Home | News    Wednesday 6 March 2013

UN report confirms South Sudan support to Darfur rebels, Khartoum

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

March 5, 2013 (KHARTOUM) - The Sudanese foreign ministry has renewed its accusations that Juba supports Sudanese rebel groups, saying a recent United Nations report confirmed their presence in South Sudan.

A UN panel of independent experts established since 2005 to monitor the arms embargo said in a report released recently says that the Sudanese Air Force uses a new weapons system, S-8 air-to-ground rockets with thermobaric warheads, "which implies a quantum leap in their effectiveness".

The report further says the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) established "a large base for around 800 armed fighters" outside Bentiu, capital of Unity State and also another base in Timshaha in Western Bahr el-Ghazal State.

"This report represents a testimony of an international body that cannot be accused of being biased to Sudan", said the new spokesperson of the Sudanese foreign ministry Abubakr Al-Sideeg Mohamed Al-Amin on Tuesday.

Al-Amin went to add that Sudan has been demanding that South Sudan should refrain from hosting rebel movements and to disengage with the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N), as provided in the agreements signed by the two countries.

Reacting to this report, Hamid Sideeg, head of the Organisational Secretariat of the ruling National Congress Party (NCP) ruled out any move from the United Nations following this report adding that hostility towards Sudan "comes mainly from the UN Security Council". It was the UN Security Council that referred the war in Darfur to the International Criminal Court in 2005 leading the indictment of senior officials including President Omar al-Bashir.

The two neighbours signed a security arrangements on 27 September 2012 providing to activate a buffer zone on the border but failed to implement as well as the other remaining deals.

The United States and other western countries have in the past called on Juba to stop its support to Sudanese rebel groups but South Sudan, which seceded from Sudan in 2011 has dismissed the accusations and denied harbouring or supporting them.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 6 March 2013 07:48, by Aarai Baka

    South Sudan is just doing tit for tat. U supported my rebel then I will support yours bitch.

    repondre message

    • 6 March 2013 08:09, by zulu

      It remains for UN to produce its report, hopefully, it will contradict Sudan as Uganda did. What is certain is that Sudan has heard a rumor that JEM rebels have now acquire a missile that will hit Khartoum. Also, UNSC is trying to pass a resolution odering sudan to negotiate with SPLA-N in 5 days

      repondre message

      • 6 March 2013 08:35, by Majak Mangar Chawul

        I refuted the baseless claims by fucken arabs.they want only to divert the attention of UN and international community to forget what they have been doing in south sudan regarding the fuelling of insecurity.we can back rebels as they are doing it to our rebels.
        the problems is that, these current rebels leader are not like the former one . why did they not go and fight in khartoum?

        repondre message

      • 6 March 2013 10:17, by ForAll

        Africans must open their minds and become deep thinkers.
        UN is a game player for the hidden wicked plans to recolonize the richest content with natural recources.

        repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 08:28, by Tutbol

    When it comes to arming Libyan & Syrian Rebels to topple their autocratic governments; The Western nations & the US would waste no time in doing that dirty job & these so-called UN independent panel of experts won’t even condemn the West for arming rebels to topple their autocratic regimes!. And when it comes to disenfranchies Sudanese fed up with their autocratic regime. The West & their...

    repondre message

    • 6 March 2013 08:36, by sudani ana

      This UN report fully exposes these idiots in South Sudan who have been denying their support to Sudanese rebels left right and centre, whilst the whole world knows what’s going on. Now you know why the international community doesn’t condemn Sudan when we bomb these rebel camps in South Sudan.

      repondre message

      • 6 March 2013 08:44, by sudani ana

        Evil bastards. And they have the audacity to say Sudan is not honouring the cooperation agreements with Kiir sending letters to African leaders. Fuck off ignorant evil bastards.

        repondre message

        • 6 March 2013 08:51, by cbuongdit cholkua

          Sudani Ana, if you were a man, I wuold have tell you at least something in response to your post, but as just you are just a dick sucker, you don’t desrved response.

          repondre message

        • 6 March 2013 09:05, by Observer

          Sudani Ana,
          Before we get all righteous about this did you read the sentence about the SAF having upgraded dramatically its capabilities- all the time there being an arms embargo on Sudan.
          How do you think that happened?
          The English have a saying. people in glasshouses shouldn;t throw stones. Maybe you need to take note of this

          repondre message

          • 6 March 2013 09:14, by sudani ana

            Observer ( the funny south Sudanese pretending to be Sudanese) how do you make this out? We have a duty to make our army and air force strong like the rest of the world to defend our land from evil enemies who are harbouring, arming and fully supporting our rebels. How does that make my house a glass one?

            repondre message

            • 6 March 2013 11:09, by Observer

              Sudanese Ana,
              I am no more Southern Sudanese than you are.
              We are under an arms embargo so how can we suddeny increase the weaponry of our airforce.
              Maybe when you are able to read the full report you might get a different story than what you are being led to beleieve.

              repondre message

          • 6 March 2013 09:20, by Mohammed Ali 2

            We are Sudanese and very intelligent , capable of developing our military equipment by ourselves. What is wrong with that? We are intelligent pple; how come you are so stupid , yet you claim to be Sudanese. Disgusting lier!

            repondre message

        • 6 March 2013 18:40, by Rommel

          sudani ana:
          Calm down, Sudani. Question: If a country attacks, sequesters and occupies lands that are veritably within the borders of another country and doggedly refuses to return these territories, despite the fact that they were part of the South at the time of the Condominium period up until the essential date of 1956... is that country evincing a desire for peace?

          repondre message

          • 6 March 2013 18:42, by Rommel

            The border between north and south Sudan is defined in the CPA as the boundary line of 1956, the year Sudan became independent. At independence Kafia Kingi was part of the south. The area was transferred to northern administration in 1960. Under the terms of the CPA, therefore, it is due to be returned to Southern Sudan, to the administration of Western Bahr el Ghazal state.

            repondre message

            • 6 March 2013 18:44, by Rommel

              The Kafia Kingi enclave was part of Bahr al-Ghazal province when Sudan gained independence in 1956. In 1960 it was transferred to Darfur, which had become a province of Sudan in 1916. (The Kafia Kingi Enclave: People, Politics and History in the North-south Boundary Zone of Western Sudan – Edward Thomas)

              repondre message

              • 6 March 2013 23:29, by Mohammed Ali 2

                Rommel,your government signed an agreement to expel rebels and sit down and resolve all issues peacfull.There is no "if" here.This a commitmemnt infront of the world.Did they do what they promised?NO.Everyone is ready to hear you when you have rights;this way nobody will listen to you.You will never win a war to take 1 inch of Sudan,even if you win a battle,it will be a continuous non-stop war!

                repondre message

                • 7 March 2013 18:58, by Rommel

                  Mohammed Ali 2:
                  No if? Yes sir!? You would make a marginally effective double digit IQ drill sergeant. So you value commitments made in front of the world!? Before you embarked on your particularly nauseating brand of moralising... did it ever occur to you that you actually made similar commitments in front of the world on the 20th of July 2002!? The Machakos Protocols... have you heard of them?

                  repondre message

                  • 7 March 2013 19:07, by Rommel

                    The Machakos Protocols constitute and resulted in the CPA. The agreement’s provisions relating to the border detailed and instructed both parties to respect the 1956 border. The CPA prescribed a specific date from which we would adjudicate territorial holdings between us. This date is inviolate... meaning it is not to be violated...

                    repondre message

                    • 7 March 2013 19:14, by Rommel

                      .. So why have you not returned the Kafia Kingi enclave to South Sudan’s administrative jurisdiction when it was indisputably part of the South at the time of the Condominium period up until the essential date of 1956? It would seem that you dishonoured your commitments or "promise". It seems that way, doesn’t it?

                      repondre message

                      • 7 March 2013 19:20, by Rommel

                        You know hubris is an essential ingredient in the fall of every form of tyranny. I love the fact that you people have the same kind of faith that Nazi Germany had in the supposed invincibility and timelessness of their evil; they actually thought that the Third Reich would last for a thousand years... they were gravely mistaken — and so are you.

                        repondre message

          • 6 March 2013 23:36, by Mohammed Ali 2

            Rommel, when did we attack SS and occupied SS and where was SS border to cross and annex any part of it!Talk sense . There was one cuntry called Sudan and it was seperated.We did not even made these borders.In 1956 there was ONEcountry the borders of which, were not made by us!Are you going to ask me about a citation here!

            repondre message

            • 7 March 2013 19:35, by Rommel

              Mohammed Ali:
              When did you attack South Sudan!? With a fatuous question like this, I genuinely fear for your mental health. Whether or not you acknowledge the fact that decades of war affected, altered and determined the provincial borders is rather irrelevant. You acknowledge that Sudan was one and was subsequently separated — and was separated based on the 1956 borders...

              repondre message

              • 7 March 2013 19:45, by Rommel

                Your government and my government agreed on the 1956 border. The Kafia Kingi enclave is South of the 1956 border, but you refuse to return it — you occupy it. So what don’t you understand? What part of this do you find so prohibitively difficult to comprehend!?

                repondre message

                • 7 March 2013 19:48, by Rommel

                  The British were [for the most part] well aware of the tribal extent of communities on both sides of the provincial border at the time of the Condominium — with this being pertinent to the Southern territories that you occupy. The British governed these territories as part of the southern province for almost a century up until Sudan was granted independence in 1956.

                  repondre message

      • 6 March 2013 09:14, by Junta

        Sudani Ana
        Which one is less evil between committing genocide and uprooting the genuine indigenouse Sudanese black Africans in Sudan who are legitimate owners and supporting the Black Africans to fight and defend themselves against illegal immigrants (Arabs) who are committing such heinous crimes?

        repondre message

        • 6 March 2013 16:01, by zulu

          MOHAMED,
          THAT IS AN IRONY. HOW COME A VERY INTELLIGENT PEOPLE IS NOT ABLE TO RESOLVE ITS PROBLEMS, MUCH LESS AMICABLLY? YOUR STUPIDITY SEEMS TO BE YOUR FORTE, IGNANIMOUSELY FLIRTISIOUS TO THE WORLD, WHILE RUNNING AMOK AT HOME. BORNE WITH VILE, DECIEPT, PATRONAGE SERVICE WITH AN INCLING ATILT TOWARDS SERVING AN ELTIST HEGEMONS.

          repondre message

          • 6 March 2013 23:43, by Mohammed Ali 2

            Zulu, we are very much intelligent and very much interested and willing to solve all problems with SS amicably and friendly.The problem is with your goverment who think diplomacy is cheating and decieving!You can’t sign an agreement and make u-turn after one day!Our security comes first.Your president had to apologize to your biggest ally and support and your best journalist was killed brutally ..

            repondre message

            • 6 March 2013 23:50, by Mohammed Ali 2

              ...was killed brutally for saying the truth about rebels in SS.Zulu , enjoy your beer in Ausralia and defend the thieves, but pple like Isias Abraham will give their life seeing the sufferings of the poor,starving and marginalized pple of SS.I am afraid that your oil will never reach any international market, because soon and very soon there will be no extra-space in our pipe line....con

              repondre message

              • 6 March 2013 23:54, by Mohammed Ali 2

                ...keep dreaming about Lamu, Djibuti, truck transportation...bla..bla until half of the poor,starving and marginalised pple of SS die of hunger, while you and your thieves family are enjying the looooooooooted money in Australia!

                repondre message

    • 6 March 2013 08:55, by Tutbol

      ... so-called UN independent of experts aim is to escapegoat South Sudan. Can the West just man up and acknowlege that their diplomacy has so much become parisan and out of touch with modern realities? May be someone out of this planet would still beleive the West that what it preaches is what it does. The West, what-can-they-do type of diplomacy will run out steam someday as we know it.

      repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 08:29, by wang

    Pure lairs, they were just trying to cover up their quilt. They are the ones using Thomas Bior Malual and William Deng Dau to cause instability in South. They purely are supporting Lam Akol militia and other rebels operating in South.

    repondre message

    • 6 March 2013 08:50, by sudani ana

      Wang
      Who is lying? This is a UN report confirming what Sudan has been saying all along whilst the idiots in South Sudan have been lying about their support to Sudanese rebels. What evil country!!!

      repondre message

      • 6 March 2013 09:02, by sudani ana

        Sudan airforce should use their advanced thermal air to ground missiles to pound these rebel camps and the rest of this evil nascent country into ashes. Cooperation agreement my ass, and they want their oil to go through our land, not in a million years, enjoy your famine.

        repondre message

        • 6 March 2013 09:07, by Observer

          Sudani Ana,
          How interesting that when the UN provide a report that may support our country they are telling the truth.
          When the produce one, such as the Human Rights abuses or is not showing Sudan in a good way, you then call them liars, puppets of the US, Israel etc
          A bit hypocritical of you really

          repondre message

          • 6 March 2013 09:28, by Mohammed Ali 2

            Observer, don’t be so stupid! You are bluffing yourself! We never say our country, neither do S.Sudanese , because it is obvious from what you write, where you stand.Yet you speak of hypocisy!Nothing worest than being lier. Shame on you!

            repondre message

            • 6 March 2013 11:13, by Observer

              M Ali 2.
              As I have said on here many times I left Sudan when I was 9 and was educated to Masters level in the UK- just like a lot of other Sudanese.
              I returned to Khartoum 6 years ago and work and live here in Khartoum.
              So I do say our country.. because Sudan is my country.
              I just don;t like what the government is doing to our country and dont understand about ppl like you who believe every li

              repondre message

              • 7 March 2013 00:03, by Mohammed Ali 2

                Observer, you don’t like Sudan my friend and you are not Sudanese.Never in your life you defended Sudan or Sudanese.All of the world, even Sudan enemies condemened the attack of Heglig and you celebrated it and you claim to be Sudanese.Try to celebrate it again in Khartoum and pple will eat you alife even if you are standing behind Basheer.Bluff somebody else, dear!

                repondre message

                • 7 March 2013 00:05, by Mohammed Ali 2

                  Observer, I don’t believe any lie, otherwise I would have believed that you are Sudanese!

                  repondre message

        • 6 March 2013 09:09, by cbuongdit cholkua

          Your pussy peeing must be powerful than that Airforce you are saying

          repondre message

      • 6 March 2013 16:07, by zulu

        sudani
        Let the UN show us the report, lest, Sudan is making a fuss because there is no report. Actually, UN’s report is about Sudan amessing weapons and its accusing South Sudan of arming JEM with Missiles. Where are missiles in South sudan. If we had one, your jets and Antonov will not fly over SS. Besides, you support rebels in SS and Uganda.

        repondre message

        • 7 March 2013 00:17, by Mohammed Ali 2

          Zulu: Let the UN show us the report!Who are you to be shown a report by the UN?!(A UN panel of independent experts established since 2005 to monitor the arms embargo said in a report released recently says that..
          The report further says the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) established a " a large base for around 800 armed fighters" outside Bentiu, capital of Unity State and also another base

          repondre message

      • 6 March 2013 18:28, by Rommel

        sudani ana:
        Khartoum continues to occupy large swathes of our territory including the Lebanon size Kafia Kingi enclave... so what does it expect in return!? You are in no position to moralise to others. We’re evil? You are from a country whose government murders its own citizens in the hundreds of thousands. That sounds kind of *evil* to me.

        repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 09:04, by cbuongdit cholkua

    That’s a point of weakness, Cripple Khartoum has nothing to say any more after they have seen that we are going hard after Yauyau to bring him to justice. Nothing but accusation, UN is fully controled by Arab memebers, so Khartoum has a easy target to spreaded their faul accusation to them as to be their eyewitness. Do South Complains to them about holding Lam Akol or Supporting YauYau? Nonesense.

    repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 09:09, by wang

    Sudan Ana
    This is AU report and handed it to UN, Not a report. UN can’t release such bias article.

    repondre message

    • 6 March 2013 09:47, by Mohammed Ali 2

      Some pple are suffering from amnesia! Forget about UN ; don’t you remember that your president had written a humulating letter of apology to Obama for lying to him about his denial of the support he is giving to the rebels in SS ?!

      repondre message

      • 6 March 2013 11:47, by Nibs

        Mohamed Ali2
        Illiterate! you are suffering from acute amnesia."humulating..." oops! It’s neither mother-tongue nor slang. And you have the audacity to shut down English learning center! Go back to school right away,you are not communicating.

        repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 09:37, by Man without fear

    Bullshit, UN will not benefit since the encourage war in both Sudans ,the re confusing the sons of the countries in btw. What is the evidence shown that South Sudan is supporting sudanese rebels group. Plise if you re bribe by Bashir govt you should not give out a such report to confuse the two nations if there is human right those who brough a lie report could face ICC.

    repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 12:01, by Panthou

    Fuck U.N hard in my natural dick! I hate those Arabs born sons Pakistan, Naple U.N problem keeping. They brought these idiots here in order to feed their family with our blood. What is happening now in south kordufan, blue Nile n darfur, don’t they see it? Fuck Baki moon or baiki mur!

    repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 12:16, by 4Justice

    Options in the Plan: Initiation or Death / Initiation and Death

    All who wish to enter the New Age must undergo an "energy activation" or "rebirth", usually marked by a subjective trance-induced "light experience" where one meets either a "spirit guide" or one’s "higher self" (no difference since all is one). The resulting "altered state of consciousness" will eventually lead to a "Luciferic initiation" into the "new humanity", or a submission to Lucifer as the leading divinity representing the Logos.

    Those who reject this "Luciferian Initiation" will be "Sent on their next life". In other words, worship Lucifer, or DIE.


    (The Revelation, p.235-6)
    (Alice Bailey, "The Rays and the Initiations" p.754-755)

    repondre message

    • 6 March 2013 12:52, by sudani ana

      4 Justice
      You have lost it man. What is it you’re smoking? I think you should see a doctor or stop smoking this shit. What’s the obsession with this LUCIFERIAN crap?

      repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 12:38, by 4Justice

    Radical evil: Luciferic Agenda


    A “Planetary Regime” should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born
    Page 942-3: Toward a Planetary Regime Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment.

    Mass sterilization of humans through drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock
    Page 787-8: Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control.

    The government could control women’s reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control
    Page 786-7: Involuntary fertility control

    repondre message

    • 6 March 2013 13:29, by Tutbol

      4justice,
      I have no doubt about those schemes engineered by people or agencies with sinister agenda; are already not being practiced on the poor countries’ citizens. Plutocracy, greed and love of wars to get what you want are all forms of fascism. Corporations bosses my friend are the 21st century hitlers. They topple govts, they remote controled politicians & made politicians invade resources...

      repondre message

      • 6 March 2013 13:53, by Tutbol

        ... rich countries so that they have unfettered access those countries. There was a catch pharase in last year’s US elections that goes "corporations are people my friend" Plutocrats & their corporations are already on the verge to take over. And a young country like ours headed by the bunch of clueless & semi-illiterates can easily be bullied & moulded by those dark forces to their own interests.

        repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 13:11, by James Maker Akok

    North Sudan Government,
    North Sudan Government, you brought another fake news again. You don’t feel shame of the such fake news you are posting on the websites?

    repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 14:14, by Ayuiu Makuac Lam

    UN reported nonsense.

    repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 23:15, by Truth Hurts

    A solution for all this burden caused by this lowness leaders of south & north should be put in place. War is not the only option but people in each territory should unit and overthrow the weak leaders. Civilians die every day like flies in SUDAN (both) do you think this leaders care? People are still sleeping in huts and unable to provide for their families? Do you think this leaders care?

    repondre message

  • 6 March 2013 23:25, by Truth Hurts

    Continuation!!!
    U.N creates the problems in order for the organisation to exist. I there is no WAR, Do you think U.N will be operating? All we need is peace in our country so that we can educate our children for the future of our nation. All we want is sincere, trustworthy, honest and creative leaders. We are still fighting each other while other nations are advancing beyond. Is it worth it?

    repondre message

    • 7 March 2013 07:51, by James Maker Akok

      Truth hurts,
      Truth, you are right for what you saying for all these problems I wish everybody talk like a way you talk.
      The problems is North Sudan Government, North Sudan Government want to take properties for South Sudan by force that will never going to happen on the eyes of South Sudan. North Sudan must agree according a Sudan Map of 1900 were Heglig, Abyei, 14 miles, Nahas, and rests were SS

      repondre message

  • 7 March 2013 07:55, by Gabriel Ajak

    UN should not lair to the world that SS are supporting Darfur revel for what reason this are rubbish report need not to be consider.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


South Sudan: Justice remains elusive, one year on 2014-12-17 04:17:40 By Elizabeth Deng December 16 2014 - A year after the outbreak of violence in Juba last December, hopes of accountability for abuses linked to the conflict remain distant. Despite repeated calls (...)

President Salva Kiir has betrayed his people and the nation 2014-12-17 04:15:00 By James Gatdet Dak December 15, 2014 - After many painful decades of destructive war of liberation against successive oppressive regimes in Khartoum, people of South Sudan gained their hard won (...)

Sudan protects terrorists 2014-12-15 04:29:57 By Kimberly Hollingsworth* December 15, 2014 - Sudan used to be the heart of Africa; now, Sudan is the heart of international terrorist organizations. Sudan is the hub for training extremists. (...)


MORE








Latest Press Releases


Norway grants US $1.9 million for humanitarian needs in Darfur 2014-12-16 06:47:08 The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) - KHARTOUM Norway helps provide nutritious food to malnourished families in Sudan 14 December 2014 KHARTOUM – The United Nations World Food Programme (...)

Darfur Association "disheartened" by ICC decision to not meet them 2014-12-14 05:50:13 12 December 2014 RE: DPANY Requests/Direction of the OTP in the Situation of Darfur Dear Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda, We, the Darfur People's Association of New York, are disheartened by your (...)

REDRESS calls for the immediate release of Sudan’s distinguished human rights lawyer 2014-12-10 09:02:53 December 9, 2014 ­­ — REDRESS, and many other individuals and organisations around the world, are extremely concerned by the continuing secret detention of Dr. Amin Mekki Medani. On Saturday, 4 (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.