Home | News    Saturday 16 March 2013

Darfur rebels claim killing of 260 Sudanese soldiers

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

March 16, 2013 (KHARTOUM) - The Sudan Liberation Movement-Minni Minnawi (SLM-MM) said on Friday that it has killed some 260 Sudanese soldiers following clashes that took place in an area near Nyala, the capital of South Darfur state.

SLM-MM military spokesperson Saleh Adam Abakr said they clashed with the Sudanese army and its allied militias in Abga-Ragil, an area located some 10kms south of Nyala, where they crushed the assailants.

According to a statement the group extended to Sudan Tribune, there were 170 soldiers and 90 militiaman among the 260 people they killed during the fighting.

He said they also killed a militia leader called Ali Tirbo and captured the commander of forces sent to attack them.

Abakr added they captured 35 soldiers, destroyed two tanks and 14 vehicles.

The Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) spokesperson was not immediately available for comment.

According to the rebels, government forces had attempted to dislodge rebels from the area five times.

The SLM-MM is part of a rebel alliance, known as the Sudan Revolutionary Front (SRF), that is fighting the Khartoum government in South Kordofan and Blue Nile states, as well as Darfur.

Recently, Khartoum said it had attained intelligence that rebels were planning to attack large towns in Blue Nile, South Kordofan and the five states of Darfur in Sudan’s western region.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 16 March 09:57, by Robot

    IF THIS ARTICLE IS TRUE, THEN NCP SHOULD ACCEPT TO NEGOTIATE WITH SRF, PERIOD.

    repondre message

    • 16 March 17:31, by zulu

      NCP NEGOTIATES MINCINGLY BY DIVING THE REBELS. SEE HOW THE OBSOLENCE OF THE BRITISH SYSTEM IS REDANDANT. UNITE AND RULE AS A MODEL OF DEMOCRACY IS SUSTAINABLE. THERE IS NO CHOICE FOR THE NCP BUT RELINQUISH POWER

      repondre message

    • 17 March 05:47, by Mohammed Ali 2

      Robot,you said it all; if this article is true! WAW, they killed 260 soldiers, that is almost a battalion. Well Heglig was freed with a battlion , who will mobilise a battalion to attack Minn’s forces?!The SAF is attacking,and could withdraw any time when facing such heavy losses.Minni is a non-educated person who wants to boost his image within the rebels!

      repondre message

      • 17 March 06:46, by Rommel

        Mohammed Ali:
        Your insistence on sprouting lies, exaggerations and embellishments from a point of irreparable ignorance is beyond belief. "Heglig" was not taken by a battalion. A battalion is around 300-1200 in size. Prior to our entry into Aliiny the SAF had 15, 000 troops stationed there. A division was what you had — and a division is most certainly what you required.

        repondre message

        • 17 March 06:52, by Rommel

          The SAF has maintained heavy forces in and around Abyei and the neighbouring oil areas. As many 15,000 troops are reportedly stationed in Heglig (Sudan: Breaking the Abyei Deadlock - International Crisis Group Africa, Briefing N°47 Nairobi/Brussels, 12 October 2007)

          repondre message

          • 17 March 07:05, by Rommel

            Truth truly is the first casualty of war. I very much doubt that Minnawi’s forces could have inflicted such heavy losses. When belligerents in a war make claims precisely like this, a healthy dose of skepticism must be employed as well as a distillation and confirmation of the facts from multiple sources.

            repondre message

        • 17 March 12:02, by Mohammed Ali 2

          Rommel, where is a lie and is exaggeration!15 ooo is 10 battlions, so that what you mean to say!Only in Heglig!And where is the arrogancy?15000 may be in all SK, non of them was withdrawn to attack Heglig. Do I said anything personally against anyone here? Did pretend to be an al-knowing person?I said you have to check your delusion of the grandeur, you might get help.

          repondre message

          • 17 March 12:34, by Rommel

            Mohammed Ali:
            The source (that I cited for your benefit) clearly says that you had 15, 000 troops stationed in "Heglig". See unlike you I don’t just make things up or make claims without providing evidence of some sort. Only "Heglig"!? You do realise that "Heglig" on its own accounts for 50% of your oil production. It is of tremendous importance... necessitating the protection of a division.

            repondre message

            • 17 March 12:55, by Rommel

              Do you honestly believe that you could possibly have only 15, 000 troops in all of south Kordofan!? Do you even know just how big South Kordofan is!? It’s bigger than England! 15, 000 troops simply wouldn’t cut it for an area of that size, especially when the area is experiencing a large rebellion with tens-of-thousands of fighters. It is you -and not I- that is guilty of delusions.

              repondre message

              • 17 March 13:07, by Rommel

                Even the United States [the word’s most powerful military] would require far more troops than you’re suggesting for an area of that size. It’s good that you have *faith* in your military, but let’s not go off the deep end. You can project all of your intellectual and moral vacuities and mental sicknesses onto me, because it’s all you have.

                repondre message

  • 16 March 10:03, by kamal

    very good job brothers kill them

    repondre message

    • 16 March 15:19, by Chol

      Sudan think South Sudan will let their oil through that hostile environment!? No way; it’s not going to happen. The rebel/freedom fighter in the regions will not allow oil through because the oil money is going to be used to exterminate them just in the way the oil money was used to terrorize South Sudanese in their struggle. South Sudan shouldn’t allow the oil to be used to killed innocence.

      repondre message

  • 16 March 10:03, by william mawien

    No joke with srf el bashir will surrendered to icc soon

    repondre message

  • 16 March 10:20, by Gabriel Ajak

    on that way you shall be recognizes we were like so before.
    SLM OYEEE MM OYEEE

    repondre message

  • 16 March 10:21, by James Maker Akok

    People,
    North Sudan Government think agreement with South Sudan Government will make South Sudan Government to help North Sudan Government to prevent Rebel attacking North Sudan Government. That is their wrong thinking, South Sudan Government will never help North Sudan Government to prevent Rebel attacking North Sudan Government.

    repondre message

    • 16 March 10:36, by Nibs

      Congratulation for job well done, i advise you to immediately kill those 35 captives.

      repondre message

  • 16 March 11:09, by ForAll

    Yes the Darfurian rebels killed many and captured others.
    Darfurian rebels must respect the prisoners of war and treat them as human beings and DARFURIAN BROTHERS.

    repondre message

    • 16 March 12:09, by Peacocktail

      Good Jobs SRF, the NCP forces are over straight with fight at the South Sudan border, Hundred Kills by SPLA and dislodge, now SRF forces killing NCP SAF like flies, where are theirs jetfighters? Russian pilots refuse to be paid with Sudanese pounds as it lost against Dollars. Good news too, Now SRF must execute those captives because they could defected to your side before you magical capture them

      repondre message

    • 16 March 12:10, by Peacocktail

      Good Jobs SRF, the NCP forces are over straight with fight at the South Sudan border, Hundred Kills by SPLA and dislodge, now SRF forces killing NCP SAF like flies, where are theirs jetfighters? Russian pilots refuse to be paid with Sudanese pounds as it lost against Dollars. Good news too, Now SRF must execute those captives because they could defected to your side before you magical capture them

      repondre message

    • 16 March 12:15, by Peacocktail

      SAF captives are devils, if you don’t chopped of the head it will still be alive. if SRF forces detained the SAF captives, they will turn around and betray the movement strategies and Secret movement. Kill them because you have time with SAF, finished deals, they execute your soldiers the capture in Khartuom raid. Do not compromise SAF captives,Move a head and capture Nyala or EL obeid before Peac

      repondre message

  • 16 March 12:29, by panchol

    SRF
    well done my dear brothers, your sickness in this planet must be diagnosed and treated. keep on AK47 speaks on their heads. hahahjaha!

    repondre message

  • 16 March 13:15, by ForAll

    I am not against northern Sudanese peoples while many Darfurians are married to Northern women "Dr Al-Haj Adam, Dr. Ali Al-Haj, Dr Adam Madibo, ...and many of the highly educated)
    Iam behind removing MARGINALIZTION and setting Equal Civil Rights for every Sudanese.

    repondre message

  • 16 March 19:04, by Northern Sudanese

    This article is a joke....... not a just joke, a ’’LIE’’ a proper ’’LIE’’ which lacks evidence! typing is easy, you can type saying ’’we have destroyed the entire airforce of the sudan’’, but where is the proof?
    of course I don’t think the rebels are dumb enough to make this lie, this lie is coming from ST to please its insect brothers loooool

    repondre message

    • 16 March 20:36, by Observer

      N Sudanese,
      I hope it is a lie.
      But where is YOUR proof that it is..
      That is the trouble here.. neither side tells the truth.

      repondre message

      • 16 March 23:09, by Northern Sudanese

        Observer
        my proof is that they didn’t show any evidence, furthermore, they didn’t show the evidence of old stories such as shooting down an antinov or capturing 150 trucks! they are all lies , it might be realistic if this is the number they killed since they went back to rebellion in 2010

        repondre message

        • 16 March 23:29, by James Maker Akok

          Northern Sudanese,
          Mr. Northern, you will never agree defeat until after Rebels go inside Khartoum and killed President Al Bashir with his all leaders and captured you that is a day you will saying yes Rebels did it.

          repondre message

    • 16 March 23:19, by cbuongdit cholkua

      Lie no lie, I still believe in them. Bashir thinks he made a deal with Chadian President by moving Chadian toops to the Fur border, but African bloods are powerful enough themselves. 260s killed, 14 tanks destroyed, and 35 soldiers captured, what a big slam in Sudan Anemic Force SAF’s ass.

      repondre message

    • 17 March 00:20, by Chol

      Northern, the proof will be there when family members find out that their love ones don’t have any contacts with them anymore. If 260 soldiers are really killed; you’ll hear it throughout Khartoum from their love ones. Just reserved your judgments by not throwing the word lie so quickly!

      repondre message

    • 17 March 07:19, by Rommel

      Northern Sudanese:
      You’re being terribly paranoid. An article citing the exact claims made by the Darfurian rebels has appeared on the Reuters website. Substantive evidence for and against this claim has yet to be provided and so I think I’ll reserve judgment with a tinge of doubt. Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/16/us-sudan-darfur-idUSBRE92F0CJ20130316

      repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Alex de Waal: the rebirth of a principled activist? 2013-06-20 03:33:50 By Monim El-Jak June 19, 2013 - Whenever Alex de Waal publishes analysis or reflections, Sudanese intellectuals and activists, and the concerned international institutions and individuals, give (...)

On Abyei enough is enough 2013-06-18 05:01:47 By Deng Vanang June 17, 2013 - No one whether locally or internationally can still argue there is more hope to resolve Abyei stalemate peacefully. It has been everybody’s wish that dialogue could (...)

The arming of rebels in Sudan and South Sudan: what is the evidence? 2013-06-18 04:57:44 By Eric Reeves 17 June 2013 - News reporting in general, a great deal of analytic writing, and virtually all diplomatic pronouncements about military support for rebel groups—in South Sudan and (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Nuer Youth and Prophet Ngundeng’s Historical Society call for unity in South Sudan 2013-06-14 05:40:43 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Leadership of Nuer Youth and Ngundeng’s Historical Society, Juba, South Sudan June 12, 2013 - Due to the announcement made by President Bashir to abrogate the September, (...)

South Sudanese lawyers call for the respect of the rule of law and human rights 2013-06-14 01:01:36 South Sudan Law Society (SSLS) 7 June 2013 Lawyers in the Republic of South Sudan call for advocacy for the supremacy of the respect of the rule of Law, Human Rights in South Sudan South Sudan (...)

South Sudan civil society alliance ask to meet the president 2013-06-12 05:23:59 South Sudan Civil Society Alliance National Issues Discussed with the Presidential Legal Advisor and Appeal to meet the President June 7, 2013 Ladies and gentlemen of the press, today the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.