Home | Comment & Analysis    Monday 4 March 2013

South Sudan’s vote on Palestine UN Status: How Amb. Nazario is victimised

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By Beny Gideon Mabor

February 3, 2013 - Last year on 29, November, 2012, the United Nations General Assembly in its sitting No: sixty-seventh General Assembly Plenary 44th & 45th meetings overwhelmingly voted and accorded Palestine as a Non-Member Observer State in the United Nations family for the first time since establishment of the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People in 1975 by Resolution No: 3376.

In practice, this decision is in line with the United Nations General Assembly Resolution No: 2949 adopted on 30 November 1970 which established a universal realization of the right of peoples to self-determination and of the speedy granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples for the effective guarantee and observance of human rights.

According to the committee report with reference No: A/67/35 states ‘that the reporting period, 7 October 2011 to 6 October 2012, was characterized by the deadlocked political process and the deteriorating socio-economic situation in the occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem’. With this appalling situation of fellow human beings and without prejudice to the agreed inalienable rights of the Palestinian people; the UN General Assembly explores all avenues for amicable solution including recognition of self-determination for the Palestinian people. This will help closely monitor the state of Palestine in the interest of peace and security.

According to the report, attempts have been made but there has never been any sign of peaceful progress and indeed towards resuming direct Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. The Jewish state of Israel continues with its settlement activity and adheres to the long-standing terms of reference of the peace process.’ With this critical observation, the General Assembly in 2012 thought wise to introduce this contestable agenda before the Council for voting with the objective to ‘breathe new life’ into peace process, as said by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas. The voting exercise took place smoothly and the UN General Assembly indeed issued a birth certificate of the reality of the State of Palestine.

The state of Palestine by large margin got majority votes of 138 member states in favor of Resolution No:A/68/L.54 on the right of self-determination of the people of Palestine and Resolution No: A/67/L.28 on the status of Palestine in the United Nations respectively. Conditionally, the two Resolutions were merged together and if you vote for the first, then you have automatically endorses the second and vice versa. There were only 9 countries against the Resolutions and they are Canada, Czech Republic, Israel, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Nauru, Panama, Palau, United States), with 41 abstentions. With job well done, South Sudan is amongst countries that voted to grant the right of self-determination and observer status of Palestine in the United Nations. Congratulations for the job well done and it is a sovereign decision.

South Sudan must stand by its sovereign decisions

Shortly after announcement of results; the speculations of unhappiness about South Sudan vote in favor of Palestine state erupt up on hearsay evidence in South Sudan and in the US. The first complaint came from one Republican congressman, identified as fellow Jews describing our decision to be bad instead we should support his fellow Jews in Israel. The second speculation developed from within our country and government for those who does not know US foreign policy strategy toward South Sudan that we are mistaken to vote for Palestine.

However, some policy makers thought if U.S.A opposed the vote; South Sudan should have followed the suit. It is very unfortunate expectation and I am afraid if we have a nation like this that we can continue shivering after US and other powerful nations without our sovereign decisions regardless of our infant economic position and other state apparatus. Remember we are no longer under foreign occupation and US has never been our colonizer though.

The US support for peaceful settlement of our political crisis in the then Republic of Sudan which led to the independence of South Sudan on 9, July 2011 is much recognized. The government and people of United State have special due respect in our hearts and minds together with other countries that stood with South Sudan in its just cause for political settlement, but it is not a credit the American government can directly interfere in our foreign policy strategy towards other nations. South Sudan is an Independent Republic with it functioning machinery of government and guided by its own principles including foreign policy framework enshrined under the Transitional Constitution and the law. South Sudan is not under foreign domination or protectorate unless otherwise altered without public knowledge.

Article 43 (a) and (e) of the Transitional Constitution states that ‘foreign policy of the Republic of South Sudan shall serve the national interest and shall be conducted independently and transparently with the view to achieving the following: (a) promotion of international cooperation, specially within the United Nations family, African Union and other international and regional organizations, for the purposes of consolidating universal peace and security, respect for international law, treaty obligations and fostering a just world economic order and (e) respect for international law and treaty obligations, as well as the seeking of the peaceful settlement of international disputes by negotiation, mediation, conciliation, arbitration and adjudication’. With this constitutional provisions, the question of Palestine falls within our jurisdiction and in compliance with the supreme law of the land cited above, it is imperative to vote in favor of Palestine and we should not be threaten by any state or any public body.

In our informal discussion in Juba and elsewhere in South Sudan about the affirmation for the right of self-determination for the Palestinian people, some of us advise that let us not panic about the letter written by one Republic Congressman. The good thing about American politics and governance is that there are developed tasks as a covenant between people and the political leadership. The Obama-led administration is Democrat and US foreign policy toward South Sudan cannot be change by a single congressman even from the opposition side.

Back to South Sudan with respect to Palestinians situation, the political leadership in Juba has never changed their mind about affirmation for the right of self-determination. This is confirmed in a statement made by current Cabinet Affairs Minister Hon. Deng Alor, in Cairo, Egypt on date 6, August 2011 that “his country will recognize an independent Palestinian state within 1967 borders at the United Nations General Assembly when it comes up for a vote in September” according to a report published by Palestinian News and Info Agency WAFA online news service.

Secondly and on top of South Sudan leadership, President Gen. Salva Kiir in his maiden speech on the occasion of proclamation of independence of South Sudan on 9 July 2011 said “as we look forward to becoming Africa’s 54th State and 193 3rd nation of the United nations, South Sudan pledges to abide by international covenants and conventions to which we shall seek to accede as soon as possible. We will be a responsible member of the international community, playing our role as defined by international law and as dictated by our own vales and ethics”.

In an explanatory note in support of the bid, South Sudan Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations Ambassador Dr. Francis Nazario in compliance with these international legal instruments recognized by South Sudan, he courageously told the council, that his delegation had supported the right of self-determination for the people of Palestine. That principle accounted for the existence of many countries, he said was “always contentious”. Dr. Francis further said South Sudan had achieved its independence from Sudan after a struggle that had lasted half a century. It believed that, in the context of a conflict between two identity groups, the most practical and viable outcome was a negotiated solution. While South Sudan had voted in favor of the resolution, it still encouraged the parties to pursue a negotiated settlement”.

Two weeks later after circulation of the said dilemma surrounding South Sudan vote in favor of Palestine, both Permanent Representatives to UN Amb. Dr. Francis Mading Deng and his Deputy Dr. Francis Nazario were summoned to Juba for questioning by the leadership of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and they also met the President for clarification on their voting. The inquiry went through and the top diplomats were told to go back to their normal duties in New York.

In fact, South Sudan vote was casted by Dr. Francis Nazario on delegation from his Boss Dr. Francis Mading, when he was busy that day for a working lunch with UN Secretary General Ban-Ki Moon according him. The question is left to the right thinking members of the society to ascertain whether the dodging to vote by Dr. Francis Mading on the voting day and throw the ball to his Deputy was intentional and calculated to cause what has happened now to his deputy? And whether his working lunch with UN Secretary General is more important than his country and the assignment vested upon him by Constitution and the law? The shift or transfer of powers from Dr. Francis Mading to his Deputy Dr. Francis Nazario was at last hours even the explanatory note in support of the vote was single handily drafted by Dr. Francis Mading. Therefore, Amb. Nazario only implement what has been agreed between them in line with directive from the government in Juba.

When I had the honor to speak to him and asked about his response when he learned of a new topic introduced in the UN Council of merging the two resolutions together, Dr. Francis Nazario said he contacted the Minister of Foreign Affairs Hon. Nhial Deng Nhial, 48 hours prior to voting by email and also text him on mobile phone as were his normal channel of communication but there was no reply. He said he has also contacted Dr. Francis Mading on phone but could not reach him for a comment. So regardless of the new topic introduced and our policy leadership in Juba had already supported the rights of Palestinian people as explained herein, Amb. Nazario voted in favor of Palestine.

The good decision by South Sudan to vote in favor of Palestine is also applauded within the region and the diaspora. A clear example is Ethiopian official of the Permanent Mission to the United Nations when he was talking to Andrew Luis, from Independent Diplomat on 16, January 2013. The official said “that Ethiopia had carefully analyzed South Sudan’s voting record at the UN General Assembly over the September to December period – as it did the voting record of all of its neighbors and partners – and had found it to be “very good.” He added that it was important for South Sudan to take into consideration the opinions of its regional partners and to act consistently with its region, as it had evidently done during this past session. In this regard, the official said that the RSS’s vote in favor of Palestine’s bid for upgraded status at the UN General Assembly was absolutely the right move.

Despite normality of the situations after the controversial votes, yet Amb. Dr. Francis Nazario was served with termination of assignment as Deputy Permanent Representative to UN on 31st December 2012 and asked to report himself to Juba not later than 15 February 2013, and which he did. Now comes the questions what is the mistake done by this person considering the whole background to the problem discuss above? If Dr. Francis Nazario is wrong to vote for Palestine, why not relieving all of them since the principal Head of Mission was the one who prepared everything including explanatory note? What is contrary to the foreign policy of South Sudan toward Palestine again if the President and his Ministers endorses the right of self-determination for others in policy statements? Is Dr. Francis Nazario aligned to ethnic identity or what? Why victimizing him for no reasons? Is Dr. Francis Mading Deng, too big to be held responsible for his mistake (s) if he has done something wrong to victimize his deputy for what both of them have equal share? Anyway, I pray the political leadership to find correct answers to these questions.

In conclusion, I would like to register that the reasons why I took up this issue are as follows: First, South Sudan got independence through right of self-determination which has been recognized by international community including Palestine. Therefore, South Sudan must be the champion of self-determination and has every right to support Palestine in their similar cause and nothing wrong has been committed by Dr. Francis Nazario to warrant his termination of assignment at the United Nations.

Second, I am writing to correct the misrepresentation across South Sudan and beyond that Dr. Francis Nazario has betrayed South Sudan. It is not true and you can now read the background history including Salva-administration to vote in favor of Palestine. However, if such a situation is left unchallenged, it will set very bad precedent in history of foreign policy that a high profile diplomat like this gentleman is recalled from such important assignment and dammed in Juba, where he will not contribute anything of immediate positive impact, when our country is in need of his caliber to speak out on behalf of South Sudan.

With utmost good faith, I do not know Dr. Francis Nazario by character association but I know him beyond doubt through performances when he was Director General of Bilateral Relation in the then Ministry of Regional Cooperation from 2005 to 2007 and as Ambassador to European Union EU in Brussels, Belgium from 2007 to 2011 as well as Deputy Head of Mission to United Nations.

I have no personal relationship with him neither and it is not a point to rise here, but to caution you because we have reached to unexpected level of misunderstanding that everything is associated with ethnic identity. Finally, I am of the opinion as citizen and appeal to our government to return Dr. Francis Nazario back to his place in New York so that the said misrepresentation is cleared. There is no reason to sacrifice him for no justification when in fact this gentleman had good tracking records when he was here in the ministry of Regional cooperation, the European Union and when he was in the United Nations.

Beny Gideon Mabor, lives in South Sudan and can be reached at benygmabor@gmail.com



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 4 March 2013 07:45, by Nuer Empire

    Beny Gedeon Mabor:Your article and Francis Deng from Abyei have betrayed South Sudan.Voting for the rights of Palestinian Terrorists! It is a big joke to vote for our killers! South Sudan was independent without Palestinian recognition over it.
    The Nuer Empire

    repondre message

    • 4 March 2013 08:48, by Sirajou

      Dr. Francis is responding to a call to duty in other countries where his service as Amb. Is needed not as deputy. Upgrade of his post please. Else, we can not kegitimise a terrorist state of the squads of death in the pretext that we got independence through self-determination. Pure lie, we fought for our struggle and negotiated it peacefully not through UN or throwing states and bombs on innocent

      repondre message

    • 4 March 2013 09:43, by Peacocktail

      Beny,
      You refeshed our mind against that fool who vote for Palestine on our behave.What relationship shall we build with Palestine land,is South Sudan going to join Jahedism/Alqaeda group? Why did he contact the Country leadership in the last minute and yet Circulation of Assmbly information was 48 hrs. He was bride by Palestine to destroy the New Nation image.Hope dep.Rep is removed from UN.foo

      repondre message

    • 5 March 2013 10:53, by julia

      now the question is,why did Francis Mading allowed Naziro to rep.him at the voting session if their was no a deals behind? Pan Deng Manyjong want to run s.sudan the way they re running Abyei affairs.neglecting the right of other 8 ngok chieftainship.Dr. Naziro welcome back home,we all know u re innocent,but victimis intentionally for ur brightness. What goes around come around!

      repondre message

      • 7 March 2013 13:33, by Mohammed Ali 2

        It is simple as that: the Abeyei gang are runing SS the way they want. Do mistakes and let the blame fall on somebody else!The Abeyei " super-race" wickedly set the trab for Dr.Naziro.Francis Deng did not go to the meeting purposly.No way Naziro had made the decision alone by himself. They are starving the pple of SS while they are living in luxury far away from SS.Francis Deng might have lived...

        repondre message

        • 7 March 2013 13:45, by Mohammed Ali 2

          CON:only the first 7 years of his childhood in S.Kordufan, likewise Luka Biong from Babanosa intermediate school to Madani secondry school with his uncle to university of Khartoum then far & away with his white Australian wife where all the loooooted money goes.Not able to withstand living in SS he is now between UK,US and Australia , "defending the rights" of the poor,starving & marginalized SS.

          repondre message

  • 4 March 2013 08:55, by Atungdiak

    Mr. Beny, no amount of justification can alter the fact that regardless of whether Nhial and Mading never got back to Dr. Nazario or otherwise, our best and wisest option should have been abstinence. South Sudan suffered a great deal becoz of that vote. However, the first Victim should have been Nhial and Dr. F. Mading. I also feel Dr. Nazario did not use his Solomonic wisdom we know him foR..

    repondre message

    • 4 March 2013 08:58, by Atungdiak

      The notion that South Sudan will always support any group asking for self determination is baseless. How about if LRA ask for that, would we vote yes? All votes should be consistent with National Foreign Policies (Not sure if we have good ones)...

      repondre message

      • 4 March 2013 09:52, by Peacocktail

        Dr. Narzio had chicken brain, He bought title called Dr.He had destroy us international,I went to Tanzania last month and they allaude me, You guys of New Nation just jump into World of drama without reviewing your strategies..Why did your country Voted for Palestine rights of determination? No Anwer, I just keep silence because that Fool Amba.Narzio had betray New Nation.Nhail must remove him.

        repondre message

        • 4 March 2013 13:00, by Takpiny

          Beny, be careful, this article is very sensitive my brother as you know the truths teller and hardworking people are the real enemies of our corrupted and weak government in juba , apart from that nothing wrong with your suggestion of calling government to return Dr Nazario to his position.

          repondre message

          • 4 March 2013 13:08, by Takpiny

            Dr Nazario is a victim of big thieves, he has done nothing wrong at all , he was just implemented the instruction given to him by his bosses, namely ,Mading Deng, Deng alore and Nhial Deng who have already received money from the Qatar in the past for South Sudan to vote in the favor of Palestine..So, the real betrayal of our nation are two men from Abyei and man from Tonj.

            repondre message

      • 4 March 2013 10:40, by Quintino

        You are quit correct. Any voting in the UN has to be cleared by the Foreign Ministry after clearance with the President.
        Therefore it naturally follows that Nhial should have resigned or fired following the UN debacle and then followed by others.
        Poor Dr. Framcis Nazario is paying for the weakness of Nhial stewardness leadership.
        Some one somewhere (power house) correct this malady.

        repondre message

    • 5 March 2013 08:23, by Tutbol

      Guys, S Sudan decision to back the palistenians obsever status to the United nations was in the best interest of our country. Which country in africa voted otherwise? We are independent nation & we are not US & Israel oversea territory. Some of our clueless citizens just want to worship israel when they don’t know that israel an appatheid state! Would we want our country isolated even in our...

      repondre message

      • 5 March 2013 08:39, by Tutbol

        ... own region? I am not a fan of Hamas but the ordinary palistenians deserve peace & a land to live on like everyone else. Just take this example, will it be possible for American natives to tell Europeans or everyone living in their country to go back where they came from including the israelis or can we in the Sudan tell all the arabs in the Sudan to go back to arabia? The israelis have been...

        repondre message

        • 5 March 2013 09:06, by Tutbol

          ... in exile for nearly 2000 years from their land, and now they displaced people who have nothing to do with their being exiled.
          As for Mr. Nazario dismissal, our govt is taken by ’mangoks’ and is it being run by ’mangoks’. Francis Mading was covering his own skin for he didn’t want to be seen by S Sudanese to have voted for N Sudan’s interest. To me personally as i stated early, there is...

          repondre message

          • 5 March 2013 09:12, by Tutbol

            ... nothing wrong with the way our diplomats voted. But why all over sudden, our young diplomat is relieved of his diplomatic duties?

            repondre message

  • 4 March 2013 09:45, by Gatkuoth

    They were drunk and that was why they did not response to Dr. Francis Email. They (Nhial and Mading) are responsible. What can Arab offer to South Sudan apart from hate? Weren’t they the ones that united against us when we captured panthou, Palestians were not acceptional. God will hold responsible the president, Nhial and Mading..... they are joking with this nation and they must pay the price.

    repondre message

  • 4 March 2013 14:15, by Makunon

    Dr. Beny or Doctors,You misrepresented southerners for sure in UN assembly and your collection proved the great mistaken committed, a pain will never heal for decade.posting this article here is like scratching the old wound. Enemy of your enemy is your friend and there is no way we abandon Israel friend and build relation with Palestine Arab nation enemy at-least we become terrorist too.

    repondre message

  • 5 March 2013 01:50, by Panthou

    Dear commentators, Dr. Francis Mading n Nhial were not in Sudan during civil war. They were abroad, so forget your suffering that you’re telling! Again, Nhial left for London to watch world cup while our forces are fighting in panthou. How could they care when their mothers are outside the country? This country is completely run out of leaders! All they care balance in their checking account.

    repondre message

  • 5 March 2013 02:05, by Ito

    Dear Dr. Beny, May God bless you for telling the truth. I know Dr. Nazario as am from eastern equatoria too. He is a man of peace and a nationalist. Yes, we fail to see why he is fired. He was instructed by foreign ministry and his boss Francis Deng to vote in favor of Palestine and he did. Why fire him for no reason. Is it not tribalism? We need great nationalist like you brother. May God bless y

    repondre message

    • 6 March 2013 07:57, by denng

      Ito, i totally agree with mr Beny there. I know Nazario personally and respect his energy over the years. This is a clear case of strength. Not everything is tribalism. Mading is more powerful politically and so Nazario got victimized in the process. Its not an issue of Acholis vs Dinkas.

      repondre message

  • 5 March 2013 02:08, by Panthou

    What do we (south Sudanese ) expect from someone whose mom still in Khartoum n the other married a white lady? I blame our cowboy too. Mr. President only hired you through his interest, rather then the interest of the nation. If not Nhial wouldn’t be there. (The riches people in the world are drugs deals n south Sudan politicians)

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


World’s newest nation has unprecedented opportunity to end sexual violence in conflict 2014-10-17 21:34:44 By Zainab Hawa Bangura October 17, 2014 - As United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) on Sexual Violence in Conflict, I completed my first trip to South Sudan last (...)

Celebrate the golden jubilee of the October 1964 Sudanese revolution 2014-10-17 21:34:32 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman October 17, 2014 - Despite the dearth and lack of what needs celebration and rejoice in the reign of the National Congress Party (NCP) regime led by the tyrant genocidal (...)

Sudan, Iran, the Obama Administration, and Khartoum’s political vision" 2014-10-16 09:05:01 More about what we learn from the leaked minutes of the August 31 meeting bringing together Khartoum's most senior military and security officials By Eric Reeves October 15, 2014 - The document (...)


MORE








Latest Press Releases


Sudan Democracy First Group condemns wave of arbitrary arrests in Sudan 2014-09-25 05:17:35 Sudan Democracy First Group 25 September 2014 - In a desperate attempt to prevent a series of events commemorating the victims of the September 2013 protests, Sudan’s notorious National (...)

HRW calls on UN rights body to press Sudan to investigate murder of peaceful protesters 2014-09-24 21:24:09 Human Rights Watch One Year On, No Justice for Protester Deaths (Geneva, September 23, 2014) – The United Nations Human Rights Council should call on Sudan to account immediately for the death (...)

Hundreds walk for peace in South Sudan 2014-09-23 08:30:16 National Platform for Peace and Reconciliation (NPPR) PRESS RELEASE Juba, 21 September 2014 - Hundreds of people took to the streets of the South Sudan capital Jubato ‘Walk for Peace’and demand (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.