Home | News    Sunday 17 March 2013

Elders seek removal of N. Bahr el Ghazal governor

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

March 16, 2013 (JUBA) - Elders and prominent political figures from South Sudan’s Greater Bahr el Ghazal region have thrown their support behind calls for the removal of Northern Bahr el Ghazal State governor, Paul Malong Awan.

JPEG - 39.4 kb
Members of Northern Bahr el Ghazal state at a community conference in Juba on 16 March 2013 (ST)

Community members argue that Awan’s behaviour was becoming “an obstacle” to community unity, raising fears that such divisions would “undermine popularity” and support for the ruling party - the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM).

The elders made the statements at a community conference in Juba to discuss solutions to political differences in Northern Bahr el Ghazal, where some groups warned South Sudan’s president Salva Kiir that he must choose between giving his support to the governor or having their cooperation.

“Let there be no any confusion. It must be clear that the people of Mading Aweil have [the] ultimate say in running and managing their own affairs and the president must make a choice between working with [governor Paul] Malong Awan and the community. The president should decide either to accept working with Malong Awan as [an] individual or accept working with the community”, former state advisor on peace and reconciliation Samayo Adut told the audience of elders and politicians.

South Sudan’s deputy speaker, Daniel Awet Akot, told the conference that he respects and supports the decision of the people of Northern Bahr el Ghazal to voice their grievances, including the demand to remove the state governor.

He gave the example of when he stepped down as governor of Lakes state.

“You know that I was a governor in Lakes state and I respected their choice when they did not want me to remain there. I simply left and went to my area to contest a parliamentary seat which brought me to the National Assembly”.

The MP suggested that Awan “should do the same thing. He should go and wait for elections. If people elect him in the next election, then he comes to Juba and if he has capabilities, the president will give him another assignment somewhere else”, Akot told the audience.

South Sudan’s deputy speaker said that he would work hard to help resolve the community’s grievances, urging the people of Northern Bahr el Ghazal to remain peaceful and supportive of SPLM activities.

Other leaders from Northern Bahr el Ghazal also spoke of political problems in the border state, including Ambrose Riiny Thiik, the former president of the Supreme Court of Southern Sudan. The state was an autonomous region of Sudan during the six-year period following the 2005 peace deal that led to South Sudan’s independence in 2011.

Thiik said while significant problems remained in Northern Bahr el Ghazal, he had been reluctant to give support to those raising such issues before the grievances were formally brought to the attention of elders and the government.

“We know there is a big problem in Aweil but we did want to be seen as supporting one side because it could be [like supporting] individual grudges. We did not want to be seen as against Malong Awan. We wanted [the] community to talk themselves like this. We will now stand with you. We will support what you want. We have seen how people have spoken. These are being recorded. There are videos. The journalists are doing their work. We will take this to the president and what you have said as it is”, said Thiik.

Aldo Ajou Deng Akuey, a former deputy prime minister in Sudan in the 1980s and now chairperson of the human rights and legal affairs committee in the Council of States, accused Awan of having divided Northern Bahr el Ghazal, resulting in politicians and intellectuals deserting the state.

“There can never be unity when Malong is still a governor. He is the cause of all these divisions. He divided all the people and created camps”, Akuey told the conference. He also accused the governor of “not respecting [the] constitution”.

JPEG - 36.2 kb
MPs from Northern Bahr el Ghazal speaking to people outside South Sudan’s parliament in Juba who were demonstrating against the inclusion of Mile 14 in a demilitarised buffer zone on the border with Sudan, 15 October 2012 (ST)

However, Sultant Abdul Bagi Ayii Akol, a former presidential advisor on peace, borders and traditional affairs, denied the existence of any divisions in the state. Instead he blamed neighbouring Warrap, president Kiir’s home state, claiming that it had a disproportionate number of ministerial and other positions in government, causing politicians in Northern Bahr el Ghazal to compete for fewer opportunities.

“We have no problem amongst ourselves, the problem is in Warrap. They are the ones who have taken more seats and gave us only two positions in the national government. They took more than they would have deserved if fair distribution and allocation of power was exercised. This is what we should be saying”, Akol told the gathering in a short speech.

Dhieu Mathok Diing Wol, chairperson of the Employees Justice Chamber, said Northern Bahr el Ghazal does not belong to Awan and criticised him for dismissing six SPLM MPs from state parliament last year.

Kiir’s office recently ordered Awan to reinstate the MPs on the recommendation of the South Sudan Council of States, which had looked into the matter.

“The state does not belong to him alone. We will go with those who have been reinstated to see who will say what. This is unconstitutional”, Wol told the audience at the conference.

In a letter bearing the signature of SPLM’s deputy secretary-general Anne Itto and dated 2 July 2012, the six MPs were accused of collaborating with members from other political parties in the house in order to undermine activities of the party. Other charges include accusations of disloyalty and lack of adherence to party directives, allegations which the members have repeatedly denied and challenged the authorities to produce evidence.

Last June, Awan issued an executive order removing speaker Aguer Wol Aguer, claiming he was responding to demands by the majority of MPs for Aguer to resign as instructed by the SPLM. Awan said his intervention to remove the speaker was to “preserve unity” in the party.

But, the Council of States rejected the decision, describing it as unconstitutional and passed a resolution reinstating Aguer as the legitimate speaker. The upper house of South Sudan’s parliament sought the approval of the president who, in February, issued a directive asking Awan to implement the decision of the house without preconditions. Kiir also asked Awan to call for political convention in the state.

The speaker of the Council of States, Joseph Bol Chan, on Saturday accused Awan of encroachment into the competence of another institution, saying his actions were in clear violation of the constitution.

“We have a big problem in this country. We have people who do not respect [the] constitution. They act as if they are above the law. The constitution is the supreme law of the land anywhere. It provides a system of checks and balances by its design. In our constitution, we have a decentralised system composed of three independent branches: executive branch, legislative branch and the judiciary. In practice, each holds separate but equal powers which prevent any single branch from exercising an unwarranted amount of influence over the operation and function of the other”, Chan explained.

“The governor has no right to remove the speaker in this case. This was why the council reinstated the speaker and the six members to their positions”, he added.

The Greater Bahr el Ghazal conference, involving Northern Bahr el Ghazal, Western Bahr el Ghazal, Warrap and Lakes state, was expected to conclude its deliberations on Sunday.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 17 March 08:36, by Anti-traitors!

    Ha, I afraid,this will be the end of Gen. Awan. Look like Kiir will go with the majority. Otherwise, let’s wait to see...!

    repondre message

    • 17 March 10:00, by Tong dut

      That man soon will die, we hate him and we shall see what kiir will do?
      He is a good killer in N. Bahr el Ghazal.
      Elders we support you with that action, go a head, official meeting will fuck him out.

      repondre message

      • 17 March 10:48, by Nhom wadit

        Dear
        there is no need of promising the death to governor, the death is known, who will die first and who will die last , so dear don’t bring death ,none of you will die. May God bless you and governor Malong as well as everybody in Mading Awiel and south sudanese all.

        repondre message

    • 18 March 08:51, by Ker.

      for those of you who are supporting that idea,let me assure you that this will never work or will bring confusion.
      why am saying this,is not because i like the way Malong handle North BG affairs but look at these groups who claimed to have seen the badness of Malong esp.
      1 Aldo ajou
      2 sumeya Adut
      3 Dhieu Mathok
      Riny Thiik and so on
      please look to thier backgrounds in relation to correcting mistake

      repondre message

      • 18 March 10:49, by Morthon Akol

        Man you are very right. most of those who seeking for removal of the governor they have a bad background and some of them are former government official. guys let me give you this example. look at Like state now after Kiir remove the elected governor. people state saying that the former one is better. so guys make sure if Kiir remove Malong you will not cry like Like state citizens.

        repondre message

    • 18 March 08:51, by Ker.

      for those of you who are supporting that idea,let me assure you that this will never work or will bring confusion.
      why am saying this,is not because i like the way Malong handle North BG affairs but look at these groups who claimed to have seen the badness of Malong esp.
      1 Aldo ajou
      2 sumeya Adut
      3 Dhieu Mathok
      Riny Thiik and so on
      please look to thier backgrounds in relation to correcting mistake

      repondre message

    • 18 March 08:55, by Ker.

      for those of you who are supporting that idea,let me assure you that this will never work or will bring confusion.
      why am saying this,is not because i like the way Malong handle North BG affairs but look at these groups who claimed to have seen the badness of Malong esp.
      1 Aldo ajou
      2 sumeya Adut
      3 Dhieu Mathok
      Riny Thiik and so on
      please look to thier backgrounds in relation to correcting mistake

      repondre message

      • 18 March 09:06, by Ker.

        these peoples they are not fit to contribute in any development ideas as their own images and stand during struggle were not clear or betrayal rather.
        if people such as Ajonga,Deng Wol,Bustos Bol,Jal Malith,Athian Teng include some women whom we know to have suffered with us during struggle, i can support but these group i can called them "power hunger group" which should not be listen to.

        repondre message

  • 17 March 09:01, by kamal

    that is very good decision keep it up and change him or let go back to millitary

    repondre message

    • 17 March 09:44, by Peacocktail

      I DO NOT AGREE WITH REMOVAL, It is too late to remove the Governor, Election is under way in 2015 and People who do not like him must vote him out simply. How you elected the Person do then changed your mind in the middle of journey....Be Patience Aweilian, Demarcated the Border first and Awan shall go home peacefully. Give Yes it due.Gen, Awan maintain the border Security FIRST. Do not remove him

      repondre message

    • 17 March 09:45, by Peacocktail

      I DO NOT AGREE WITH REMOVAL, It is too late to remove the Governor, Election is under way in 2015 and People who do not like him must vote him out simply. How you elected the Person do then changed your mind in the middle of journey....Be Patience Aweilian, Demarcated the Border first and Awan shall go home peacefully. Give Yes it due.Gen, Awan maintain the border Security FIRST. Do not remove him

      repondre message

      • 17 March 17:59, by bakuluk

        I disagree,for remove Governor,it is not right time to remove him.if you code Abagi Ayii speech,Awiel politician need be patient here,there is political ideology that can cause back fire,to Awiel Communities,

        repondre message

  • 17 March 09:52, by kamal

    Awan is not the only soldier in NBG

    repondre message

    • 17 March 10:33, by Dhong Bang Aweil

      Dear Aweilisn, whom do you think should be good enough to take over this Awan’s post? Awan is good interms of millitary and you know very well that we are still having fear behind us at boarder. Will his removal really be good?

      repondre message

  • 17 March 10:44, by whatsayyou

    Mr. A wet Akot is supporting the removal of the Governor Awan, on the other hand he want to contest of governorship in 2015 general election. What has he left behind when he was the governor of lakes s1tate?

    repondre message

    • 17 March 12:10, by Tutbol

      Governor Awan has the respect of all S Sudanese on his stances, but our current federal government officials including our fool presiding want him out at all costs, because Governor Awan stands in his/their way of re-uniting S Sudan & N Sudan. Kiir is playing with fire, he should resign & take his Gogrial clan to Khartoum so that we are left to fight our known enemies...

      repondre message

      • 17 March 12:17, by Tutbol

        ... The fool with his councils minsters fools should be banned in some states. These fooled should be restricted in some states, until they are out of their fooling people around.

        repondre message

  • 17 March 14:17, by Mel mosa

    Dear all
    I think this guys call themselves community elders are joking. Kiir will never remove Malong from governor. Lake state governor was removed for security reason and not compare with General Malong.

    repondre message

  • 17 March 14:47, by James Maker Akok

    People,
    LOL, I see every body who has education in South Sudan just fight for his mouth thing to has job in Government to confuse people. They think if they educate they must be working in government offices, that is a bad thinking. There are many jobs which are not Government offices educators people are working and they get money than some people working in Government offices.

    repondre message

  • 17 March 14:49, by Samuel Malual

    70 wives times 70 mothers inlaws times
    100 boys inlaw times relatives and hundreds childern of his own equal Northern Bahr El Ghazal budget. Malong must be removed in Aweil.

    repondre message

  • 17 March 15:23, by blesssing

    I DO NOT AGREE WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE GOVERNOR. Paul Malong is an elected Governor and elected Governor can be removed by the public but not politicians who were reshufled out in the state government. Elected Governor can be impeached by the people’s representatives in the assembly.

    repondre message

  • 17 March 15:52, by blesssing

    People needs to know something about laws of South Sudan and the constitution.
    If we remain removing the Governors regardless of the constitutional term limit, what do you thing will happened? We elect & remove, appoint & remove. Is there a democratic country like that? Even they will claim the removal of the President if that is the case.

    repondre message

  • 17 March 17:48, by Madingthith

    Dear Celebrators,
    Let us be reasonable enough and be good analyst and not rush to the point and start celebrating on what is not yet taken it course. I really agree with Mr. Blessing in his comments if we keep removing the elected Constitutional post holders one time we will be forced to removed the President.Elders who called such a meeting for his removal are wasting resources which could be

    repondre message

    • 17 March 17:56, by Madingthith

      The money used for this meeting could be useful if these Elders and prominent Politicians could think of other developmental events that promote NBeGs instead of conveneing a meeting which will bring division among the people of Northern Bahr el Ghazal State.All the Speakers talked against Awan, only wiseman Ayii Akol talked in differ with his colleagues beco he know what will happen next time

      repondre message

  • 17 March 20:26, by Madingthith

    1. Elected Governor can only be removed by Presidential decree or vote with no confidents by state Legislative Assembly Members.
    2. Wait until 2015, when his term is expired and mobilise the community not to re-elect him again.
    3. You better need not to invite external bodies to speak on your own state affairs e.g. Daniel Awet Akot and Ambrose Riny Thiik. What do they know about Aweil Affairs?

    repondre message

  • 18 March 03:20, by Bol Bul

    The removal of Awan should be with the reasons not employment reasons for someone to get his position. Awan position is only one position will not enough for Mading-Aweil population. Pleas remove him peacefully, if Mading-Aweil get into crisis, South Sudan will be in a big disaster.
    Response to Sultant Abdul Bagi Ayii, this old man please advised him not to blamed neighboring people.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 07:21, by Fundamental Change icon

    It’s absolutely their constitutional right to remove the dictator from power more so if they deem it neccassary in regards to failurity to perform coz it was the suppreme will of the people who hitherto put him in the current position.So the elders represent the people on the ground.So Kiir must listen to the elders and dislodge Awan just as he did to Chol i wish Rizick is also dislodged.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 12:15, by Ajongtar

    Mr. President dont listen to those bogus people who are your neiboughre.
    They are the one who elected Poul Malong Awan as thier Governor of the year 2010 to 2015.
    If you side with them, then I will recomend you to desolve the ministry of Security in your office, then you bring Malong Awan as DG for security answerable to you, and the 2 directors of ESSO & ISSO to report to Malong Awan.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 12:46, by Garang

    Finally, Malong maintained corrupt, unproductive, thieves, womanizers and valueless in his government and the good example is Madut Dut Yel (Abuk Abuk. This guy is doing nothing since his appointment, he is just there to grab lands and threat people. Malong need to remove him and appoint capable person to assist him.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 12:52, by Garang

    First, Aweil people on ground will not accept the resolutions because they were not put as part of it.
    2ndly, we need to know who funded the conference?
    3rdly, the colour of the elders is not clear to Aweilians.
    We agreed there are some mistakes Malong had done but they can be correct rather than removing him from the post. Those who are claiming for the removal didn’t even vote for him.

    repondre message

  • 18 March 13:02, by Garang

    Malong need to urgently correct the following mistakes to be more peaceful with Aweil Community. 1. the humiliation he had done to Aweil West people by appointing Garang Kuac from Aweil East as commissioner of Aweil West. 2. Reinstatement of 6 MPs and speaker. 3. Reconciling with colleagues during the war so that collaborators could keep quite.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


National unity: a project for each and every South Sudanese 2013-05-21 14:23:01 By Jacob K. Lupai May 21, 2013 - South Sudan has just attained independence from an imposed unity that had failed miserably to take into account the objective realities on the ground. In the old (...)

Unity and reconciliation necessary for sustainable peace in Darfur 2013-05-21 14:19:47 By Adeeb Yousif May 20, 2013 -The biggest challenge in the Darfur conflict today is divisions. These divisions have created misunderstanding and mistrust within Darfurian society. Moreover they (...)

The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Sudan: Anatomy of a Conflict—New Report from Harvard Humanitarian Initiative 2013-05-22 00:46:46 Harvard Researchers Publish Satellite Imagery-Based History of Conflict in Sudan 2000+ Civilian Structures Appear Intentionally Destroyed; Humanitarian Agencies Targeted May 21, 2013 (...)

Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.