla an SPLA/IO MI was the watershed of all this mess. The plan of Jieng is to eliminate SPLA/IO leadership by first eliminating their guards that surprisingly met a fierce resistance.

    repondre message

  • 19 July 13:55, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    The sequence of events in South Sudan is very clear as to whom started the animosity. Mr James Gatdet you do not to need to waste your rhetoric energy to explain things. The killing of Gismalla an SPLA/IO MI was the watershed of all this mess. The plan of Jieng is to eliminate SPLA/IO leadership especially Riek by first eliminating their guards that surprisingly met a fierce resistance.

    repondre message

  • 19 July 16:20, by Hardlinner

    Gatdet Dak as no shame to call Riek visionary. perhaps the scarification on his forehead have distorted is reasoning. remember what Riek did in 1991 to SPLA which was being Run by true visionary leader named John Garang. the your finding is old and can only entertain foolish nuer men. both leaders are equally no good. they should both resign.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Holding accountable those enabling genocide in Sudan 2016-12-05 05:30:49 Eric Reeves As grim genocide by attrition in Darfur is set to enter its fifteenth year, as Khartoum’s claim of a purely nominal “cease-fire” in South Kordofan is belied by repeated reports of Sudan (...)

Sudan’s Civil Disobedience, a model for political change 2016-12-04 05:23:21 by Mahmoud A. Suleiman According to Gene Sharp of Albert Einstein Institution in his masterpiece book from Dictatorship to Democracy, he quoted Civil Disobedience among the 198 Methods of (...)

Sudan’s Civil Disobedience: Africa’s latest "Hashtag Revolution"? 2016-11-30 06:14:21 by Suliman Baldo November 29, 2016 “Because of the nature of the dictatorship we are under, you are forced to embrace the use of social media, . . . It’s not secure to try and use the tactics (...)


Latest Press Releases

Conspiracy, rumour mongering and power struggle behind alleged case of corruption in president’s office 2016-12-05 05:36:45 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4 December, 2016 Legal Watch Associates South Sudan has been following up the alleged case of corruption in the Office of the Pesident. The case involved 16 people from (...)

Amnesty urges to investigate chemical weapons Sudan’s Jebel Marra 2016-10-12 12:52:01 Sudan: International chemical weapons investigation urgently needed into horrific Jebel Marra attacksAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL NEWSFLASH 11 October 2016 Sudan: International chemical weapons (...)

UNAMID JSR’s statement read to the media on peace in Darfur 2016-10-10 20:57:56 African Union United Nations Mission in Darfur Though the region of Darfur is relatively peaceful at this time, a small portion of Jebel Marra within Darfur continues to be intermittently (...)


Copyright © 2003-2016 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.