Home | News    Saturday 9 August 2014

S. Sudan political parties object to the restriction of peace talks


August 8, 2014 (JUBA) – South Sudanese political parties have objected to a proposal seeking to limit ongoing peace talks between the country’s two conflicting parties, accusing the warring sides of adopting a divisive approach to resolving the conflict.

JPEG - 11.9 kb
Lam Akol who heads the opposition SPLM-DC party (splm-dc)

Lam Akol, the leader of all South Sudanese opposition parties, said the latest round of talks in the Ethiopian capital, was convened with the full understanding that all parties have agreed on a multi-stakeholder roundtable peace talks as the format to bring about just and sustainable peace to the war in the country.

“Little did the South Sudanese know that the warring parties were up again at their delaying tactics while our people continue to die daily as a result of the war they have imposed on the South Sudanese for nothing other than fighting over power”, Akol said in a statement Sudan Tribune obtained.

The opposition leader insisted that Sudan People’s Liberation in opposition delegation demanded that negotiations with their government counterparts take place without direct participation of other stakeholders.

On its part, however, the government delegation said it would not take part in any meeting of stakeholders that excludes the opposition.

“The position of the government delegation became clearer on Wednesday when the Leader of their delegation delivered a letter to the special envoys that they be given opportunity to engage with SPLM/A-I-O delegation and that whatever they agree on need not be reported to the plenary of all the stakeholders as contained in the summary consensus on the format and agenda of the talks,” said Akol.

“In other words, the government delegation has back-tracked from its position a day earlier and come out clearly against multi-stakeholders format”, added the opposition leader.

He accused the rival warring parties of adopting divisive approach to resolving the conflict he said was imposed on the people and the country over power struggle within the ruling party.

“By insisting on bilateral talks between them, the two warring parties are in effect dividing the people of South Sudan into first class and second class citizens in determining their future. The two parties are arrogating to themselves the right to decide on behalf of the people simply because they carry guns, and those who do not are to accept their whims,” the opposition leader stressed in his statement.

It adds, “We totally reject this misguided notion. We believe that South Sudan belongs to all its citizens and all of them have a fundamental right to be part of any process that shapes the future of their country”.

According to Akol, the necessity for participation of the other stakeholders in the talks because the problem being discussed did not start on the 15th of December 2013 but that was just a spark.

“The problems are deeply rooted in the way this land mass called South Sudan was misgoverned since 2005. Both parties to the current armed conflict and the resulting crisis were together in charge for eight years since then, and it is an abuse to the intelligence of our people for them to think that they alone can be trusted to sort out the mess they created”, he argued.

He however maintained that the way forward was to adhere to the multi-stakeholder roundtable format as the only way to conduct the talks and ensure that talks are convened immediately with the stakeholders who are ready to take part.

“We must all together demonstrate our resolve that South Sudan will not and cannot be held at ransom by anybody, group of people or party. Our people are yearning for peace and peace they deserve and must get. As political parties, we shall spare no effort to see that the IGAD mediation is crowned with success”, he stressed.


Meanwhile rebels led by former vice-president Riek Machar refuted “assertion” by the mediators that the group had backtracked from their commitment to the inclusive stakeholders peace process, saying this was a mere “misrepresentation”.

In a press statement by the rebels’ information and public relations chairperson, Mabior Garang de Mabior released on Wednesday, the opposition group reiterated their position for direct bilateral negotiations with the government.

The mediators, in a press release issued on 5 August, announced that the SPLM/A in opposition failed to attend the peace talks and urged them to return to the negotiation table.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 9 August 2014 09:27, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

    Dr Lam Akol is 100% right. The people of South Sudan expect nothing less than an agreement made by all representatives of South Sudan parties. The two warring parties are part of those parties that need to be present in deliberation of the problem of our country. Lam expose to the world what these people are really fighting for. We do not see anymore lies and bloodshed.

    repondre message

    • 9 August 2014 13:04, by Wicdail

      Telling me which armed conflict has ever been achieved through such format installed by M7 influence? How come they don’t listen to concern group? Dr Lam shouldn’t cry out there, he could have been the interim leader if he could stand firm as opposition leader. When did he become independent opposition leader? While he was been fascinated by Kirr’s regime and became of part of its delegations.LOOL

      repondre message

      • 10 August 2014 06:09, by jur_likang_a_ likan’g

        Mr Wicdail,

        This war should not be a way to plunder the top political leadership of the country. It should be about instituting a correct governance to the people where freedom, justice, and independence become the cornerstone of foundation of our country. It should not be only about Kiir, Riek and Lam Akol. South Sudan lives long after the three disappear from the planet. it is about the future.

        repondre message

  • 9 August 2014 17:15, by Realist

    Dr. Lam is right. This mess was created by both Kiir and Machar. They shouldn’t be allow to decide the fate of others alone.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Sudan’s Civil Disobedience: Africa’s latest "Hashtag Revolution"? 2016-11-30 06:14:21 by Suliman Baldo November 29, 2016 “Because of the nature of the dictatorship we are under, you are forced to embrace the use of social media, . . . It’s not secure to try and use the tactics (...)

IGAD : why not a South Sudanese head? 2016-11-29 05:38:32 By Amb. Dhano Obongo Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), in Eastern Africa Community was formed in1996 succeed the Intergovernmental Authority on Drought and Development (IGADD) (...)

SLM Al-Nur to U.S. Booth: ’Negotiations by Khartoum are illusory’ 2016-11-28 15:46:50 ATTN: U.S. Special Envoy for Sudan and South Sudan; Ambassador Donald Booth by Abdul Wahid al-Nur Sir, Your calumnious editorial scapegoating me as the primary obstacle to peace in Darfur is so (...)


Latest Press Releases

Amnesty urges to investigate chemical weapons Sudan’s Jebel Marra 2016-10-12 12:52:01 Sudan: International chemical weapons investigation urgently needed into horrific Jebel Marra attacksAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL NEWSFLASH 11 October 2016 Sudan: International chemical weapons (...)

UNAMID JSR’s statement read to the media on peace in Darfur 2016-10-10 20:57:56 African Union United Nations Mission in Darfur Though the region of Darfur is relatively peaceful at this time, a small portion of Jebel Marra within Darfur continues to be intermittently (...)

Sudan: No justice for protester killings 2016-09-23 08:03:30 (Nairobi, September 22, 2016) – Sudanese authorities have yet to provide justice to victims of a violent crackdown on anti-austerity protesters in Khartoum in September 2013, the African Centre (...)


Copyright © 2003-2016 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.