Home | News    Wednesday 2 July 2014

S. Sudan faces dilemma over aid distribution routes in Upper Nile

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

July 1, 2014 (JUBA) – The South Sudanese government is in a bind over delivery of humanitarian assistance to rebel-held areas, with officials trading accusations over the selection of distribution routes used.

JPEG - 26.3 kb
Thousands have been killed and more than one million displaced since conflict broke out almost four months ago, in the worst violence to erupt post-secession (AFP)

Already, some officials at the ministry of humanitarian affairs and disaster management are being accused for allegedly diverting food rations to rebel-held areas in Upper Nile region.

“We are getting reports of the civilians in Ulang and Nasir counties crossing again to areas under the rebel control to access food because officials at the ministry of humanitarian affairs and disaster management, especially those involved in the coordination of relief assistances gave wrong information to the United Nations world food programme. I don’t understand why this happened? Kueth Kang Deng, who is the chairperson of the relief and rehabilitation commission (SRRC), seems to have not provided correct information about distribution routes and locations,” Gordon Buay, a former rebel official, told Sudan Tribune Sunday.

Buay said roads needed for delivery of the food rations from Malakal, the Upper Nile capital to the conflict affected displaced areas under the government control in the state have been opened for truck convoys and rivers are accessible for barges to deliver “emergency relief for people in need now”.

He accused the official of having failed to perform to the expectation of the displaced.

Upper Nile’s state governor Simon Kun Puoc, however, admitted that there were administrative issues his administration would like to settle with relevant officials and institutions involved in the coordination for the delivery of the humanitarian assistances to the displaced in the area.

“The government has done everything possible to facilitate easy movement of the delivery trucks areas under our control. What we want now is the provision of correct information by the concerned officials and institutions involved in the coordination for delivery of food rations to our people. We don’t want them to cross to the other side. We want the food rations and other relief items to be delivered directly to them in areas where they would be safe,” Puoc said on Tuesday.

"I mean where security would be provided by the government", he added.

Meanwhile, Nasir county commissioner, Dak Tap separately confirmed that civilians trapped in the rebels held areas in the region were getting humanitarian assistances, but that it was unclear whether the food goes to them or it was being diverted.

“As the government in the state and county we think it would be wise if we are involved in the coordination for the delivery of the relief assistances, especially delivery routes and in the selections of the location for distribution purposes because we know where our people are. Those involved in the coordination should actually get information from us so [that] correct information is obtained by relief organisations,” Tap said in an interview on Tuesday.

Sudan Tribune was unable to independently verify the veracity of the claims made over the diversion of the food rations after delivery in the rebels held areas, although several rebel officials dismissed the allegations, describing it as “mere political propaganda of the government supporters against their leadership”.

“This is not true. There is nothing like that. This is just a mere political propaganda by the government. We are actually concerned about the safety of our people and which is why they cross to the areas under our control because they feel safe. They get maximum protection with all their properties and other belongings,” Hussein Maar Nyuot, head of the opposition’s humanitarian committee, said.

President Salva Kiir and rebel leader Riek Machar met face to face in May for the first time since violence erupted more than six months ago, during which the two rival leaders held hands and prayed together in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia before signing the peace agreement.

The two principals pledged before regional leaders their readiness to cease all hostilities and open up humanitarian corridors. They also agreed that a transitional government offers the best chance to take the country forward. There were no immediate details on who would be part of the proposed interim administration.

Negotiations have dragged on for several months with little progress, while violence has killed thousands and displaced more than 1.2 million people.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


An Alternative National Dialogue: Sudan’s last chance for sustainable peace and Unity 2014-08-30 06:18:14 By Suliman Baldo August 29, 2014 — Last week, with much fanfare and renewed hope on the part of Sudanese citizens, the African Union High Implementation Panel (AUHIP) for Sudan and South Sudan, (...)

A critique of the IGAD protocol for peace in S Sudan 2014-08-30 05:53:03 “A critique of the IGAD protocol on agreed principles on transitional arrangements towards resolution of the crisis in South Sudan” By David de Chand August 29, 2014 - First and foremost of all, (...)

IGAD failure to delivering peace for South Sudan! 2014-08-30 05:43:48 By Jacob Odong August 29, 2014- The East African Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD) is concluding a plan to allow for what they are calling a unity government for South Sudan. If (...)


MORE








Latest Press Releases


National Dialogue in Sudan: Past experiences and current challenges 2014-08-27 06:18:22 Sudan Democracy First Group (SDFG) Since independence, Sudan has undergone a number of national peace agreements, some of which were observed and honored for short periods, others which were (...)

A new approach to the National Dialogue will stop war and lead to democracy in Sudan 2014-08-22 06:50:30 A New Approach to the National Dialogue in Sudan that will Stop the Wars, Address the Humanitarian Crisis and Lead to Democratic TransformationChatham House, London on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 (...)

Friends and Diaspora of South Sudan urge leaders to choose peace 2014-08-19 20:29:59 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Esther Sprague, Founder & Director, Sudan Unlimited 415.713.2495, esprague11@yahoo.com FRIENDS AND DIASPORA OF SOUTH SUDAN URGE LEADERS TO CHOOSE PEACE UNSC (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.