Home | Comment & Analysis    Friday 6 August 2004

Silence on Sudan


NEW YORK, Aug 6, 2004 (The Wall Street Journal) — As the killing in the western Sudanese region of Darfur unfolds, there is nothing but chilling silence from Europe’s usually vociferous antiwar crowd.

The conspicuous silence vis-à-vis the killing fields in Sudan betrays more than just the usual selective concern for world peace. Yes, for the progressive left, it is only the participation of the U.S. that makes a war really objectionable. But when the self-declared champions of human rights don’t speak up in the face of what the United Nations calls "the world’s worst humanitarian crisis," then the movement’s moral bankruptcy is fully exposed.

In Sudan, the progressive movement is trapped in the absurdities of its own ideology. Conflicts that involve the U.S. are usually squeezed into a Weltanschauung that sees "American imperialism" as the root of all ills and racism as an exclusively white phenomenon. But not even the most elastic post-colonialist theory can explain the war in Sudan, where Arabs are massacring black Africans.

What’s more, in Sudan Muslims are ethnically cleansing fellow Muslims. How do you explain that if you believe in a conspiracy between a right-wing American President and Christian fundamentalists to launch a crusade against the Muslim world?

Progressives’ usual allies are also only too happy to ignore events in Sudan. The many Islamic organizations that have been collaborating with Europe’s peace movement in the anti-Iraq war demonstrations naturally have little interest in turning the spotlight on an Islamic regime.

Equally, anti-globalization activists have a hard time explaining the Darfur massacre under the template of their bizarre trade theories; nor can they blame it on the spread of U.S. capitalism. Unlike Europe, the U.S. long ago slapped an embargo on Khartoum for its 20-year campaign against African Christians and animists in the south.

So it’s best to ignore the dying or — even better — rewrite history to make it fit the movement’s ideology. And so what’s happening in Darfur is simply the result of a "civil war," for which the regime in Khartoum can’t be held responsible. The real reason for any potential military intervention by the U.S. or Britain would be — you guessed it — to grab Sudan’s vast oil fields.

John Laughland, otherwise famous for defending Slobodan Milosevic and criticizing the revolution that restored democracy in Georgia, was allowed to present this theory Monday in the Guardian, Britain’s flagship paper for opponents of the Iraq war.

"As oil pipelines continue to be blown up in Iraq," he writes, "the west not only has a clear motive for establishing control over alternative sources of energy, it has also officially adopted the policy that our armies should be used to do precisely that." Mr. Laughland’s article has been reprinted on many antiwar and Islamic Web sites.

The prominent "Not In Our Name" antiwar movement has already spoken out against any possible intervention in Sudan. It does not specifically mention oil, but calls on supporters to "resist the U.S. government’s global grab for unlimited power."

"No Blood for Oil" was the antiwar crowd’s rallying cry opposing the liberation of Kuwait during Desert Storm and during the recent Iraq war to dispose of the butcher of Baghdad. It looks like it could also become the slogan of the "peace movement" to prevent the end of a genocide.

The views expressed in the 'Comment and Analysis' section are solely the opinions of the writers. The veracity of any claims made are the responsibility of the author not Sudan Tribune.

If you want to submit an opinion piece or an analysis please email it to comment@sudantribune.com

Sudan Tribune reserves the right to edit articles before publication. Please include your full name, relevant personal information and political affiliations.
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.

Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis

What if Dr. John Garang were alive today? 2019-12-05 08:21:57 By Nhial T. Tutlam Let’s imagine that on the fateful day of July 30, 2005 the helicopter carrying Dr. John Garang from Uganda back to his base in Southern Sudan arrived safely. Let’s further (...)

The cries of South Sudanese women in Australia 2019-12-04 07:13:57 Biong Deng Biong Amidst Melbourne’s African youth crime saga and its associated political chaos, a quiet cohort watch events unfold, weary and grim-faced. They are the struggling mothers of the (...)

South Sudan’s Security Arrangements: flawed rhetoric vs real practice 2019-12-02 06:41:06 By Steve Paterno Some compatriot South Sudanese wrote on his Facebook status, jokingly by urging people to flock to cantonment sites in big number to fulfil the required 83,0000, a threshold the (...)


Latest Press Releases

S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.