Home | News    Wednesday 31 October 2012

NCP wants no disagreements over “Islamic” foundation of next constitution – official

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

October 30, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – An official with Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party (NCP) warned opposition parties on Tuesday against objecting to an Islamic foundation for the country’s next constitution.

JPEG - 24.3 kb
A Sudanese woman stands in front of an electoral poster for Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party (The Guardian Website)

Speaking to reporters in the capital Khartoum, NCP leading member and minister of investment Mustafa Osman Ismail said that the Islamic current is the dominant one among Sudanese people and therefore should form the basis of the next constitution. “We don’t want any disagreement over that” he said.

Ismail comments reflect the growing polarization in the country over the issue of the constitution that should replace the current transitional one which was installed in 2005 following the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) with the mainly Christian South Sudan.

As South Sudan hurtled towards its independence, which took place in July last year under the CPA, a number of NCP officials, including the country’s president Omer Al-Bashir made remarks suggesting that the country should create a new constitution on the basis of Islamic Shariah laws, citing religious homogeneity in the country after the secession of the south.

The main opposition coalition National Consensus Forces (NCF), which comprises the National Umma Party (NUP) of former Prime Minister Al-Sadiq al-Mahdi and the Islamist Popular Congress Party (NCP) of Hassan Al-Turabi among others, rejected an invitation by President Omer Al-Bashir last month to participate in a meeting to discuss the constitution.

NCF allies argue that the current political climate is not suitable for such a critical process, pointing to lack of freedoms, NCP absolute control of state institutions and the ongoing wars in the peripheral regions of Darfur, South Kordofan and Blue Nile.

Opposition parties demand, therefore, that the constitution-making process takes place under a transitional government representing all political parties and armed groups. They also argue that the NCP has no legitimacy to supervise such process citing their boycott of, and alleged fraud in, the 2010 general elections which the ruling party won.

The NCP official stressed the importance that opposition parties clarify their position on the Islamic premise of the constitution since most people in Sudan favor this premises without risking the rights of religious minorities.

Adding to the controversy surrounding the constitution is the existence of a coalition of Islamist groups, the Islamic Constitution Front (ICF), which is lobbying the government to create a puritan version of an Islamic constitution. The ICF threatened on more than one occasion to mobilize the masses against the government if it fails to create a proper Islamic constitution.

NCF allies did not make a clear stance over the issue of an Islamic constitution but they once accused the NCP of seeking to use Islamist groups to create a constitution that ignores religious and ethnic diversity in the country.

Ismail said that the dialogue with opposition parties over the next constitution will not witness any disagreements over the issues of governance structure and freedoms if the opposition demonstrated enough seriousness to engage in the process.

The NCP official denied opposition’s allegation that his party is trying to single-handedly create a constitution that would consolidate its grip on power. “If we were rushing to do it we would have already proposed a draft constitution and made use of the absence of other parties. But this is not our way” Ismail said.

He added that his party is keen to secure enough consensus around the constitution hence their attempt to include opposition parties. Ismali said that if certain “considerable” parties agreed to join the process of constitution creation, it will start.

The NCP has been trying to bring the NUP to the constitution-making process. On 22 October, NCP member and second Vice-President Al-Haj Adam Youssef held talks with NUP leader Al-Sadiq al-Mahdi at the latter’s house in Omdurman. Youssef expressed hope after the meeting that the NUP would agree to participate in the dialogue over the constitution.

Few days later the NUP announced the formation of a committee under the chairmanship of Al-Mahdi to discuss whether or not to accept NCP invitation to participate in the talks over the constitution.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 31 October 2012 09:46, by Northern Sudanese

    i am not pro south shit or anything, but when do our leaders realize that Islamic ruling is what brought Sudan down? i am not anti islam but why do we ’’have’’ to live under Shariah? yes most sudanese are muslims, but does that mean those who are not have no right? why having wars when we could easily be a democratic state. a muslim goes to his mosque and christian goes to his churge. whats wrong?

    repondre message

    • 31 October 2012 12:13, by Logic

      N. Sudanese
      Who cares what bigots like you think. The reason why political Islam destroyed the country is because of simple retarded minds like yours.
      As long as the SPLM-N exists there will never be a peaceful Islamic state, unless we divide the country yet again.

      repondre message

      • 31 October 2012 17:18, by Northern Sudanese

        Logic
        and who’s gonna listen to an insect’s opinion? you got your shithole, now leave us in our country alone son of a bitch :)

        repondre message

  • 31 October 2012 09:50, by Northern Sudanese

    i can assure you NCP, the majority of Sudanese would have remained happy if we were still a Democratic State. in 1985 we didn’t down Nimeiry because we hated Democracy but because of his economic crisis he created. thats why we need to turn back to a democratic state, we are a nation full of different cultures,religions,tribes and people.

    repondre message

  • 31 October 2012 09:55, by Akol Liai Mager

    Even with no disagreements, a viable Taliban Islamic style regime will never survive in North Sudan. Take examples of the current Tunisian, Libyan and Egyptian governments led by Muslim Clerics (Islamic Movements) and answer this question; are they stable? Even Muhammad’s Caliphs did not have a stable Islamic State and that’s why they were all killed in their struggles for power.

    repondre message

    • 31 October 2012 10:17, by Nibs

      That desert is your own now.you can impose all madness you want. One thing i’m certain,there will be more civil wars.i absolute encourage your stupidity of all sorts.

      repondre message

      • 31 October 2012 17:20, by Northern Sudanese

        Nibs
        thank you for leaving us alone, good luck in your shithole where there is no food,electricity,clean water,doctors,schools,security. i am pretty sure we will hear more cow conflict in your insect nest :)

        repondre message

  • 31 October 2012 11:05, by australian

    Islamic state means it will have to rely on looting to survive. Too many Islamic states in the region mean more refugees for non-Islamic countries so the Islamic states can live on the remittances they send home. Islamic states are good for no-one. The Muslims are unhappy and so are we because we get all the refugees - which we don’t want because they bring Islam and cost us a fortune.

    repondre message

    • 31 October 2012 17:23, by Northern Sudanese

      australian
      really? so your christian country knows law? why did you do for those who stole 4 bilion?lol and what about those who keep killing each other for cows? and those cops that keep killing civilians?
      please, now your speaking about refugees that you push into south? do you know the number of insects in sudan? if you did then you won’t mention refugees :D

      repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Africa and the ICC: a dynamic relationship 2013-05-24 09:19:39 By Tiina Intelmann May 23, 2013 - The relationship between Africa and the International Criminal Court (ICC) is remarkable in its history, and dynamic. Africa and the ICC share the fundamental (...)

NCP Parliament Speaker will not negotiate with those who carry arms 2013-05-23 08:09:52 By Mahmoud A. Suleiman May 22, 2013 - This article comes on the backdrop of the war drums beating campaign orchestrated by the National Congress Party (NCP) regime Parliament Speaker, Ahmed (...)

At the Mercy of the Sky, South Sudanese professionals 2013-05-23 08:02:35 By Suzanne Jambo May 22, 2013 - "I have nothing to hide and I walk away with my head high. There was absolutely no board meeting to discuss my issue. The reason given were unilateral spending (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


FAO expands support for national food security information systems for decision makers 2013-05-24 00:41:30 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FAO expands support for national food security information systems for decision makers They say information is power; in South Sudan, (...)

Sudan: Anatomy of a Conflict—New Report from Harvard Humanitarian Initiative 2013-05-22 00:46:46 Harvard Researchers Publish Satellite Imagery-Based History of Conflict in Sudan 2000+ Civilian Structures Appear Intentionally Destroyed; Humanitarian Agencies Targeted May 21, 2013 (...)

Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.