Home | Comment & Analysis    Tuesday 15 January 2013

A Call for a Marshall Plan for South Sudan (1-2)

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

By John A. Akec

"There is no shortage of funding in the world, only shortage of fund-able plans"- Author’s personal conviction

January 14, 2013 - South Sudan obtained its independence from Sudan in July 2011, six months after voting overwhelmingly to secede from the country in a referendum conducted on 9th January 2011.

The baseline on which the government of the independent South Sudan had launched its developmental effort was grim, even by African standards. With a population of 8.26 million, as per World Bank’s December 2010 census, about 90 percent lived on less than one dollar per day and 33 percent were classified as chronically hungry. Only six percent had access to improved sanitation, 85 percent of adults were recorded illiterate, and there was only one teacher for every 1,000 students. Moreover, one in six mothers dies during childbirth, and 135 out of 1,000 children die before the age of five.

The region’s infrastructure—roads, bridges, and electricity—is poor or non-existent. Other sectors of the economy, such as agriculture, are under-developed. Landlocked and with no productive industries of its own, South Sudan imported everything from Sudan, Kenya, and Uganda, while exporting nothing in return.
To fund development effort, South Sudan relied heavily on oil revenues which formed 98 percent of the government of income from the sale of the crude in international markets. Unfortunately, barely six months into independence, the government’s oil revenues dried up, following the shut-down of oil production in January 2012, a consequence of a dispute with Sudan over the level of transit fees.

A World Bank brief about the possible adverse impacts of oil shut-down on South Sudan’s economy in June 2012, predicted a jump in the number of people living under poverty line (or those spending less than USD 1.2 per day) from 51 percent in 2012 to 83 percent in 2013; infant mortality rates for under 5s to double from 10 percent in 2012 to 20 percent in 2013; school enrolment was predicted to drop from 50 percent in 2012 to 20 percent in 2013 (the level it was some eight years ago). With continuing disagreement over outstanding issues with Sudan, and with no sources to fund development effort, the future of the nascent country looks unsettling.

Most recently, the United Nations added South Sudan to the list of the world’s poorest 46 countries.

The Challenge of Triple Traps
Mirroring the diagnosis provided by economist Paul Collier in his book, the Bottom Billion (Collier, 2007), South Sudan appears to be suffering from at least three structural ailments or traps: abundant natural resource trap (resource curse); a land-locked nation with bad and powerful neighbours (Sudan); and being a relatively new and small country facing governance challenges, as reflected by 7-year long liaises-fair rule by Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM) that is still carrying on unabated.

And as one South Sudanese academic commented (Blackings, 2012), the SPLM nationalist leaders [like other Africa anti-colonial leaders before them] were clearer on what they wanted to end, than on what they wanted to put in place to replace it (quoting Ajayi, 1982).

What’s more, hopes were raised that the signing of Addis Ababa Agreement between South Sudan and Sudan on 27 September 2012 would resolve outstanding issues between the two countries, remove the ghost of a renewed war, prevent the collapse of the economies of two Sudans, and allow South Sudan to focus on affecting a resemblance of socio-economic development for its citizens. But regrettably, nothing of this sort is forthcoming as the government of Sudan began to attach an ever increasing list of impossible preconditions before it would allow South Sudan oil to flow through its territory.

It is worth pointing out that one of the most serious obstacles to normalizing relationships between South Sudan and Sudan is the continuing accusation by Sudan that the former provides moral, material, and logistical support to Sudan’s armed dissidents, precisely the SPLM-North which is waging war in South Kordofan and Blue Nile, and Revolutionary Front fighting in Darfur, despite denial by South Sudan. And rather than pressurizing the government of Sudan to negotiate peace with SPLM-North, the international community persistently pressurizes South Sudan to normalize relationship with Sudan, a great irony of our time.

No Good Crying Over Spilt Milk
And even if oil money were to flow again into South Sudan’s government coffers, and without well reasoned economic vision backed by commitment and credible action plans, many analysts expect that it is going to be business as usual in Juba, with hundreds of millions of petro-dollars coming in every month, and with no impact whatsoever on provision of badly needed services such as health, education, and critical infrastructure development; or possible diversification of the oil dominated economy.

That said, enough criticism has been labelled against South Sudan ruling party, SPLM. And if criticism would kill anything, SPLM would have long been dead, as once noted by Ambassador Sabit Alley currently South Sudan ambassador to UK, in defence of SPLM, many years ago on an internet discussion forum. It would therefore be more instructive for South Sudanese (be they in the government or outside the government) to brainstorm in order to come up with ideas that would help the nation find its path out of current stagnation and despair into a bright and prosperous future. Some indigenous think-tanks as well as individuals using social media are already debating this issue, but more of such a debate is needed.

The author believes this article is a small contribution towards this debate, hopes that it is going to stimulate further discussion, and in due time, leads to crystallization of a shared vision which we could all embrace and execute with determination, honesty, and commitment.

While embarking on this debate, we must keep an open mind. We should also forget about what is generally perceived as mediocre failure of our government. We have come a long way since our ancestors rebelled in Torit in August 1955 and we should be proud of what has already been achieved, realizing that in any worthwhile project, failure is part of the game.

And yet, as the saying goes, failure is not so much about falling down, but rather it is more about failing to rise up again. And for us in South Sudan, rising up against all forces of gravity is not an option, but national duty. So rise we must.

A Marshall Plan for South Sudan
For those unfamiliar with the term, it was at the end of World War II that the government of United States came out with a plan that extended credit and financial assistance to many European countries to accelerate the revival of their war-ravaged economies. The plan’s official name was European Recovery Program (ERP), but became historically more popular as the Marshall Plan after the US Secretary of State George Marshall, who revealed the plan for the first time in a speech he delivered to graduate students at Harvard University on 5th June 1947. The essence of the Marshall’s speech was captured in the following lines, and I quote (Marshall Plan, Wikipedia):

"The modern system of the division of labor upon which the exchange of products is based is in danger of breaking down…It is logical that the United States should do whatever it is able to do to assist in the return of normal economic health to the world, without which there can be no political stability and no assured peace…[the Plan] purpose should be the revival of a working economy in the world so as to permit the emergence of political and social conditions in which free institutions can exist." Unquote.

Looking back to over half a century when this speech was made and the Plan subsequently launched (1948-1952), one cannot help but admire how far-sighted and ahead of its time the Marshall Plan was, and that the leaders of United States who conceived the Plan had already realised the economic and political interdependence of the countries of the world, now christened as Globalization.

Given the leading role the United States, Norway, and Britain had played in the birth of South Sudan as world’s newest nation, it is morally right that these countries and many others with good will and self-interest extend such assistance to South Sudan, irrespective of whether or not oil export resumes sooner or later. No conditionalities should be attached to granting favourable credit terms or extending financial assistance save that the plans which would be prepared and presented by South Sudan for funding be credible, realistic, and well designed. Otherwise, the goals for a Marshall Plan for South Sudanare in essence not much different from those that inspired the original Marshall Plan – the advancement of world’s political stability and peace.

The experience of Multi-donor Trust Fund in South Sudan has left much to be desired. Therefore, this time around, the proposed Marshall Plan for South Sudan should put the government and people of South Sudan in the driving seat (foreign consultants, need not apply, must be its good-faith empowering philosophy!).
Priorities should be made and programs designed by the government of South Sudan with participation and consultation of wide sector of South Sudan society including South Sudan Diaspora. Funding would be composed of a combination of grants and loans from Marshall Plan Fund, negotiated and supported by the Obama Administration in partnership with Norway, Great Britain, Germany, France, Japan, Canada, Australia, Denmark, China, amongst others. The Plan should last 10 years from the date of its launch.

The South Sudan Marshall Plan’s strategic goals should be to enhance South Sudan’s social, economic, and natural capitals. The Plan would do so by aiming to enhance social justice and improve the quality of life for great lot of society, achieve economic growth that would raise living standards, and sustain global and regional environmental quality (Elkington, 1989; Maathai, 2009).

Exact details of the programs could be worked out and it suffices to say that the programs should include among others the promotion of trade and long-term economic integration of South Sudan into East African Community (Beny, 2012), provision of sufficient education and health services; provision of clean drinking water; achieving food security; implementation of electrification program for towns and country-side; building of communications and ICT infrastructure; development of country-side; building of efficient transport infrastructure that links South Sudan states and links South Sudan to the East African coast by high-speed railway line to Djibouti or Kenya (Reeves, 2012); funding of socio-economic research, and transfer of science and technology; building value-added industries; increasing non-oil exports; harnessing the country’s tourism potential; promotion of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This list is not all-inclusive.

Making it Work this Time!
In order to succeed, institutional reforms would be necessary. Laws and regulations would have to be enacted in order to create an enabling environment for opening new business and attracting foreign direct investment. South Sudanese must be trained to acquire employable skills through the widening opportunities in higher education, technical vocational and second chance programmes. Women and girls must be empowered through education and elimination of cultures that oppress them in order to achieve women’s potential and garner their effective contribution to the well being of South Sudanese society. My next article will shed more light on some of these proposals.

Before ending the article, I must borrow a powerful phrase from British Liberal Party’s pamphlet that was published at the end of 1929 (Clarke, 2009) and apply it in the context of our nation:

SPLM has successfully mobilized its people for war. It MUST now mobilize South Sudanese people for peace and prosperity.

Finally, President Salva, once again our pleas that you lead the marsh to the promised land... Our support and our sweat guaranteed.

Recommended Readings that inspired and lend support to many ideas in this article:
Ajayi, Ade (1982). Expectations of Independence. Daedalus. Quoted in Blackings, Mari John (2012), South Sudan, One Year On: From World’s Newest State, to Another African Story, Paper presented at Sudanese Programme Conference, St. Antony’s College University of Oxford. June 23, 2012.
Beny, Laura Nyantung, and Matthew Synder (2012). South Sudan and East African Community, Pros and Cons and Strategic Considerations, Report, University of Michigan Law School.
Blackings, Mari John (2012). South Sudan, One Year On: From World’s Newest State, to Another African Story, Paper presented at Sudanese Programme Conference, St. Antony’s College University of Oxford. June 23, 2012.
Clarke, Peter (2009). Keynes: The Rise, Fall, and Return of the 20th Century’s Most Influential Economist, Bloomsbury Press. New York.
Elkington, John (1989). Cannibals and Forks, referenced in Richard C. Dorf (2001), Technology, Humans, and Society: Towards a Sustainable World, Academic Press, Sandiego, CA.
Collier, Paul (2007). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About IT, Oxford University Press.
Maathai, Wangari (2009). The Challenge for Africa. Arrow Books, London.
Marshall Plan. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marshall_Plan.
Reeves, Eric (2012). Oil Transport from South Sudan to Kenyan Coast, an Alternative to Oil Pipeline (http://www.sudanreeves.org/2012/02/24/oil-transport-from-south-sudan-to-the-kenyan-coast-an-alternative-to-the-oil-pipeline-proposal-that-would-promote-immediate-employment-national-unity-and-long-term-economic-growth/)



The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 15 January 2013 12:45, by Paul Chadrack

    This plan will suceed after Kiir’s government.because international is not stupit to lend funding to corrupt thieving SPLM government, so mr John Akec!, instead of proposing a master economic plan for your corrupt bhar el regime, just advise them to resign

    repondre message

    • 20 June 2013 14:13, by margse6t

      I am doing a report on this subject. Your article is full of really useful information. I will make sure to come back to check out your posts for my next report. Cheers
      lazy hammocks

      repondre message

  • 15 January 2013 19:42, by Gordon

    A Marshall Plan for South Sudan? No chance! The main reason for the Marshall Plan was USAs fear that Stalin would take his chance to invade Europe, especially Germany and the expansion of communism.- Of course South Sudan needs help. But first step must be to overcome the tribal conflicts and to establish a reliable government. You can’t buy this with money, you should know.

    repondre message

  • 15 January 2013 22:34, by Gordon

    You are a typical American: All goals can be achieved with money, money, money. Sometimes this can help,but not in the case of South Sudan. They have to overcome their problems with convincing ideas in their own country. No chance up to now. The deviation from North Sudan was the greatest fault in Sudans history. Referendum? That was a failure, no vote for independence, just anger against Arabs.

    repondre message

  • 15 January 2013 22:47, by Gordon

    Garang knew better: NEW SUDAN! With a government to care for the whole country, not only having the interest of Khartoum in their eyes. Long time ago, also Gordon knew better! Kind regards.

    repondre message

  • 16 January 2013 00:40, by Gordon

    Eric, you are a dreamer in your ivory tower in a maiden school. Since years I’m following the news of Sudan Tribune, especially the comments of their readers, which are something like a mirror what is really going on there. My conclusion: South Sudan is an absolutely failed construction. I can’t see that there is the slightest sign of success in this new African Country. Hate and threads against e

    repondre message

  • 16 January 2013 00:44, by Gordon

    Cont.: Hate and threads against everybody, mixed with dreams of superiority is no fundament to form a new nation. I do hope, that I’m wrong.-

    repondre message

  • 16 January 2013 18:33, by Bill Dhieu Manyang

    Dear Akec,
    The Marshall economic plan will be a great ideal for South Sudan if given a chance but I doubt about the success of such plan in South Sudan given the lack of political will from our current leaders. As you said in this article that failure is part of the game, let us see but it may not be different from the existing Donors Trust Funds where millions dollars are unaccounted for.

    repondre message

    • 17 January 2013 08:40, by Lotodo Awino Odug

      is this the same Bill who borrowed student’s fund and never repay it back? I will be amaze if you really are.

      repondre message

  • 17 January 2013 03:39, by Gordon

    Tutbol & Born to Rule:Very sorry having offended you, please accept my apologizes. But you should know that Sudan Tribune is open for everybody all over the world to comment on Sudans’ affairs, even when they don’t find your approval. Let me tell you, following Sudans’ politics since independence, that my heart is bleeding that both sides are still suffering, where there could be a paradise

    repondre message

    • 17 January 2013 03:43, by Gordon

      Cont.: where there could be a paradise on earth with just a little bit common sense and good will.---

      repondre message

  • 17 January 2013 04:36, by Gordon

    @Born-to-Rule: Let me tell you, that we have something in common: I lost my family during WWII and understand very well your feelings. But I don’t blame the Russians, who did this and only having in mind – contouring to you - take revenge. I’m utmost happy that nowadays peaceful connections are possible to the welfare of my children.--- Think it over! Arabs are no devils, people like you and me

    repondre message

    • 17 January 2013 06:01, by Tutbol

      Mr. Gordon,
      In a healthy discussion; we all disagree to agree, that is everyone spit out his/her own crap. Because we never know who has the best crap if it is not let out & in the end, we will all pick the crap we deem best suit our situation. So worry less Mr. Gordon, it is just a discussion.

      repondre message

      • 17 January 2013 07:59, by Lotodo Awino Odug

        Thank you Dr Akech,that is all we need from you,to chart our developemental goals,although our officials only think about the number of wives and children they want to have inorder to be recoqnize as being successful and productive members of any given society.our country will emerge as these greedy men get old and retire to their localities.it is irresponsible to separate away from safety ned

        repondre message

        • 17 January 2013 08:03, by Lotodo Awino Odug

          safety net [Sudan] in the name of marginalization and immediately stole money from people whom you emmancipated,that make hypocrites for the lack of better word.

          repondre message

  • 17 January 2013 07:51, by Mapuor

    Mr John A Akec
    Your article is appealing indeed,however,when you look scrupulously on the social and economic conditions of our country,something that is more pragmatic comes up as a panacea for our ailments.its OVERHAUL, AND COMPLETE RESTRUCTURING of our institutions including the army.Army alone takes more than 60% of our budget,50% of which is spent by generals ,

    repondre message

    • 17 January 2013 08:03, by Mapuor

      95% of whom are from greater Upper Nile and only 10% is paid as salary to officers,N CO’s and men.This is evidenced by the enormous resources that they have in neighboring countries,Kenya,Uganda,Ethiopia and even Sudan.30% of the total budget is paid to constitutional post holders and only 10% is paid as salary to redundant civil service.Where do we get money for development in such a situatio

      repondre message

  • 24 May 2013 19:41, by seth0098

    For the most furniture part, I am in agreement with bean bag chairs what you wrote. couch It’s certainly reading furniture what others have to say on the subject matter.homepagesofa

    repondre message

  • 16 July 2013 02:53, by realestatemilton
  • 19 July 2013 01:25, by realestatemilton

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Who was behind the killing of civilians in Bor? 2014-04-22 06:50:43 By Peter Gai Manyuon "A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death", from unknown author. (...)

Embracing victimhood to celebrate victimisation 2014-04-22 06:28:12 By Juliana Bol April 21, 2014 - It was a bit disturbing to hear news of our citizens in the IDP camps (where they are seeking protection and shelter) celebrating the recapture of Bentiu -in (...)

South Sudan: Revenge Killings is not the basis for building a modern nation 2014-04-21 05:39:31 By Steve Paterno April 20, 2014 - The theme of this article develops as a result of my extensive research and writings on a culture of revenge killings among South Sudanese communities, (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


SDFG mourn the loss of a Sudanese activist 2014-04-20 09:02:39 The Sudan Democracy First Group mourns the loss of Osman Hummaida, a towering figure of the human rights movement in Sudan, and a tireless campaigner for democracy and peace in the country. Osman (...)

UNICEF supports emergency response for children in Sudan with 89 tons of life-saving supplies 2014-04-19 09:47:06 Khartoum, 18 April 2014 --- Today in Khartoum airport, UNICEF received 89 tons of life-saving supplies to support the humanitarian response to children affected by emergencies in various hot (...)

Letter to the South Sudanese government on the ratification of the African Charter 2014-04-16 06:24:18 Letter to the Government of South Sudan on the ratification of the African Charter H.E. Salva Kiir Mayardit President of the Republic of South Sudan Juba, South Sudan CC: Dr. Barnaba Benjamin (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2014 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.