Home | News    Friday 18 January 2013

U.S. denies Sudan accusations of backing New Dawn charter

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

January 17, 2013 (KHARTOUM) – The United States issued a statement on Thursday dismissing accusations made by the Sudanese government that Washington stood behind the "New Dawn" charter signed by opposition parties and armed rebel groups in Uganda this month.

JPEG - 23.8 kb

The Sudanese presidential assistant Nafie Ali Nafie, who is also the deputy chairman of the ruling National Congress Party (NCP), said at a press conference on Monday that the U.S. and the European Union (EU) pushed anti-Khartoum forces to sign the charter.

But the U.S. embassy in Khartoum said in a press release it had nothing to do with the Kampala meeting.

"While the United States has been in dialogue with various parties in Sudan, the U.S. was not involved in the sponsoring, financing, organizing or the outcome of the recent meetings in Kampala between the Sudan Revolutionary Front and the National Consensus Forces" the statement said.

The embassy stressed that Washington’s consistent message to all parties in Sudan that conflicts in the East African nation "can only be resolved through political consultations and negotiations".

The signatories to the deal included the National Umma Party (NUP), Popular Congress Party (PCP), Sudanese Communist Party (SCP), Sudan People Liberation Movement North (SPLM-N), Sudan Liberation Movement of Abdel-Wahid Mohamed Nur (SLM-Nur) and Sudan Liberation Movement of Minni Minnawi (SLM-Minnawi).

The participants agreed on the goal of changing the regime but were at odds over means to achieve that through political or military means. They also concurred on the need to prevent exploitation of religion in politics.

The Sudanese government and the NCP launched a fierce campaign against the charter saying it wants to turn Sudan into a secular state and undermine the country’s institutions particularly the military.

The NUP, PCP and SCP later appeared to distance themselves from the agreement saying they were rushed into signing and voiced objections over some of its clauses.

The U.S. emphasized that there will be no military solution to Sudan’s conflicts in South Kordofan, Blue Nile and Darfur adding that "the suffering of millions of Sudanese from these conflicts is a terrible humanitarian price for failure to find a peaceful outcome".

The armed movements in Darfur have formed a coalition known as the Sudanese Revolutionary Front (SRF) to unite military efforts in the conflict zones.

The embassy said that a delegation from the SPLM-N is in Washington "to discuss how to reach a resolution to the conflict and humanitarian and human rights crisis in the Sudanese states of Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile".

"These talks have only reinforced our view that agreement between the Government of Sudan and the SPLM-N for an immediate cessation of hostilities and humanitarian assistance is an urgent need. The SPLM-N has assured us that this is their priority. We urge the Government of Sudan to begin such talks at the earliest opportunity. This has also been the recommendation of the Africa Union and the UN Security Council" the U.S. embassy said.

Sudan has vowed to crush the rebel groups this year in Darfur, South Kordofan and Blue Nile. It has also refused to start peace talks with the SPLM-N despite an AU decision to the contrary.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 18 January 2013 13:58, by akoonapg

    Stupid Sudan, they know they need the U.S embassy in their country, if you have a problem then kick U.S embassy out of your country.

    repondre message

  • 18 January 2013 14:23, by James Maker Akok

    To North Sudan government,
    President Al Bashir is creating another countries in North Sudan while he does not know what he’s doing. Bashri military to attacking Rebels without peace talk will bring chaos in North Sudan to create two countries again like what South Sudan did to have their own country.
    This is advice to you North Sudan people if you need peace really to be one country.

    repondre message

    • 18 January 2013 14:44, by James Maker Akok

      To North Sudan Government,
      President Al Bashir is making military action to attacking South Kordofan, and Blue Nile to silencing them by force but is difficult to silencing them, is like going from Earth to Heaven as you know they don’t like North Sudan Government acting and they had jointed SPLM. So, is better President Al Bashir to make good things to make them happy to change their mind.

      repondre message

  • 5 March 2013 20:45, by abualk

    Thanks so much for this! I havent been this thrilled by a blog post for quite some time! You’ve got it, whatever that means in blogging. Anyway, You are certainly somebody that has something to say that people need to hear. Keep up the good work. Keep on inspiring the people!
    cigarettes | here

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Referenda in Scotland and South Sudan told a tale of two cities 2014-09-21 06:01:02 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman September 20, 2014 - This article comes against the backdrop of the referendum in Scotland and southern Sudan in the years 2014 and 2011, respectively, and the result was (...)

Undermining South Sudanese expertise’s is ironical! 2014-09-19 10:15:59 By Peter Gai Manyuon September 18, 2014 - The recent order from the Ministry of Labor and Public Service in the Republic of South Sudan that was issued on 16th of September 2014 is absolute (...)

Sudan - Colliding interests 2014-09-16 10:04:11 By Mohamed Elshabik September 15, 2014 - Sudan seems to be unconcerned by the current political crisis in the region. Amid a prognosis of full-scale war in South Sudan, unrest in Egypt, chaos in (...)


MORE








Latest Press Releases


Sudan Democracy First Group: Art as resistance – art as resilience 2014-09-09 12:34:15 Sudan Democracy First Group Art as Resistance – Art as Resilience September 8, 2014 - To mark the third anniversary of the resumption of civil war in Blue Nile and Nuba Mountains/South Kordofan, (...)

Sudan: Those behind unlawful killings and torture of protesters must be brought to justice 2014-09-03 13:13:43 Amnesty International Sudan: Those behind unlawful killings and torture of protesters must be brought to justice The brutal suppression of protest in Sudan must end, and members of the security (...)

National Dialogue in Sudan: Past experiences and current challenges 2014-08-27 06:18:22 Sudan Democracy First Group (SDFG) Since independence, Sudan has undergone a number of national peace agreements, some of which were observed and honored for short periods, others which were (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.