Home | News    Wednesday 19 March 2014

Security Council urges Sudan, S. Sudan to withdraw troops from Abyei


March 19, 2014 (KHARTOUM) – The UN Security Council (UNSC) has demanded that South Sudan and Sudan immediately withdraw their troops from Abyei, saying it has grave concerns over the volatile security and humanitarian situation in the contested oil-producing region.

JPEG - 24.9 kb
The United Nations Interim Security Force for Abyei (UNISFA) says the presence of armed elements from Sudan and South Sudan is causing further instability in the contested Abyei area, which is claimed by both countries (FILE)

The calls come after the council was briefed on the situation in Abyei by UN peacekeeping chief Hervé Ladsous in Luxembourg on 12 March.

In a separate report to the council last month, UN secretary-general Ban Ki-Moon said the United Nations Interim Security Force for Abyei (UNISFA) had confirmed the presence of more than 600 officers from the South Sudan army (SPLA) and national police service, while up to 150 Sudanese Oil Police were observed in the Diffra oil complex in northern Abyei and other areas.

The UNSC says the presence of armed groups is a clear violation of a 20 June 2011 agreement signed by both countries, which declared Abyei a weapons free area.

The agreement outlined temporary arrangements for the security and administration of Abyei, and stipulated the redeployment of all Sudanese and South Sudanese forces out of the area and the disarmament of militia elements.

However, UNISFA says several hundred South Sudanese security personnel, deployed to the area ahead of a unilateral referendum in October 2013 to decide the fate of the region, remain in Abyei.

It says some army and police units in the country had established military-type settlements and are heavily armed with AK-47 rifles and anti-tank rocket propelled grenades.

It says repeated requests to the South Sudan government to redeploy its forces have so far been ignored, with the heavy military presence posing a major security risk to the Arab Misseriya nomads migrating through the area.

Ban says the conflict in South Sudan is also directly impacting on Abyei. As both governments shift their focus to the crisis there, agreement negotiations have stalled, leading to increased tensions and a higher risk of violence in the region.

According to UNISFA, sporadic incidents involving unauthorised armed groups in the area had led to in civilian casualties and displacement, with the situation on the ground remaining unpredictable.

GIF - 25.4 kb
Map showing the lcoation of the contested Abyei region in relation to Sudan and South Sudan

“South Sudanese security personnel remain in the Abyei area and are obstructing the freedom of movement of UNISFA. Security incidents directly related to their deployment and aggressive posture have been reported. Their presence is a major security concern and is impeding the efforts of the force to maintain security,” Ban said in his report to the council.

On Monday, the SPLA claimed the Sudanese army (SAF) and their armed militia are planning to invade and take control of the contested border region of Abyei following repeated attempts to breach a buffer zone established by UNISFA.

A South Sudanese government official confirmed that Sudanese forces had attempted to enter from the west and east of Abyei, but had been repulsed on both occasions by UNISFA.

South Sudan says claims by Khartoum that its troops are active in Abyei is a political ploy designed to shift attention away from its own activities on the ground.

The UNSC, meanwhile, has reiterated calls for both Sudan and South Sudan to resume unconditional negotiations on the final status of Abyei and to commit to the establishment of a demilitarised border zone.

It also called on both countries to move forward with implementing pending aspects of the 2011 agreement, including the establishment of an area administration and council and police service.

The status of Abyei, which is considered strategically important to both Sudan and South Sudan for its oil resources and fertile agricultural land, has remained deadlocked after a planned referendum to decide the future of the region never went ahead due to disagreement over who was eligible to vote.

Khartoum is pushing for the Misseriya, who enter the area periodically to graze their cattle, to be allowed to take part, whereas Juba maintains that only the Ngok Dinka, as permanent residents of the area, are eligible vote.

In October last year, the Southern-aligned Ngok Dinka went ahead with a unilateral vote in which they almost unanimously opted to join South Sudan, although the results have not been formally recognised by either country.


Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 19 March 2014 08:04, by Mading Makuac

    It is this so called International community and UN that delays right of Abyi people. Referendum needed to be done once and for all.

    repondre message

  • 19 March 2014 08:33, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

    UNSC is mad, how come to pressure south sudan to withdraw troops from Abyei, while SPLA is not base in the region!
    UNSC is failed to solve Abyei issue better to be solve by AK47/AK24 by the owners of territory.

    repondre message

    • 19 March 2014 08:53, by Malakal county Simon

      Then Who will lead Abyie frontline, since all Dinkas are coward.... Or you meant UPDF and desperate Sudanese rebels mercenaries??

      repondre message

      • 19 March 2014 09:01, by Malakal county Simon

        No body or other tribes should die for Abyie apart from Dinka tribe, who have sold the Abyie to Arab in exchange of food.... Very shameful indeed!!!!

        repondre message

      • 19 March 2014 09:27, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

        Malakal C/S
        Dinkas will lead Abyei battllion like now in Abyei are Dinkas.
        #Malakal, the battllion base in Unity state is a Dinka led by santino Deng Wuol and Bor battllion is led by Malual Ayom Dor.
        Please, Dinkas are not coward, your suggestion is baseless.

        repondre message

        • 19 March 2014 16:36, by Bentiu son

          Ayuiu Makuac Lam,which Dinkas are you talking about? We Nuer are not fighting Dinka but East African forces imported by Salva Kiir to shielded Dinka and to protect his genocidal regime from being destroyed by Nuer warriors. If this war is bt Jieng vs Nuer it wouldn’t take one month leave alone 3 months by now.Hence,despite your regional conspiracy, Nuer will protect themselves from any aggression.

          repondre message

  • 19 March 2014 09:03, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

    US and UNSC are in scene of supporting terrorism in Africa, they are most terrorist on this plannet. Look, Repulic of Russia and Republic of Ukrain on Crimea disputed land" what happened? Is voted like Crimea voted to joined Russia on Sunday.
    Republic of South Sudan should reconsider the previous votes which Abyei was voted to join South Sudan.

    repondre message

Comment on this article

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

What federal system is suitable for South Sudan? 2019-11-12 11:06:55 By Dr Jacob K. Lupai* Introduction Federalism is seen as a constitutional arrangement for dividing power between different levels of government so that federated states, regions or provinces can (...)

Differences between Sudan government, SRF and FFC are the main issues of concern 2019-11-09 11:17:17 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman As the proverb goes, the difference of opinion does not spoil amity and does not spoil the friendliness issue. On the other hand, mere differences of point of view and (...)

Can women make the world more peaceful? 2019-11-06 11:31:03 By Paulino Akoon Yel Dut A genuine comprehensive analysis shows that involving women in peacebuilding increases the probability that violence will end in an easy manner. Hence we should thank (...)


Latest Press Releases

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.