Home | News    Sunday 14 October 2012

UN official warns against isolating tribes from solution to Abyei

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

October 13, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – The UN’s assistant secretary general for peacekeeping operations Edmond Mulet warned on Saturday that isolating Al-Misseriya and Dinka Ngok tribes from any potential settlement of Abyei dispute between Sudan and South Sudan could lead to renewed confrontations.

JPEG - 21.1 kb
UN’s Assistant Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations Edmond Mulet. UN Photo/Ryan Brown

Sudan and South Sudan are yet to reach an agreement on the status of the hotly-contested border region despite reaching a series of agreements on other post-secession issues including border security and oil following a six-day summit between Sudan President Omer Al-Bashir and his South Sudanese counterpart Salva Kiir Mayardit in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa last month.

The talks over Abyei collapsed after Khartoum rejected a proposal from African Union mediators to hold a referendum in the area in October 2013. Whereas Juba accepted the proposal, Khartoum argued that the criteria of voter eligibility would exclude Al-Misseriya who only reside in the region few months a year to graze their cattle.

Khartoum later indicated that it would prefer a political solution to the dispute and warned that a referendum could spark war between Dinka Ngok and Al-Misseriya, and potentially between Sudan and South Sudan.

In a meeting with Sudan’s state minister for foreign affairs Salah Wansi on the sidelines of the UN’s 76th General Assembly Session, Mulet said that reaching a settlement over Abyei without including Al-Misseriya and Dinka Ngok in the process could lead to renewed confrontations.

According to statements reported Sudan’s official new agency (SUNA) from New York, Wansi called on the international community to give the sides of the dispute enough opportunity to hold extensive consultations and discussions in order to reach a solution accepted by all sides.

Mulet however said that the recent agreements between Sudan and South Sudan had put relations between the two neighbors on the right track. He pointed out that the agreement to establish a demilitarized buffer zone along the unmarked 1800-km north-south border would help to rebuild confidence and facilitate a settlement to the conflict between the Sudanese government and the rebel Sudan People’s Liberation Movement North (SPLM-N) in the Sudanese border states of South Kordofan and Blue Nile.

For his part, the Sudanese minister conveyed his country’s keenness in continued cooperation with the UN’s peacekeeping operations department through the UN-AU Peacekeeping Mission in Darfur (UNAMID).

Wansi called on the UN to play a role in supporting the agreements reached between Sudan and South Sudan, reaffirming Khartoum’s commitment to the full implementation of the deal and resolution of the outstanding issues including Abyei.

Abyei’s status was supposed to be determined via a referendum under its own protocol of the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement between Sudan and South Sudan. But the vote that was slated for January 2011 never took place as Khartoum and Juba disagreed over who has the right to vote.

Sudan wants Al-Misseriya to vote while Juba insists only the region’s indigenous population of Dinka Ngok be allowed to vote. The AU proposal on Abyei referendum gives the right to vote to the Dinka Ngok and permanent residents of Al-Misseriya.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 14 October 2012 07:58, by Madina Tonj

    Edmond Mulet
    Abyei is a Dinka Ngok land period.
    When someone visited you at your home for short time, they are called Visitors and according to this Abyei’s case. Misseriya tribe are movable tribe or Arab forset whom moved every dry session, they came to Abyei with their animals just for grazing and later they moved back like that. They have no any rights to claim on Abyei

    repondre message

    • 14 October 2012 08:06, by Chol

      The issue is not the isolation of Misseriya tribe but the question is; do Misseriya have the history of land ownership in Abyei? The answer is NO! The only history they have in Abyei is to bring their cattle for grazing in the season. If Abyei happened to be valuable in oil reserved today; it doesn’t automatically justify Misseriya to have land ownership in Abyei.

      repondre message

      • 14 October 2012 08:29, by AdierCien

        In The Name Of The Trinity God Amen
        That’s Mulet’s thought. Those guys should history between these communities first before talking that way.
        Misseriya are normad who move just without having land. This poor community need to be help by Khartoum not by us. We’ve other things to do with help in South Sudan.

        repondre message

      • 14 October 2012 09:31, by Kur William

        No I don’t think this guy know anything about the dispute regoin of Ayei otherwise he is pro-Arab,there is no ground for Misseriya to be include into Abyei referendum as citizen of Abyei,the world do understand that misseriya use to come to Abyei for grazing per a season each a year.
        Kur William live in malou

        repondre message

    • 14 October 2012 13:36, by Dinkawarrior

      The Al-Khartoum’s special interest groups within the UN and the world’s gangsters are destroying the lives of the Ngok Dinka people. Since the criminal Bashit occupied Abyei, there was none spoken to save children and women lives in their land. But now it’s their chances to tell us nonesense in order for them to benefit later. God is watching and he will punish those who are against his people!

      repondre message

  • 14 October 2012 07:58, by Madina Tonj

    Edmond Mulet
    Abyei is a Dinka Ngok land period.
    When someone visited you at your home for short time, they are called Visitors and according to this Abyei’s case. Misseriya tribe are movable tribe or Arab forset whom moved every dry session, they came to Abyei with their animals just for grazing and later they moved back like that. They have no any rights to claim on Abyei

    repondre message

  • 14 October 2012 08:12, by Crude Owner

    To Mr. Mulet
    With my respect to your position, I would like you to think deeply about our feelings on Abyei. This land is belong to 9 Dinka Ngok Chiefdom. Never ever include Masiria to participate in any processes. So please revoke your words and praised the lord. If you really want to help masyrira, then transport them back to where they came from if you have a clue. Thanks.
    Mr. Crude owner

    repondre message

    • 14 October 2012 08:19, by Crude Owner

      Mr. Mulet
      Please study the case before supporting northern Sudan. We will never give away any piece of Abyei’s land to Massirya or whoever looking for it.

      repondre message

  • 14 October 2012 08:13, by 4Justice

    Edmond Mulet knows better than you and me Abyei belongs to the Ngok Dinka, but he won’t say it because it would end the conflict. All conflicts are manufactured and prolonged this way, independent scholars call it "Problem = Reaction = Solution" or (The Hegelian Dialectic).

    repondre message

  • 14 October 2012 08:15, by Tutbol

    These UN morons should stop preaching us their nonsenses for we have known what souls they wear in and out. Some Europeans are masquarauding themselves in the UN will not ever be South Sudanese friends. Why do they let palistenians be made they way they are by the people they almost exterminated and they just keep watching. The Europeans think they are agents of good but the OPPOSITE IS TRUE!

    repondre message

  • 14 October 2012 08:24, by 4Justice

    The Problem Reaction Solution Paradigm (The Hegelian Dialectic)

    1) The United Nations creates or exploits a problem
    2) The people react by asking the United Nations for help willing to give up their rights
    3) The United Nations offers the solution that was planned long before the crisis

    repondre message

    • 14 October 2012 08:35, by 4Justice

      There are two diabolical forces working in tandem, the "New Age Movement" luciferians masquerading as Christians and the Islamist, both hell bent on the elimination of Christians from the coming antichrist one world government.

      repondre message

  • 14 October 2012 08:47, by Michael Miyom Minyiel

    This man might be an agent somewhere.Stay off in Abyei’s case.period!

    repondre message

  • 14 October 2012 18:19, by panchol

    Edmon Mulet.
    Abyei belongs to nine Ngok chiefdoms , if persuaded as you talked. Those Missyria you said to participate in talks in Adis Ababa. falls under Administration of White Nile State of Sudan. They just come to Look pastures and water for their livestock.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


On Abyei enough is enough 2013-06-18 05:01:47 By Deng Vanang June 17, 2013 - No one whether locally or internationally can still argue there is more hope to resolve Abyei stalemate peacefully. It has been everybody’s wish that dialogue could (...)

The arming of rebels in Sudan and South Sudan: what is the evidence? 2013-06-18 04:57:44 By Eric Reeves 17 June 2013 - News reporting in general, a great deal of analytic writing, and virtually all diplomatic pronouncements about military support for rebel groups—in South Sudan and (...)

Bashir’s decision, a material breach of the oil agreement 2013-06-16 06:21:14 By Justice Deng Biong June 15, 2013 - After its ratification by the National legislatures in both South Sudan and Sudan States, the Cooperation Agreement [CA] (Oil Agreement included) signed on (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Nuer Youth and Prophet Ngundeng’s Historical Society call for unity in South Sudan 2013-06-14 05:40:43 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Leadership of Nuer Youth and Ngundeng’s Historical Society, Juba, South Sudan June 12, 2013 - Due to the announcement made by President Bashir to abrogate the September, (...)

South Sudanese lawyers call for the respect of the rule of law and human rights 2013-06-14 01:01:36 South Sudan Law Society (SSLS) 7 June 2013 Lawyers in the Republic of South Sudan call for advocacy for the supremacy of the respect of the rule of Law, Human Rights in South Sudan South Sudan (...)

South Sudan civil society alliance ask to meet the president 2013-06-12 05:23:59 South Sudan Civil Society Alliance National Issues Discussed with the Presidential Legal Advisor and Appeal to meet the President June 7, 2013 Ladies and gentlemen of the press, today the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.