Home | News    Monday 18 April 2016

U.S. should impose modernized sanctions on Sudan: group

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

April 17, 2017 (KHARTOUM) - A new report by the United States-based Enough Project has proposed that the U.S. administration should deploy new targeted financial pressures on the Sudanese regime to support a peace deal in the country.

JPEG - 25.5 kb
US president Barack Obama (Photo: Getty Images)

Washington imposed economic and trade sanctions on Sudan in 1997 in response to its alleged connection to terror networks and human rights abuses. In 2007 it strengthened the embargo, citing abuses in Darfur which it labelled as genocide.

The report titled “Modernized Sanctions for Sudan: Unfinished Business for the Obama Administration” demands Washington to increase pressure on the Sudanese regime by adopting a strategy “based in part on an approach that was effective over time in bringing Iran to the negotiating table”.

“While the economic and political contexts of Iran and Sudan are quite different, as are the underlying U.S. national security and foreign policy interests and exigencies, the fact is that both governments have become severely compromised due to isolation from the global financial system,” read the report.

The report underscored that the policies and actions of the Sudanese government justify enhanced and modernized U.S. sanctions; saying the latter doesn’t “deserve sanctions relief or debt relief so long as it undermines inclusive peace in Sudan and diverts public financial and military resources to attacking the Sudanese people and enriching itself”.

It demanded the U.S. administration to deploy a new wave of modernized sanctions tools that can more effectively target top regime officials and their commercial interests.

According to the report those tools include the imposition of sanctions on foreign banks dealing with the regime, targeting the conflict gold and weapons sectors, increasing enforcement of existing sanctions besides introducing anti-corruption sanctions and increasing designations of companies owned by Sudan’s National Intelligence and Security Service (NISS) and key regime elites.

On the other hand, the report pointed that the U.S. government should take steps to alleviate the negative impact of the existing sanctions on service providers that support the Sudanese public, saying however the administration should not succumb to diversionary tactics and a manipulation of the humanitarian imperative from the Sudanese government.

It is noteworthy that a number of organizations operating in Sudan have mentioned the challenges they face due to the sanctions. Also, Sudanese officials continued to point to the negative impact of the economic sanctions on ordinary citizens.

Last December, the country’s justice minister Awad al-Hassan al-Nur called for indemnities "for the victims of coercive unilateral sanctions imposed by the U.S and other international powers on the Sudan".

The report added that the goal of this combination of tightened and eased sanctions measures is to bring Sudanese regime “to a more inclusive, single, unified peace process that aims for a negotiated political transition in Sudan”.

According to the report, previous non-inclusive peace processes separating the parties and conflicts in Darfur, South Kordofan and Blue Nile, and the political opposition have failed to achieve lasting peace in the country.

It pointed that the Sudanese government has “undermined every peace process aimed at addressing Sudan’s internal conflicts since the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, which ended the North-South war in 2005”, saying it effectively uses these peace talks “as a means to divide opposition and undermine progress toward an end to conflict”.

“The Obama administration—backed by a bipartisan group of congressmen and congresswomen—can use enhanced financial leverage to press the Sudanese government to unify the three currently disaggregated and ineffective negotiations forums (Darfur, the Two Areas, and the National Dialogue) and ensure that the root causes of conflict are addressed inclusively and comprehensively”, read the report.

The Sudanese army has been fighting Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/North (SPLM-N) rebels in Blue Nile and South Kordofan since 2011 and a group of armed movements in Darfur since 2003.

Last December, negotiations between Khartoum the SPLM-N stalled after the government delegation insisted that the objective of talks is to settle the conflict in the Two Areas, while the SPLM-N team has called for a holistic approach to resolve ongoing conflicts across Sudan.

Also, Sudanese government and four of the “Sudan Call” opposition groups held a strategic consultative meeting in Addis Ababa between 19 to 21 March under the auspices of the African Union High Implementation Panel (AUHIP) which brokers Sudan’s peace process.

At the end of the meeting, the Sudanese government signed a Roadmap Agreement calling to stop war in Blue Nile, Darfur, and South Kordofan and to engage in the national dialogue process. However the opposition groups refused to sign the agreement saying it would lead to reproduce the regime.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 17 April 23:40, by sudani ana

    You idiots Sudan government has signed the road map agreement brokered by the African Union and supported by the US whilst the rebels refused to sign it. So who should the US sanction? This neo conservative Evangelical Christian Zionist supporting Enough Project certainly do have their own hidden agendas.

    repondre message

    • 18 April 01:02, by Darkangel

      Sudani, i wouldnt worry about Enough. No one listens to them anymore, but they want to sound relevant. If anyone should have sanctions on them, it should be South Sudan. But these morons think bashing Sudan is still popular. The world doesnt have time for American double standards now. Africa, Europe & Asia are moving on, with or without the US.

      repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Call for the release of S. Sudanese arbitrarily detained by national security services in Juba 2016-12-07 07:54:53 By Bangasi Joseph Bakosoro On 22 December 2015, at around 12pm, I received a call from the National Security Service (NSS) summoning me to their headquarters for a meeting. I drove to the office (...)

Holding accountable those enabling genocide in Sudan 2016-12-05 05:30:49 Eric Reeves As grim genocide by attrition in Darfur is set to enter its fifteenth year, as Khartoum’s claim of a purely nominal “cease-fire” in South Kordofan is belied by repeated reports of Sudan (...)

Sudan’s Civil Disobedience, a model for political change 2016-12-04 05:23:21 by Mahmoud A. Suleiman According to Gene Sharp of Albert Einstein Institution in his masterpiece book from Dictatorship to Democracy, he quoted Civil Disobedience among the 198 Methods of (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Conspiracy, rumour mongering and power struggle behind alleged case of corruption in president’s office 2016-12-05 05:36:45 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 4 December, 2016 Legal Watch Associates South Sudan has been following up the alleged case of corruption in the Office of the Pesident. The case involved 16 people from (...)

Amnesty urges to investigate chemical weapons Sudan’s Jebel Marra 2016-10-12 12:52:01 Sudan: International chemical weapons investigation urgently needed into horrific Jebel Marra attacksAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL NEWSFLASH 11 October 2016 Sudan: International chemical weapons (...)

UNAMID JSR’s statement read to the media on peace in Darfur 2016-10-10 20:57:56 African Union United Nations Mission in Darfur Though the region of Darfur is relatively peaceful at this time, a small portion of Jebel Marra within Darfur continues to be intermittently (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2016 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.