Home | News    Monday 1 October 2012

Security deal means "death" of SPLM-N rebels, Sudan’s ruling party says

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

September 30, 2012 (KHARTOUM) – Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party (NCP) said on Sunday that the security arrangements deal the country signed last week with neighbouring rival South Sudan will effectively spell doom for the rebel Sudan People’s Liberation Movement North (SPLM-N).

JPEG - 32.1 kb
SPLM-N deputy chairman Abdel Aziz Al-Hilu (L), Chairman Malik Aggar (M), and Secretary-General Yasir Arman (R)

Prior to the deal, which was signed in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa on 27 September, Sudan had been accusing South Sudan of supporting Sudanese rebels who fought as part of its army in the second Sudanese civil war. SPLM-N has been fighting Khartoum government since last year in the country’s regions of South Kordofan and Blue Nile which border South Sudan.

The security arrangements deal provides for the establishment of a safe demilitarized zone along the unmarked 1800 km common borders to be monitored by the Joint Border Verification and Monitoring Mission which consists of the two sides as well as independent monitors. It also stipulates that the two parties cease “harbouring of, or support to rebel groups against the other state”

NCP’s spokesperson Badr Al-Din Ahmad Ibrahim told reporters in the capital Khartoum that if the security arrangements deal is implemented “it would effectively mean the death of the SPLM-N”

Sudan and the SPLM-N have been engaged in indirect negotiations through the African Union High-Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP) to find a settlement to the conflict but the talks produced nothing so far except an unimplemented agreement to allow humanitarian assistance in the two regions.

However, Badr Al-Din suggested that the talks with the SPLM-N would continue in view of the domestic nature of the conflict, saying that "it is possible to talk with SPLM-N leaders [Malik] Aggar, [Yasir] Arman and [Abdel Aziz] Al-Hilu in their capacity as northern [Sudanese] citizens." He added that after the deal with Juba all issues had become “purely Sudanese”

SPLM-N accuses the government of failing to implement the deal they signed on 4 August to allow unfettered humanitarian access to South Kordofan and Blue Nile which are, in the words of the group’s secretary-general Yasir Arman, “experiencing the worst humanitarian crisis in Africa today"

The rebels say they control over 40% of Sudan’s common borders with South Sudan in Blue Nile and the Nuba Mountains of South Kordofan. They also insinuate that the security arrangements deal will be hard to implement without a ceasefire with them.

Arman said on Saturday that the SPLM-N is offering a ceasefire but linked it to humanitarian access to the areas they helds in the Two Areas stressing that such deal would enable all parties to "put an effective demilitarized buffer zone in place."

The rebel official also regretted that the summit meeting of Sudan President Omer Al-Bashir and South Sudan President Salva Kiir Mayardit ended with “a total failure to recognize the humanitarian situation” in South Kordofan and Blue Nile.

The UN Security Council’s (UNSC) resolution number 2046 ordered Sudan and the SPLM-N to cooperate in order to end the conflict in the two regions. Under the resolution, two parties are supposed to negotiate on the basis of the 28 June 2011 agreement they signed in Addis Ababa before it was scrapped by President Omer Al-Bashir.

The scrapped deal provides for the integration of SPLM-N fighters into regular forces and recognizes the group as a legal political force in Sudan.

In November last year, the SPLM-N forged an alliance known as the Sudanese Revolutionary Front (SRF) with three rebel groups from the country’s western region of Darfur and the allies vowed joint military operations to topple the government of President Omer Al-Bashir.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 1 October 2012 09:27, by forza

    ohh, look who is here..the three little birds.lol..we are coming to get you..i personally looking for the KING-KONG in the middle..traitors

    repondre message

    • 1 October 2012 12:46, by zulu

      You bet. they are coming for you instead.

      repondre message

      • 2 October 2012 06:08, by Force 1

        Killing leaders don’t help at all; you did it in South Sudan but it didn’t prevent South Sudan from getting independent!

        repondre message

    • 1 October 2012 13:20, by Logic

      Forza
      You’re an internet warrior, you can never confront real men. Your description of the man indicates the backward racist mentality of your likes. For over two decades SAF (Pussycats) were tormented in Blue Nile during N&S war by this man, in your dreams could you even have the balls to confront SPLA-N. Keep commenting from the safety of your PC. RETARD.

      repondre message

      • 1 October 2012 13:44, by sudani ana

        Logic; so this "king kong" as Forza called him (you must admit the likeness is uncanny) has been fighting his own country and its national army for two decades leading to separation of South Sudan? What does that make him if not a traitor. Am against any talks with traitors, I think their Sudanese nationality should be revoked. They are a waste of skin.

        repondre message

        • 1 October 2012 14:33, by Marco A. Wek

          You the so calling yourselfsudani ana, those three and especially the two arerarereal Sudanese more than you and your criminal gay uncle Omar Al Bashir. South Sudan fought you mamaliks for many years and today they achieve their goals and so will their fellow brothers and sisters will equally achieve their goals in Nuba Mountains, Blue Nile and Darfur.

          repondre message

        • 1 October 2012 15:32, by Logic

          Sudani ana
          Our ancestors are the founders of ancient kingdoms & empires on this land and you (an African/Arab by-product) think you can revoke our Sudanism! Are you mentally capable of comprehending our history, don’t waste readers time with your habitual silly rhetoric. You’re hilariously funny...lol!

          repondre message

          • 1 October 2012 18:00, by sudani ana

            Logic, you are such an idiot. You call me "Afro-Arab by product" and in the same breath you call us racists? you are the most racist idiot I’ve ever known. We are very proud of our African and Arab roots and if you don’t like it you can go FYS. Whether you like it or not, the Muslim Afro-Arab Sudanese are the majority in Sudan so live with it or bugger off to Chad or South Sudan.

            repondre message

        • 1 October 2012 15:37, by Logic

          Those who betray the decent common values of, tolerance, co-existence, & humility are the real traitors. Once you label the elite of Khartoum as the despicable humans that they were/are then preach to us about treachery. Pathetic retard.

          repondre message

        • 1 October 2012 15:41, by Logic

          Ali O. Taha looks like a black mouse, Nafi looks like a camel and Haroun looks like a weasel but we don’t care about their animal likeness but more about their society wide consequential actions. You guys are so retarded you can’t even accept your own prejudicial nature.

          repondre message

          • 1 October 2012 17:19, by forza

            logic, KING-KONG is not an animal,you can call him a movie star.these guys when they fought against NCP nobody called them traitors but when they confront SAF then any sudanese will be calling them traitors.they should be brought to justice.or we can take them to medan jackson and let the public decide what to do with them.

            repondre message

    • 1 October 2012 13:43, by Nubian King

      Forza,
      Those are twitter/facebook comments, hence take them to the right place. Here people want to come up with meaningful ways of coexistence between true Sudanese (n/s)and hence all born out of Sudan off the game. The true traitors in this country are those who came into it, carrying only a sack (Mukhla)and now have the guts to speak trash towards their hosts.what a shame!!!!!!!!!!!!

      repondre message

      • 1 October 2012 14:23, by zulu

        calling somebody as traitor really means one has betrayed his kin’s group antipathy where one favors the the existense of another group at the nadir of society and the favored few enjoying all previlleges. the conscienable one as Arman chose the political correctness to amend and atone for all wrongs of the favored few.

        repondre message

      • 1 October 2012 17:39, by forza

        Nubian King, people carrying sacks you are talking about actually didn’t invade sudan but came with their trade and settled as they were welcomed by their HOST.nations are meant to be mixed.people with mukhlaya have been in frontline against british invaders we came to loot your country.

        repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 09:34, by Daniel Deng

    Don’t worry brothers, we are behind you 100%. You know how many agreements signed in Sudan, but dishonored by greedy and faked Arab governments in Sudan. It is a matter of time and you will hear NCP dishonors these agreements signed. Just wait and you will see. By the way your brothers and sisters in South Sudan will never be fooled by these fake criminals in Khartoum. Our bonds are more powerful.

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 09:37, by Mr Equal

    Well; it seems things getting worst to everyone. I do not think that this deal will work.But it is going to be good to civilians.

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 09:42, by Jalaby

    It’s time for peace now, reaching a fair peace agreement with SPLA-N is must now, gun will never resolve any problem to any party but only peace can do. I don’t believe Aggar is an evil person.
    SPLA-N talking about Aljazeera project, dams in Sudan, etc have nothing to do with BN & SK, they are Jalaby Yasir Arman agenda!

    repondre message

    • 1 October 2012 11:14, by panchol

      Jalaby & Forza.
      If your Government wants to restored peace in the country,let it see the right of Southern Kordufan and Southern Blue Nile, for they had been with us in the struggle to topple regime in Khartoum.
      S.Kordufan and S.Blue Nile has what is called popular consultation.
      Talk with them and Sudan shall be in peace forever.

      repondre message

      • 1 October 2012 12:09, by Jalaby

        Panchol,
        Let us be realistic and honest, first:there is no rebellion in Blue Nile by the real name of rebellion, the political environment, the nature of the people, the nature of the area and overall situation are totally different from Nuba Mountain, remember, british administration locked Nuba Mountain with the south but never touched the Blue Nile

        repondre message

        • 1 October 2012 12:22, by Jalaby

          Second, compare to Nuba Mountain (NM), the level of education and political perception in Blue Nile (BN) is much higher than NM, tribalism is never an issue in BN while it’s big issue in NM, there is nothing really can classify BN people from the rest of Sudan and makes them unique.
          third, Aggar had no plan to rebel and there is nothing really makes him rebel but Al-Hilo forced

          repondre message

          • 1 October 2012 12:30, by Jalaby

            him to rebel and then SPLM/A used them as one of its military tool in their recent war with Khartoum and as expected, now SPLM/A will send them "against the wind" after they reached a deal with Khartoum and agreed to dismember division 9th & 10th in BN & SK and disconnect the relationship between them!

            repondre message

            • 1 October 2012 12:34, by Jalaby

              Having said all that, no matter what, SPLA-N are Sudanese people and part of our body, reaching peace agreement with them is must now!
              It’s time for peace, time for reconciliation, time to sit together and build Sudan together without excluding anyone because Sudan belongs to all of us!

              repondre message

        • 1 October 2012 13:30, by Logic

          Abo dirty jalabia
          Who are you fooling with talk of peace and reconciliation? The s.Sudanese were once also fellow countrymen but at the end, the racist like you called them, Africans, monkeys, don’t look like us etc etc... Division happened! Now, Aggar & Hilu are true Africans who will never conform to your bullshit identity.

          repondre message

    • 1 October 2012 13:36, by Logic

      If you want true peace, change your mentality, respect all Sudanese as equals, stop religious bigotry and most importantly get rid of that blanket identity of "ARABISM". Just accept Sudan’s diversity in all its glory, maybe then we could have lasting peace. Until then, you’re a racist retard! lol...

      repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 10:13, by Tutbol

    North Sudan should keep dreaming, do you think we in the South will foresake our kins in the Nuba mt and Blue Nile just because Arabs, the UK, and France say? We know the UN and her filthy financiers pressured S Sudan just because of oil and not after peace average southerner knows that and this cannot makes us to abandon our brothers and sisters to wolves. Devils won’t dictate our people lives.

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 10:18, by NO PEACE

    The former president AL.Bashir he with not do any thing now we want two SPLA/M/N Malik and Arman to be leaders of sudan coming 2014 without fail.

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 10:21, by NO PEACE

    The former president AL.Bashir he was not do any thing now we want two SPLA/M/N Malik and Arman to be leaders of sudan coming 2014 without fail.

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 13:30, by Nubian King

    Hey Badr El Din,
    Don’t count your chickens before the eggs get hatched. Have you started implementing the deal?, if yes, where, how and when? You lack leadership qualities and an enemy of peace, that’s why your speech looks doom. What bad thing will it cost you if you talk about signing another comprehensive deal with SPLM-N and all warring groups in Sudan? absolutely nothing! We fear not you!

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 13:46, by Chuangah

    I urged all south sudanese especially president and the cabinet not to betray our brothers in nuba mountain and blue nile they fought with us their blood spilled all over south sudan, the international community should insist to let popular consultation be done becoz its part of the cpa, this will bring lasting peace in sudan.

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 15:37, by 4Justice

    I know some of you may disagree with me, THE WEST WANTS BASHIR AND HIS ISLAMIST TO STAY IN POWER, It sounds illogical but that’s the geopolitical reality we all have to leave with. thank you and good bye!

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 20:13, by BM Bol

    What a wrong conclusion? rather see it in a positive way to sign a peace deal that would last the warmongers see it as an opportunity to dislodge the SPLM-N. Didn’t learn from Darfur? They said the samething we chad signed deal with Khartoum and yet Darfur is not peaceful.

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 20:56, by Northern Sudanese

    The thing is that these rebels benefit of any type of weapon, they hide in the bushes. when it is a clear battle the SAF always crushes them but when its a surprise attack it gets harder. they hide in different areas and the army can’t be everywhere. the country is too big with an army of 200,000 men. we destroy their weapons, they secretely recieve some from south

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 22:04, by ViVa Sudan

    Nubian losser so called king & Insect logic plus other
    insects from south Security deal means "death" of SPLM-N rebels THAT’S WAT EXACTLY WE SUDANESE WANT NOT FOR 3 LITTLE BIRDS BUT FOR ALL SPLMA/N OR WATSOEVER COWARDS WE DON’T WANT PEACE / ANY DAM RELATION WITH SOUTHNERS & YOU MAY GO TO HELL WITH THEM 2 ITS TIME TO FORCE YA SELF 2 ABIDE BY AGREEMENT PUNISHMENT NO WAY TO RUN OR HIDE U MAY DIE .

    repondre message

  • 1 October 2012 23:12, by Nguetbuny de Luelpiny

    International stand with strong people.
    stop talking international Organization are supporting Arab settler in Africa than supporting black sudanese. We must fight to get respected by others world. SPLA have a right to all sudan if they had power. But Kiir&Riek make us weak this time. They could alway corwded with just onethings dwelling on

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)

The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.