Home | News    Wednesday 25 June 2014

IGAD leaders may seek UN sanctions against S. Sudan rival leaders: opponent

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

June 25, 2014 (JUBA) – The Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD), the regional bloc mediating South Sudan peace talks aimed at ending the more than six-month-old conflict, may seek approval from the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to impose sanctions on the main SPLM rival factions to the conflict.

JPEG - 23.8 kb
African leaders at the IGAD heads of state and government meeting held in Nairobi, Kenya on 27 December 2013 (Photo: Larco Lomayat)

“It is clear that the two parties are the ones trying to prolong the conflict, by boycotting the talks on issues which could have been addressed while deliberations continue,” John Luk Jok, South Sudan’s former minister of justice, told Sudan Tribune on Wednesday.

The former detained SPLM leader said that “issues like the inclusivity can be raised as talks continue. Also the demand limiting the talk to the two parties contravene the two agreements, the May and the June agreements which provides participation of the other stakeholders in the roundtable negotiation”.

Jok said he and his group had a meeting Wednesday with the head of the IGAD mediation committee, Seyoum Mesfin, to register their readiness to participate in the talk as per the June agreement without any condition.

He revealed that the head of the mediation team will travel to New York in coming days to submit a report to the UNSC on the progress of the negotiations.

“We had a good meeting with the mediation team to clarify our position. We told them our readiness to participate in the talks without any condition in accordance with the May and June agreements. We stressed to them the need to expedite the peace process so that it ends the suffering of our people,” Jok said.

Last Monday the mediators announced the indefinite adjournment of the peace talks following the boycott of the talks by SPLM/A In Opposition; to protest the exclusion of civil society organisations and faith-based groups who fled the country. They also said the selected groups are dominated by the pro-government societies.

But the mediation slammed the move and decided to postpone the talks.

“This is in contradiction to the 9 May 2014 agreement, as well as the 10 June 2014 communiqué, which provides for the inclusion and participation of other stakeholders in the negotiations for a new political dispensation in South Sudan,” said the mediation team on 23 June.

The mediators also explicitly stated that they would undertake consultations with the African Union and the UNSC and other friends and partners of South Sudan.

The mediation earlier this month gave a deadline of 60 days to the parties to finalise talks on the formation of a transitional government, or else face penalties for impeding the peace process.

Jok underlined there is a high possibility that sanctions will be imposed on parties to the conflict, depending on the recommendation of the mediators.

According to the former justice minister, the imposition of sanctions will depend on the report to be submitted by the chief mediator Seyoum Mesfin to the UNSC.

However, Jok did not express his thoughts on who could be targeted by these sanctions.

On 20 June, the ruling SPLM faction and the group of former detainees threatened to boycott the talks over the representation of the civil society groups. While the SPLM-in Opposition agreed to resume discussions, saying they have similar reservations.

However, it later appeared that the two camps changed their positions and it appeared the talks were boycotted by the faction of Riek Machar.

The former minister is one of the former political detainees who were held in Juba for more than a month over accusations of taking part in an alleged coup d’état against president Salva Kiir.

Last month the United States unilaterally imposed asset freezes against the commander of Kiir’s presidential guard, Marial Chanuong, and top rebel general Peter Gadet Yaak. The US government stated that it would attempt to seize any of their assets that came under control of its country’s banking system, and it also described the designation of those two leaders as only a “first step”.

In late April and May, French and US diplomats at the UNSC were reported to be considering a resolution to impose sanctions on South Sudanese leaders.

The SPLM in-Opposition criticised as “unnecessary” the decision by IGAD to adjourn the peace talks, saying instead the mediators should have responded to their concerns about the selection process of other stakeholders.

The opposition delegation boycotted the talks last Friday and Saturday over concerns that the non-governmental stakeholders at the talks – clergy, civil society and other political parties – were not representative of the country overall.

After the suspension of the talks on Monday, the deputy spokesman of SPLM-IO Mabior Garang de Mabior accused the IGAD of “backtracking” from the agreed agenda and framework for the talks. He said the opposition “fears that the mediation undermined inclusivity by presenting government-sponsored institutions as credible South Sudanese civil society organisations”.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 26 June 2014 00:48, by Ito

    Sanction is definitely an option but the rebel leaders should not be sanction as they are the victims of abuse by the government. President Salva Kiir and his cohorts should be sanction if IGAD really wanted to end this cycle of violence in south Sudan. Sanction those who fought against injustice would be unproductive. The oppressor is the government.

    repondre message

  • 26 June 2014 03:27, by Joseph

    Both Rebel and Government leaders shall be sanction, but rebel has nothing only govt shall be the loser. Kiir stupidly and propaganda known over the world and very soon his red line will return to him and die like Sadam Hessen of Iraq or Qadaffi of Libya.

    repondre message

    • 26 June 2014 04:15, by Moc Nyickedenloi

      I hate Kiir b,se he did not declare a war btn Dinka and Nuer so that nuers see their women and mothers raped, cattle looted,and houses burned down. By this time they would have been humble and talks would have been smooth. For a gov’t to be respected, it must to defeat the rebels first. Chadian president sold off oil and bought heavy weapons 4 fucking rebels until they became humble, our Damn Kir!

      repondre message

  • 26 June 2014 07:38, by Chol A.

    Mediators should not press our people and talks of sanction against South Sudan always. Who cares! There is no way South Sudan being panic with word of sanction, how long we fought war without this rebel tribes who are by then collaborated with north? I need that sanction to go ahead and who will win in this war and remain as South Sudan leader will be known and sanction can be lifted.

    repondre message

  • 26 June 2014 07:42, by Jalaby

    Do you remember what I told you before? I said the south will eventually be put under "International trusteeship" and green hats will soon rule the south!
    The south problem is much much bigger than CAR, Congo, Rwanda, Burundi, etc.. the south is big country very rich of ethnicity and clans!
    The south is hopeless case because it has no unique identity!

    repondre message

    • 26 June 2014 09:04, by Chol A.

      Jalaby there are tribalist fighting now going on in Darfur and rebels battling in East and southern side of Khartoum government, have you handle these issues? If you think South Sudan will be put under UN trustee than the same things will happen to North because trustee fall under fail state. If you know what "fail state" is, then both countries will be put under UN trustee like DRC and Car.

      repondre message

      • 26 June 2014 11:25, by Jalaby

        Chol A
        We don’t have rebel in Darfour but we do have few gangsters & bandits and our RSF broke their backbone!
        In addition,we don’t have foreign troops and mercenaries to defend the capital like Ugandans,JEM & SPLA-N who are fighting the rebel and without them Juba would have been fallen in rebel hands since the first week of this fighting!

        repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Democracy needs a free press 2015-05-03 21:49:33 By Ambassador Jerry Lanier, Every year on May 3, the world celebrates World Press Freedom Day to recognize the fundamental principles of press freedom; evaluate press freedom around the world; (...)

Victory and defeat in a battle do not constitute a loss of the war 2015-05-03 21:30:00 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman This article comes against the backdrop of the battle between the Janjaweed militia codenamed Rapid Support Forces (RSF) hired by the ruling regime of the National (...)

Musa Hilal’s "Awakening": Khartoum’s worst nightmare? 2015-04-22 06:33:05 By the Sudan Democracy First Musa Hilal, once one of the principal commanders of the Janjaweed militias which supported the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) in the 2003/04 ethnic cleansing campaign in (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


HRW calls to stop arbitrary detention in Sudan 2015-04-30 21:53:00 Sudan: Surge in Detention, Beatings, Around Elections Free Those Held Arbitrarily; Investigate Abuses (Nairobi, April 29, 2015) – Security forces in Sudan<https://www.hrw.org/africa/sudan> (...)

Sudan’s 2015 Elections: A huge step in democratic consolidation 2015-04-22 13:12:25 EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN 3 CLEVELAND ROW, ST.JAMES'S LONDON SW1A 1DD TEL: 020-7839 8080 PRESS AND INFORMATION RELEASE (2/2015) Sudan’s 2015 Elections: A Huge Step in Democratic (...)

Sudanese security arrest rights defender Adil Bakheit 2015-04-18 08:04:21 FRONT-LINE DEFENDRSPress StatementSudan Human rights defender Adil Bakheit arrested Human rights defender Mr Adil Bakheit was arrested on 16 April 2015 by the National Intelligence and Security (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2015 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.