Home | Press Releases    Wednesday 22 April 2015

Sudan’s 2015 Elections: A huge step in democratic consolidation

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN 3 CLEVELAND ROW, ST.JAMES’S LONDON SW1A 1DD TEL: 020-7839 8080

PRESS AND INFORMATION RELEASE (2/2015)

Sudan’s 2015 Elections: A Huge Step in Democratic Consolidation

AU and AL observers witness proof of the will of voters.

At a time in which most of Sudan’s neighbours and the wider region suffer from conflict, instability and terrorist bloodshed, the Government of one of the few oases of reasonable stability, Sudan, embarked on its first constitutionally stipulated democratic consolidation elections after the secession of South Sudan. Instead of appreciation and encouragement, the declared schedule of April 2015 elections was met with negative comments, some emanating from international actors whose questionable political assessments and analyses resulted in the current tragic events engulfing the whole region.

Anti-Elections rhetoric was raised several weeks before the elections actually took place. Speaking at Chatham House on 29 October last year, the leader of the Umma Party, explained that the elections would be rigged the way the 2010 elections were and held this as an excuse for boycotting the polls, ignoring the fact that the 2010 election brought about the widely recognised secession in South Sudan which raises questions about double-standards when it comes to Sudan policies. Several armed warlords issued statements threatening to stop the scheduled elections. Both the suspicion of rigging and the threat to disrupt turned out to be without foundation.

The bastion of African integrity, the African Union (AU) has again demonstrated African will and integrity. Its African Union Election Observation Mission (AUEOM) issued a statement on 17 April 2015 documenting the adequacy of polling stations. It added “The Mission notes that the polling process was generally peaceful save for a few security incidents reported elsewhere. The mission therefore commends the people of Sudan for their peaceful conduct”. It concluded “Everything taken together, the African Union Election Observation Mission (AUEOM) reached the conclusion that the results of the election would reflect the expression of the will of the voters of Sudan”.

No “rigging” recorded; but security incidents, a reference to the killing of four citizens by the random shelling that has failed to impede the electoral process.

The African Union Election Observation Mission (AUEOM) called on the Sudanese political leaders “to strive for genuine and inclusive national dialogue after the elections”.

This was the declared position of the government when the opposition stalled the National Dialogue by obstructive declarations (Paris, Berlin and Addis Ababa).

The Arab League’s (AL) 40 observers travelled to all States of the country during the elections. They stated that the elections were carried out “transparently and in accordance with international standards”.

Other international bodies, whose bias was clear in their refusal even to send observers, have criticised the elections (without indicating an alternative). The claim that unrest in some isolated peripheries reduces the validity of elections does not hold water; because Northern Ireland suffered serious “troubles” for decades and that didn’t stop UK elections. The Sudan itself-before secession-held several elections despite the second civil war.

As far as the low turn-out is concerned, the phenomenon is not only Sudanese. The membership of all major parties in the UK is about 1% of the electorate and a suggestion has even been floated to make voting compulsory for first time voters to overcome this voter apathy.

Especially disappointing was the statement by the Troika (Norway, UK, USA) (dated 20 April 2015) whose members have been financially and diplomatically supportive in brokering the CPA and helping the Sudan during the transitional period until the peaceful secession of South Sudan.

Unlike the African Union’s statement, the terse Troika statement made no mention of the list of positive features of the electoral process. It “regretted” the government’s policies but shied away from openly condemning the terrorist attacks by SPLM-N that resulted in killing four citizens in South Kordofan, but failed to derail the voting. Terrorists seem to be immune from censor or condemnation. No wonder; their food supply is clandestinely provided by some of those who claim to be offering only humanitarian aid.

However, the Troika’s statement did end on a positive note that echoes the AU’s call for resumption of the inclusive national dialogue.

The 2015 elections were a triumph for the consolidation of democracy in the Sudan. There seems to be a consensus that the new government, when it is formed should continue the inclusive national dialogue as has already been promised before the elections were held in the country which is a relative oasis of stability in a turbulent area.

Media Office
London
21st April 2015

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


What options are available for President Bashir of Sudan? 2019-01-20 21:43:26 By Luka Kuol Sudan is one of the few African countries whose citizens pioneered post-independence popular uprisings in 1964 and 1985 that forced the ruling military regimes to step down. The (...)

Tasgut Bass is the buzzword and a slogan of the Sudanese uprising 2019-01-20 21:38:57 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman This article comes against the background of the progressive escalation of the Sudanese popular revolution, despite the use of the regime of Omer al-Bashir of the lethal (...)

Sudan’s uprising is putting the future of al-Bashir’s rule at stake 2019-01-18 01:30:38 By Adil Babikir The buzzword in Sudan these days is tasgut bass. The catchphrase, which translates into “you must go, no matter what”, is echoing in demonstrations across the country calling on (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


Ethnic Murle politicians say enough to cattle raiding 2018-12-28 09:32:00 December 27, 2018 (JUBA) - Murle political leaders in Buma state have vowed to end the practice of cattle raiding and child abduction by individuals in the community. Jodi Jonglei, who is also (...)

CEPO: South Sudan Opposition Alliance (SSOA): Stop politics of split and focus on R-ARCSS implementation 2018-12-26 09:53:29 26th December, 2018. South Sudan Opposition Alliance internal leadership change frication is disturbing and demoralizing public opinion. The big question CEPO is raising, will SSOA be a strong (...)

Progress observed at end of second month of R-ARCSS implementation 2018-10-22 06:44:02 Press Release 21 October 2018 South Sudanese government released 24 detainees in the implementation of the revitalized peace agreement said the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.