Home | Comment & Analysis    Saturday 30 August 2014

An Alternative National Dialogue: Sudan’s last chance for sustainable peace and Unity


By Suliman Baldo

August 29, 2014 — Last week, with much fanfare and renewed hope on the part of Sudanese citizens, the African Union High Implementation Panel (AUHIP) for Sudan and South Sudan, led by President Thabo Mbeki, travelled to Khartoum to hold consultations with a broad range of stakeholders on the so-called national dialogue. President Mbeki and his team arrived just in time, coming as they did right on the heels of the ruling party’s announcement on 16 August of the long-awaited roadmap for the national dialogue process. Yet, even with this roadmap, and the National Congress Party’s (NCP) new insistence on its readiness to involve opposition groups, including armed movements, in the dialogue, the AUHIP and other international actors need to remain vigilant in their own insistence that political will is evidence-based and can only be measured by acts. Recent events have proven yet again that the government is serious neither about providing a political environment that encourage free participation nor about allowing a dialogue that ensures a comprehensive political solution. Not only has the violence in Darfur, Blue Nile, and South Kordofan increased, as a result of the government’s continued aerial bombardments and attacks by its allied militias on civilians, but violations against basic freedoms in Khartoum and other urban centres have multiplied.

Yet, the roadmap outlines a national dialogue process that would span only one to three months. It is no coincidence then that this timeframe would allow for a process that conveniently concludes in time for the ruling parties and its junior governing allies to go into the April 2015 elections, the timetable of which was also recently announced, with some understanding of power sharing and a veneer of legitimacy.

Conscious of the NCP dialogue’s glaring limitations, leading political actors, including armed movements, the opposition groups allied under the National Consensus Forces (NCF), and civil society are increasingly jointly calling for an alternative dialogue, one that is genuinely inclusive and comprehensive, and conducted in accordance with the best international practices. In the most recent significant development, the National Umma Party (NUP), one of Sudan’s largest opposition parties, having walked out of the national dialogue, forged a new grouping with the armed movements that make up the Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF), in what has come to be called the Paris Declaration.

Not only did the Paris Declaration revitalize the debate about the national dialogue but it also clearly threatened the political position of the ruling party and its allies, old and new, who emphatically rejected the Declaration quickly after it was announced. The Declaration itself calls for a unilateral cessation of hostilities in order to permit humanitarian access to war victims, and ensures the SRF’s engagement in a comprehensive national dialogue, provided that certain requirements for such a dialogue are met, such as the enforcement of fundamental rights and freedoms, and the release of political prisoners and detainees.

It is into these rapidly evolving internal dynamics that the AUHIP landed last week. This will only complicate matters for President Mbeki and his team, who continue to face their own challenges and capacity limitations. Up to now, the AUHIP’s engagement, in its capacity as lead mediator for the conflict in the Two Areas of South Kordofan and Blue Nile, has largely been limited to parties to the conflict. While in this latest visit, the AUHIP welcomed the views of representatives of youth and civil society groups on the national dialogue, there continues to be a glaring omission when it comes to the AUHIP’s engagement with the millions of victims in the conflict areas of Sudan, whose voices remain absent in national discourse. This despite the fact that President Mbeki, during his first mandate in Sudan with the 2009 AU High Panel for Darfur (AUPD), travelled to IDP and refugee camps and heard the views of victims on how to bring peace back to Darfur without sacrificing the demands of justice and reconciliation. The AUPD also held town hall style meeting with civil society and professional groups on a broad range of issues, including the institutional reforms that Sudan remains in desperate need of. The Sudanese miss this type of inclusive, assertive approach, and the question remains whether the AUHIP will fulfil the AUPD’s promise. As momentum for national dialogue advances, the AUHIP must instil urgency in its mediation and other efforts if it is to regain the trust of the Sudanese people.

In the end, though, any alternative national dialogue must be Sudanese-led. The Sudanese must together build the agenda and mechanisms for the national dialogue – it cannot be driven by one party inviting others. As the Sudan Democracy First Group outlines in its most recent publication, National Dialogue in Sudan: Past Experiences and Current Challenges, any such alternative national dialogue must be supported by a conducive environment, including a nation-wide cessation of hostilities, unhindered humanitarian access to all conflict-affected civilians, and basic democratic civil and political rights; genuinely Sudanese-led; holistic in scope addressing all the conflicts and their root causes across different geographic areas; inclusive of the full range of Sudanese society, including geographic, political and social diversity; accountable and open to the Sudanese public; and built around nationally-owned mechanisms for justice and reconciliation.

Such an alternative dialogue is the only chance Sudan has left for lasting peace and unity.

Suliman Baldo is the executive director of the Sudan Democracy First Group.

The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

Comment on this article


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Musa Hilal’s "Awakening": Khartoum’s worst nightmare? 2015-04-22 06:33:05 By the Sudan Democracy First Musa Hilal, once one of the principal commanders of the Janjaweed militias which supported the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) in the 2003/04 ethnic cleansing campaign in (...)

A brief history one man’s destructive misrepresentations 2015-04-18 08:07:54 By Eric Reeves Al Jazeera America is currently airing a two-part documentary that attempts to represent the character and causes of the catastrophe that has overtaken South Sudan following the (...)

Sudan’s election marred by arbitrary detention, and insecurity 2015-04-18 06:31:10 By African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies Sudan’s national general elections began on 13 April 2015. Scheduled to end on 15 April, they were extended one day by the National Elections (...)


Latest Press Releases

Sudan’s 2015 Elections: A huge step in democratic consolidation 2015-04-22 13:12:25 EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN 3 CLEVELAND ROW, ST.JAMES'S LONDON SW1A 1DD TEL: 020-7839 8080 PRESS AND INFORMATION RELEASE (2/2015) Sudan’s 2015 Elections: A Huge Step in Democratic (...)

Sudanese security arrest rights defender Adil Bakheit 2015-04-18 08:04:21 FRONT-LINE DEFENDRSPress StatementSudan Human rights defender Adil Bakheit arrested Human rights defender Mr Adil Bakheit was arrested on 16 April 2015 by the National Intelligence and Security (...)

Which do you choose? Peace or War? 2015-04-18 06:16:42 To the South Sudanese Diaspora Which do you choose? Peace or War? Coalition of Advocates for South Sudan, April 11, 2015 “The Voice of the South Sudanese Diaspora” Who are/What is the South (...)


Copyright © 2003-2015 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.