Home | Comment & Analysis    Wednesday 9 January 2013

Reply to Luka Biong’s Articles: “Sudan Under Bashir: Trajectory of Shame and Agony”


By Khalid Al Mubarak

January 7, 2013 - Dr. Luka Biong, co-chair of the Abyei Oversight Committee and senior member of the SPLM, has published an important article in “New Nation” newspaper (republished by Sudan Tribune on 27th December 12). As one of those still trapped in the civil war mindset, the usually polite Dr. Biong wrote in pre-CPA incendiary and provocative invective.

He is, in John Dryden’s words: “So over-violent or over-civil, that everyman with him [is] God or devil.” God, of course, is the khawagat, especially the evangelical Taliban with their black-and-white apocalyptic world view. The devil is the Sudan and its President.

As a Sudanese citizen from Abyei, he has every right to criticise; but as a highly qualified senior politician and former minister , one expects a more reasonable and considerate discourse from him, especially at a time in which the main task for both Sudans is to build on the positive momentum that was generated by the 27th September Cooperation Agreement between the two presidents. To choose this time to publish a toxic article designed to inflame passions and increase tensions is indefensible, to say the least.

Using unbecoming words about President Bashir, could be seen as an attempt to invite a similar response towards President Kiir. We will disappoint him; but will be less amenable in shredding the arguments he labels as “objective”.

Luka Biong begins his article by quoting Mr. Idris Hassan, who wrote in the Arabic language Sudanese Al Sahafa, that those who struggled for independence would be gutted if they saw the state of the nation today. What Dr. Biong does not seem to note is that critics of government policy in the Sudan, like Mr. Idris Hassan, still write their columns openly, advocating a change of course and different policies.

By comparison, Isaiah Abraham, who expressed views that call for a more balanced approach to the Sudan and avoidance of support for rebels across the border, has been killed on 4th December 12. Another example is Dr. Jok Madut Jok, undersecretary of the Ministry of Culture and, like Isaiah Abraham, a staunch SPLM cadre, has been beaten up in Wau. He wrote : “If this sort of thing happens to a senior government official, what we should imagine, will happen to ordinary citizens?” The question is forwarded to Dr. Biong.

After the initial barrage of unbecoming rhetoric, Dr. Biong goes on to claim objectivity relying on sources which, he argued, supported his predictions that the Sudan under Bashir was a story of shame and agony, set to be repeated. He quotes the Global Peace Index table that places the Sudan at a low position; but he does not say that the G P Index was criticised even by the Christian Science Monitor for not including violence against women and children as an indicator.

It was also criticised by others for neglecting the weight of military expenditure and its impact. He quoted the Sudan’s position but did not mention that the USA too was very low (No. 88 out of 158) behind many Arab and Muslim majority countries like Qatar, Malaysia, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Senegal, Tunisia, Morocco and Jordan. Small but influential Qatar was placed 12th, seventy sixth points above the USA. Israel too, didn’t get a high rating (No. 150) only six points above the Sudan. If both the US and Israel are not much better than the Sudan, does it follow that both face a dismal prospect in 2013 and after? Moreover,the index implies that the Arab Spring had a negative effect. Could it be that the editors miss the days when the likes of Hosni Mubarak,Ben Ali and Gaddafi ensured stability and control?There is also a significant omission.

The Republic of South Sudan is not included at all in the 2012 Global Peace Index. Until the Global Peace Index.Until the management replies to my query, I have two explanations: either the index was prepared for the whole Sudan, without consideration to secession in July 2011, in which case the situation in the South would have been enough o pull the country down to the bottom; or there was no time to separate the two Sudans before publication , so the easy practical option was to combine them.

In both cases, it would not be objective to use this index against the Sudan.. Anyway, the 2013 index will soon be out. We’ll see what it says about the Republic of South Sudan (the New Sudan).

Dr. Biong uses the ICC allegations to conclude that they are a source of “shame”. Actually, it is an honour, not a shame, for the Sudan to stand up to an unjust international order. The allegations have increased the prestige of President Bashir and earned him the solidarity of the African Union, the Arab League and many other regional bodies; but most significantly, it won him support among the Sudanese people, who soon re-elected him with 68% of the vote.

In siding with the ICC and not the African Union, Dr. Biong repeats a pattern of subservience to the khawagat. In the 1960s the Southern rebels sided with Israel, the only country apart from the US, that traded with Apartheid South Africa, and propped it up, while the Sudanese governments supported Nelson Mandela and the ANC financially and diplomatically, as the ANC’s archives and Mandela’s autobiography record.

Some Southern Sudanese rebel leaders have given the impression that they resembled Moise Tchombe, not Patrice Lumumba, (as the late Abdul Khaliq Mahjoub, leader of the Communist Party is said to have opined; according to a Sudan Tribune article by a writer who is now an adviser to an NGO).

The ICC is now irrelevant. It is an embarrassment to those who championed it. Its President has told the EU and UN General Assembly that the Court operates in a political world. That explains to us the reason why the crime of aggression was not included in its remit. It also explains why Iraq, Gaza, Guatanamo Bay and other atrocities are not the concern of the Court. The Sudan has not ratified the ICC’s Rome Statutes and as such( like Security Council members, the US, Russia and China) is not bound by its rules according to international law.

Things have now come full circle as the Israel lobby in the US “honoured” L. Moreno Ocampo for his role on Darfur on 14th November 12. The lobby started the Darfur Defamation campaign by setting up Save Darfur Coalition and pushed for the ICC allegations .It has now openly celebrated the services of the court’s former prosecutor.

The shame is not on the Sudan or its president; but on those who have devalued the UN Security Council by their illogical manoeuvres that politicised the Court.

Dr. Luka Biong quotes the US Freedom House which is not even-handed on the Sudan. It has got a special section called “coalition for South Sudan”.

Another controversial point in the article is the brazenness of writing about corruption. Many cases of corruption have been exposed and addressed in the Sudan. However, there is nothing comparable to the corruption in South Sudan in the whole world. To his great credit President Kiir has declared publicly that huge sums of money were stolen. He appealed for the funds to be returned; but so far those influential officials have avoided punishment and kept the billions of dollars that belong to the South Sudanese people. Even donors have openly complained about corruption in the Republic of South Sudan.

Dr. Biong resorts to misleading statements and presents them as facts. He writes that the “image of Sudan” has deteriorated under the National Congress Party that governs Sudan with Sharia law. Actually, the Sudan is governed by a coalition in which the NCP is the main partner. The country is run by an interim constitution that was approved by the SPLA/M leadership. It exempted the South and Christians from Sharia. It defines the Sudan as a multi-cultural ,multiethnic and multi-religious country.

The literal implementation of Sharia law was the brain child of none other than Dr. Hassan Turabi, now leader of the Popular Congress Party and a loud voice in the opposition that calls for regime change in the Sudan.In the 1980s, under President Numeiry, he even went to Cooper prison in Khartoum North to witness the first amputation of a hand (and fainted at the sight of gushing blood). Since 30 June 1989 , no hand was amputated in the Sudan.Whenever injudicious and anachronistic sentences were issued by junior courts, they were overturned upon appeal or by higher courts.

At the bottom of the article, Dr. Biong gives us his e-mail address. Surprisingly, he is using the name “Kush”, which he also gave to an organization. This is an attempt to “take over” the history of the ancient Nubian civilisation. Archaeologists have told us that he actually visited historical sites in northern Sudan (before the 2011 secession of the South) )and was told by experts what Dr John Alexander had expressed during a Sudan Studies Association meeting in London ,that no evidence exists to link the Southern Sudanese with ancient Nubia.

In a nutshell, Dr. Biong’s article is a litany of inaccuracies and mistrust by a politician who seems determined to undermine any chance of peaceful cooperation between the two Sudans.

Under the title “Salva-Bashir Summit: what is expected?”Dr Biong has written a second article, published by Sudan Tribune on 3 January, one day ahead of the Addis Ababa summit between the two presidents. The reader is told that this article, like the previous one,” is also published by the New Nation Newspaper, New York-US.”This might be an attempt to give the impression of an international status and reach as a syndicated writer. Actually ,there used to be a newspaper with such a title in the UK, serving the black community; but it went out of business. If there is a US paper with the same title, it must be so insignificant that it has not got a website and cannot be proof of US or international impact.I cold only traceNew Nation News which is a website that is obsessed with colour ,crime and race.

The second article is less aggressive ;but equally full of inaccuracies. Dr Biong claims that any insistence on “disengagement” between South Sudan and SPLA/N is “unjustifiable”, forgetting that the same insistence was made by top US emissaries who visited Juba and was even raised by President Obama with President Kiir. What is unreasonable and indefensible is to insist on the “right” of one state to keep battalions in another sovereign state and avoid the process of DDR demobilization , demilitarisation and reintegration in civilian life.

Paradoxically, those of us who resent the western bias for the R of S Sudan and against us welcome a role now for western advisers , hoping that they can talk sense to Juba and say that expecting the western mentors to parrot everything that Juba says or does is out of the question. SPLM documents which should have been amended in 05 to signify the end of the New Sudan dream and acceptance of a referendum can now be revisited during the much delayed SPLM Convention to reflect the reality of two states ,to separate the political party’s army from the National army and liberate the SPLM/A once and for all from the bush –fighting era.
Another feature of this second article is the deliberate distortion of well-documented facts.The rebel Revolutionary Front in the Sudan never called for regime change “through peaceful means” They have openly advocated reliance on the bullet and rejection of the forthcoming elections.

In an attempt to shift the burden of responsibility for mismanagement and lack of capacity Dr Biong disingenuously claims ”It is common belief in the South that the recent increase in the level of insecurity in the South is largely instigated by Khartoum with the aim of weakening the leadership of the South.” He writes “the South” not the Republic of South Sudan,because for SPLM/A hawks, the struggle is still going on (by proxy) for a new Sudan that comprises both republics.

To his credit, Dr Biong admits that the South (again not the R of S Sudan) “is facing serious economic difficulties as its foreign reserves seem to be dwindling rapidly”.As one of those who applauded the shutting down of oil wells, does Dr Biong bear any responsibility for this situation? The full brunt is faced by ordinary S Sudanese citizens ,not senior SPLM/A leaders with fat bank accounts abroad who represent the “New Class”.

The successful summit of the two presidents is now over. Mechanisms are in place to implement the provisions of the 27 September Cooperation Agreements. Teams will meet again to follow-up details. There is no alternative to this route, even if it involves delays. We in the Republic of the Sudan, the Mother country, have to be patient while our new young neighbour passes through a delicate transitional period which gives rise to unexpected actions and is fed, led and misled sometimes by half-baked ideas like the ones disseminated by Dr Luka Biong .

Khalid Al Mubarak is the Media Counselor at the Sudanese Embassy in London, United Kingdom.

The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 9 January 2013 11:05, by Akolde Nhiak Jinub

    Mr. Khalid Al Mubarak thanks for this piece. There are logics in ur response to Dr. Biong n this is acceptable in civilize world where views n divergence re regarded as two windows of seeing things, but I do not agree with u on two 2 three areas. Z there r no links betn Nubia & S.Sudanese, z forces fighting Khartoum re SPLA n not Nubian pple, n economic hardship as being S.Sudan hit alone harder!?

    repondre message

  • 9 January 2013 14:21, by sudani ana

    Thank you Mr Khalid Al Mubarak for a well written and well argued article. Makes a change from the hate filled articles written by the hate preacher Dr Luka Biong.

    repondre message

    • 10 January 2013 07:39, by zulu

      It is a pitty that one who is an NCP tries to justify things. I know, nothing will work bet SS and NCP Sudan. Patronizing, is way far humiliating. I quote, " We in the Republic of the Sudan, the Mother country, have to be patient while our new young neighbour passes through a delicate transitional period which gives rise to unexpected actions and is fed, led and misled sometimes by half-baked idea

      repondre message

      • 10 January 2013 07:45, by zulu

        .... like the ones disseminated by Dr Luka Biong.
        I can cite so many inconsistencies in Khalid’s rebuttle, but chose to just ignore the nonesense and the lack of articulation as justification for his gvernment’s beligerent behavior in the face of civilized world. At any rate, we do not see the importance of gettng oil thro sudan as well as demilitarization when border is not defined. It is absr

        repondre message

    • 11 January 2013 15:00, by zulu

      At least 11 Christians were killed in Sudan and two Coptic Orthodox priests arrested during last year.
      The Sudanese security forces refused to reveal the whereabouts of two Coptic priests arrested in December after they baptized a Christian convert who reportedly had kept her conversion a secret from her family for two years, Morning Star News reported.

      repondre message

      • 11 January 2013 15:02, by zulu

        Sudanese security organs also arrested a Khartoum travel agent accused of trying to help the convert leave Sudan without the knowledge of her Muslim family.
        The Khartoum government also damaged an Africa Inland Church building in Khartoum north, deported a pastor and his wife; and refused to allow the Lutheran Church of Sudan to record a Christmas message for its traditional television broadcast.

        repondre message

  • 9 January 2013 14:44, by Akolde Nhiak Jinub

    Dr. Luka isn’t preaching hate as u may have preceived it. It depends on how one sees things from his/her perspective. Dr. Biong has all rights to criticize what he sees is not right in Sudan by NCP. It is not sin. I am one person having been victimized is so many ways by Khartoum successive regimes with their mentality of sorting domestice issues militarily! SK & BL war is NCP making!

    repondre message

    • 9 January 2013 16:38, by Paul Ongee

      Ya Khalid Al Mubarak,
      Take your trash or critique to the National Criminal Party (NCP) dustbin. SPLM-N has its political rights stipulated in the CPA but popular consultation is never implemented the way it’s supposed to be. Got that? Why don’t you advise media to publish an article criticizing NCP for using delay tactics and regretting signing the CPA?

      repondre message

      • 9 January 2013 16:40, by Paul Ongee

        Ya Khalid Al Mubarak,
        Take your trash/critique to the National Criminal Party (NCP) dustbin. SPLM-N has its political rights stipulated in the CPA but popular consultation is never implemented the way it’s supposed to be. Got that? Why don’t you advise media to publish an article criticizing NCP for using delay tactics and regretting signing the CPA?

        repondre message

  • 9 January 2013 18:22, by Mapuor

    Mr Khalid El Mubarak and Dr Luka Biong
    Thank you very much fellow Sudanese,you talk so much about a foreign country to which you don’t belong and try to capitalize on the problems you don’t understand well.Both Sudans benefited from oil revenues and have also fallen into economic hardships due to the loss of oil revenues.Sudan will lose alot of things if it doesn’t cooperate with the South

    repondre message

    • 9 January 2013 18:31, by Mapuor

      the most important of which is water.Water is now becoming scarcer and its being accepted as a priced commodity.White Nile water will be stored in the South if transit fees are not paid by Sudan which depends on water for irrigation.The Republic of South Sudan will also suffer but there are alternative routes for exporting the South Sudan oil and Sudan does have alternative routes for water.

      repondre message

      • 9 January 2013 20:14, by Peacocktail

        Hon. Luka Biong tell the trust about sisters countries. He is not preaching hatred. He is a man of Peace, Therefore the best Arabs to argue with is the DEAD ONE, because the LIVING DO NOT BELIEVE in TRUTH. SPLA-N tell them to change the Policies of Governing &forced them to be Rebels,they have cemented the agreement with joint Military commands under SRF to deals with NCP vigorously till fail

        repondre message

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

A new approach to peace 2018-04-23 06:16:35 By Miroslav Laják When the United Nations was created, its founders envisioned a different kind of world. A world in which disputes were resolved in meeting rooms and not battlefields. A world (...)

Bring Sudanese troops home now 2018-04-21 15:25:57 By Salah Shuaib The Sudanese troops fighting hard now in Yemen, who were sent there by order of al-Bashir, should return home. The process of implementing this task is much challenging. But, we (...)

Dissolution and formation of the Cabinet - 2013 2018-04-20 08:00:00 Amb Telar Deng The events that led to the 2013 dissolution of cabinet can be traced back to the deep mistrust that fermented back in 1991 when leaders failed to close ranks. After the 1991 (...)


Latest Press Releases

Petition on the Deteriorating Human Rights and Humanitarian Situation in Sudan 2018-04-22 10:01:20 UN Secretary-General, New York African Union Commission, Addis Ababa UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva Petition on the Deteriorating Human Rights and Humanitarian Situation in Sudan (...)

Abyei celebrates Mine Awareness Day 2018-04-05 08:52:03 4 April 2018 | Abyei - The United Nations Interim Security Force for Abyei (UNISFA) and the United Nations Mine Action Service (UNMAS) commemorated the International Day for Mine Awareness and (...)

Appeal for forgiveness and pardon of John Agou Wuoi 2018-03-07 08:28:08 H.E. Salva Kiir Mayardit, President and Commander-in-Chief, of the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA), Republic of South Sudan (RSS), 5th February, 2018. Through: Hon. Michael Makuei Lueth (...)


Copyright © 2003-2018 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.