Home | News    Monday 11 March 2013

S. Sudan’s Kiir orders army pullout from border areas

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

March 10, 2013 (JUBA) - South Sudan president, Salva Kiir, has issued an order for immediate withdrawal of the national army (SPLA) from its border areas with Sudan, as part of the security agreement reached with the latter on Friday in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

JPEG - 13 kb
Salva Kiir (Reuters)

The president’s directive, announced on the state-owned SSTV, comes two days after Sudan and South Sudan agreed on immediate and unconditional withdrawal of forces to their side within two weeks, to allow for establishment of a safe demilitarized border zone.

The two countries, according to the African Union High Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP), also committed themselves to the deployment of the Joint Border Verification and Monitoring Mechanism (JBVMM) and the activation of all security related mechanisms from 10 March

"The president of the republic has directed withdrawal of the SPLA forces from the border areas. These instructions have been sent to the general commands for immediate implementations", Kiir said in the statement.

Both countries, under the agreement, are required to deploy their troops 10 kilometers from their current positions to their side of the border with each other, with the United Nations Interim Security Forces for Abyei (UNISFA) tasked with monitoring roles.

Last year, The inclusion of ’Mile 14’ in the proposed border buffer zone caused consternation in South Sudan’s Northern Bahr el Ghazal, despite the African Union and United Nations making clear that the location of the buffer zone would have no bearing on any final border settlement.

Sudan had initially proposed for the extension of the demilitarised area on the common border to include Blue Nile and South Kordofan, a proposal Juba declined to accept. The Sudanese army later claimed Juba refuses to pull out its troops from the disputed area of Mile 14.

James Hoth Mai, the SPLA chief of staff said he was aware of the president’s directive, and has issued instructions for immediate implementation.

"It is true. We have received orders from the presidency. The president of the republic has directed withdrawal of the SPLA forces from the border areas with Sudan with immediate effect, but it is in the event when it is seen to be a fully coordinated exercise", said the senior army official.

He however said Kiir’s order implies that as the SPLA begin to withdraw from the borders; their counterparts in the north (SAF) should equally do the same.

"It is not a one sided movement. It must be done in line with security arrangement matrix as came out in the Joint Political Security Mechanism meeting", Hoth told reporters in the capital, Juba.

The SPLA chief, did not reveal when the actual pullout of the army exercise would commence.

"We will start. The orders are being communicated through chain of command. Division commanders and commanding officers in the areas where withdrawal will take place are being informed. They are getting these orders now. We are communicating", he said.

This is itself a starting process of implementing the president’s directive, Hoth added.
Philip Aguer, the SPLA spokesperson also confirmed the order, but said the army withdrawal process will be a coordinated exercise, monitored and witnessed by international observers.

"The SPLA forces will withdraw from the border areas. We will withdraw from Sirmilaka in Western Bahr el Ghazal and the Sudan armed forces will withdraw from Kafia Kinji and other areas that they occupy. They will withdraw from Teshkuin in Unity State, Joda and Magnes in Upper Nile State. It will be a coordinated and complete process", Aguer said in a statement.

Aguer further said the implementation process would be within the framework of the Joint Political Security Mechanism, which the two sides agreed upon last week in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

"The implementation will be within the framework of the outcomes of the Joint Political Security Mechanism which calls for implementation of the security arrangement as [per the] September agreement", the SPLA spokesperson said in separate interview Sunday.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 11 March 06:14, by omoni jr.

    This is really wrong order made by President of RSS. Does he really studied the impact of this pullout? or is it because of oil to flow via N. sudan?
    Kiir need to resign immediately..........

    repondre message

    • 11 March 06:45, by Paul Chadrack

      Kiir is an illiterate person, how can you expect from him during this hard time for his government?, it is just a matter of days before this regime collapse totally.in this morning news,anti-corruption (corrupters themselves)broke,no money for them to run their affairs,tomorrow it will be the whole government.even if you withdrew no oil will flow. arabs will create another condition.

      repondre message

      • 11 March 08:03, by ngadodo

        Slava Kiir, pullout army meanwhile in Boma Solders preventing civilian from living war zone keeping them as human shills, civilian trying to going refugees comp. These act i condemned it’s because is action against human right.

        repondre message

    • 11 March 07:20, by Tong dut

      USELESS MAN,
      They bought you,the blood of those southernes killed by the Arabs is at your neck.We wants election, not you again.

      repondre message

    • 11 March 07:27, by Tong dut

      This is a very big problem,You have failed to deal with arabs. Criminal boss, only needs money from NGO.

      repondre message

    • 11 March 07:35, by Mohammed Ali 2

      Omoni, this the right step , though late! Problems are not setelled yet, but they are giving the a chance to do that peacfully ! What is wrong with that. There was no need for all the blood shed in the past 2 years nor the resources lost or sufferings of the poor, needy & vunerable.Yes, we do benifit from oil through our country, but we will not die without it.Forget about the false pride of that.

      repondre message

      • 11 March 07:44, by Mohammed Ali 2

        con: SS is a paradise, it is not.It is potentially very rich, true, equally it very much underdeveloped and pple are realy suffering after stopping oil production.Isias Ibraham courageously said what am saying , he clearly " we donnot need to support rebels in SK & BN , while we are suffering" Oviously this is the theme of discussions in SS.He didn’t invent it!Kiir was under tremendous from ...

        repondre message

        • 11 March 07:52, by Mohammed Ali 2

          con: tremendous pressure from both internal & external powers to implement this agreement, which is in the best interest of SS.The only opposition to it commes from the " super-race" Abeyei sons and " Garang’s Sons" Peace for them is dangerous. It means full democracy in the next elections,which they will definetely loose.It will followed by accountability! $ 10 BILLIONS had gone.75 figuers had...

          repondre message

          • 11 March 08:03, by Mohammed Ali 2

            con: been accused of being thieves by the president.They will allow democracy to prevail easily?!This why they are delaying the SPLA conference.Kiir will definetely loose to Machar, who will get support even from some Dinka.Machar is building his base carefully and didn’t involve himself in any internal conflict eg. sacking popular army generals!The sentement against the hegemony of Abeyei gang...

            repondre message

            • 11 March 08:11, by Mohammed Ali 2

              con:reached the stage of calling them non-S.Sudanese in Juba even inside the minsters cabinet!Equotorians and Shuluk will form an alliance with Machar, particulary Lam who is popular in upper nile. They did it before and they will do it again!After that peace will prevail!

              repondre message

    • 11 March 10:45, by jay b

      What’ s an idiot, incomplete, illiterate and illusionariate president? He really don’t understand and comprehend the roles of being a president of the nation. In his mind, he is up to something else. What’s a curse God given to us?

      repondre message

  • 11 March 06:16, by Jalaby

    It’s clear that the south has surrendered now and raised the white flag very high!!
    What happened?! you said you’re "NUBA"?! LOOOOL
    We know you guys are fake tiger, just a paper tiger!
    What visionless people?!
    Anyway, I support this agreement between the two Sudan completely!

    repondre message

    • 11 March 06:43, by Manyang Deng Boor

      Dear Mrs. Jalaby,
      Jalaby your message clearly contravens the implementation of security arrangements between the two states. What the president has done by ordering SPLA out of the frontier is to show his readiness and sincerity in the implementation of security Documents he has signed in Addis ababa. This is to make peace prevails between the rival states rather than hit and run tactics.

      repondre message

    • 11 March 07:01, by Peter Marko

      To Son of B**ch: Jalaby:
      Do not fool yourself, an idiot. The withdraw of the forces from disputed areas will be done in a coordinated manner, simultaneously. Meaniny, your army will be withdrawing from Kafia Kinji and other areas that they occupy. This agreement will enable us to buy sophisticated weaponry system using oil money, and the reclaim all of the disputed areas by force.

      repondre message

    • 11 March 07:02, by Peter Marko

      To Son of B**ch: Jalaby:
      Do not fool yourself, an idiot. The withdraw of the forces from disputed areas will be done in a coordinated manner, simultaneously. Meaniny, your army will be withdrawing from Kafia Kinji and other areas that they occupy. This agreement will enable us to buy sophisticated weaponry system using oil money, and the reclaim all of the disputed areas by force.

      repondre message

    • 11 March 08:13, by zulu

      MOHAMED. WE CANNOT BE DEVEOPING LAMU PORT IF WE ARE EASY, DYING OR DESPERATE FOR DEVELOPMENT. OUR MEGA PROJECTS ARE GOING ON WITH OTHER AFRICAN STATES. SECOND, WE ARE NOT UNDER DURESS BUT YOU.
      JALABY, DO NOT BE EXCITED. WE’VE BEEN HERE BEFORE AND YOU WILL SEE THE JUNGLE MAN GO BACK TO THE JUNGLE. YOU WILL SEE SUDAN RUNNING TO BAG FOR MONEY IN CHAD AND QATAR.

      repondre message

      • 11 March 12:24, by Mohammed Ali 2

        Zulu,which projects you are talking about? Are you going to build it for free?You donnot have a penny and talking about a pipe-line which will cost $ 10 billions! Rediculous. How could you get that money, when banks around the world are collapsing.You have to know the ABC’s of finance to talk about such projects.What SS rating to get $ 10 billions,the poorst country on Earth with war....

        repondre message

        • 12 March 03:35, by Force 1

          Ali, “the banks around the world are collapsing”! You have to be inanely funny! The sad thing for you Sudanese is; you’ll never see South Sudanese oil going through that pipeline we built for you ever! We generously gave that pipeline to you; you can take it apart and sell it to either pay off your debt or use the money to buy breads to survive!

          repondre message

          • 12 March 04:16, by Mohammed Ali 2

            Force 1, on the contrary, we do want oil to come through us, because it brings economic benifit to us.We want you also to benifit from it, & this will in turn brings benifit for both of us.You shut down your production yourself in a step descibed by your allies in the west as suicidal.Which is proved to be true!Then you started an unecessary war which there was no chance for you to win...con

            repondre message

            • 12 March 04:25, by Mohammed Ali 2

              con:Then you continue to support rebels in our country; how can on earth we allow you to buildy your country while you are trying to destroy us!It is inconcievable that we give money to destroy us!As for the pipe-line which claim to have built for us, why donnot build one for yourself.What did your SPLA thieves build during the last 8 years? What did they do apart from looooooooting?

              repondre message

  • 11 March 06:24, by hamil

    Rushing into making a decision like that is not always good haven’t we learnt enough that these Northerners are double headed vipers who do not abide by signed agreements Mr. President be careful these fake Arabs are agents of the Devil

    repondre message

  • 11 March 06:25, by Padiet Deng Alony

    ordering the withdrawal of SPLA will complaining that saf is attacking our positions at the border two days back.
    what a contradiction words is that.
    Let see if it will work with Omar who is now in Saudi Arabia to die with his disease, i wish him to be taken to ICC before he die of that disease.
    Long Live South Sudan and the denied vetrans plus widows and sons of martyrs.

    repondre message

  • 11 March 06:34, by Kenyang

    There we go! Hopefully, North Sudanese will seek permanent peace instead of miscalculations through Salva Kiir naive, stupidity...

    repondre message

  • 11 March 06:44, by Jalaby

    What does it mean this signed agreement between the two Sudan?
    Finally, the south has agreed to sign the security Mechanism agreement in Addis unconditionally while the south had rejected it last time claiming that Khartoum is adding new clauses that didn’t exist in Cooperation agreement but in fact the real reason behind the

    repondre message

    • 11 March 06:51, by Jalaby

      rejection is the strong generals inside SPLA who are unwilling to cut ties with SPLA-N and opposing the cooperation agreement with Sudan in general and refused clearly to obey Mr. Kiir order to withdraw SPLA from 14 mile, the recent crucial decisions by Mr. Kiir of moving some SPLA generals to retirement (who are mainly opposing the agreement) and changing some

      repondre message

      • 11 March 07:05, by Jalaby

        states governors have a lot to do with acceptance of this recent agreement and the south will practically cut ties with SPLA-N and there will be joined peace forces to watch the border and will exist inside each country to make sure that the south stopped giving any type of support to SPLA-N and Darfourian rebels along the area they’re moving around!

        repondre message

        • 11 March 07:14, by Jalaby

          There is no doubt the economy war that Sudan has imposed over the south and supporting the south rebels are about to blow up the south completely and cause a full collapse to the new south Sudan state and that explains why Mr. Lyman ringed the bell and call for international donor meeting to collect money for South Sudan and rescues the south from inevitable collapse!

          repondre message

          • 11 March 07:15, by Gatkuoth

            You started the withdrawal, until you finished your withdrawal then the SPLA will withdrawal, we are honest people and you are liars, the world knows.

            repondre message

          • 11 March 07:18, by George Bol

            Jallaby & Master,
            Never make mistake to fake your identity while you are DOR from South Sudan. A coward from Uganda and Congolese origin. I f you are not from South Sudan, say Amen! You are pretending to be from North but you are coward Dor who side with enemy when their hot issue. I can not think of other than DOR EQ

            repondre message

            • 11 March 08:22, by Mohammed Ali 2

              Bol,what do you mean by DOR EQ? Do you mean that equotorians are Coward Congolese & Ugandans? Then who are S.Sudanese ? Is it only one tribe , that is S.Sudanese? It is just funny! To be honest, in fact equotorians were the first to fight for SS " whether I like it or not" At that time your Abyei gang were happy learning the language of the jalabba, which now is their mother tongue!

              repondre message

              • 11 March 08:31, by Mohammed Ali 2

                G. Bol, your Abeyei gang heros will come back to Sudan as their mother land after they loose their positions in the SPLA during the next SPLA conference.The sons of Deng Majok never fought a war against Sudan. Abeyei was the only peacful area during all the wars of SS.Francis Deng defended the present status of Abeyei during Numeri’s rule and called it the " melting" of Sudan, following the ....

                repondre message

                • 11 March 09:28, by Mohammed Ali 2

                  con: the steps of his father.Only after Garang with his " new Sudan " ideology, he elevated them to adress their fellow Arabic speaking north Sudanese; then they became 5-star hotel worriors.They hardly find themselves with S.Sudanese e.g. Ahmed " Deng" Alor, married to Ethipians, Luka married to White Australian.So do you consider these SSudanese and equotorians as ugandans & congolese?

                  repondre message

          • 11 March 07:25, by Jalaby

            To South Sudan, this agreement like the lifeline, giving a drip to dehydrated person who is in the emergency room fighting for his life!
            What does it mean to Sudan?
            Although Sudan was able to repulse the south oil production stoppage because that oil is considered to be a vital element in Sudan economy but it created a great shake in Sudan economy and affected

            repondre message

            • 11 March 07:36, by Jalaby

              Sudan economy so badly, we won’t be a logical and realistic if we say anything otherwise, that agreement will help the two Sudan no doubt because both Sudan need the other Sudan hand and cooperation to go forward rather than backward!
              This agreement will open the door for peace between Khartoum and SPLA-N, Juba and south rebels too no doubt!

              repondre message

              • 11 March 07:45, by Jalaby

                The Fate of Sudan Book
                John Young has issued a book about Sudan & S Sudan after separation, he concluded in his book that the secession of the south didn’t solve south problem or Sudan problem either but created another chronic problems to both of them, he put responsibilities on both party:NCP & SPLA/M on failing to resolve

                repondre message

                • 11 March 07:55, by Jalaby

                  Sudan & S Sudan problems because both of them have looked to Sudan problem from one side and both of them don’t believe in democracy but in power and unwilling to recognize their opponents,and accepted CPA only because of the pressure that US & international community put on them,and he said SPLM wanted to achieve what they failed to achieve through war on negotiation

                  repondre message

                  • 11 March 08:03, by Jalaby

                    table as SPLA was unable to beat SAF in the battle field! I completely agree with John Young!
                    Apart from security and economy prospective, This agreement will allow the nations of the two countries to move freely inside the other country as 4 freedoms agreement is also there and this will mean a lot if you look deep at it!

                    repondre message

                    • 11 March 08:12, by Jalaby

                      Any one who has a little sense of politics and not naive person will figure it out quickly that both Sudan will move to confederation state,remember two thirds of South Sudan people are living on the border with Sudan and their lives are so overlapped with Sudan and can’t afford to disconnect it and the same applies for Sudanese

                      repondre message

                      • 11 March 08:18, by Jalaby

                        people who share the border with their counterpart in the other side of S Sudan!
                        The economic ties between the two nations, the historical relationship and the strong interference between the two nations had prevented the British administration to separate the south before and now it appears again and forced NCP & SPLM to forget about their political differences!!

                        repondre message

                        • 11 March 08:51, by Jalaby

                          You can’t believe it!! Do you know how much Ethiopia/Djibouti have asked South Sudan to pay as a transition fee to carry on their oil to the sea?! and Kenya also?
                          Ethiopia/Djibouti asked the south to pay $30 per each barrel to carry their oil to the sea, it’s hard to believe right?! they believe this fee is fair!

                          repondre message

                          • 11 March 08:59, by Jalaby

                            What about Kenya?!
                            Well, let us see what Mr. Peter Oremo,the Kenyan officer in charge of the Lamu project said about this issue, he said "If they (Southerners) decided Djibouti, they are charging $30 per barrel but we are negotiating for a lower fee. So Kenya is the best option for them" so that means Kenya is asking between $28 to $29 or something close

                            repondre message

                            • 11 March 09:08, by Jalaby

                              What a joke?! LOOOL
                              Arab/Jalaba agreed to carry south oil between $10 to $11 only for each barrel and still very profitable to both Sudan & S Sudan, so if you guys consider Arab/Jalaba are thieves then Ethiopians/Djiboutians and Kenyans are nothing but clear looters and you know thieves are much better than looters anyway! LOOOL

                              repondre message

                              • 11 March 09:14, by Jalaby

                                Visionless people came back to what Dr. Lual Deng told them long time ago that "carrying south oil through Kenya is economically unprofitable and Sudan is the best choice", they attacked him and called him a traitor and now they came back to what he said before after they just about to kill themselves of hunger, what visionless people?!

                                repondre message

                                • 11 March 09:22, by Jalaby

                                  I’m telling you, the south oil will run through Sudan until it dries out completely, Sudan will share the south its resources and the south will share Sudan its resources too and that will go on for ever!
                                  I always tell you facts and the truth, here is the link for what Mr. Peter Oremo, the Kenyan officer in charge of the Lamu Port project said about the fees:

                                  repondre message

            • 11 March 08:14, by okucu pa lotinokwan

              Jalaby or Lam Akol,Please there is an end to every things,that money the Arabs are using you to be against any development in the South Sudan,soon or later you will pay it dearly to them take care Lam Akol or Jalaby.
              OKUCU PA LOINOKWAN

              repondre message

          • 11 March 14:25, by Oppressor

            Plzzz dear brother Jalaby teach them coz they are uneducated ppl- Fake Salava is ready to sell his own wife & childrens to stick to the leader chair of S.South

            repondre message

        • 11 March 09:46, by wang

          Jalaby
          Don’t be too naïve, our half-bloods which you are carrying will curse for life.
          Even the real white and blue eyes Arabs do not hates black Sudanese as you do idiot.

          repondre message

          • 11 March 12:32, by Mohammed Ali 2

            Wang, real Arabs have neither blue eyes nor real white skin!

            repondre message

      • 11 March 07:15, by Gatkuoth

        Jalaby, your negotiating team were claiming that 14 extends to Raja and Unity, we rejected it. This time, they dropped the claims and that’s why we agreed to the implementation. It is not a new agreement. Second, you started withdrawal since Sunday http://www.kuna.net.kw/ArticleDetails.aspx?id=2297475&Language=en , who surroundered? you don’t even now what is happenning in your country.

        repondre message

      • 11 March 10:12, by wang

        Jalaby
        Don’t be too naïve, our half-bloods which you are carrying will curse you for life. Even the real white and blue eyes Arabs do not hates black Sudanese as you do idiot.

        repondre message

        • 11 March 12:30, by Jalaby

          Wang,
          My friend, you completely misunderstood me, I never and will never ever hate South Sudanese people, never my friend, I hate SPLA/M visionless leaders and thieves only!
          I do respect and value many south Sudanese leaders like:Joseph Lagu,Abel Alier,Machar,Lam Akol and of course Dr Lual Deng, I do respect him very much!

          repondre message

  • 11 March 06:52, by master

    south sudan refused to allow this process on all borders qnd this is not good for them becasue this could allow us to back SS militas
    visionless people could suffer soon

    repondre message

    • 11 March 14:43, by Oppressor

      SPLA wehye wehye wehye hahahahahah just smarting slogen SPLA rotten rotten looters Oil Money seekers .. lol we support SS rebel the brave Murle & YAU YAU ..

      repondre message

  • 11 March 07:02, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

    Kiir should not ordered troops to withdraw before conslidation understanding by both sides. Khartoum will not pullout sincerely.

    repondre message

  • 11 March 07:11, by George Bol

    S.Sudan must be in maximum alert now. If South understand Khartoum tactics, we would be ready because SAF will bomb and attack the border areas. I have doubted if bashier will withdraw and allow their troops without testing our boarder and latter deny it. This strategy must be understand our commanders in line of duties.

    repondre message

  • 11 March 07:26, by Gabriel Ajak

    Good for the president to issued order for immediate withdrawal of the national army SPLA, but also good to be done in the present of JBVMM/UNIFA on both side and even at the same day not one by one.

    repondre message

    • 11 March 08:49, by Nuer Empire

      Kiir is not bribed by fake Arabs,but has too soft actions against the North.Pulling out will be a disaster.North won’t make it the same way like the South will do it.
      The Nuer Empire

      repondre message

      • 11 March 10:45, by EES Kingmaker

        Nuer Empire,
        Don’t harbour worries. RSS leadership and International community will take care of Khartoum dirty tricks. NCP is struggling under serious, huge heat__open rebellions and internal dissents. If it still defies agreements, it will find itself bouted out of power. In other words, NCP spends sleepless nights: how to end dissidents within its rank and file and improve relations with RSS.

        repondre message

  • 11 March 07:46, by Axios

    Cant see the logic in pulling out so suddenly. I doubt the stipulations were all agreed to; the major one being the disarmament of SPLM-N. If that’s not the case then what’s to stop Sudan from saying the conditions are not met once more and back away thus returning to more tedious Addis meetings?

    repondre message

    • 11 March 14:29, by Oppressor

      Axios so intellectual at long last

      repondre message

  • 11 March 07:48, by Madingthith

    Bravo Mr. President,
    We South Sudanese have to abide by the International community request and see whether SAF/Khartoum government have also pullout its army from bordering areas between North- South borders.
    CONDITIONS: If North Sudan pullout his troop as expected too then we can declare non stop war against Khartoum and it ally.
    Madingthith the next Governor of 2015

    repondre message

  • 11 March 08:01, by Pif Paf

    Bravo Sudan’s. The decision to withdraw from disputed area’s will be for the good of both countries. However the core of the dispute remains, that is, SPLM support for SRF. If S.Sudan continues to find ways around this agreement to continue this support then it will always be at the risk of taking us back to square one. Both countries need to protect this agreement to open a new chapter of peace.

    repondre message

    • 11 March 09:21, by master

      pif Paf
      sorry
      you don’t know the mentality of SPLM toward sudan
      these thugs will never allow a chance to pass if they can harras sudan
      don’t be optimsit with someone can not get his own decision

      repondre message

      • 11 March 10:20, by EES Kingmaker

        Master,
        The SPLA/M actions were/are commensurate with shadowy and deceptive moves NCP leadership embarked on since it usurped people’s power 24 years ago.

        repondre message

  • 11 March 08:43, by John N

    you guys how would you crying like that president have right to order the pullout of SPLA because in the world i never heard about the country which have no border and also you just talking while you do not know the suffering of our people in northern part of the country, their daily consumation is more than what you have here...
    president have right to order pullout and can order them to go bac

    repondre message

  • 11 March 09:39, by wang

    Kiir was still has weekend drinking hangover and couldn’t has any clues about what he was pointing his figure at… 2morrow SAf will bomb our territory as usually and him and his spokesperson Barnaba Marial Benjamin will goes on air accusing North for something that they have put themselves into---- so what was the rush of pulling our troops out from those contests areas for the stupid joint agreeme

    repondre message

    • 11 March 09:52, by EES Kingmaker

      I think President Kiir is still on the right path, though this decision both sides have decided to commit themselevs, is long overdue. As the implementation enters its actual phase, the SPLA should be mindful and watchful of usual double-faced NCP genocidaires, lest they may be tempted to torpedo this peace process citizens of both nations deserve dearly.

      repondre message

  • 11 March 09:40, by wang

    so what was the rush of pulling our troops out from those contests areas for the stupid joint agreement mechanisms which just signed up lastnight? This joint agreement mechanisms should have been given couple days or might be longer than that to see if those of North honorable what they have signed

    repondre message

    • 11 March 10:04, by EES Kingmaker

      Wang,
      I see no rush there. The agreement mechanisms were signed last and to be implemented this week. Is it is a rush in your own view? Remember, the lives of ordinary people of both nations shouldn’t be compromised by our clear-cut stance. Let’s not oppose for the sake of it. Let’s See the other side of the same coin. Do we go to war against the expectations of our people: dignified lives?

      repondre message

      • 11 March 10:11, by EES Kingmaker

        Wang,
        I see no rush there. The agreement mechanisms were signed last week and to be implemented this week. Is it is a rush in your own view? Remember, the lives of ordinary people of both nations shouldn’t be compromised by our clear-cut stance. Let’s not oppose for the sake of it. Let’s See the other side of the same coin. Do we go to war against the expectations of our people: dignified lives?

        repondre message

  • 11 March 09:45, by wang

    Jalaby
    Don’t be too naïve, our half-bloods which you are carrying will curse for life.
    Even the real white and blue eyes Arabs do not hates black Sudanese as you do idiot.

    repondre message

  • 11 March 10:40, by malang

    By Parwath
    this agreement between parts will not feed the people, as like withdrawal of panthou last year, what happened right now, why SAf are still while SPLA withdrawa from there, SAF always rejected withdrawal fro any disputy area like Abyei. that is not right decision to be withdraw from bordering areas.

    repondre message

    • 11 March 11:08, by EES Kingmaker

      Parwath,
      It appears uncondtional withdrawal of forces should be done simultaneously and monitored by a body assigned to oversee their smooth, scheduled movements. That is why UNISFA is there. Let’s have the benefit of doubt what UNISFA will do for us. This does not mean we fold our hands and watch only. We need more proactive,firm stance,lest interest groups will invade and possibly change course

      repondre message

  • 11 March 11:50, by malang

    EES kingmaker,
    you are right, but south sudan always respect all what is said by UNISFA, and why North Sudan never respect such orders, meanwhile those of UNISFA are behind of dsiputy, they supposed to ask North-Sudan for disobedience

    repondre message

  • 11 March 13:52, by Mapuor

    Bravo Mr Mayardit,lets see what Bashir will do next.Peaceful co-existence is good for the citizens of both countries.

    repondre message

  • 11 March 13:57, by kimo

    i know spla will surrender and perform what the ncp government dictates,because south sudan can not and never exports its oil through ethiopia,it like committing economic suicide.the distant between oil fields to gambella in ethiopia is more than 700 km,from gambella to natheriet(ethiopian town)is more than 1000kgs,from natheriet to logia (the dry port in Afar region in ethiopia)is more than 1200k

    repondre message

    • 11 March 14:08, by kimo

      the road from gambella to jimma is very narrow hardly enough for a bus,roads in ethiopia are very rough and twisting,you always see containers falling beside the roads.the custom area between ethiopia an Djibouti is very congested trucks have to wait 3 days to get through.most ethiopian imports and export go through it.ethiopia is planning hire barbara port of somalia. ethiopian roads are up hills

      repondre message

  • 11 March 14:29, by John The President

    Is a statement that need to be work-out in due course as long as Sudan will abid by and pullout, S.Sudan security forces should carefully monitor the implementation of this agreement.

    repondre message

    • 11 March 14:49, by Oppressor

      I THINK U BELIEVED THAT U ARE REALY The President OF ss FAKE STATE GOOS 4 YOU FAKE President " John " SOUTH FORCES WHERE ARE THEY .. I WILL TELL U THEY ARE LOOTING RAPING & KILLING THIER OWN PPL IN JONGULE & RECIVING NO SALARIES THAT’S WHY FAKE GEN: SALVA SIGNED THE AGREEMNT TO GET MONEY TO FEED THEM ...LOOL

      repondre message

  • 11 March 14:53, by 4Justice

    Panthou 2.0 is the only solution

    repondre message

    • 11 March 15:01, by Oppressor

      4 JUSTICE WAT DO U EXPECT US TO TAKE IT IN UR DREAM TILL U KICK AWAY SPLA/N

      repondre message

  • 11 March 15:21, by Bilpam Land & Itang are Roots of South Sudan.

    Hahaahaaaaa Sorry South Sudanese what shall we do now about Illitrate President he don’t know any situation in South Sudan; Salva he believe that, he will not come again as the President of South Sudan that is why he wont to give our Land to Arabs again you South Sudan you waiting for what will happening again here in South Sudan.and Salva is one who support Uhuru of our Moneys here in South Sudan

    repondre message

    • 11 March 15:33, by Bilpam Land & Itang are Roots of South Sudan.

      we all know that Salva will not Come again, that is why he playing with us , look he Loving the Criminal President Uhuru and he have a link with the Pesident of Uganda the who killed our Heroes Dr. John Garang that is why he wont also to be come Criminal President and he wont I.C.C.

      repondre message

  • 11 March 16:00, by AUGUSTINO DENG

    Coward leader like mother-fucker. Shame on him. What kind of security did he know? wicked minded leader. Go to Khartoum have your mother-fucker Omar teach you how tough he is. I am so sorry. I don’t think whether God like Southern Sudanese. When we have right leader, God take him. I hope the Late John Garang was alive. What is in Salva Kiir mind is Dollar and that is it.
    By Augustino Deng.

    repondre message

  • 11 March 19:39, by Kim Deng

    What do you expect if the country is lead by coward/ idiot leader? Of course, humiliation and defeat at the same time. Shame on him!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    repondre message

  • 11 March 21:14, by Axios

    All you people do is complain. No man is perfect. Compared to Sudan’s Genocidal President,& the first U.S. President (who was a slave owner) President Kiir is performing his duties well. He has no frame of reference for Presidency; so each task is a new obstacle for him and his party. Yes mistakes will happen, but let him work.

    repondre message

    • 11 March 21:16, by Axios

      If you feel you can provide a superior performance then organize your own party and run for election.

      repondre message

  • 12 March 02:56, by Born-to-Rule

    President is brilliant in his move (this a game of chess) just because the butcher (Bashir)of Khartoum has announced withdrawal of their army’s does not means they are not in agreement with the S. Sudan. Many of you are so critical of the President because non of you have ever been on leadership position. You people are too damn emotion and confuse. You need to use your brain to beat your enemy

    repondre message

    • 12 March 23:49, by AUGUSTINO DENG

      Born to Rule,
      I thought that you are an open minded person who can scrutinize things clearly with a confident of knowing what will affect you and what will beneficial you in the future.
      When Salva Kiir Miyardit captured Kurmuk on December 11,1988,why did he not order withdrawal or pullout Kazuk battalion when they uphold Kurmuk? You and Salva Kiir need to go and rule your own ass. Fuck you.

      repondre message

      • 12 March 23:57, by AUGUSTINO DENG

        I thought that Salva Kiir Miyardit was a brave and an intellegent guy, however he was just a coward leader like chicken. What does pullout of SPLA from the border has to do in the South? Arabs carry attack in Aweil border last week and Salva Kiir is talking shit. What I see is that, Salva Kiir need to spend his time drinking bear and fucking women in the office. Fuck all of them.
        By Augustino Deng

        repondre message

        • 12 March 23:58, by AUGUSTINO DENG

          It is true there is no God. Fuck!

          repondre message

  • 13 March 00:05, by AUGUSTINO DENG

    Born to rule,
    You need to take Salva Kiir Miyardit to Bor and rule your ass. I don’t know exactly where are you from, but the nickname that you named yourself is the "ideology nickname that came from Bor when they used the term "13012" which mean Bor. So that is why I know that you are from Bor yourself. Fuck you. Salva Kiir is not a brilliant leader like you said it so.
    By Augustino Deng.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)

The misapprehension of peace in the context of conflict resolution 2013-05-16 11:40:39 By Ngor Arol Garang May 16, 2013 - Political leaders and citizens with an interest in politics within the Bahr el Ghazal region will come together for a one week conference on Wednesday, where (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.