Home | Comment & Analysis    Tuesday 4 March 2014

Irrationality of Dr. Riek’s rebellion and Addis Ababa talks

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By James Okuk

“Men will cease to commit atrocities only when they cease to believe in absurdities” – Voltaire.

March 3, 2014 - What does the attempted coup d’etat and the rebellion of Dr. Riek Machar and his group mean for South Sudan (the people, the government, the territory and the sovereignty) and the world at large? This is the essential question whose attempted answers attract many connections and conclusions, including this article.

However, the question of the failed coup in Juba does not any longer make sense even if we travel all over the world on expensive costs to sell it to the skeptics. It is a gone case because the coup has already failed.

What we should deal with now in a realistic manner is the on-going devastating Nuer rebellion against what they call Dinka government. This rebellion has been declared and is pursued under leadership of Dr. Riek and his allies who are now operating at large. It is being funded and defended by a good number of Nuer in Diaspora and with the help of their foreign friends. The rebellion will have slim chances to succeed on ‘defeat-victory’ premise since the Nuer and Dinka ethnic groups, in their anthropologies, are known of rejecting defeat and glorying victory only.

Beginning at the start:

But before getting into the substance, let me make sense of my previous prophetic opinion articles published on 8th July 2011 under the title “South Sudan Paradox: Joyful Independence, Sorry Leadership!” (http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article39483), on 10th October 2012 under the title: “To Office Managers of VP Dr. Riek Machar” (http://www.southsudannewsagency.com/opinion/columnists/to-office-managers-of-vp-dr-riek-machar), on 27th November 2013 under the title “Sudan and South Sudan: Tough Year Ahead in Politics of Power Monopoly” (http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article48971), and on 10th December 2013 under the title “Analysis of SPLM Rivalry Press Statements: Tough Choices Between History and Future” (http://www.southsudannation.com/analysis-of-splm-rivalry-press-statements-tough-choices-between-history-and-future/)

The first core quote: “with the good news of the declaration of the independence of the Republic of South Sudan kicking off on 9th July 2011, yet bad news of bad leadership from the SPLM and its military wing (the SPLA) remains the greatest concern locally, nationally, regionally and internationally…God have mercy on the poor people of South Sudan since their leaders are failing to protect them from harms!!!”

The second lead quote: “Everybody within the SPLM seems to be touched and you could see black signs of reactions written clearly on the grey wall. But for how long is this strange political culture going to continue before the SPLM split and splinter officially? Again, absurdity and uncertainty seems to have the reign, hence fear of resultant atrocities!”

The third main quote: “Pres. Salva Kiir knows that Dr. Riek has never helped but been working against him by not advising him well in many critical occasions... He was afraid to run in 2010 elections against Pres. Salva Kiir Mayardit, perhaps, because he has realized that democracy is higher than his (Dr. Riek’s) despotic and tribally magical mentality. Now it is too late for him and nothing but home is going to be the best place for him soon.”

The fourth essential quote: “Spilling the milk on dry sand and telling your leader to cry over it does not show sincerity and maturity in political statesmanship. The end result of such irresponsible culture and erratic behavior will be bitter divisions and ungrateful departures on toxic politics of lies, denials, fear, rage, retribution and malice …The solution is to give each rivaling Group of the SPLM a big mirror so that they can reflect on themselves from top to toe. Do they desire the common good of South Sudan or they love only power and wealth for themselves? Can somebody who loves his country wish it a bad luck of chaos, disorder, instability and abyss? ...Time for the SPLM is gone. It is the moment for South Sudan! End quotes.

The consequences of independence with bush mentality:

Indeed and with the evils that have engulfed the Republic of South Sudan due to the SPLM coup attempt on itself, it could be seen that my worries were not in vain. The fact that the SPLM and its SPLA military wing wanted to continue running South Sudan on bush and guerrilla mentality became the mother of all atrocious absurdities.

South Sudanese, especially Nuer, Dinka and Shilluk tribes, became preys of these unjustifiable atrocities that have never been witnessed in the known history of South Sudan. Akobo, Bentieu, Parieng, Bor, Leer, Malakal and many historical ethnic villages around them (Doleib Hill, Baliet, etc.,) got ruined to ashes and became ghosts and inhumane habitats within a shortest time unprecedented.

No good scenes any more in these territories accept apocalyptic memories of mass shootings, mass killings, mass graves, mass lootings, mass blazing, and mass displacement of the survivals by the trigger-happy illiterate youth hailing from Nuer and Dinka tribes. Unimaginable savagery destruction!

It has been observed that Dr. Riek and his allies within the SPLM wanted to push President Salva Kiir out of power for the reasons that he is too weak to handle the rampant corruption, recurrent insecurity, bad governance, inexistent foreign policy, Dutch-diseased economy and deformed SPLM political party. They have been preparing themselves to become the alternatives to the extent that President Kiir has been accusing them of running a parallel government within his government. What betrayed them is impatience and improper planning to oust Salva Kiir at the right time and without using wrong means of transfer of power.

Now Dr. Riek and his allies have missed the opportunity so badly that they have to disgracefully descend from governance palaces to the rebellion bushes of South Sudan. They have cultivated more seeds of hatred that will take longer time to weed out. I don’t know if they know that coming back from bush to presidency is not an easy ride under normal governance situation. In the rebellion wars the unlucky usually perish and the lucky take longer time to get back to civility.

Dr. Riek and his allies lost the sympathy of many of those who might have been supporting them if they did not resort to violence. They failed to understand that whoever kills and displaces innocent civilians in the name of power gains and victory is supposed to lose respect and legitimacy in politics immediately.

Comparatively, Mr. Salva Kiir is not losing much because he has already been recorded by history as the first President of the Republic of South Sudan. Even if he is out of power (alive or not) that known history shall remain in his advantage.

Given the well known fact-sheets about the SPLM’s top leadership conspiracies and rivalries for power monopoly, it could be concluded that Dr. Riek and his allies were the ones who put President Kiir into the catty corner he operated in. They wanted democracy within the SPLM but only after the resignation of their Chairman Kiir. If democracy is about open and free competition for leadership through elections why Dr. Riek and his allies did attempt to be dictators on resignation of Kiir while they claim to champion democracy?

Is it not negligence and senselessness when the SPLM/SPLA in government runs from the SPLM/A in opposition in the theatre of operation and leave the civilians alone to suffer in hospitals, churches, UNMISS compounds, etc.

Also is it not the height of hypocrisy from the so-called international friends of South Sudan (especially USA) to care more for the few political detainees, who are under protection rather than worrying about the suffering innocent civilians who are left alone to perish as victims?

It is known that the rebels are outlaws and are never accountable to the people; but what about the government? Who is really governing the government of South Sudan in this crisis, especially in Upper Nile State?

I think South Sudan is lucky to be South Sudan. Otherwise, resignations and dismissals would have been the order of the days since the time things fell apart within the SPLM ruling party!

Despite the crisis, President Kiir wants to maintain power based on the following roadmap: cessation of hostilities, humanitarian assistance, grand national political dialogue, investigation of aborted coup crimes and accountability, presidential pardons and amnesty to the guilty, national peace and reconciliation, government review and reforms, preparation for 2015 elections and re-organization of the SPLM ruling party. Will he be victorious or he shall be defeated in all these?

Cessation of hostilities that has never ceased the hostilities:

The peace talks in Addis Ababa between the Government of South Sudan and the rebels’ leaders have superseded SPLM internalization and localization, yet the SPLM is still sleeping in hangovers of a lost glory. Regional and international interests have already sneaked in with more sophisticated complications than simplifications.

The international community intensively pressured the two warring sides to sign initial agreement on secession of hostilities in terms of military confrontations (including progressive withdrawal of allied forces invited to the theatre of operations), negative media and propaganda campaigns, ethnic hatred propagation, killings and displacement of civilians (especially children, girls, women and elderly), human rights abuses, destruction of properties, attacking of civilians aircrafts and other means of transport, recruitment of child soldiers, humanitarian assistance access, burial of the dead and memorization, reunion of families and movements of the civilians and their goods. The other complimentary agreement acknowledged the role that the detainees can play (together with other political actors, civil society organizations, traditional and religious leaders) in the process of dialogue for peace and reconciliation in South Sudan after the war has been stooped.

All these terms of the agreements shall be noted by the Monitoring and Verification Mechanism, advised by the Technical Committee under the leadership of the IGAD.

However, the cessation of hostilities has been signed on the paper only; it is not working on the ground. The reason is that majority of the people of South Sudan and their leaders are absurdly complicated in their being rather than reasonably sophisticated in their thinking.

They have not thought that they could go to war with one another one day, hence, they have not been preparing for war.

They did not think that the military training they were getting was for killing themselves so badly than a neighboring enemy elsewhere.

They did not think that they could burn down their own cities and towns. They did not think that they could displace themselves and becomes refugees in more numbers than they used to be during the war with Khartoum regimes.

They did not imagine that they could sit opposite to each others as opponents mediated by foreigners for negotiations.

Now they did all these but they still don’t believe it. They propagate that they are one nation when they are not. Their loyalty to the independent South Sudan has become questionable? They are loyal to their tribal leaders. What a people!

Irrationality of Dr. Riek’s rebellion:

Dr. Riek and his allies wanted to remove President Salva Kiir from power, yet they are harming and destroying innocent civilians and their livelihoods so evilly.

Is Salva Kiir Pariang Dinka? Is Salva Kiir Bor Dinka? Is Salva Kiir Bailiet Dinka, Is Salva Kiir Shilluk people and kingdom? Has Salva Kiir left J-One in Juba to go hiding in these places so that Dr. Riek forces would have been justifying of committing untold atrocities on innocent civilians who did not know what went wrong with SPLM politicians in Juba?

With all what has happened, the healing shall not be easy. It shall not be safer any more for the Nuer to cross to the Shilluk and Dinka areas and vise versa. The binding fabric of South Sudanese people has been loosed terribly. Perhaps, Greater Equatoria is the only region where a little neutrality is left. What an unlucky people!

Dr. Riek’s rebellion has really exposed the ugly tribal bigotry and savagery realities in South Sudan based on absurdities of deceitful politics mixed with black magic. The savagery deeds of the White Army in Jonglei and Upper Nile States speak louder. This betrays Dr. Riek and the cronies more than they would have thought.

The end of Addis Ababa peace talks:

The Addis Ababa peace talks should not come back with the SPLM glory because South Sudan shall for a longer time be held hostage for no noble reason apart from greed and malice. A democratically elected dictator and killer does not make any special meaning of genuine democracy!

The peace talks should bring home the dignity of the people of South Sudan where they will choose the leaders who have no blood of innocent people in their hands. No more power and wealth rewards to heartless warlords. Those who are fueling Dr. Riek’s rebellion and contributing money for killings and destruction in his name should not be allowed to govern South Sudan.

It is time to punish killings, atrocities and human rights abuses that have been committed with impunity in South Sudan. In the first place ‘peace-first’ has been tried and even bought with money and power but it did not work. It is now time to try ‘justice-first’ without any fear or favor.

These should come out clearly in the IGAD declaration of principles that would constitute the basis for resolution of the current crisis, unjustifiably created by the SPLM for South Sudan.

“Know thyself” is the Socrates’ philosophic command that the people of South Sudan need to notice keenly from the current crisis and after it is over.

Call it SPLM in opposition or SPLM in resistance or SPLM in detention or whatsoever absurdity, the fact is that this former liberation movement has brought greatest shame to the Republic of South Sudan than expected.

The SPLM, hitherto, doesn’t deserve any future credit of legitimacy and dignity. This outdated dinosaur and its military wing must be laid to the rest of historical archives.

The good future of South Sudan should transcend beyond the evils of the SPLM/A. It is then, and only from then, will the Republic of South Sudan see in reality values called peace, harmony, justice and prosperity.

Dr. James Okuk is reachable at okukjimy@hotmail.com



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 4 March 07:32, by Mi diit

    James Okuk,
    You are the one who is always irrational and politically lost. Can you first explain to us how did your boss, Lam Akol, find himself in the lap of dictator Salva Kiir, whom you so belittled and hated to death? Riek Machar is a champion and courageous unlike you people who are mere opportunists. Riek is the one playing the right card, but you won’t understand it until next time...

    repondre message

    • 4 March 07:47, by Mi diit

      "Is Salva Kiir Pariang Dinka? Is Salva Kiir Bor Dinka? Is Salva Kiir Bailiet Dinka, Is Salva Kiir Shilluk people and kingdom? Has Salva Kiir left J-One in Juba to go hiding in these places so that Dr. Riek forces would have been justifying of committing untold atrocities on innocent civilians who did not know what went wrong with SPLM politicians in Juba?" Look at those silly questions by Okuk.

      repondre message

      • 4 March 07:52, by Mi diit

        James Okuk, with those above silly questions in your article you have proven to be narrow-minded PhD holder. When you Shilluk militias under Lam Akol attacked Shilluk kingdom, was there Salva Kiir? When SPLA used to attack Jekou, Nasir, Torit, Bor, Rumbek, Yei, etc, during the 21 years of war from 1983, were there Nimieri or Omer el Bashir as residents of those towns??? You are so silly James Okuk

        repondre message

        • 4 March 08:13, by mathem jech amer

          MI diit
          Okuk is meaning the areas Nuer fighters attacking are civilians places and killing only women and children. So is Riek and his allied Nuers fighting to kill civilians and fearing going to government places.

          repondre message

          • 4 March 20:34, by Mi diit

            Mathem whatever,
            Two of you are silly. Your militias and their husbands Ugandans were killing innocent Nuer civilians in Juba. Was there Riek Machar in Juba at the time of killings for days? Okuk’s militias attacked Shilluk kingdom many times. Don’t tell rubbish. The rebels attack Kiir’s soldiers who hide among civilians...

            repondre message

  • 4 March 07:35, by Akol Liai Mager

    Opp!! With your list of absudies, "Call it SPLM in opposition or SPLM in resistance or SPLM in detention or whatsoever absurdity", "And SPLM-DC too".

    repondre message

    • 4 March 10:45, by wacjak

      Dr Okuk, if SPLM something is the cause of all the suffering in SS, then would you mind to change your SPLM-DC’s name to something else coz your party killed people also in Upper Nile before joining the govt. No matter which ever name these people change to, it will not change realities on the ground. The problem in SS is not about names but about attitudes towards one another (tribes)

      repondre message

  • 4 March 10:33, by King of Nyamlel

    The illness in South Sudanese PhDs holders’ minds is an evaporation of educational pride, politico-ethnic and lack of political direction. Dr Okuk is happy because his mastersDinka and Nuer trouble themselves. Things will change.... remain preaching lies!

    repondre message

    • 4 March 11:02, by jijury

      James Okuk nyemai-da- der shame on you, Johnson Ulony and your Lam Akol for dragging Chollo people in to this mess. Nuer have intermarried with Shilluk even those children dying in Kodok, Wau Shilluk etc. a good number of them are Nuer kids. But Dinka Bahr Gazal tricked Ulony and your uncle to fight Nuer. You never listen to great advice from Maak Chollo warning chollo people to intervene

      repondre message

      • 4 March 15:58, by Adodi Jotuwa

        Dr. Okuk,
        You have tried to change the tone of your analysis because Shilluk is affected this time. Do you remember your past writings before and after attainment of your so-called PhD from Nairobi, Kenya? Do you really remember you writings against SPLM under leadership of Dr. John Garang and his successor Cde. Salva Kiir Mayardit?

        repondre message

        • 4 March 15:59, by Adodi Jotuwa

          What do you mean by this “A democratically elected dictator and killer does not make any special meaning of genuine democracy!” Some Nuer, Dinka and Shilluk were in bed with Khartoum during the war and interim period although Nuer top the list. Did we all PhD holders or intellectuals of South Sudan have to be in bed first with Khartoum in order to be able govern South Sudan democratically?

          repondre message

          • 4 March 15:59, by Adodi Jotuwa

            It’s SPLM/A that composed of all South Sudanese from all walks of life that librated this country not only PhD holders who shifted allegiance at their disposal, looking for leadership position only and later turn around to butcher whoever insight or non-member of his tribe for failing to join his senseless tribal war. Why do you describe the absurdity of Dr. Riek, leaving some PhD holders?

            repondre message

            • 4 March 16:00, by Adodi Jotuwa

              The problem of South Sudan is not SPLM/A, it’s power greed without considering where has South Sudan come from in the first place and where it’s heading regardless of some of the outstanding issues that remained to be resolved between Khartoum and Juba. Why do we have outstanding issues that are not implemented in the presence of PhD holders who are addicted to massacre?

              repondre message

              • 4 March 16:00, by Adodi Jotuwa

                The playing ground of democracy that some PhD holders are pulling up their tribal socks to contest for presidency is brought by the very SPLM/A that you tend to ignore and expect the majority of South Sudanese to do the same. It cannot happen. We learned the lessons from Anyanya One and Anyanya Two. That’s whyDr. John used a different approach to get South Sudan liberated.

                repondre message

                • 4 March 16:01, by Adodi Jotuwa

                  Cde. Salva Kiir is one of the only remaining founding fathers of South Sudan who needs to be supported in one way or another until outstanding orders are resolved whether they will be done under his leadership or not before the successor picks up from where he leaves. Dr. John Garang was able to unite SPLM/A although some joined Khartoum in 1991. Cde. Salva Kiir continued building that untiy.

                  repondre message

                  • 4 March 16:23, by Adodi Jotuwa

                    Does any PhD holder like Riek appreciate this unity or only after leadership position by mobilizing tribes at any cost to assume that position? Uniting people during war and after war/during peace time is not even easy to keep people united for the common purpose. Service delivery is one of the greatest expectations of South Sudanese people that need to be carefully managed.

                    repondre message

                    • 4 March 16:23, by Adodi Jotuwa

                      But some PhD holders see it one way traffic. If that leadership position is not given to him in a golden plate as he was already forgiven in Nairobi in 2002, blood must be shed in the name of democracy no matter whether the political climate is right or expedient; innocent civilians, elders, women or children pay the price. Now how many tribes besides some Nuer, who are blindly following Dr. Riek?

                      repondre message

                      • 4 March 16:24, by Adodi Jotuwa

                        Alfred Ladu Gore is well-known for his absurdity as you have put it. He does not represent all the Bari speakers and not more than fifteen people from Bari of his clan are there in the rebellion of Dr Riek and his associates. The application of justice system that you have pointed out in your analysis should have been applied since 2002 including those who followed suit under amnesty.

                        repondre message

                        • 4 March 16:24, by Adodi Jotuwa

                          In which country where any candidate (gubernatorial or parliamentary) fails elections for one reason or another resorts to rebellion? In which country where political leadership position is viewed from tribal lenses instead of other States where one’s tribe is not there? Only South Sudan. Because candidate hides behind his/her tribes instead of nation as you have indicated in your analysis.

                          repondre message

  • 4 March 17:04, by Kim Deng

    The other coward Jurs (Shilluk, Anyuak, Burun, Nyam-Nyam...) have only two choices, either to remain neutral and just watch the dirty war or join the coward Jaang/Slaves. The Mighty Nuer Warriors are capable of confronting those coward 60+ tribes in South Sudan.

    repondre message

    • 6 March 09:53, by Jewish Ally

      Kim
      I AM SORRY IF YOU TERM REASONABLE SOUTH SUDANESE TO BE COWARD. I REALLY SEE ALL NUERS’ COMMENTS ALL AS COMMENT OF THOSE LACKING NATIONALISM/PATRIOTISM ETC. AND THE HART THOSE WHO TELL THE TRUTH. AND SO TO ME THAT 99% OF NUER ARE COMPLETELY STUPID IN THINKING. LET SEE IF NUER ALONE WILL LIBERATE RSS.

      repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


An Alternative National Dialogue: Sudan’s last chance for sustainable peace and Unity 2014-08-30 06:18:14 By Suliman Baldo August 29, 2014 — Last week, with much fanfare and renewed hope on the part of Sudanese citizens, the African Union High Implementation Panel (AUHIP) for Sudan and South Sudan, (...)

A critique of the IGAD protocol for peace in S Sudan 2014-08-30 05:53:03 “A critique of the IGAD protocol on agreed principles on transitional arrangements towards resolution of the crisis in South Sudan” By David de Chand August 29, 2014 - First and foremost of all, (...)

IGAD failure to delivering peace for South Sudan! 2014-08-30 05:43:48 By Jacob Odong August 29, 2014- The East African Inter-Governmental Authority on Development (IGAD) is concluding a plan to allow for what they are calling a unity government for South Sudan. If (...)


MORE








Latest Press Releases


National Dialogue in Sudan: Past experiences and current challenges 2014-08-27 06:18:22 Sudan Democracy First Group (SDFG) Since independence, Sudan has undergone a number of national peace agreements, some of which were observed and honored for short periods, others which were (...)

A new approach to the National Dialogue will stop war and lead to democracy in Sudan 2014-08-22 06:50:30 A New Approach to the National Dialogue in Sudan that will Stop the Wars, Address the Humanitarian Crisis and Lead to Democratic TransformationChatham House, London on Wednesday, August 20, 2014 (...)

Friends and Diaspora of South Sudan urge leaders to choose peace 2014-08-19 20:29:59 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Esther Sprague, Founder & Director, Sudan Unlimited 415.713.2495, esprague11@yahoo.com FRIENDS AND DIASPORA OF SOUTH SUDAN URGE LEADERS TO CHOOSE PEACE UNSC (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.