Home | News    Wednesday 25 June 2014

IGAD leaders may seek UN sanctions against S. Sudan rival leaders: opponent

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

June 25, 2014 (JUBA) – The Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD), the regional bloc mediating South Sudan peace talks aimed at ending the more than six-month-old conflict, may seek approval from the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) to impose sanctions on the main SPLM rival factions to the conflict.

JPEG - 23.8 kb
African leaders at the IGAD heads of state and government meeting held in Nairobi, Kenya on 27 December 2013 (Photo: Larco Lomayat)

“It is clear that the two parties are the ones trying to prolong the conflict, by boycotting the talks on issues which could have been addressed while deliberations continue,” John Luk Jok, South Sudan’s former minister of justice, told Sudan Tribune on Wednesday.

The former detained SPLM leader said that “issues like the inclusivity can be raised as talks continue. Also the demand limiting the talk to the two parties contravene the two agreements, the May and the June agreements which provides participation of the other stakeholders in the roundtable negotiation”.

Jok said he and his group had a meeting Wednesday with the head of the IGAD mediation committee, Seyoum Mesfin, to register their readiness to participate in the talk as per the June agreement without any condition.

He revealed that the head of the mediation team will travel to New York in coming days to submit a report to the UNSC on the progress of the negotiations.

“We had a good meeting with the mediation team to clarify our position. We told them our readiness to participate in the talks without any condition in accordance with the May and June agreements. We stressed to them the need to expedite the peace process so that it ends the suffering of our people,” Jok said.

Last Monday the mediators announced the indefinite adjournment of the peace talks following the boycott of the talks by SPLM/A In Opposition; to protest the exclusion of civil society organisations and faith-based groups who fled the country. They also said the selected groups are dominated by the pro-government societies.

But the mediation slammed the move and decided to postpone the talks.

“This is in contradiction to the 9 May 2014 agreement, as well as the 10 June 2014 communiqué, which provides for the inclusion and participation of other stakeholders in the negotiations for a new political dispensation in South Sudan,” said the mediation team on 23 June.

The mediators also explicitly stated that they would undertake consultations with the African Union and the UNSC and other friends and partners of South Sudan.

The mediation earlier this month gave a deadline of 60 days to the parties to finalise talks on the formation of a transitional government, or else face penalties for impeding the peace process.

Jok underlined there is a high possibility that sanctions will be imposed on parties to the conflict, depending on the recommendation of the mediators.

According to the former justice minister, the imposition of sanctions will depend on the report to be submitted by the chief mediator Seyoum Mesfin to the UNSC.

However, Jok did not express his thoughts on who could be targeted by these sanctions.

On 20 June, the ruling SPLM faction and the group of former detainees threatened to boycott the talks over the representation of the civil society groups. While the SPLM-in Opposition agreed to resume discussions, saying they have similar reservations.

However, it later appeared that the two camps changed their positions and it appeared the talks were boycotted by the faction of Riek Machar.

The former minister is one of the former political detainees who were held in Juba for more than a month over accusations of taking part in an alleged coup d’état against president Salva Kiir.

Last month the United States unilaterally imposed asset freezes against the commander of Kiir’s presidential guard, Marial Chanuong, and top rebel general Peter Gadet Yaak. The US government stated that it would attempt to seize any of their assets that came under control of its country’s banking system, and it also described the designation of those two leaders as only a “first step”.

In late April and May, French and US diplomats at the UNSC were reported to be considering a resolution to impose sanctions on South Sudanese leaders.

The SPLM in-Opposition criticised as “unnecessary” the decision by IGAD to adjourn the peace talks, saying instead the mediators should have responded to their concerns about the selection process of other stakeholders.

The opposition delegation boycotted the talks last Friday and Saturday over concerns that the non-governmental stakeholders at the talks – clergy, civil society and other political parties – were not representative of the country overall.

After the suspension of the talks on Monday, the deputy spokesman of SPLM-IO Mabior Garang de Mabior accused the IGAD of “backtracking” from the agreed agenda and framework for the talks. He said the opposition “fears that the mediation undermined inclusivity by presenting government-sponsored institutions as credible South Sudanese civil society organisations”.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 26 June 00:48, by Ito

    Sanction is definitely an option but the rebel leaders should not be sanction as they are the victims of abuse by the government. President Salva Kiir and his cohorts should be sanction if IGAD really wanted to end this cycle of violence in south Sudan. Sanction those who fought against injustice would be unproductive. The oppressor is the government.

    repondre message

  • 26 June 03:27, by Joseph

    Both Rebel and Government leaders shall be sanction, but rebel has nothing only govt shall be the loser. Kiir stupidly and propaganda known over the world and very soon his red line will return to him and die like Sadam Hessen of Iraq or Qadaffi of Libya.

    repondre message

    • 26 June 04:15, by Moc Nyickedenloi

      I hate Kiir b,se he did not declare a war btn Dinka and Nuer so that nuers see their women and mothers raped, cattle looted,and houses burned down. By this time they would have been humble and talks would have been smooth. For a gov’t to be respected, it must to defeat the rebels first. Chadian president sold off oil and bought heavy weapons 4 fucking rebels until they became humble, our Damn Kir!

      repondre message

  • 26 June 07:38, by Chol A.

    Mediators should not press our people and talks of sanction against South Sudan always. Who cares! There is no way South Sudan being panic with word of sanction, how long we fought war without this rebel tribes who are by then collaborated with north? I need that sanction to go ahead and who will win in this war and remain as South Sudan leader will be known and sanction can be lifted.

    repondre message

  • 26 June 07:42, by Jalaby

    Do you remember what I told you before? I said the south will eventually be put under "International trusteeship" and green hats will soon rule the south!
    The south problem is much much bigger than CAR, Congo, Rwanda, Burundi, etc.. the south is big country very rich of ethnicity and clans!
    The south is hopeless case because it has no unique identity!

    repondre message

    • 26 June 09:04, by Chol A.

      Jalaby there are tribalist fighting now going on in Darfur and rebels battling in East and southern side of Khartoum government, have you handle these issues? If you think South Sudan will be put under UN trustee than the same things will happen to North because trustee fall under fail state. If you know what "fail state" is, then both countries will be put under UN trustee like DRC and Car.

      repondre message

      • 26 June 11:25, by Jalaby

        Chol A
        We don’t have rebel in Darfour but we do have few gangsters & bandits and our RSF broke their backbone!
        In addition,we don’t have foreign troops and mercenaries to defend the capital like Ugandans,JEM & SPLA-N who are fighting the rebel and without them Juba would have been fallen in rebel hands since the first week of this fighting!

        repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


World’s newest nation has unprecedented opportunity to end sexual violence in conflict 2014-10-17 21:34:44 By Zainab Hawa Bangura October 17, 2014 - As United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) on Sexual Violence in Conflict, I completed my first trip to South Sudan last (...)

Celebrate the golden jubilee of the October 1964 Sudanese revolution 2014-10-17 21:34:32 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman October 17, 2014 - Despite the dearth and lack of what needs celebration and rejoice in the reign of the National Congress Party (NCP) regime led by the tyrant genocidal (...)

Sudan, Iran, the Obama Administration, and Khartoum’s political vision" 2014-10-16 09:05:01 More about what we learn from the leaked minutes of the August 31 meeting bringing together Khartoum's most senior military and security officials By Eric Reeves October 15, 2014 - The document (...)


MORE








Latest Press Releases


Sudan Democracy First Group condemns wave of arbitrary arrests in Sudan 2014-09-25 05:17:35 Sudan Democracy First Group 25 September 2014 - In a desperate attempt to prevent a series of events commemorating the victims of the September 2013 protests, Sudan’s notorious National (...)

HRW calls on UN rights body to press Sudan to investigate murder of peaceful protesters 2014-09-24 21:24:09 Human Rights Watch One Year On, No Justice for Protester Deaths (Geneva, September 23, 2014) – The United Nations Human Rights Council should call on Sudan to account immediately for the death (...)

Hundreds walk for peace in South Sudan 2014-09-23 08:30:16 National Platform for Peace and Reconciliation (NPPR) PRESS RELEASE Juba, 21 September 2014 - Hundreds of people took to the streets of the South Sudan capital Jubato ‘Walk for Peace’and demand (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.