Home | News    Monday 26 August 2013

Khartoum warns South Sudan against holding unilateral referendum in Abyei

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

August 25, 2013 (KHARTOUM) – The Sudanese government described threats by South Sudan to unilaterally hold a referendum in the contested Abyei area as "warbling away from the flock," and a breach of the cooperation agreements.

JPEG - 30.3 kb
FILE - People from the Misseriya tribe of the Abyei oil region protest against the proposal of African Union (AU) mediator former South African president Thabko Mbeki for a referendum to decide whether the region belonged to Sudan or South Sudan, outside the United Nations (U.N.) and AU headquarters in Khartoum November 28, 2012. (Reuters/ Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah)

Sudan’s foreign ministry spokesperson, Abu Bakr al-Sideeg, said in press statements on Sunday that the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) statement this week stated clearly that it does not accept unilateral solutions for Abyei.

Al-Sideeg reiterated that such move would be contrary to the UNSC call for setting up civil institutions in Abyei prior to the referendum and implementing the interim security and administrative arrangements in accordance with the June 2011 agreement. The latter provides for swift establishment legislative and administrative institutions and a police force.

On Friday the UNSC expressed its "grave concern about the highly volatile situation" in the disputed region and urged the two sides to form interim local institutions they agreed to in June 2011.

"The Council recalls their decision in Resolution 2046 that the parties must resume immediately negotiations to reach agreement on Abyei final status under the auspices of the AUHIP", further said the UNSC presidential statement.

The 15 member body urged to disarm local communities and to turn Abyei into a "weapons-free zone" as it was previously decided by the two parties at the level of Abyei Joint Oversight Committee (AJOC).

In line with the 20 June agreement, a joint police force has to be formed along with a joint administration and a legislative council. But the two sides they failed to reach a deal on the composition of the local parliament.

The Dinka Ngok population in Abyei fears that the formation of these institutions without an agreement over the referendum would lead to perpetuation of Khartoum’s control over the region.

Last year, the African Union mediation team proposed that a referendum be held in Abyei this October, but that only those residing permanently in the area would be allowed to vote in the plebiscite, and decide whether they want to join Sudan or South Sudan.

This proposal would effectively make the majority of voters come from the Dinka Ngok tribe, aligned with South Sudan, thus putting the Arab Misseriya nomads, who spend several months in Abyei every year grazing, not part of the voting.

However, Sudan swiftly rejected the plan, which received the blessing of the AU Peace and Security Council (AUPSC).

The head of the sub-parliamentary committee on legislation and justice, Al-Fadil Haj Suleiman, announced Sudan’s absolute rejection for holding Abyei referendum in October and warned of doing so without involving the Arab Misseriya tribesmen else it would be an invalid move.

He threatened that Sudan would not recognize the results of the referendum had Juba insisted on holding it unilaterally and without involving the Misseriya.

Al-Fadil went on to accuse Juba of intentionally creating further problems and pointed that the Misseriya have acquired the right to vote as citizens of Abyei, saying that their absence from the area in certain months during the year does not justify denying them this fundamental right which was guaranteed by international conventions.

He demanded that Juba agrees with Khartoum on the appropriate time to hold it with the involvement of the Ngok Dinka and the Misseriya.

Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party (NCP) spokesman Yasser Youssef in separate statements pointed to the threats of the co-chair of Abyei Joint Oversight Committee (AJOC) for the South Sudanese side to hold the referendum in October whether Khartoum agreed or not describing it as “political talk”.

In a related issue, the union of the Misseriya tribes has reiterated its rejection for holding the referendum in October and stressed that any attempt by South Sudan to impose a “fait accompli” would be doomed to fail.

The head of the Misseriya general union, Mohamed Khater Jumaa, said in a statement on Sunday that they reject the move of South Sudan’s president, Salva Kiir of sending all Ngok Dinka tribesmen to Abyei, stressing that Misseriya will not accept a referendum in their homeland.

He warned that Kiir’s call for making the necessary preparations for holding the referendum would only trigger conflict between Misseriya and Ngok Dinka, demanding that Khartoum take similar steps to defend Misseriya rights.

On Saturday, Misseriya paramount chief Mukhtar Babu Nimir criticized the silence of the Sudanese government and cautioned that they are prepared for all eventualities including going to war.

"Our government is silent while they know everything. We are yet waiting for their reaction and if it does not move we will not accept that South Sudan organize unilaterally a referendum. We want the government to be clear with us", he said stressing "if it fails, we will play our part in the liberation of our land in war and peace."

Khater added that priority should be given to setting up the legislative council and the civil institutions as well as resuming efforts for peaceful coexistence between Misseriya and Ngok Dinka.

During the wartime, the Misseriya were organized in militias and fought alongside the Sudanese army against the former rebel Sudan People Liberation Movement (SPLM) that now rules South Sudan.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 26 August 2013 08:02, by Tutbol

    The N Sudan isn’t obligated to recognize the results of Abyiei referendum. And any member of that so-called corrupted UN 15 wishing another formation of another layer of delaying stratagems to frustrate the Abyiei citizens right to decide their own fates should have their dam* skulls medically examine. Some bunches of crooks cloak themselves with playing humane game in that UN NYC building,>>>

    repondre message

    • 26 August 2013 08:07, by Tutbol

      >>> but in truth, they are only playing devil games against the weakest world’s citizens. Pathetic indeed.

      repondre message

  • 26 August 2013 10:29, by Moses Kuocgoor

    The problem of Abyei has become a source of income to those who turn their faces away from reality. How comes Khartoum regimes still hold on to Abyei while they had been ruled out from Abyei by the high court in the world. What is the initiative of Khartoum regimes? War? Well they know us very well that if it happens in the way they want, then they will run away from Heilge oil field too.

    repondre message

  • 26 August 2013 10:41, by Moses Kuocgoor

    The south Sudan government should coordinate the tactical solution about Abyei. Abyei has enough to wait for dictatorship from Khartoum. Abyei people know their right and missariyia people know their right. If Khartoum warns South Sudan about Abyei, then the only option left on the table is war.

    repondre message

  • 26 August 2013 12:13, by Malakal county Simon

    Sudan should not panic, because Abyie is on Sudan official map. That,s explains all.

    repondre message

  • 26 August 2013 14:14, by Malakal county Simon

    Rommel! I,m not siding with an enemy, but I,m also not interested to die for Abyie, because I was not consulted when it was sold.

    repondre message

    • 26 August 2013 15:11, by Tiger

      Malakal county Simon.
      How dumb are you in your heart to say this"Abyei was sold and you wasn’t consulted, have you ever read the history of Sudan how Arabs came to Sudan,you need to read history so that you can learn it better then next time you won’t have to judge blinded way without knowing what you are talking about.

      repondre message

  • 26 August 2013 16:05, by Malakal county Simon

    Rommel:
    I know how shameful you are feeling now about what your grandpa, Deng Majock did in 1951. Your little making up history above, does not convince me, at all. I was born in Sudan, grow up in Sudan, went to school in Sudan and most all, I know our histories. What’s you wrote above, is just to cover the shame that’s done by your grandpa Deng Majok.

    repondre message

  • 26 August 2013 16:11, by Malakal county Simon

    Tiger/retarded
    You should feel shame of yourself, to called some one you know a dumb. That’s just proved your uncivilized street boy, under influence of alcohol.

    repondre message

    • 26 August 2013 20:40, by Tiger

      No I do not consume drink of alcohol nor do I look like a retarded person,but I judge people bases on what they wrote or say,and it’s true nobody would dare to judge an speechless innocent animal,but human being like you and me can be judged accordingly,Abyei people had faded for so long,so for you to come up with your baseless accusation and sided with their enemy will not be unacceptable to me.

      repondre message

  • 26 August 2013 16:29, by Malakal county Simon

    Tiger/retarded
    You should feel shame of yourself, to called some one you don’t know dumb. That’s just proved how uncivilized/street boy you are. But I don’t blame you, since you are under influence of alcohol.

    repondre message

  • 26 August 2013 16:47, by Hardlinner

    Since went have nomads had any right to claim the land that does not belong to them. If Arabian nomads can’t claim Israelis or Egyptians land, what give sudanese nomads rights to claim ngok dinka land?. Leadership greedy kiir must do some thing about this. Infact we would be happy to see embezzled money turn into weapons caches.

    repondre message

    • 26 August 2013 20:54, by Tiger

      Hardliner.
      I agreed with you brother,your comment shows your patriotic to South Sudan unlike those who judge blindedly,Abyei problem is our problem,it’s a problem even to those who lived in a borderhood with Uganda,Kenya and Ethiopia,it’s a major problem to even our brothers who lived outside South Sudan,it’s a problem to our unborn children so people should not let Abyei people be wipe away.

      repondre message

  • 27 August 2013 01:00, by Malakal county Simon

    Tiger:
    You can bark about Abyie, as long as you want. But that’s will not achieve your dream to bring Abyie back to South, unless you and your likes need to grab your guns, and ready to dies for Abyie. Because stated very clear above, that’s me and others are not interested to die for Abyie as is not worthy.

    repondre message

  • 27 August 2013 01:12, by Malakal county Simon

    More over, these people’s are not even ready whether to remains as part Sudan, or join South Sudan leave alone die for Abyie. So South Sudanese people’s need to be patient and let’s the Abyie decides for themselves what they really want and then we can support them. But at the moment they don’t have a unification voices, about where they are standing!

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Why SPLM should not be a political party? 2014-10-27 08:00:25 By John Adoor Deng October 27, 2014 - Many people who have the focus in South Sudanese politics, these days have been bombarded with many coined Acronyms around SPLM. Truthfully, it has been a (...)

World’s newest nation has unprecedented opportunity to end sexual violence in conflict 2014-10-17 21:34:44 By Zainab Hawa Bangura October 17, 2014 - As United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) on Sexual Violence in Conflict, I completed my first trip to South Sudan last (...)

Celebrate the golden jubilee of the October 1964 Sudanese revolution 2014-10-17 21:34:32 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman October 17, 2014 - Despite the dearth and lack of what needs celebration and rejoice in the reign of the National Congress Party (NCP) regime led by the tyrant genocidal (...)


MORE








Latest Press Releases


Sudan Democracy First Group condemns wave of arbitrary arrests in Sudan 2014-09-25 05:17:35 Sudan Democracy First Group 25 September 2014 - In a desperate attempt to prevent a series of events commemorating the victims of the September 2013 protests, Sudan’s notorious National (...)

HRW calls on UN rights body to press Sudan to investigate murder of peaceful protesters 2014-09-24 21:24:09 Human Rights Watch One Year On, No Justice for Protester Deaths (Geneva, September 23, 2014) – The United Nations Human Rights Council should call on Sudan to account immediately for the death (...)

Hundreds walk for peace in South Sudan 2014-09-23 08:30:16 National Platform for Peace and Reconciliation (NPPR) PRESS RELEASE Juba, 21 September 2014 - Hundreds of people took to the streets of the South Sudan capital Jubato ‘Walk for Peace’and demand (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.