Home | News    Saturday 9 August 2014

S. Sudan political parties object to the restriction of peace talks


August 8, 2014 (JUBA) – South Sudanese political parties have objected to a proposal seeking to limit ongoing peace talks between the country’s two conflicting parties, accusing the warring sides of adopting a divisive approach to resolving the conflict.

JPEG - 11.9 kb
Lam Akol who heads the opposition SPLM-DC party (splm-dc)

Lam Akol, the leader of all South Sudanese opposition parties, said the latest round of talks in the Ethiopian capital, was convened with the full understanding that all parties have agreed on a multi-stakeholder roundtable peace talks as the format to bring about just and sustainable peace to the war in the country.

“Little did the South Sudanese know that the warring parties were up again at their delaying tactics while our people continue to die daily as a result of the war they have imposed on the South Sudanese for nothing other than fighting over power”, Akol said in a statement Sudan Tribune obtained.

The opposition leader insisted that Sudan People’s Liberation in opposition delegation demanded that negotiations with their government counterparts take place without direct participation of other stakeholders.

On its part, however, the government delegation said it would not take part in any meeting of stakeholders that excludes the opposition.

“The position of the government delegation became clearer on Wednesday when the Leader of their delegation delivered a letter to the special envoys that they be given opportunity to engage with SPLM/A-I-O delegation and that whatever they agree on need not be reported to the plenary of all the stakeholders as contained in the summary consensus on the format and agenda of the talks,” said Akol.

“In other words, the government delegation has back-tracked from its position a day earlier and come out clearly against multi-stakeholders format”, added the opposition leader.

He accused the rival warring parties of adopting divisive approach to resolving the conflict he said was imposed on the people and the country over power struggle within the ruling party.

“By insisting on bilateral talks between them, the two warring parties are in effect dividing the people of South Sudan into first class and second class citizens in determining their future. The two parties are arrogating to themselves the right to decide on behalf of the people simply because they carry guns, and those who do not are to accept their whims,” the opposition leader stressed in his statement.

It adds, “We totally reject this misguided notion. We believe that South Sudan belongs to all its citizens and all of them have a fundamental right to be part of any process that shapes the future of their country”.

According to Akol, the necessity for participation of the other stakeholders in the talks because the problem being discussed did not start on the 15th of December 2013 but that was just a spark.

“The problems are deeply rooted in the way this land mass called South Sudan was misgoverned since 2005. Both parties to the current armed conflict and the resulting crisis were together in charge for eight years since then, and it is an abuse to the intelligence of our people for them to think that they alone can be trusted to sort out the mess they created”, he argued.

He however maintained that the way forward was to adhere to the multi-stakeholder roundtable format as the only way to conduct the talks and ensure that talks are convened immediately with the stakeholders who are ready to take part.

“We must all together demonstrate our resolve that South Sudan will not and cannot be held at ransom by anybody, group of people or party. Our people are yearning for peace and peace they deserve and must get. As political parties, we shall spare no effort to see that the IGAD mediation is crowned with success”, he stressed.


Meanwhile rebels led by former vice-president Riek Machar refuted “assertion” by the mediators that the group had backtracked from their commitment to the inclusive stakeholders peace process, saying this was a mere “misrepresentation”.

In a press statement by the rebels’ information and public relations chairperson, Mabior Garang de Mabior released on Wednesday, the opposition group reiterated their position for direct bilateral negotiations with the government.

The mediators, in a press release issued on 5 August, announced that the SPLM/A in opposition failed to attend the peace talks and urged them to return to the negotiation table.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 9 August 09:27, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    Dr Lam Akol is 100% right. The people of South Sudan expect nothing less than an agreement made by all representatives of South Sudan parties. The two warring parties are part of those parties that need to be present in deliberation of the problem of our country. Lam expose to the world what these people are really fighting for. We do not see anymore lies and bloodshed.

    repondre message

    • 9 August 13:04, by Wicdail

      Telling me which armed conflict has ever been achieved through such format installed by M7 influence? How come they don’t listen to concern group? Dr Lam shouldn’t cry out there, he could have been the interim leader if he could stand firm as opposition leader. When did he become independent opposition leader? While he was been fascinated by Kirr’s regime and became of part of its delegations.LOOL

      repondre message

      • 10 August 06:09, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

        Mr Wicdail,

        This war should not be a way to plunder the top political leadership of the country. It should be about instituting a correct governance to the people where freedom, justice, and independence become the cornerstone of foundation of our country. It should not be only about Kiir, Riek and Lam Akol. South Sudan lives long after the three disappear from the planet. it is about the future.

        repondre message

  • 9 August 17:15, by Realist

    Dr. Lam is right. This mess was created by both Kiir and Machar. They shouldn’t be allow to decide the fate of others alone.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Referenda in Scotland and South Sudan told a tale of two cities 2014-09-21 06:01:02 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman September 20, 2014 - This article comes against the backdrop of the referendum in Scotland and southern Sudan in the years 2014 and 2011, respectively, and the result was (...)

Undermining South Sudanese expertise’s is ironical! 2014-09-19 10:15:59 By Peter Gai Manyuon September 18, 2014 - The recent order from the Ministry of Labor and Public Service in the Republic of South Sudan that was issued on 16th of September 2014 is absolute (...)

Sudan - Colliding interests 2014-09-16 10:04:11 By Mohamed Elshabik September 15, 2014 - Sudan seems to be unconcerned by the current political crisis in the region. Amid a prognosis of full-scale war in South Sudan, unrest in Egypt, chaos in (...)


Latest Press Releases

Sudan Democracy First Group: Art as resistance – art as resilience 2014-09-09 12:34:15 Sudan Democracy First Group Art as Resistance – Art as Resilience September 8, 2014 - To mark the third anniversary of the resumption of civil war in Blue Nile and Nuba Mountains/South Kordofan, (...)

Sudan: Those behind unlawful killings and torture of protesters must be brought to justice 2014-09-03 13:13:43 Amnesty International Sudan: Those behind unlawful killings and torture of protesters must be brought to justice The brutal suppression of protest in Sudan must end, and members of the security (...)

National Dialogue in Sudan: Past experiences and current challenges 2014-08-27 06:18:22 Sudan Democracy First Group (SDFG) Since independence, Sudan has undergone a number of national peace agreements, some of which were observed and honored for short periods, others which were (...)


Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.