Home | News    Monday 18 March 2013

South accuses Sudan of launching attack despite border agreement

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

March 17, 2013 (JUBA) - South Sudan accused neighbouring Sudan of launching a fresh ground attack against its Northern Bahr el Ghazal State on Sunday, killing at least one civilian and wounding others just days after the two sides agreed to withdraw their troops from the tense, contested and heavily militarised border.

JPEG - 58.9 kb
A soldier of the SPLA waiting amongst acacia trees at the front lines just north of Heglig (file/Getty)

The attack forced civilians to flee the area, Aweil North County’s commissioner and area representatives in the State Legislative Assembly said on Sunday.
 
Commissioner Kuol Athuai Hal said one civilian was killed when Sudanese armed forces, allied militia forces and armed Arabs tribes raided the area at dawn.

"The division commander Major General Santino Deng Wol was around when the incident took place. He went to the site and was actually the one who brought the wounded. He found one dead”, Hal told Sudan Tribune from Gok Machar, the area’s administrative headquarters.
 
Maj-Gen Wol confirmed the reports and said army remained committed to respecting the decision of the Southern government to pull their troops 10km from the disputed border within the specified time period.
 
“They came today. It was dawn attack on Riangkuel where our forces have been removed. We do not have presence in this area anymore. I found one civilian dead today during my visit. I also met with some civilians carrying the wounded whom we helped with transport," Wol told Sudan Tribune from Wunyiik, the headquarters of the South Sudanese army (SPLA) in the area.
 
Wol, who is the military officer responsible for the area did not say whether the army would retaliate or whether the SPLA would suspend their withdrawal plan from the area until a Joint Border Verification Monitoring Mission is deployed to ensure safety of the citizens along the border.
 
"The Sudanese armed forces have done it once again. They carried out another attack in areas where our forces have pulled out in compliance of the directive of the government to implement the [security] matrix", the head of information and public relations in the Northern Bahr el Ghazal State Legislative Assembly, Majang Ngor Kuany, told Sudan Tribune on Sunday.
 
Kuany asked the government to immediately take action against Sudanese government and take full responsibility to provide adequate and protection to civilians in areas where forces have been withdrawn.

"The government of Sudan is taking advantage of the withdrawal of troops from border areas. Our troops are withdrawing and they are deploying. This is what they are doing. The government of Sudan has never done what it says. What it says is not what it does. What happened today is exactly what has been the fear of our people", Kuany said on Sunday. 
 
South Sudan’s Information Minister, Barnaba Marial said he had heard of the incident but had not yet been received a full briefing from the army and state authorities and was still waiting for clear details before he makes any statement. The government’s official spokesperson expressed Juba’s commitment to implement the cooperation agreement with Sudan within the given timeframe to complete a withdrawal.
 
“We are committed to full implementation of the matrix. It is our hope that implementing it is in the best interest of the two nations. On our side, we have completed more than 90% of what is required of the government of the republic of South Sudan to do in this agreement. We have pulled out troops from all the border areas to allow creation and operationalisation of the buffer zones. The reported attack in Northern Bahr el Ghazal in which some lives have been lost took place in an area where our troops were deployed ahead. They were 35 miles away. This means that there are no longer there”, Marial said in an interview with Sudan Tribune on Sunday. 
 
Sudan Tribune was not able to independently verify reports of the new attack and the SPLA’s spokesperson could not be reached for comment on Sunday evening. His deputy said that he had no details of the attack.

Aweil North’s Commissioner Kuol Athuai Hal said that the security situation was "under control" by Sunday but remained "unpredictable".

"We have asked civilians to be calm. We know such killing pains not only the family members but also the government and will do the best to provide security and protection. We have informed our leadership. The office of the governor has been informed."

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 18 March 06:26, by Deng II

    This is frustrating indeed. I don’t know why army force withdraw where there is no oil?.

    repondre message

    • 18 March 06:28, by Deng II

      How many life lost will we understand the uncertain future in South Sudan?

      repondre message

      • 18 March 07:18, by Hardball

        The agreement was just a joke; anyone who believe it must be crazy!

        repondre message

        • 18 March 10:14, by Madiak

          Hardball, You are 200% right any one who believe it must be crazy, I never believe all the agreements with north, and this agreement is a most gold chance to Sudan, first of all they will Take Kiir Adem and break the bridge and the same to Majok Yinh Thiou and other areas and SPLA will not easly push them back again,
          There is an Arabic Daksa mafata jarima!

          repondre message

    • 18 March 08:14, by Tiitrot

      JALABY,
      Stop acting like an educated and a fool and believe what the authorities concern posted on the public websites,this agreement was signed for the benefit of both countries after you people cried when you heard of US support to the Republic of South Sudan financially and militarily with advance weapons.Commissioner Kuol Athuai can not lie while he is in the border where there are taxes.

      repondre message

  • 18 March 06:29, by Jalaby

    Liars!!
    Those are the enemies of the recent agreement between Sudan-S Sudan inside SPLA/M who are trying to fail the agreement and drag both countries to square 1 and war where those corrupted people can get some profit that mixed with blood to satisfy their greedy and ugly habits!
    It’s too late thieves, the train of peace already started and nothing will stop it!!

    repondre message

    • 18 March 06:36, by Michael Angelo

      Jalaby,
      How can they lie while there is a dead person if you’re not stupid bastard? They done this many times over to foul the world that they’re committed to peace while stabbing us in the back. Terrorists will never be trusted.

      repondre message

      • 18 March 07:04, by Hardball

        The same Sudan who occupy Panthou/Heglig and attacking northern Bar el gazelle believes there is an agreement and will have the oil to go through Sudan!? No way in hell but I will reserve my opposition and wait to see what will happen.

        repondre message

        • 18 March 07:24, by Jalaby

          If this case is true then SPLA-N and Darfourian gangsters are to be blamed, they’re the one who did it with the incorporation of war traders inside SPLA/M, they did it to fail the cooperation agreement because no one is benefiting from failing the agreement other than SPLA-N!
          Please hand them over quickly to our defense minister Mr. Al-Lemby!

          repondre message

      • 18 March 07:18, by Mohammed Ali 2

        Anglo,"They came today. It was dawn attack on Riangkuel where our forces have been removed. We do not have presence in this area anymore....."How could SAF attack an area where there is no arm? Why?If you are not there who did they attack then? What is the benifit? If it is attacking civillians, why killing only one? Well, you can hardly find the truth here!

        repondre message

        • 18 March 07:45, by Hardball

          Is there any excuse or justification possible out there that’s not going to make Sudan as an attacker? I don’t know how good you have to be at lying to make Sudan Armed Forces innocent! Even the expert who are trained liars can’t talk themselves out of this attack.

          repondre message

          • 18 March 08:55, by Mohammed Ali 2

            Hardball, they attacked who? There was no presence of SPLA as they said? Did attacked the wind-mill there? All armies donnot tell the truth always, but let this one be"platable".It perfectly sounds like a lie. Nobody in SAF had to appologise in an official letter to a head of srate for lying! So be careful, and watch your words

            repondre message

            • 18 March 21:15, by Hardball

              Ali, you’ve said it yourself “armies don’t tell the truths”! If so, then which lie are you defending and the one you don’t?

              repondre message

        • 18 March 15:35, by Hamra

          I’m afraid the answer is perfectly plain. There are elements within the Sudanese military who don’t want a peace deal to work and would prefer a return to all out conflict. They attacked the civilians but this is unfortunately typical behaviour of the SDF.

          repondre message

          • 18 March 17:44, by Oppressor

            You are talking about a great well orgnized Army not SPLAM-N
            Puppet !! so keep da Rubbish comment to urself.

            repondre message

          • 18 March 17:44, by Oppressor

            You are talking about a great well orgnized Army not SPLAM-N
            Puppet !! so keep da Rubbish comment to urself.

            repondre message

    • 18 March 07:21, by Nuer Empire

      Hey Jallaby:It is true that you have -ve inner feeling that causes itching of your fungy ass! Its not funny here to deny the true situation imposed by your poor Arabs.Deceiving is a culture of poor Arabs!
      The Nuer Empire

      repondre message

    • 18 March 07:37, by cbuongdit cholkua

      Jalaby, you are dying to see the oil flow,but that’s not going to happen the way you thought; if your anemic forces are not stop attacking our innocence civilian. Who you do think would believe that was a full committed agreement from the Norht? it was just simply a hoax to let the South withdrawed it troops along the border so that they squeezed in to reach where they were not able to reach befor

      repondre message

      • 18 March 07:48, by cbuongdit cholkua

        I suggest for SPLA not to withdraw their troops along the borderlines and needed to be done like what Ethiopia and Eritrea did some years ago. they never sat for negotiation but they sowed their manhood which gave them clear full border demarcation and also none disputable areas.

        repondre message

        • 18 March 07:51, by cbuongdit cholkua

          My bad. I mean showing their manhood.

          repondre message

    • 18 March 09:10, by Riek Met

      no matter whether the two country reaches thier implementation peacfully,let we keptup in any things as a watch dog.

      repondre message

  • 18 March 07:04, by 4Justice

    To spot a luciferian you only have to do one thing: observe the results of their actions. Does the action bring about chaos, war, death or destruction? Any president who desires war is a member. Telling you one thing and then doing another is simply to create confusion. The current Sudanese president is a perfect example of this.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 07:15, by wang

    North Sudan has never honoured anything whether they signed or believes in it. They delivery attacked SPLA positions at middle of withdrawn and make it looks it were carried out by armed civilians.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 07:25, by Pif Paf

    Baseless accusations are made by enemies of peace. Always quick to accuse prior to any investigation and lacking any logical motive. Both Sudan and S.Sudan signed this agreement to move forward otherwise there was no need to do so. Signing peace is one thing and preserving it is another. Warmongers have other agenda’s that are not in Sudan or S.Sudan best interests.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 07:37, by Jalaby

    Mr. Abel Alier wisdom regarding Arab/Jalaba turns out to be 100% true!
    You know guys what Mr. Abel Alier said long time ago about Arab/Jalaba in regard of living with southerners (Jonobean)?
    Mr. Alier said "We southerners like a glass that can’t put it together and will break unless there is a mediator (Northerners) between it"

    repondre message

    • 18 March 07:48, by Jalaby

      You see now how the south moved to a piece of hell when Arab/Jalaba left it and Jonobean killed each others as crazy as hell! no one knows for sure who is killing who? famine,lack of food,lack of medicine,lack of money! it’s just a great mess!
      Absolutely Mr. Alier is 100% correct because all that messes started right after the secession when Arab/Jalaba left the south

      repondre message

      • 18 March 07:54, by Jalaby

        No worries guys because the recent agreement between the two Sudan included the most important part of it which is the 4 freedoms agreement and I believe that part is much important than the oil agreement itself!
        Very soon Arab/Jalaba will influx the south in a huge number of immigration and their mighty goal is to prevent Jonobean from killing each others and allow

        repondre message

        • 18 March 08:03, by Jalaby

          Jonobean to live in peace and harmony!
          In order to implement Mr. Alier wisdom successfully, between each two houses of Jonobean there should be Arab/Jalaba house in the middle separating Jonobean houses to prevent any mess and resolve any conflict between them!
          The south government should build Arab/Jalaba houses and pay monthly salaries to them for their great risky

          repondre message

          • 18 March 08:14, by Jalaby

            mission otherwise who is going to endanger his life and might be caught in the middle between Jonobean while trying to be a messenger of peace!
            I believe Arab/Jalaba never mind to endanger their lives and live in the middle between southerners but the south government is required to do its part and prepares its budget and pays Arab/Jalaba an attractive package!

            repondre message

            • 18 March 08:23, by Jalaby

              Majority of Jonobean commentators on this website are living in Europe, Australia and N. America and will never come back and live in the south again, so you guys expelled out Arab/Jalaba through the door and now they’re coming back through the window in huge number, where shall you go then? Go To Hell LOOOOOL

              repondre message

              • 18 March 08:45, by cbuongdit cholkua

                jalaby, keeps on making noise boy, I don’t think there is any where in the entire planet that, you eat in a plate then after you are done, you pees in it. We give you a good chance to survive your weak economy and you ruins it again. Ever time there is any agreement signed between the two countries, you guys are always start blackmailing the South

                repondre message

              • 18 March 18:10, by J Human-Rights

                Jalaby
                You’re very wrong of what you have just said. I live in United States and I did come back, and I belief you don’t know what you’re talking about sir.

                repondre message

      • 18 March 08:22, by Rommel

        Jalaby:
        I know I shouldn’t laugh at the intellectually emaciated and mentally sick, but you are absolutely hilarious. You seem to suffer from some kind of self-induced amnesia. Do you not recall the mountains of ammunition provided to tribal militias and warlords during the war!? Does kerubino kuanyin bol not ring a bell!? What about Paulino Matip!?

        repondre message

        • 18 March 08:27, by Rommel

          You know that wonderful chap that drove tens of thousands of people off their lands in order to facilitate unfettered oil exploration!? 70, 000 people died in the 90s in Warrap alone because of your jihadist government’s internationally known policy of aggravating tribal divisions and hostilities by arming tribal militias against each other.

          repondre message

          • 18 March 08:36, by Rommel

            I don’t know just what kind of dictionary you’re in possession of, but arming tribal factions against each other doesn’t come under the definition of mediation. You seem to live in a world where words have wholly different meanings as we understand them. Genocide is harmony, tyranny is freedom, divide and conquer is mediation and paternalistic racism is a genuine expression of regard and love.

            repondre message

            • 18 March 08:45, by Rommel

              Do you really want to talk about famine!? Let’s talk about famine shall we. Your government created an artificial famine that claimed the lives of 250, 000 people in 1988-89 and a further 100, 000 in 1998 when it raided the Dinka communities of Bahr el Ghazal in tandem with Arab militias. Here’s a source: http://www.globalpolitics.net/essays/Tom_Rhodes.pdf

              repondre message

              • 18 March 08:47, by Rommel

                You know I find your detached, hypocritical and wholly self-unaware, rants on the level of ethnic-determined violence in South Sudan incredibly hilarious. You seem to be entirely oblivious to the unenviable afflictions and realities of your own Nation. You have lost no less than a hundred thousand people in Darfur, and have had millions displaced as a consequence.

                repondre message

                • 18 March 08:50, by Rommel

                  You have lost more civilians in State sanctioned ethnic-determined violence than any other Nation within the continent and indeed the world. You may be content with inducing yourself into some kind of amnesia in regards to the immense human suffering in your own backyard, but to the rest of us -to the rest of the world-... the persistence of this reality is unremitting!

                  repondre message

                  • 18 March 08:51, by Rommel

                    According to institutions of international significance, including the world’s quintessential political institution — the UN... your government engaged in a brutal campaign of ethnic determined violence that claimed a quarter of a million innocent lives. That’s infinitely more than we have lost in tribal violence since the condominium.

                    repondre message

                    • 18 March 08:58, by Rommel

                      Jalaby can you please provide me with a source for Abel Alier’s apparent little quote.

                      repondre message

                • 18 March 09:11, by Jalaby

                  Mr. Rommel,
                  As long as you’re closing your eyes about the real reason and the root cause of the problem in the south and always point your finger to Arab/Jalaba then you will never ever find the cure for your disease!
                  Just tell me,who opposed dividing the south into 3 regions instead of one as Addis Ababa agreement stated in 1972?

                  repondre message

                  • 18 March 09:27, by Jalaby

                    why Equatorians and other tribes decided to divide the south in the first place? why Dinka under Abel Alier leadership opposed it? why Dinka decided to rebel in 1983 when Jonobean elected Joseph Tumbara over Dinka candidate who was Mr. Clement Amboro?
                    Who killed the founders of SPLA/M like Kerubino Kuanyin Bol, William Abdalla Chol,William Nyoun,Sammuel Gai Tut,etc?

                    repondre message

                    • 18 March 09:37, by Jalaby

                      You’re from Dinka Ngok and as long as Abyei will stay in the hand of north then you will do what ever you could to fail any agreement between north-south and will never recognize it but you will do your best to erase it!

                      repondre message

                  • 18 March 09:47, by Rommel

                    Jalaby:
                    You are from a country whose leader has murdered millions of people when there was no Nation by the name of South Sudan — and who then murdered a further quarter of a million people in Darfur. Deal with your sickness first. Cure the disease (s) that continues to cause such evil.

                    repondre message

                    • 18 March 09:57, by Rommel

                      So you want to know who opposed the division of the South during the time of Nimeiry? Contrary to your little flight of fancy, the Addis Ababa Agreement of 1972 did not prescribe a re-division of the South into three [3] provinces. Nimeiry first came up with the idea of redividing the South into three [3] provinces in February 1980 — long after the Addis Ababa Agreement was signed.

                      repondre message

                      • 18 March 10:04, by Rommel

                        Most Southerners in the central committee opposed the re-division proposal; a proposal that would set province against province and weaken the South as a whole. Nimeiry then dismissed Alier’s government in 1981 and requested a referendum on diving the South. National Assembly elections in 1982 returned a two-thirds majority of Southern members who opposed the plan.

                        repondre message

                        • 18 March 10:08, by Rommel

                          Nimeiry announced on the 5th of June 1983 Republican Order Number 1 that redivided the South into three regions. The presidential decree violated the constitution, which specified that the Addis Ababa Agreement could only be amended by a three-quarters majority vote in the national assembly followed by a two-thirds majority in a referendum in the South.

                          repondre message

                          • 18 March 10:13, by Rommel

                            There was no vote by the Southern regional assembly, no endorsement by the national assembly and no referendum in the South. When we opposed this brazen act, Nimeiry responded by saying that the agreement was not sacred. Nimeiry immediately disbanded the HEC and regional assembly and replaced them with three governors.

                            repondre message

                            • 18 March 10:22, by Rommel

                              Nimeiry then cancelled direct elections for the regional assemblies and withdrew their control over revenue derived from trade and natural resources. The proposal to re-divide the South did receive significant support from minority tribes who were frightened of Dinka domination — but that’s not the reason Nimeiry supported the re-division of the South.

                              repondre message

                              • 18 March 10:29, by Rommel

                                Nimeiry’s motivations for wanting the re-division of the South was to undermine its political strength and denude it of powers it had under the Agreement. Nimeiry cancelled direct elections for the regional assemblies and withdrew their control over revenue derived from trade and natural resources.

                                repondre message

                                • 18 March 10:38, by Rommel

                                  Military officers in the South were ordered to answer directly to the Defense minister in Khartoum and no longer to the Southern Command in Juba. Nimeiry’s proposal was to advance and serve Northern interests and aggrandizement at expense of the South. The resumption of the war had very little to do with tribal animus in the South.

                                  repondre message

                                  • 18 March 10:46, by Rommel

                                    Kerubino Kuanyin Bol was killed by Peter Gadet, Paulino Matip’s right hand man. William Abdalla Chol was not among the founders of the SPLM/A. He allied himself with Khartoum and so thoroughly deserved the fate metered out to him by the SPLA. William Nyoun was killed by his own tribesmen from his own faction when he wanted to return to the SPLM/A.

                                    repondre message

                                    • 18 March 10:48, by Rommel

                                      Samuel Gai Tut was murdered by the very much sadistic Kerubino Kuanyin Bol. You shouldn’t try to reduce the many underpinnings that contributed to the resumption of the war to just one reason... especially not one that is congenial to your prejudice and bias; one that attempts to absolve you of any and all responsibility for the collapse of that peace agreement.

                                      repondre message

                                      • 18 March 11:31, by Jalaby

                                        Rommel,
                                        Your attempt of twisting the neck of the truth will never work out and you can’t change history and misleading people by mixing truth with false!
                                        Like any elite southerner, you always point your finger to north and lead your naive people to fight their fake enemy in the north while unable to provide them with any solution

                                        repondre message

                                        • 18 March 11:36, by Jalaby

                                          and completely failed to establish a democratic country in the south when given a chance but in fact you elite guys turned the south to a piece of hell and put your people at great danger and just about to die of hunger and disease and tribal conflict that you created by your own hand because you Dinka guys consider yourself as "born to rule" and other tribes should

                                          repondre message

                                          • 18 March 11:43, by Jalaby

                                            always listen, obey and stay behind!
                                            Every body knows about the tribal conflict between Dinka from one side and Equatorians and Nuer from the other side over dividing the south into 3 regions and that conflict led to collapse Addis Ababa agreement, just tell me, who was behind Joseph Tumbora and who was behind Clement Amboro? what mandate that Tumbora got?

                                            repondre message

                                            • 18 March 11:49, by Jalaby

                                              how many votes Mr. Joseph Tumbora got and how many votes Mr. Amboro (the Dinka loser horse) got? What did Mr. Tumbora pledged to do in his first speech after became the president in charge in the south?
                                              William Chol wasn’t among 1983 rebellion founder? come on man!
                                              Mr. Chol deserved the death because he allied himself with Khartoum? so what about Kerubino?

                                              repondre message

                                              • 18 March 11:56, by Jalaby

                                                Kerubino also allied himself with Khartoum before after he escaped Garang jail, Arok Thon was one of the founder also allied himself with Khartoum till his death, Taban Deng, Riek Machar, Paulino Matip, Peter Gadet, etc ......
                                                Stop telling us nonsense man, you can fool the naive people in the south who you elite people stole $4bn from them but not us!!

                                                repondre message

                                        • 18 March 11:48, by Rommel

                                          I’m twisting the truth!? LOL! Do you even know the meaning of the word, you pathetic sap!? You claimed that the Addis Ababa Agreement of 1972 mandated a re-division of the South into three provinces despite the fact that this proposal came out eight [8] years later. You clearly lied and now you’re accusing me of lying. How so very sad.

                                          repondre message

                                          • 18 March 11:54, by Rommel

                                            "Fake enemy"!? You mean the very same "fake" enemy that annexed the Kafia Kingi enclave from Bahr el Ghazal to Darfur in 1960!? Or perhaps you mean the same "fake" enemy that armed Arab militias to terrorize Southern communities on the border, causing the deaths of a quarter of a million people in 1988-89.

                                            repondre message

                                            • 18 March 12:00, by Rommel

                                              The same "fake" enemy that dislodged the Dinka from "Heglig" in 1999 as documented by Human Rights Watch, the Coalition of International Justice and a plethora of other authoritative sources!? The Arabs blame the Jews for any and everything that goes awry, without so much as a morsel of evidence. We on the other hand have mountains of grit-edged evidence.

                                              repondre message

                                              • 18 March 12:12, by Rommel

                                                I don’t think anyone would dispute the fact that South Sudan is ’governed’ by ignorant, corrupt, incompetent cretins... but at least they haven’t committed genocide — you have. A quarter of a million people are dead! You armed Arab tribes in Darfur and helped them murder the Masalit, Zaghawa and the Fur. Has that happened in the South? 2000 people died last year in South Sudan. Compare!

                                                repondre message

                                                • 18 March 12:17, by Rommel

                                                  It’s hilarious that you’re trying to admonish us for having a Nation apparently dominated by one ethnic group. LOL! You really need to ask yourself why it is you’ve had a rebellion of some sort in virtually every corner of your Nation —- in all the non-Arab peripheries; and why the rebellions always bemoan the hegemony, marginalization and persecution of a dictatorial, genocidal Arab elite. LOL!

                                                  repondre message

                                                  • 18 March 12:28, by Rommel

                                                    The Nuer did not support the re-division of the South — they vociferously opposed it, as did the Shilluk. Bahr el Ghazal and Upper Nile opposed the re-division of the South. Some tribes in Equatoria were more welcoming of the idea — and understandably so. Provide me with evidence supporting your contention that the Nuer wanted the re-division of the South. I’ll wait.

                                                    repondre message

                                                    • 18 March 12:41, by Rommel

                                                      There were seven founding members of the SPLM/A... Abdalla Chol was not one of them. Kerubino Kuanyin Bol deserved to die. He helped cause the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians in Warrap. Arok Thon Arok is my mother’s first cousin... and he too deserved to die for allying himself with Khartoum following the split in the movement.

                                                      repondre message

                                          • 18 March 12:12, by Jalaby

                                            Mr. Rommel,
                                            You’re not kidding are you? every body in this planet knows that Addis Ababa stated the south as one entity but Equatorians and Nuer wanted to revise it by dividing the south into 3 regions and end the hell of Dinka dominant,just tell me, where I said that Addis Ababa Agreement of 1972 mandated a re-division of the

                                            repondre message

                                            • 18 March 12:16, by Jalaby

                                              South into three provinces"! where? here what I said "who opposed dividing the south into 3 regions instead of one as Addis Ababa agreement stated in 1972?"

                                              repondre message

                                              • 18 March 12:25, by Jalaby

                                                I would say you want some courses in English to understand what other say but you’re excellent in English (writing, reading and speaking) LOOOOL!
                                                Mr. Rommel, unfortunately, majority of educated and elite people like you are thieves and only believe in dollars and always have a feeling that they’re a child who got abused, oppressed by Arab north and

                                                repondre message

                                                • 18 March 12:34, by Jalaby

                                                  the whole international community should treat you as their beloved child and run fast to help you when they hear your first cry!!!
                                                  Wake up man, that time is over and no one paid attention to you not even Israel that Mr. Kiir went to them first and right after the separation and kissed their ass hoping for help but "farting" was the only outcome he got from them!!

                                                  repondre message

                                                  • 18 March 12:40, by Jalaby

                                                    Mr. Rommel,
                                                    Be realistic and be honest with yourself, Arab/Jalaba left the south and handed over a country with huge oil and resources to you elite guys but you failed to establish a democratic state or the dreaming "Utopia" state but you turned the south to a piece of hell and your friends in US are trying to beg money and

                                                    repondre message

                                                    • 18 March 12:48, by Jalaby

                                                      rescue you from inevitable collapsing that you created by your own hands!!
                                                      Blaming Arab/Jalaba after you got your independent state and always flash back to history and say Sudan killed us, genocide us, starved us, bla bla won’t help you anymore, leave Darfour alone and concentrate on extinguishing the fire that you ignited it by your own hands at your home!

                                                      repondre message

                                                      • 18 March 12:53, by Jalaby

                                                        Ironically, the south came back and accepted all Khartoum conditions and signed the recent matrix security implementation with no condition after they found themselves at the edge of full collapsing and the south can’t make it without the cooperation and help of Sudan!
                                                        You should know that the 4 freedoms agreement is the south demand and not Khartoum!
                                                        Wake up man!

                                                        repondre message

                                            • 18 March 12:48, by Rommel

                                              Jalaby:
                                              Ah, so the Nuer wanted the South divided!? Provide evidence that the Nuer ever supported a re-division of the South. This shouldn’t be too hard to prove, should it? A couple of citations from a history book will do it for me. Can you do that for me. If you didn’t make it all up, you can prove it. Prove it!

                                              repondre message

                                              • 18 March 12:58, by Rommel

                                                I like the fact that you so desperately want to believe that I’m a member of the government for the purpose of trying to win this little debate. Your country is acknowledged as one of the most corrupt Nations on earth. Do you not know this!? There is no such thing as the ’international community’ and I certainly don’t think that we need help from them to deal with the likes of you.

                                                repondre message

                                                • 18 March 13:09, by Rommel

                                                  "Leave Darfur alone"! How pathetic! If you want to refer to tribal violence in the South, I’ll refer to the genocide in Darfur — a conflagration that eclipses the tribal violence in South Sudan a hundred times over. The recent agreement is mutually beneficial in economic terms... Khartoum wouldn’t have signed it if its economy was flourishing.

                                                  repondre message

                                                  • 18 March 13:35, by Rommel

                                                    I don’t blame Sudan for anything after 2005. Any problems we have now are our own doing through naivety, ignorance, disorganisation, incompetence, corruption and myopia. Sudan isn’t helping South Sudan by signing this agreement. That you would posit such nonsense necessarily means that you’re incapable of critical thought. This is mutually beneficial.

                                                    repondre message

                                                  • 18 March 13:50, by Jalaby

                                                    Mr. Rommel,
                                                    You said you don’t want any help from international community?!
                                                    Man, why are you making joke of yourself?! LOOOL
                                                    The south is about to collapse and Mr. Lyman will beg the donors to collect money and rescue the south, not only that but your thugs government formed a high level committee to attend US donor conference!!

                                                    repondre message

                                                    • 18 March 13:54, by Jalaby

                                                      what a shameful? they strangled themselves by shutting down their oil production and showed their hands begging others to feed them!!
                                                      here is the link for forming a high level committee for begging money, please read my comment lol:
                                                      http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article45595

                                                      repondre message

                                                      • 18 March 14:01, by Jalaby

                                                        wait a minute, you said Arok Thon is deserved to die because he allied himself with Khartoum?! well, well, what about Mr. Riek Machar?! yes your current VP who allied himself with Khartoum and is accused of committing genocide against Dinka Bor people? did you forgive him but not your mother cousin Arok Thon? that’s so ridiculous!!

                                                        repondre message

                                                        • 18 March 14:07, by Jalaby

                                                          Mr. Rommel,
                                                          You asked me to provide you with evidence that Nuer were supporting the division of the south into 3 regions, well, no problem, I’ll talk on that next time because I can’t continue now but please remind me later because as you know I’m a busy man and have many things to do at the same time.

                                                          repondre message

                                                          • 18 March 14:12, by Jalaby

                                                            Please don’t forget to bring your note and pen to write down all the important points when I lecture you history next time and feel free to ask any question!
                                                            Have a great day!
                                                            Best regards,

                                                            Jalaby (Abo Jalabia)

                                                            repondre message

                                                    • 18 March 14:18, by Rommel

                                                      Jalaby:
                                                      Are you lampooning us for preparing to attend a donor conference!? This is begging. This is abject behavior, worthy of ridicule, isn’t it? But wait, your country did the same thing. A donor conference for Sudan was organised by Turkey and was subsequently cancelled due to U.S. meddling. Another donor conference organised by Norway for Sudan was also scuttled.

                                                      repondre message

                                                      • 18 March 14:23, by Rommel

                                                        You recently begged Germany to write off your debts and invest in your blood-soaked country. I won’t mention the billions you beg from the Arabs in the Gulf. You are so proud and yet you beg. Why!? But you’ll find a way to justify this, won’t you? They’re pure Arabs (not like you Arabized Nubians)and so it’s okay if you beg from them. LOL!

                                                        repondre message

                                                        • 18 March 14:31, by Rommel

                                                          It’s hilarious that you would ridicule us for this. You ridicule the South for tribal violence, despite the fact that you’re the world’s new champions in tribal violence. You seem to see no problems with comparing the quarter of a million dead in Darfur to South Sudan’s 2000 dead as of last year.

                                                          repondre message

                                                          • 18 March 14:39, by Rommel

                                                            A man’s moral character must be judged on the basis of his actions, his statements and his conscious convictions. I cannot excuse betrayal committed by a man on the spurious ground that we share blood. I will not indulge in such abject evasions. Betrayal is deserving of death — no matter who you are. You can be the Vice President, but if you betray your people, you deserve death.

                                                            repondre message

                                                            • 18 March 14:47, by Rommel

                                                              I’m a patient man and so I’ll wait for you to provide evidence that the Nuer ever supported a re-division of the South. You expect me to believe that you’re a busy man!? I supposedly know this? How!? Am I suppose to gauge this from your near perennial presence on this site?

                                                              repondre message

                                                              • 18 March 14:54, by Rommel

                                                                If I am ever to attend something featuring you, it would be a comedy routine. The idea that you could ever teach anyone anything about history is laughable. You lecturing me on history would be akin to Michael Phelps accepting advise on swimming from a swimmer in the special Olympics. It’s just not going to happen. LOL!

                                                                repondre message

                                  • 18 March 11:05, by master

                                    insect Rommel
                                    you have country with people, show us what you are going to do and stop annoying us
                                    arab were/are bad and you are good so we want to see your good governce and human rights and all nice song

                                    repondre message

                                    • 18 March 11:53, by Nuer Empire

                                      Master:We can’t show you anything as we aren’t reporting to any one of your leaders.South is an independent country with its own entities.
                                      The Nuer Empire

                                      repondre message

    • 18 March 07:50, by Tambura

      I started to beleive the words of Israeli who said good arabi is a dead one, they are not people to trust. How come they reached agreement and yesterday we heard that they already withdrew ther forces from the boarder. What that attack for?

      repondre message

      • 18 March 08:12, by cbuongdit cholkua

        Tambura, do you believe that? Arabs they say things backwards. Their withdrawal were to let the South moved their troops from those areas and then they moved in. That was their game plan. But, make sure when hygena cried/roars before he reached his perfect target,that’s a sign of failing the mission. So Sudan SAF is losing.

        repondre message

    • 18 March 07:51, by Hardball

      Jalaby, that has to be your old South Sudan! This is a 21st century South Sudan and most of your fake Arabs know now that this is not their old South Sudan! If you don’t know it; then you have to be out of your mind!

      repondre message

      • 18 March 07:54, by Hardball

        Someone who don’t these fake Arabs is someone who is not born yet!

        repondre message

    • 19 March 01:37, by Muoc Couris

      Hi Jalaba, do you know what jalaba mean to Dinka? or Southerners? It is homosexuals or gay and Abel mean rope his father name Aliar is air or win, so, you as jalaba and Abel mean here to Southerners is that gay pulling the rope in the air. North will not stand without South support form South.

      repondre message

  • 18 March 07:39, by Gabriel Ajak

    In the BZ we don’t want to see any arm person in any kind of human being either militias nor civilian, if so our reaction must be there immediately.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 08:01, by Ran jam

    This september agreement is just a timley agreement where by govenment of sudan will reserve a huge amount of money from the southern oil and buy weapon to fight south their goal from this agreement is to be able to walk again after their economic collapsed and when they satify enough than they already got their strength so they will not be affected any more by any drcision that south will take.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 08:02, by master

    SOUTH SUDAN
    be polite and honest with your self frist
    if you want to renege last agreement you can do that but the consecqueny will be painful

    repondre message

  • 18 March 13:48, by James Maker Akok

    Southerns Sudanese,
    We know North Sudan Government need South Sudan lands for them to be rich. our blaming go to President Kiir with his team leaders for not listening us.

    repondre message

    • 18 March 17:40, by Oppressor

      If we need your land we could ’ve not agreed to let you to have self determination & even we couldn’t accept CPA . be4 2005 ur land was ours ask urself why we let u come & role it plz don’t tell me SPLAM/N Defeated SAF coz it is Funny hahaha.. unfortunately we gave u land but u are useless u can’t role it u are 7 ranked citizenship White ppl are 1st with Salva Fake..

      repondre message

      • 18 March 20:08, by James Maker Akok

        Oppressor,
        North Sudan Government was forced by Eastern African Leaders, and UN to signed CPA and let South Sudan get their decision for their own country Independence. This is what North Sudan Government need now they need to be force again by Eastern African Leaders, and UNSC for South Sudan to get their Lands.

        repondre message

  • 18 March 14:39, by Samuel Malual

    There are enemies of peace who act in the name of the Sudanese government. So my people from South should stop rushing with endless accusation. who knows, maybe LRA might be responsible of this attack.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 15:40, by philipdit wol

    "you see what we cuase on withdrawal issue by NCP."

    repondre message

  • 18 March 16:25, by Makuer Marou Manok

    those foolish Arabs the don’t want us to have peace even if we are different nation. they just respect you when you fight them serious like what our army did in 1997 that led to let them agree peace accord with us. so at this time again they want to be crushed like butterfly, then they call peace.

    repondre message

    • 18 March 17:47, by Oppressor

      Big liar u didn’t force us to accept peace agreement. foolish

      repondre message

    • 18 March 21:26, by Oppressor

      " Interior Minister of Sudan & Saudi Counterpart Discuss Bilateral and Security Relations " you see bloody idiots Bilateral we are talking here not war like you useless tank thinkers ...

      repondre message

  • 18 March 16:28, by Lobby

    The Root Problem: Al Bashir et al DO NOT say what the MEAN, NOR do they MEAN what they SAY! Their identity crisis plays the role: They are thorn apart between looking like a "Arab" and "Black" African! They always seek confirmation and support from Egypt and the Arab world! Confirmation, certifing to them that they are "Human" enough to be Arab! Hence they can’t live in harmony with Black Sudanese

    repondre message

    • 18 March 17:52, by Oppressor

      If so then why we were living with you idiot it is good u dis-part but tell me why u are so jelly about being Arabs or not simply it is non of ur business .. but hey u are just lazy doing nothing ..

      repondre message

  • 18 March 16:56, by JUNNUB-SHEPHERD

    When it come to war;only poor brothers like my innocent brother on the photo will face hardship defending JUNNUB Whilst bigbellies asshole who loot money for these poor soldiers without shame will be on comfort zone with their families.
    WHEN WILL YOU LEARN BEAUTIFUL WORD "ALTRUISM" BIGBELLIES ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    repondre message

  • 18 March 17:38, by hellonearth

    Believe me South Sudan when i say that Oil will never flow through the north again. Believe that this agreement is not new and will fail like the rest. only that this time South Sudan is going to be the winner.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 17:43, by Kim Deng

    The 1955 Torit mutiny marked the beginning of the 17 year old bush war that was ended by the defunct Anya Nya I and by the Anya-Nya II insurgencies from 1975-1983, were fought on the principle of the right of self-determination-meaning the establishment of an independent and sovereign State in the South. When the Addis Ababa Accord of 1972 was signed as an attempt to bring the country...

    repondre message

  • 18 March 17:44, by Kim Deng

    its first civil war [1955-1972] between the government and the rebel’s movement [SSPLM/A] to an end, there was pocket of Anya-Nya One elements who doubted about the implementation of the Accord due to lack of commitment and seriousness from government side.
    These few separatists remained in the bush despite the Accord until many other soldiers rejoined them after Akobo mutiny in 1975...

    repondre message

  • 18 March 17:45, by Kim Deng

    spearheaded by Vincent Kuany Latjor before Bor and Ayod mutinies erupted in 1983 respectively. They became a unified force and carried the name SSLM/A or Anya-Nya II, the only well-known name for many people under the command of CDR. Vincent Kuany Latjor, whereas Bilpam became their Headquarters. There were over 7,000 troops behind SSLM/A [Anya-Nya II] and the objective of their movement...

    repondre message

  • 18 March 17:47, by Kim Deng

    was for total separation of the South from the rest of the country unlike SPLA/M with its “New Sudan,” vision.
    After the arrivals of “Newcomers,” as Anya-Nya II call them in 1983, two camps were formed within “New-arrivals/Newcomers.” Camp A was under the leadership of Lt. Col. Sammuel Gai Tut Yang, Mr. Quot Atem and CDR. William Abdalla Chuol Deng. Meanwhile, Camp B, led by Col. Dr. John Garang,

    repondre message

  • 18 March 17:48, by Kim Deng

    CDR. Kerubino Kwanyin Bol and CDR. William Nyuony Bany. The factious between the two camps it is noteworthy mentioned and it was due to two critical following factors. 1) What should be the sole objectives of the movement and its principles? 2) Who shall lead the movement (SPLA/M?) Camp A, proposed that, the objective of the movement shall be “self-determination-meaning complete separation...

    repondre message

  • 18 March 17:50, by Kim Deng

    of the country into two independent and sovereign states juxtaposition with Egypt and the North along the Nile Valley and the movement SPLA/M shall be led by Mr. Kuot Atem follow by Lt. Col. Samuel Gai Tut ,” instead Camp B, did not only rejected that proposal, but came up with its own ideology, an ideology of “United Socialist Secular/New Sudan, and the leader of the movement shall be...

    repondre message

    • 18 March 18:17, by Oppressor

      F A K E H I S T O R Y ... SO FUNNNNNNNNNY STICK TO HISTORY WAKE UP THIS 2013 WAKE UP SLEEP SOUTHNERS ...

      repondre message

  • 18 March 17:59, by Kim Deng

    shall be Lt. Col. Samuel Gai Tut Yang follow by Col. Dr. Garang.” It took the two camps few months before camp B rushed to use force against camp A due to fact that, the Ethiopian government which sealed a conspiracy and surreptitious deal with Garang against the separatists was acting behind the scene rather than being a mediator between the two rivals.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 18:00, by Majongdit

    Rommel vs Jalaby: I read it all and analysed it and then came to one conclusion; It was a man against a boy. Leave Jalaby alone...he does not know what he is doing. He does what he does to justify his pay slip.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 18:00, by Kim Deng

    From their last meeting CDR. Rhino William Nyuony Bany who doesn’t care about the human life pulled out his pistol and hold it with his right hand while pointing it at Lt. Col. Samuel Gai Tut and CDR. Cobra Abdallah William Chuol Deng, and said “from today onwards, anyone who appears to oppose Dr. Garang’s leadership and the objective of the movement ‘New Sudan,’ must not be silenced by talks,...

    repondre message

  • 18 March 18:02, by Kim Deng

    but bullet.” Camp A, took technical withdrawal from the area (Itang) without a fight just to avoid casualties within the town and to give camp B more time to reverse its dead-end judgments toward South Sudan issues.
    To make the matter worse, after Col. Dr. Garang’s group secured its position against Lt. Col. Samuel Gai Tut’s group, the seizure of Lt. Col. Samuel’s group by Mr. Marxist-Leninist..

    repondre message

  • 18 March 18:03, by Kim Deng

    Garang group did not satisfy Garang’s appetite, but went further and channeled his doom plan to annihilate the [Anya-Nya II] in Bilpam by force due to fact that this secessionists’ movement shared the same principles and objectives with camp A. Therefore, to secure the “New Sudan,” vision fully, “the Anya Nya II HQTRs, Bilpam must be destroyed and/or dislodged from its foundation,”...

    repondre message

  • 18 March 18:04, by Kim Deng

    And on other hand, Mr. Mengistu Hailemariam of Ethiopia, a man who got separatist rebels’ movements [Woyane & Shabiah] in his own backyard seemed to forget that his government had her own chestnuts roasting in the store for it, impose his socialist ideology on southern Sudanese and that mission must be fulfilled by someone who believes in that vision; “Dr. Garang must be the right person,”...

    repondre message

  • 18 March 18:05, by Kim Deng

    according to calculation of “Dergue” regime base on its interests and bipartisan issues between the two allies.
    With no regret, the Ethiopian armed forces along with few elements from Garang’s group launched an assault against the Anya-Nya II position in October 1983 which caught them by surprise. The Anya-Nya II headquarters, Bilpam was not only smashed down to ground, but many separatists’...

    repondre message

  • 18 March 18:06, by Kim Deng

    fighters were eliminated and those who caught alive were ordered to dig out their own graves before executed them by firing-squad if they repudiate joining the former Marxist-Leninist SPLA/M. Of course, many deserters from the Anya-Nya II joined Garang’s group conditionally, amongst them; CDR. John Kulang and CDR. Kuach Kang.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 18:14, by Majongdit

    Jalaby,
    Can you please lend me your ears?
    1. Most of S Sudanese commentators in this site are here in South Sudan. Of course, we have our broters in the diasphora and it’s the same for the N Sudan.
    2. The US Donor Conference for S Sudan was going to be a disaster for Sudan. The new spirit in signing the matrix may have helped S Sudan but it helped swayed off a disaster that would have befallen S

    repondre message

    • 18 March 18:22, by Oppressor

      Majongdit AM WRITING TO YOU IDIOT FROM KHARTOUM & WE ARE 1ST CITIZEN NOT 7TH AFTER DOGS & AMERICAN WERE HELPING U BE4 WHAT U ACHIEVED NOTHING COZ U ARE UNEDUCATED & JUST CLAIMING DEMOCRACY LOOK AT UR CORRUPTED 75 PM WHO LOOTED 4 BLNS & U COULD NOT DO ANYTHING U S A WILL NEVER PAY TO FAKE CORRUPTED GOVT ... FNUY MAN

      repondre message

      • 18 March 19:00, by Majongdit

        MR OPPRESSOR, 1ST CITIZEN,
        YOU ARE THE FIRST; THOSE OF AMERICA AND THE ENTIRE EUROPE COME AFTER YOU. YOU ARE IN HEAVEN, EVERYONE ELSE IS STILL ON THE MOON.
        I DONT TALK ABOUT EDUCATION, I ALLOW OTHERS TO JUDGE HOW EDUCATED I AM. I’M NOT EDUCATED, FINE.
        OUR 75 OFFICIALS STOLE 4M, ONE MAN IN SUDAN STOLE A WHOLE 9BILLION AND HE STILL GOES AS A NATIONAL HERO.
        YOU FAILED TO OPPRESS S SUDANESE,IT’S FAC

        repondre message

        • 18 March 21:11, by Oppressor

          Look at this funny :
          China Stresses Importance of Developed Relations with Sudan
          Khartoum - China said keen to fur-ther promote the friendly relations with Sudan, exchange support at international forums and cooperate in all fields.Receiving the Sudanese foreign minister Ali Karti yesterday; the Chinese ambassador to Khar-toum Luo Xiaoguang said the new Chinese administration will continue fosteri

          repondre message

        • 18 March 21:12, by Oppressor

          Look at this funny :
          China Stresses Importance of Developed Relations with Sudan
          Khartoum - China said keen to fur-ther promote the friendly relations with Sudan, exchange support at international forums and cooperate in all fields.Receiving the Sudanese foreign minister Ali Karti yesterday; the Chinese ambassador to Khar-toum Luo Xiaoguang said the new Chinese administration will continue fosteri

          repondre message

          • 18 March 21:18, by Oppressor

            Continue ..
            Fostering to the president, government, and people of Sudan.Karti delivered messages from President Al Bashir to his Chi-nese counterpart Xi Jinping and the head of the state council. The foreign minister also delivered a message to his new counterpart.Karti thanked China for its continued support for Sudan and said he hopes relations will flourish even more under the new administratio

            repondre message

  • 18 March 18:37, by Majongdit

    Master,
    1. THE INSECTS MANAGED TO OBSTRUCT THE ARAB AND ISLAMIC AGENDA FOR AFRICA FOR CENTURIES. IT’S THE REASON ISLAM AND ARABIZATION NEVER WENT BEYOND NUBA LAND.
    2. THE INSECTS MANAGED TO TAKE A WHOLE COUNTRY IN YOUR WATCHFUL EYES
    INSECTS, INSECTS, INSECTS...CONTINUE TO SAY IT MISTER MYSTRY MAN.

    repondre message

    • 18 March 20:41, by Northern Sudanese

      Majongdit
      Islam is currently the fastest growing religion in the ’’world’’ I don’t know where you get this nonsense from ,and you insects received your freedom and land ’’through a piece of paper’’ keep dreaming bitch, when those dumb Islamists who signed the Nivasha agreement were dumb, wait until ’’real’’ islamists come to power, you better find a refuge in Rwanda lol

      repondre message

  • 18 March 20:43, by Northern Sudanese

    Lets say this was true, If we really took those areas after they withdrew why didn’t they go back and fight instead of crying at the media? because all they have is a couple of tanks and land cruisers, it really doesn’t take that long to turn the truck back lol!
    lying pussy whores :D

    repondre message

  • 18 March 22:40, by Observer

    The IQ of this website has just lowered.
    Jalaby has returned - and is convinced that he is so superior of intelligence... but in reality he is just a buffoon ..

    repondre message

  • 19 March 01:40, by Muoc Couris

    Hi Jalaba, do you know what jalaba mean to Dinka? or Southerners,it is homosexuals or gay and Abel mean rope his father name Aliar is air or win, so, you as jalaba and Abel mean here to Southerners is that gay pulling the rope in the air. North will not stand without Southerners support.

    repondre message

    • 19 March 05:19, by Northern Sudanese

      Muoc Couris
      you know, gays and homosexuals don’t belong in sharia state, that is what you didn’t like and why you let, because you are all whores and gays. when you speak about soutrh sudanese, you think of dirt , disease , urine showers and so on. what do we want from south? oil? dude please, more than halve your people depend on food aid already :D go have your urine shower!

      repondre message

      • 19 March 07:08, by Nuer Empire

        North Sudanese:Lool,Islam is what!? I have never seen Muslims man in South Sudan for 2 years now.Where is it growing!? That world doesn’t include South Sudan.
        The Nuer Empire

        repondre message

      • 19 March 23:17, by Muoc Couris

        fack off with your sharia

        repondre message

  • 19 March 05:12, by Axios

    Fruitless to argue with such people. First step is to verify the validity of these claims and if so, then from whom they came.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


On Abyei enough is enough 2013-06-18 05:01:47 By Deng Vanang June 17, 2013 - No one whether locally or internationally can still argue there is more hope to resolve Abyei stalemate peacefully. It has been everybody’s wish that dialogue could (...)

The arming of rebels in Sudan and South Sudan: what is the evidence? 2013-06-18 04:57:44 By Eric Reeves 17 June 2013 - News reporting in general, a great deal of analytic writing, and virtually all diplomatic pronouncements about military support for rebel groups—in South Sudan and (...)

Bashir’s decision, a material breach of the oil agreement 2013-06-16 06:21:14 By Justice Deng Biong June 15, 2013 - After its ratification by the National legislatures in both South Sudan and Sudan States, the Cooperation Agreement [CA] (Oil Agreement included) signed on (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Nuer Youth and Prophet Ngundeng’s Historical Society call for unity in South Sudan 2013-06-14 05:40:43 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Leadership of Nuer Youth and Ngundeng’s Historical Society, Juba, South Sudan June 12, 2013 - Due to the announcement made by President Bashir to abrogate the September, (...)

South Sudanese lawyers call for the respect of the rule of law and human rights 2013-06-14 01:01:36 South Sudan Law Society (SSLS) 7 June 2013 Lawyers in the Republic of South Sudan call for advocacy for the supremacy of the respect of the rule of Law, Human Rights in South Sudan South Sudan (...)

South Sudan civil society alliance ask to meet the president 2013-06-12 05:23:59 South Sudan Civil Society Alliance National Issues Discussed with the Presidential Legal Advisor and Appeal to meet the President June 7, 2013 Ladies and gentlemen of the press, today the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.