Home | News    Wednesday 28 November 2012

UN urges S. Sudan to ratify Chemical Weapons treaty "without delay"

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

November 27, 2012 (NEW YORK) - The United Nations has urged South Sudan, one of the eight countries not party to the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), to ensure it ratifies the treaty “without delay”.

JPEG - 19.5 kb
Chemical Weapons symbol

Ban Ki-moon, the UN Secretary-General and Ahmet Üzümcü, the Director-General of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) made the call Tuesday, in a joint communication to heads of states.

The CWC is an arms control agreement, which outlaws the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons. The agreement is administered by the OPCW, an independent organization based in The Hague, Netherlands.

Both leaders, in letters, addressed to representatives of the eight countries, reportedly underscore the importance of achieving the universality of the Convention as a condition necessary to attain a world free from chemical weapons.

“The continuing growth in the membership of the (OPCW)… is evidence that the prohibition against the development, production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons constitutes a universal norm,” the letter reads in part.

In addition, however, the letter reportedly calls upon the respective governments to undertake a commitment to the legally binding prohibition against chemical weapons in order to consolidate these norms and to ensure that such weapons are never re-used.

So far, 188 states out of the 196 recognized by the UN have reportedly ratified the convention, representing more than 98% of the world’s population and chemical industry.

However, of the eight states that are not party to the treaty, two have reportedly signed, but not ratified the treaty. These are Burma and Israel, while those that have not signed the treaty, include Angola, North Korea, Egypt, Somalia, South Sudan and Syria.

In October this year, a high-level meeting in New York to commemorate the 15th anniversary of the entry into force of the convention, stressed the importance of achieving universality of the agreement.

The UN Secretary General, while speaking on the occasion, highlighted the importance of universality of the CWC, saying the use of chemical weapons by any country would be “an outrageous crime with dire consequences.”

Meanwhile, in early 2010, the total world declared stockpile of chemical weapons was reportedly about 30,308 tons, and that a total of 71,315 tons of agents, 8.67 million munitions and containers, and 70 production facilities were declared to OPCW before destruction activities began.

The UN has, however, expressed concerns that while several countries not party to the treaty are suspected of having chemical weapons, especially Syria and North Korea, member states like Sudan and China have reportedly failed to disclose their stockpiles.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 28 November 2012 07:53, by Kennedy

    What is the need of South Sudan ratifying the convention when Sudan and China have failed to declare their stockpiles? South Sudan is fighting hunger leave alone developing weapons. Ban-Ki Moon should avoid favoring China and Sudan which are doing the same agenda. Mr. Ban you hate South Sudanese, then fight with God who created these people.

    repondre message

    • 28 November 2012 09:24, by South South

      South Sudan should ignore all these calls about ratifying Chemical Weapons. This will keep penguins in our northern border think twice about us in the future. They are Sub-human and you need to deal with them accordingly.

      repondre message

      • 29 November 2012 04:17, by Alier

        Where were the UNs when Bashir called SPLA insects and use chemical weapons against them in Panthou/Heglig? South Sudan need to have that open right to buy or manufacture such weapons to use for counter attack against Sudan in case Sudan use chemical weapon for the second time!

        repondre message

    • 28 November 2012 10:13, by Mading Makuac

      Imagine this man called Ki Moon is targeting wrong people and
      he leaves right groups he suppose to deal with.Why leaving
      China and North Sudan?South Sudan has never ever involved
      in those crimes of using chemical weapons .Since Bashir
      has been using them, KI MOON just watched and said
      nothing.UN heads are real Bashir ’s errands.

      repondre message

    • 28 November 2012 14:02, by okucu pa lotinokwan

      UN is really onesided organization,why to include Sudan,while they are having chemical weapons bought from China and Iran at the same time still manifacturing weapons with chemical from Iran.
      OKUCU PA LOTINOKWAN

      repondre message

    • 29 November 2012 07:41, by agwait majok

      What ban ki moon try to say, South Sudan has a lot of problem with there nighbor sudan, alway sudan use that chemicsl to the populstion of south Sudan where are you that time, we should not listen to him any more, Mr: Ki moon is agnaet to the people of south Sudan,

      repondre message

  • 28 November 2012 07:54, by Anti-traitors!

    Mr Ban is too naive to think we’ve chemical in our territory. Actually, we don’t. Only those gays aka North Sudan do. So, they should ask them, instead.

    repondre message

  • 28 November 2012 07:58, by Tutbol

    Do some countries really bother to obey these myriads of well intentioned treaties, just wondering?

    repondre message

  • 28 November 2012 08:04, by wang

    I thought UN should be happy if South Sudan is going to obtain chemical weapons in a future, because we are living with a snake in our houses. Mr. Ban is a crazy old man and let him go to hells

    repondre message

  • 28 November 2012 08:47, by Madiak

    See the so called Ban Ki-Moon this guy is not qualify 4 this high position the position need more qualify person than him the person who can think and make analysis before expressing or condemning any state’ and fair to the whole world’ who can not take bribe from any country. Ban Ki-Moon use to take bribes from Khartoum which made him a dumb person to see Khartoum’s aggressions against Juba

    repondre message

    • 28 November 2012 09:14, by Thorbanat

      South Sudan should never hurry and force to sign this treaty. We are still one year old and we should be the last country to sign. Ratifying treaties like ICC, anti personnel mines ect will backfire on our national security. Sudan have use chemical weapons on us even recently during Heglic crisis.

      repondre message

  • 28 November 2012 09:06, by Akolde Nhiak Jinub

    Ban Ki-Moon is just being naive 2 think z South Sudanese have stockpiled chemical weapons. Noteven amoured vehicles r available, noteven airdefence systems in place, noteven field attillery is in place. Since last year, Sudan has been bombing n killing innocent S. Sudanese civilians n Ban just stupidly shut up. Ban may have bad feelings of S.Sudanese people n their land. What evidence does he have

    repondre message

  • 28 November 2012 09:38, by Gabriel KK

    We must have chemical weapons whether UN like it or not. if any leader in South Sudan sign that treaty then that will be the end of his/her leadership. Mr. Ban kimoon must shut up his big mouth on our affairs because we are independence nation, our safety is our first priority.

    repondre message

  • 28 November 2012 09:41, by Letigolight

    We lost more than 700 soldiers as the SPLA advanced close to Damazin, that was due to chemical weapons use Ban Ki Moon says is "outragious crime with dire consiquences", let Ki Moon demonstrate what this body has done to punish the then Sudan government! Isreal and South Sudan deserve chemical weapons for defence against terrorism!

    repondre message

  • 28 November 2012 10:01, by 4Justice

    Most people have no idea that the United Nations was originally created with Satanic spiritual values in mind! Alice A. Bailey admits that her books are "channeled" by Master D. K., one of the more powerful demons in the Hierarchy.

    NOTE: The "Hierarchy" referred to here is that supernatural group of "Ascended Masters" led by Sanat Kumura (Satan).

    Alice writes:

    "The Atomic bomb does not belong to the three nations who perfected it and who own its secrets at present — the United States, Great Britain, and Canada. It belongs to the United Nations for use ... or threatened use when aggressive action on the part of any nation rears its ugly head." [The Externalisation of the Hierarchy p. 548]

    repondre message

    • 28 November 2012 11:51, by 4Justice

      Praising the Fallen Angels and Re-defining “666”

      Bailey denied any opposition between God and the Devil, Christ and Anti-Christ: “Christ and anti-Christ are the dualities of spirituality and materialism, both in the individual and in humanity as a whole. Or you can speak of God and the Devil with the same basic implications.”[10] Bailey describes Lucifer as the ruler of humanity, “Son of the Morning, The Prodigal Son.”[11]

      Bailey re-interpreted the number 666 as the number of a “Heavenly Man;”[15]she also saw it as the number of “materialism, the number of the dominance of the three worlds prior to the process of reorientation and the expression of developed idealism and purpose. The third aspect expresses itself through pure materialism, and hence the three sixes.”[16]She thus obscured a symbol which the Bible describes as “the number of the beast” (Rev. 13:18).

      [10]Alice A. Bailey, The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, 1957, Lucis Publishing Company, p. 137.
      [11]Ibid., p. 107.
      [15]Alice A. Bailey, A Treatise on Cosmic Fire, Lucis Publishing Company, 1925, p. 306
      [16]Alice A. Bailey, The Rays and the Initiations: Volume V, A Treatise on the Seven Rays, 1960, Lucis Publishing Company, pp.
      79-80.

      repondre message

  • 29 November 2012 01:01, by Nguetbuny de Luelpiny

    South Sudan no capacity to manufacture anything even simple bullets. Where does this OWCP come with their threatening plan? They wanted allure south into trapped them to sign evile treaty deed. No shall sign treaty or ratification anything with them. South did not reach that standard to do anything with chemical weapons project.

    repondre message

  • 29 November 2012 02:45, by Wen Junuub

    This dude is sick in the head because Sudanese Government is the one bombed South Sudan Territories & also using chemical weapons to kill innocent people. Yet Ban Ki-Moon never ever response to the incident. I don’t know what the hell is he talking about. We (S. Sudan) never had any chemical weapons & we are being target in our land. Which stupid leader in S.Sudan would listen to this ugly man.

    repondre message

    • 29 November 2012 03:13, by 4Justice

      He is under the influence of satan

      repondre message

  • 29 November 2012 05:58, by Nguetbuny de Luelpiny

    Decoding the triple “666” is United Nation Armies.
    United has six letters, Nation has six letters and Armies is six letters too. This Organization is running secrete Agenda to small country and Against African countries. And it black people in generally. Arab settlers and white settlers in Africa used virtual cruelty. SPLA must Allied with any evile to defeat Arab evil in sudan by any mean.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)

The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.