Home | Comment & Analysis    Saturday 28 December 2013

How South Sudanese negotiations among the warring parties can be futile


By Steve Paterno

December 27, 2013 - Ever since the conflict broke out in South Sudan two weeks ago, there have been array of shuttle diplomacy in Juba led by IGAD members and supported by other regional and international agencies and players to assist in restoring peace. At the heart of the conflict is a political rivalry within the ruling SPLM party, which eventually escalated into firefight dangerously aligned along ethnic divide that quickly engulfed the entire nation, with death toll mounting, displacement of thousands and damage of properties.

The consultative efforts of the mediators are yet to materialize into concrete framework in achieving real peace and the expedient the process, the better, so as lives are immediately saved, properties protected and further escalation of the conflict prevented, with permanent political settlement achieved. This process must at best entail immediate cessation of hostilities, protection of livelihood, access to humanitarian assistance, full commitments of the parties involved, permanent political settlement, administering of justice and accountability among others.

The deterioration of security situation as a result of this conflict already underscored the urgency for ceasing fire. However, to stop the fight can otherwise prove difficult than simply stated in paper. This is going to require an enforcement mechanism in place to ensure implementation of any agreed upon ceasefire. The additional deployment of international peace keepers, which is already on the table to supplement the implementation of such a ceasefire is a plus, particularly in ensuring access to humanitarian assistance. Nevertheless, as we have already known, the presence of peace keepers perse will not necessarily prevent the aggression of some of these ruthless fighters such as in the case of Akobo (Jongolei State), where innocent civilians, included peace keepers themselves were dragged out of the UN compound and then bludgeoned to death.

Another challenge that can further complicate any effort to ceasefire is the variety of nature of the fighting groups. Thus far, the fighting groups paint a picture of individuals with diversified interests. For example, the group in Juba who triggered the fight on December 15, seems to be directly or indirectly under the influence of Riek Machar and his ambition to forcefully wrestle power. The reprisal that, therefore, followed in Juba against the members of ethnic Nuers, were to have been carried out exclusively by alleged personal militias of President Salva Kiir, who were not even answerable to South Sudanese military chain of command. The subsequent allegations and rumors of Nuers’ massacres in Juba further sparked spontaneous reactions of the Nuers throughout. Case in point is with Gen. Peter Gadet who was in charged of SPLA division 8 in Jongolie state and on December 18, rebelled against the government and embarked on revenge spree. Up to now, there is no definitive evidence as to whether the infamous defector Gen. Peter Gadet is acting on behest of power hungry Riek Machar or he was simply acting on his own accord as he has done numerous times. Also in a case of Unity State, where another Nuer renegade general, James Koang took over control of Bentiu and declared himself as the governor of the oil rich state, we are yet presented with another different characteristic of this war. The case of fighting in Bentiu suggests more of a rivalry among the Nuers to exert dominance over the oil rich state. This is similarly the case with the fighting in Malakal (Upper Nile State), which mimics the participation of the so called White Army, a loosely armed and civilian group, driven rather by adrenaline and no political agenda.

The pertinent question then: how many rebel forces does Riek Machar has command and control over? Thus far, Riek Machar has been missing in action, even though from time to time he issues media reports, claiming to be in charge of all these various fighting forces. The fact that Riek Machar declared his peace delegation to be led by a government prisoner, Pagan Amum, betrays as to how much military power, political influence and leverage Riek Machar has in order for the government to reckon with him. Machar calls for the conditional release of the political prisoners not only demonstrates his naivete, but also portrays his weak stand against the government he vows to overthrow militarily.

First of all, among these detained prisoners are unlikely allies of Riek Machar. For example, prisoner Pagan Amum who Machar named as his head of peace delegation along with Rebecca Nyandeng are individuals with high ambitions, vying for the same seat that Machar is aspiring for, the chairmanship of SPLM and ultimately the presidency of South Sudan. The group were soundly defeated in SPLM National Liberation Council convention on December 14 through 15, which left them to resort into military take over of the leadership.

Beside, through the USA Envoy, who just visited the detained group in Juba, they denounced violence as a means for political transformation as oppose to Machar who still clings into a military solution, which he is quickly losing. In essence, Riek Machar already shown a divergence departure with those detained prisoners allied to him.

Therefore, this leaves the government with a lot of options to deal with the situation in its favor. For one, the government can wait it out and not rush to any negotiation so as to crash the rebellion militarily. The government has already an upper hand with the success of recapturing of Bor and repulsion of the rebels in Malakal. For the government, one theater of operation remains, the town of Bentiu. Alternatively, the government can also uses its magic, which has been successfully thus far, the amnesty, to lure the rebellious commanders back into fold and isolate politicians like Riek Machar and the group in the cold.

So, it is going to be very challenging for the mediators to figure out who really to negotiate with and how cohesive the group the chose is. The current assumption is that Riek Machar who is in hiding and very much on a ran is the defacto leader of the rebellious group. How much of a power and influence he actually wields is yet to be found. In the end of all this, there is going to be a need for justice and accountability, not only to ensure closer to the victims but to also deter punitive actions by those in power.

Steve Paterno is the author of The Rev. Fr. Saturnino Lohure, A Romain Catholic Priest Turned Rebel. He can be reached at stevepaterno@yahoo.com

The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 28 December 2013 08:18, by Knight In Shining Armor

    Mr. Steve, you have the language to write but on this topic, you have no knowledge or you have shallow understanding of what is going on in SPLM as political party. For such, your contribution here does not give any meaning to the problem. It may only make sense to foreigners or to those with shallow understanding of the problem like you. For your information, there is nothing called attempted cou

    repondre message

    • 28 December 2013 08:19, by Knight In Shining Armor

      Mr. Steve, you have the language to write but on this topic, you have no knowledge or you have shallow understanding of what is going on in SPLM as political party. For such, your contribution here does not give any meaning to the problem. It may only make sense to foreigners or to those with shallow understanding of the problem like you. For your information, there is nothing called attempted co

      repondre message

      • 28 December 2013 14:13, by Mr Point

        Why does this write keep spinning lies?
        There is an alliance of senior SPLM. Leaders who want a real democratic transformation of the party and the state.
        Kiir has been acting like a dictator and acting unconstitutionally in the appointment of state governors. Then he started the ethnic violence in juba, for which he is accountable.

        repondre message

        • 28 December 2013 20:58, by sanduksanduk

          What lies. He (Steve) is telling u the truth.SPLM members now in custody wanted to reform their party. Riak had another agenda of which his colleagues knew nothing of. If this is not betrayal, what else is it. This explains why he was able to escape Juba with relative ease leaving his friends at the mercy of marauding Kiir’s militia guards. Take that war to ur backyards away from Equatoria. Idiots

          repondre message

  • 28 December 2013 08:22, by Knight In Shining Armor

    . For your information, there is nothing called attempted coup. All those arrested were found in their houses. For Dr. Machar, if he were not to run away, he would have been killed together with some of these political detainees. They were the main target of all this game called “attempted coup”. Even after some of them were already under custody, the president was

    repondre message

  • 28 December 2013 08:24, by Knight In Shining Armor

    Even after some of them were already under custody, the president was still giving statement that they were on run. What scenario do you expect? They will be killed in detention and their body will be taken to the forest with a claim that they were killed in a battle. This happened before to some renegades; just reflect your memory.

    repondre message

    • 28 December 2013 08:45, by Toney Toney Matot

      Mr Knight,
      What is written by Mr Stephen is reality and since we don’t admit the truth, our country will never be stable. I do not know why should you deny that it wasn’t a coup when it was known as coordinated operation. let accept that Riek in fact was trying but failed. Riek had alerted people that they will do everything to topple Kiir. what could be the meaning of that bro.

      repondre message

  • 28 December 2013 13:42, by Paul Chadrack

    Steve is really bought by bhar el gazel. You a useless writter who use this website today. For this country to have peace kiir must go to ICC.

    repondre message

    • 28 December 2013 14:10, by Toney Toney Matot

      Nuer are good in rebellion, betrayal and food lovers only. Kiir will never go to ICC whether you like it or not but your likes will go to ICC instead. those who were murdered in Bor Akobo Bentiu and Malakal are they not human being. the killing of Dinka is a bless to you Right? there will be no peace in South Sudan till you are brought back to your senses.

      repondre message

Comment on this article


The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

Who was behind the killing of civilians in Bor? 2014-04-22 06:50:43 By Peter Gai Manyuon "A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death", from unknown author. (...)

Embracing victimhood to celebrate victimisation 2014-04-22 06:28:12 By Juliana Bol April 21, 2014 - It was a bit disturbing to hear news of our citizens in the IDP camps (where they are seeking protection and shelter) celebrating the recapture of Bentiu -in (...)

South Sudan: Revenge Killings is not the basis for building a modern nation 2014-04-21 05:39:31 By Steve Paterno April 20, 2014 - The theme of this article develops as a result of my extensive research and writings on a culture of revenge killings among South Sudanese communities, (...)



Latest Press Releases

Sudan: No justice for protest killings 2014-04-23 21:06:10 Human Rights WatchRelease Detainees and Punish Abusive Forces (Nairobi, April 21, 2014) – Sudanese authorities have failed to provide justice for scores of civilians killed in anti-government (...)

SDFG mourn the loss of a Sudanese activist 2014-04-20 09:02:39 The Sudan Democracy First Group mourns the loss of Osman Hummaida, a towering figure of the human rights movement in Sudan, and a tireless campaigner for democracy and peace in the country. Osman (...)

UNICEF supports emergency response for children in Sudan with 89 tons of life-saving supplies 2014-04-19 09:47:06 Khartoum, 18 April 2014 --- Today in Khartoum airport, UNICEF received 89 tons of life-saving supplies to support the humanitarian response to children affected by emergencies in various hot (...)


Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.