Home | News    Thursday 10 April 2014

Khartoum dismisses Juba’s accusations of SAF military activity along borders


April 9, 2014 (KHARTOUM/JUBA) – The Sudanese government today rejected accusations by Juba of conducting “unusual movements” along the borders describing it as “lies”.

JPEG - 37.8 kb
Soldiers from the South Sudanesearmy (SPLA) point at a circling Antonov in the contested Sudanese border town of Heglig on 17 April 2012 (Photo: Getty)

On Tuesday, South Sudanese army (SPLA) spokesperson Colonel Philip Aguer told Sudan Tribune in an exclusive interview that such activities undermine regional stability and efforts to improve bilateral relations between the two countries.

Furthermore, the Unity state’s deputy governor Stephen Mabek Lang told Sudan Tribune in a separate interview on Tuesday that “there have been reports since last week from our forces about unusual movement of the Sudanese army along the border area, which is a clear evidence of [a] lack of respect and coercion and intimidation”.

Lang said his country would continue to respect the terms of a government agreement, but would not accept any revisions of the border line outside the previous agreement between the two countries.

“As the government we will continue to respect the terms of the agreements with the government of Sudan, especially the cooperation agreement, which was why our president visited Khartoum recently. It was to show the commitment of the government of the Republic of South Sudan,” Lang said.

“But now it is appearing that someone wants to redefine the boundaries by force, which is a clear violation of territorial integrity and sovereignty of another independent state,” he added.

Lang said several local sources in Pariang county witnessed Antonov bomber and MiG jets flying over the Panyang area between about 9am and noon (local time). He further claimed that Sudanese jet fighters dropped at least 10 bombs, destroying one car and forcing civilians to flee from Panyang to Pariang.

On Wednesday, South Sudan’s government officially accused Khartoum with which it contests the ownership of areas separating the two nations, of harbouring rebels fighting to depose president Salva Kiir, despite a cooperation agreement between the two sides.

“The rebels of Riek Machar have been carrying out attacks on the positions of the SPLA in Upper Nile for the last few days. They carried out attacks on the 6th and today on 9 April, in Kaka Tajaria. They carried out [the] attack aided by the militia group based in South Kordofan, which is against the cooperation agreement,” Aguer told Sudan Tribune on Wednesday.

He said the attack forced troops loyal to the government to “tactically withdraw” from the area.

“The attack on Baliet and Adong by the rebels of Riek Machar, who uses Galachel as the base of their operation and attacks comes from Sudan,” Aguer said in a statement broadcast by the state-owned South Sudan Television (SSTV) on Wednesday.

However, the spokesman for the Sudan Armed Forces (SAF), Colonel Al-Sawarmi Khaled Saad, hit back at Juba’s accusations, saying that Khartoum has been monitoring the ongoing war in South Sudan and that its position remains the same, in that it is seeking an end to the current crisis and to lay the foundations for security and stability with an emphasis on the legitimacy of Juba’s government.

In a statement released on Wednesday, Saad denied SAF troops had made hostile movements along the borders between the two countries.

He said the allegations had caught SAF by surprise and that the remarks by other South Sudanese officials included lies, describing the claims as implausible and lacking credibility.

“We affirm that we have [made] no movements toward the state of the South and there is no hostility nor war or deployments there, and we are more keen on advanced relations between the two countries, and we are awaiting for the positive outcome of the recent visit by South Sudan’s head of state to Sudan in order to further agreements of mutual cooperation between the two states,” the SAF spokesman said.

He added that Khartoum is also awaiting the fulfillment of promises made regarding the implementation of security arrangements to determine the zero line, opening of border crossings and the formation of joint monitoring mechanisms between the two countries to verify implementation of these agreements.

“However, we have not seen any implementation or response to implement these mechanisms on the part of [the]South Sudan state. We are still waiting for the reply which was promised during the recent visit of president Salva Kiir,” Saad said.

Violence erupted in the South Sudanese capital, Juba, in mid-December last year killing thousands and displacing more than a million people. President Kiir accused his former deputy Machar of instigating the violence, which the latter vehemently denied.

Prior to the South Sudanese conflict Juba and Khartoum agreed to normalise relations and to implement a cooperation agreement signed in 24 September 2012. The two countries have, however, failed to deploy a joint force to monitor the border due to differences over the baseline for the demilitarised security zone, known as the zero line.

The Sudanese president has maintained support for his South Sudanese counterpart since his visit to Juba on 6 January. However, the two countries denied they had agreed to sign a security agreement to deploy a joint force to protect South Sudan’s oil fields from rebel attacks.


- S. Sudan warns of “unusual movement” of Sudanese army in border areas

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 10 April 04:24, by tootke’bai-ngo


    repondre message

    • 10 April 07:55, by Tong dut

      It is a problem now to south sudanese, WHO ARE WE GOING TO FIGHT? Bashier or Riack Machar?
      Kiir is eclected president,creating war with his people and Arabs even.
      Soon MUSEVEN and Bashir are going to fight that Kiir soon.

      repondre message

  • 10 April 07:33, by mathem jech amer

    Kiir was in Khartoum yesterday, today accusing SAF, game after game, anyway Bashir is not interesting in fighting this time because is busy with his sickness which might result in death that is why he started softening his relationship with political parties

    repondre message

    • 10 April 08:25, by Bentiu son

      Kiir’s pro-SPLA,JEM,SPLA-N and Uganda Army UPDF are building troops on border between South Kordofan and Unity State priority to carry our offensive against Sudan Army Forces( SAF)in Nuba Mts.Kiir can not be trust he is double dealer one leg with Khartoum and one leg with Uganda.Salva Kiir recently visited President Beshir in Khartoum and betrayed him by reported all the minutes his husband M7.

      repondre message

  • 10 April 10:14, by 4Justice

    No wonder the beneficiaries [$$$] of Kiir’s self-enrichment project are reluctant to comment on this important thread. You see, to them getting their money from Salva [Milch Cow] is more far important than the Sovereignty and integrity of South Sudan. If the Taliban in Afghanistan were to extend their assistance to him, desparate Kiir will likely accept their offer without hesitation.

    repondre message

  • 10 April 12:01, by Konan

    Kiir visited Khartoum to persuade Bashir to send SAF under the disguise of protecting the oil fields, which technically means Sudan engagement in SS civil war. Sudan may not take part, but at same will never tolerate M7 presence on its border. Unfortunately, Kiir is playing a very very dangerous game.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Referenda in Scotland and South Sudan told a tale of two cities 2014-09-21 06:01:02 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman September 20, 2014 - This article comes against the backdrop of the referendum in Scotland and southern Sudan in the years 2014 and 2011, respectively, and the result was (...)

Undermining South Sudanese expertise’s is ironical! 2014-09-19 10:15:59 By Peter Gai Manyuon September 18, 2014 - The recent order from the Ministry of Labor and Public Service in the Republic of South Sudan that was issued on 16th of September 2014 is absolute (...)

Sudan - Colliding interests 2014-09-16 10:04:11 By Mohamed Elshabik September 15, 2014 - Sudan seems to be unconcerned by the current political crisis in the region. Amid a prognosis of full-scale war in South Sudan, unrest in Egypt, chaos in (...)


Latest Press Releases

Sudan Democracy First Group: Art as resistance – art as resilience 2014-09-09 12:34:15 Sudan Democracy First Group Art as Resistance – Art as Resilience September 8, 2014 - To mark the third anniversary of the resumption of civil war in Blue Nile and Nuba Mountains/South Kordofan, (...)

Sudan: Those behind unlawful killings and torture of protesters must be brought to justice 2014-09-03 13:13:43 Amnesty International Sudan: Those behind unlawful killings and torture of protesters must be brought to justice The brutal suppression of protest in Sudan must end, and members of the security (...)

National Dialogue in Sudan: Past experiences and current challenges 2014-08-27 06:18:22 Sudan Democracy First Group (SDFG) Since independence, Sudan has undergone a number of national peace agreements, some of which were observed and honored for short periods, others which were (...)


Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.