Home | News    Wednesday 26 September 2012

Khartoum’s provocations will not derail talks: S. Sudan official

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

September 25, 2012 (JUBA) - South Sudan remains undeterred by Sudan’s aggression and will continue to engage the latter in talks until both countries amicably resolve all the outstanding post-secession issues, its information minister, Barnaba Marial Benjamin, said on Tuesday.

JPEG - 34.7 kb
South Sudan nformation minister, Barnaba Marial Benjamin (Getty)

Marial’s remarks comes in the wake of earlier reports that the South Sudan army (SPLA) and UN peacekeepers witnessed about eight airdrops from an aircraft in Likuangole village of South Sudan’s Jonglei state.

Although the UN could neither confirm what was dropped nor who was behind the incident, the SPLA accused the Sudanese army (SAF) backing rebels fighting South Sudan regime; an allegation Khartoum has repeatedly denied.

“Any act of flying within the territory of South Sudan without permission is a complete violation of out territorial integrity. This is totally unacceptable,” said Marial.

“The Republic of South Sudan, I can assure you, has always been committed to the peace process and will continue doing the same until a lasting solution is reached,” he added.

The two Sudans are expected to clinch a deal in the final round of talks, currently taking place in the Ethiopian capital. The two countries’ leaders have also entered into day three of the highly anticipated presidential summit.

Phillip Aguer, the SPLA spokesperson told Sudan Tribune that Sudanese military aircraft airdropped about eight parcels of weapons to renegade David Yau Yau-led rebels in Likuangole, after which the army reportedly repulsed a rebel attack.

He also accused some section within the Sudanese government of allegedly working to frustrate the ongoing peace process, being facilitated by the Thabo Mbeki-led African Union High Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP).

“There are always some elements in Khartoum who remain opposed to the peace process between Sudan and South Sudan. Their actions, as we have often seen, are always contrary to what the leadership of both countries is trying to achieve in the interest of peace,” said Aguer.

Sudan and South Sudan fought over two decades of a bloody civil war, which ended in 2005 with the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA). A referendum was held six years later in which the South Sudanese people overwhelmingly voted in favour of separation, leading to South Sudan’s independence in July 2011.

The two nations, however, remain locked in negotiations on several outstanding issues, including borders, oil, citizenship and the disputed border region of Abyei.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 26 September 2012 05:21, by mohammed ali

    Are you serious? You waged an unecessary lost war against Sudan;why are you suddenly so keen about about peace? Why are you in so much a hurry? It seems that thieves are tightening the rope around their neck.Now they are screeming!

    repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 06:08, by SeekingTruth

      Ali, I thought you have been for peace all this time, what changes now that u seem to be laughing at S. Sudan minister who is calling for peace despite your gov’t reckless behaviour every time peace is about to be at hand? If you can tell the world, why would your NCP drop bombs on South’s soil when negotation is on its way for peace to prevail?

      repondre message

      • 26 September 2012 06:46, by Mi diit

        I fear for Jonglei’s future this year. It may be set on huge fire that nobody will be able to extinguish. Khartoum is playing fool with South Sudan knowing that it has not prepared itself to shoot its planes down. The SPLA has not purchased even a single anti-aircraft weapon. Shame.

        repondre message

        • 26 September 2012 06:49, by Mi diit

          The only thing that prevents Khartoum from invading South Sudan is the fact that we have the most courageous fighters in the infantry divisions. Generals like James Gatduel Gatluak taught Khartoum a good lesson in Heglig/panthou before he was betrayed in the unpopular withdrawal decision. I believe in our generals in the field, not those who just eat lazily in Bilpam.

          repondre message

          • 26 September 2012 23:41, by panom lualbil

            MIDIIT?
            Talking about JAMES GATDUEL GATLUAK who just joined us after CPA through AMNESTY, means you’re useless and desdain thugs, boy. But look here, if any of such kind or DR RIAK had became a president and by being known as enslaved hearty and cowardic, OMER EL BASHIER would had confiscated this land without exchanging of bullets, I sword God. So thank God MR KIIR is another Dr John.

            repondre message

        • 26 September 2012 07:07, by omoni jr.

          Mi Diit,
          your comment is really impressive and patriotic .
          Be safe buddy.

          repondre message

      • 26 September 2012 09:07, by mohammed ali

        Seeking, because he is not seriuos. He is lying as usual.He thinks diplomacy is " lying" You can;t achieve peace through lies!

        repondre message

        • 26 September 2012 13:59, by panchol

          Muhammad ali.
          Please try to prepare good country for you to go for exile.There will be an invation that is going to take place soon since your damn president is longing for 2nd war in Sudans.
          My friend ask the one who had been to South during civil war,just to tell you how bad it was.
          Beat for drums of war, but,but,but there will be the time for SPLA/South Sudanese to attend the dancing.

          repondre message

        • 26 September 2012 18:54, by Hardball

          Mohammed Ali condemning others of lying! Wow; this is like a blind telling another blind that; he or she can’t see!

          repondre message

      • 26 September 2012 10:46, by okucu pa lotinokwan

        Politic should not be use to deceive the local communities,Mr minister tell the truth,truth can let you free.
        OKUCU PA LOTINOKWAN

        repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 08:12, by Rommel

      Ali:
      Your vainglorious chest-thumping is entertaining. An unnecessary war!? The foray into Aliiny was an act of self-defense; South Sudan’s poorly executed actions were merely in response to a second round of military aggression, launched by the SAF from Aliny — an area in which the Ruweng Dinka were displaced from in 1992-93 through to 1999 as documented by Human rights watch.

      repondre message

      • 26 September 2012 09:16, by mohammed ali

        Romel or Luka, it seems that you are fpnd of the term "vainglorious chest-thumping" who ever talks to you brand him with this term! Is it because somebody described you so?The whole world rejected and condemend your attack Heglig.It is unecessary because you can’t win, you lost and so many poor, innocent and marginalized southerners perished for nothing.This happened while your family is safe

        repondre message

        • 26 September 2012 09:24, by mohammed ali

          con:and sound in Australia while you are enjoying the nice wether in London.You contradict yourself when you say self defence and then say badly excuted!There was no SPLA in Heglig to act in self defence!Your article about the final round proved to be a fiasco, and it is not the final round.We will watch you strangulating yourself!

          repondre message

        • 26 September 2012 09:29, by mohammed ali

          con:and sound in Australia while you are enjoying the nice wether in London.You contradict yourself when you say self defence and then say badly excuted!There was no SPLA in Heglig to act in self defence!Your article about the final round proved to be a fiasco, and it is not the final round.We will watch you strangulating yourself!

          repondre message

          • 26 September 2012 11:00, by Rommel

            Ah, Mohammed, how so very nice to hear from you. Are you really entertaining the laughable idea that I could possibly be Luka Biong operating under a pseudonym? That the immoral, ignorant, corrupt, death-deserving poltroons in Juba attempted and failed to explain and legitimize their actions in the fog of a military engagement to actors of international significance, who more often than not are

            repondre message

            • 26 September 2012 11:19, by Rommel

              operating under a dearth of evidence with regards to the location of the border as it stood in 1956 is disconcerting, but ultimately immaterial with regards to whom "Heglig" actually belongs. The displacement of the Ruweng Dinka from "Heglig" in 1992-93 through to 1999 as documented by Human rights watch, the coalition of international justice and the Harker report is far more pertinent.

              repondre message

              • 26 September 2012 11:36, by Rommel

                I haven’t contradicted myself at all, Mohammed. Please do pay close attention. Our entrance into the land of the Ruweng Aliiny (renamed "Heglig") was an act of self-defense, after consecutive attacks by the SAF from Aliiny with long-range rocket artillery and personnel. It was poorly executed because it should have been limited to merely repulsing the forces that attacked our troops

                repondre message

                • 26 September 2012 11:49, by Rommel

                  in the absence of an air defense blanket for our troops to operate underneath. War -total war- not skirmishes on the border require a great deal of resources, an independent means of production of the required material, an increase in the military’s conventional capabilities, years of planning, training and exercises — a criteria impossible to meet in the space of just a year.

                  repondre message

                  • 26 September 2012 12:02, by Rommel

                    A criteria made all the more prohibitively difficult to achieve when your leader is a servile, complacent and lethargic sheep. Salva Kiir and his pathetic government seem to have absolutely no interest in assuring the territorial integrity of South Sudan and for this they deserve death not power.

                    repondre message

                    • 26 September 2012 12:24, by Rommel

                      I am a firm believer in Niccolo Machiavelli’s pronouncement that "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." What you witnessed in Aliiny was the manifestation of a knee-jerk reaction; an action executed without the anticipation or appreciation of the political consequences that South Sudan would be shackled in the immediate aftermath.

                      repondre message

                      • 26 September 2012 12:37, by Rommel

                        The goons in Juba should have directed the military with the cautious, limited and specific task of repulsing the attacking enemy instead of having them pursue the attackers further into what is still our territory. It would of been clear to all third parties on what had actually transpired.

                        repondre message

                        • 26 September 2012 12:50, by Rommel

                          I would then have used the incident to evoke the grit-edged reports on the displacement of my civilian population from this very area by Human rights watch, the coalition of international justice, the Harker report and the 1999 report of the then UN Special Rapporteur, Leonardo Franco.

                          repondre message

                          • 26 September 2012 12:59, by Rommel

                            I would have provided these reports to actors of international significance, so that they would perfectly understand that when I do reclaim my territories in the not too distant future... that I have every right to them. What I am saying is this: consistent, detailed, referenced and authoritative political activism on this issue is what they should have engaged in...

                            repondre message

                            • 26 September 2012 13:17, by Rommel

                              .. instead of the unedifying morass of underpowered military adventurism. The leaders in Juba are novices — they genuinely don’t seem to know just what it is they should do in scenarios like this. They [more than anyone else] have emboldened and enabled your occupation of our lands. They are the first snakes whose heads must be cut off — figuratively speaking of course.

                              repondre message

                              • 26 September 2012 13:25, by Rommel

                                I don’t brand every person that I happen to disagree with as vainglorious, unless they actually are - which you so happen to be. Despite my rigorous and incisive distillation of arguments put forward by others, I’m actually an extremely affable individual. I don’t believe that being brutally truthful and being affable are at all mutually exclusive.

                                repondre message

                        • 26 September 2012 13:04, by sudani ana

                          Rommel
                          Your good command of the English language and eloquence are impressive, but don’t necessarily mean you are right. If the Heglig war was just a "foray" and a "knee jerk" reation as you call it, how come it was done with co-ordination between SPLA and Darfur rebel factions as ducumented by various sources including the Sudanese medical staff who were arrested there and AFP news with photo...

                          repondre message

                          • 26 September 2012 13:09, by sudani ana

                            ..photo evidence. Would you call that a knee jerk reaction? I think not. How come SS never contested Heglig before that. And, is it called Aliiny or Panthou or whatever other name you might come up with?

                            repondre message

                          • 26 September 2012 13:42, by Rommel

                            sudani ana:
                            I thank you for your kind words, the civil manner in which you delivered it and the pertinence of your responses. I very much hope you don’t think that I am using my "eloquence" as a crutch of some sort. Let’s get this show on the road:

                            repondre message

                            • 26 September 2012 14:13, by Rommel

                              I could very well be wrong, but all the images displaying the *initial* thrust into Aliiny by the SPLA don’t seem to show the salient participation of any third party, until the latter stages of the engagement. The Darfurian rebels have in the past more than demonstrated -on multiple occassions- their ability to make their presence felt in neighboring Kordofan in a very short period of time...

                              repondre message

                              • 26 September 2012 14:24, by Rommel

                                .. and needless to say this is what *I* [in my biased estimation] think happened in that instance. The SPLA’s occupation of Aliiny spanned a period of at least ten days — which is more than enough time for the Darfurians to make ample use of in their eventual participation in that theater of war. You must also consider that the actions of the SPLA were [as they claimed] in response to a

                                repondre message

                                • 26 September 2012 14:41, by Rommel

                                  second round of attacks on their positions by the SAF and their auxiliary forces using "Heglig" as a launching pad. Perhaps they had decided at the heels of their first engagement with the SAF that they would not only repulse attacks from "Heglig", but that they would perform a planned counterattack in concert with the Darfurian rebels — who I am sure they’re supporting.

                                  repondre message

                                  • 26 September 2012 15:06, by Rommel

                                    I will readily acknowledge that I am biased — that perhaps my analysis and judgment is being compromised, clouded and subordinated to the aggregates of my sentiments and filial loyalty to my people as their son. I don’t know how you got the idea that South Sudan made no claims on "Heglig" prior to the fighting this year, so please allow me disabuse you of this fiction:

                                    repondre message

                                    • 26 September 2012 15:42, by Rommel

                                      The wealth-sharing provisions of the CPA mandated - and I quote that "(50%) of net oil revenue derived from oil producing wells in southern Sudan shall be allocated to the Government of Southern Sudan (GOSS) as of the beginning of the pre-Interim Period and the remaining (50%) to the National Government and States in Northern Sudan."

                                      repondre message

                                      • 26 September 2012 15:53, by Rommel

                                        It’s clear from the text above that Khartoum did not have to share revenue from oil fields found in the North. I assume that you know that Khartoum *did* share revenue from "Heglig" during the interim period, up until it misinterpreted the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in July of 2009.

                                        repondre message

                                        • 26 September 2012 15:55, by Rommel

                                          The NCP acknowledged (albeit grudgingly) that Aliiny does indeed belong to South Sudan; the NCP acknowledged this fact in the most explicit way possible with regards to the economic arrangements between the two ruling parties: that south Sudan was entitled to remittance on only those oil fields found within ‘the south’.

                                          repondre message

                                          • 26 September 2012 15:59, by Rommel

                                            The NCP acknowledged “Heglig” as part of south Sudan during the interim period up until July 2009 – the year of the PCA’s ruling on Abyei; hence the frisson of celebratory triumphalism that came at the heels of its convoluted and very much purposeful misinterpretation of the ruling on Abyei by the PCA, after which it immediately denied south Sudan a share of the proceeds from “Heglig”...

                                            repondre message

                                            • 26 September 2012 16:12, by Rommel

                                              I hope you realize that the extensive reports by Human rights watch, the coalition of international justice, the Harker report, and the 1999 report of the then UN Special Rapporteur, Leonardo Franco on the displacement of the Ruweng Dinka from Aliiny by the SAF and the Misseriya... leaves no scintilla of doubt just to whom Aliiny belongs - and that you don’t see these reports as derivatives of

                                              repondre message

                                              • 26 September 2012 16:27, by Rommel

                                                Western subterfuge. The Ruweng Dinka [the rightful owners of Aliiny] have called this area Aliiny for centuries — but the much larger and much more powerful Panaruu Dinka who, neighbor the Ruweng, refer to it as Panthou. Most South Sudanese seem to prefer using Panaruu’s name for the area.

                                                repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 08:14, by Majok Akuecbeny

      Mohammed Ali, I came to understood Arabs don’t preach peace and that is why alot of turmoil happening in Arab World Countries e.g Syria and so on. You don’t celebrate if Khartoum Government fail to respect S.South territory. Why are you suspicious on S.South is it because our land is rich?

      repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 08:28, by Diu J.Kuek

      Since Sudan use this provocative acts while two parties are in the peace negotiation and rejecting African Union proposal on Abyei referendum so International Community should take affirm position to bring this conflicts to end and the World must know that the negotiation with terrorists or dealing with terrorists will not yield or producing anything.

      repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 05:33, by 4Justice

    “Any act of flying within the territory of South Sudan without permission is a complete violation of out territorial integrity. This is totally unacceptable,” said Marial.Why don’t you shoot it down?

    repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 05:39, by 4Justice

      What’s more important, V8 SUV Vehicles or Patriot air defense system (PAC-3)?

      repondre message

      • 26 September 2012 07:57, by Lula

        Good,V8 SUV vehicles,renting hotel for family residency instead this money should have been used to established self defence. stop complians to world, you help your self so that others help you,independent of south sudan was not a free gift but we lost peoples, distructions.

        repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 06:10, by Bolman

      good ? more complaint no action where is our artilleries weapons money lover your corruption against any act just watch

      repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 06:29, by zulu

      The SPLA generals are so mad at the President and the world. But, the silence of our forces on the violation of our airspace concerns us a great deal. How can we allow baboons to enter the lion’s territory?

      repondre message

      • 26 September 2012 08:22, by zulu

        block the border again so that their goods will not be sold in south sudan. stop their flights. they are running low of money and were hoping to trade again with south sudan because we are the only one eating their dura, and other uselss grains.
        we need to synergistically work against these fellows

        repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 07:38, by joseph-maleel

      You Got That Right 4Justice .Why Talked shoot That Plane Down. And See Who Will asked S-S About That Plane. Will Bashir Tell The World That His Plane Has Been Shoot Down In S-S? (anwser)Yes. Question(What Your Plane Doing Over There) Now south Sudanees miss The Old Man Garang Was Good With Those of North Becuase Garang Was Tricky With Arabs He Knows How to Play Game With Bashir

      repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 06:12, by Madina Tonj

    Talk Talk Talk-Doing Nothing Make You Guys A shameful.
    When a nation become independent, it mean a lots of things but most importantly to remember is that, the government has all rithts and authority to defending its territorials and no other authority would come to claim. If you guys don’t know it how to defend this nation then, I am sorry and you guys need to get out and let others take lead

    repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 06:12, by Madina Tonj

    Talk Talk Talk-Doing Nothing Make You Guys A shameful.
    When a nation become independent, it mean a lots of things but most importantly to remember is that, the government has all rithts and authority to defending its territorials and no other authority would come to claim. If you guys don’t know it how to defend this nation then, I am sorry and you guys need to get out and let others take lead

    repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 06:12, by Madina Tonj

    Talk Talk Talk-Doing Nothing Make You Guys A shameful.
    When a nation become independent, it mean a lots of things but most importantly to remember is that, the government has all rithts and authority to defending its territorials and no other authority would come to claim. If you guys don’t know it how to defend this nation then, I am sorry and you guys need to get out and let others take lead

    repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 06:12, by Madina Tonj

    Talk Talk Talk-Doing Nothing Make You Guys A shameful.
    When a nation become independent, it mean a lots of things but most importantly to remember is that, the government has all rithts and authority to defending its territorials and no other authority would come to claim. If you guys don’t know it how to defend this nation then, I am sorry and you guys need to get out and let others take lead

    repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 06:36, by 4Justice

      These people need psychological evaluation

      repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 08:25, by manyang mawech

    Lula ,
    Oh man! You made my day.... The best of the best... renting the hotels for whole family for whole life.... That is ridiculous for South Sudanese man.

    repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 08:46, by 4Justice

      This stuff is no laughing matter, people are dying from this! It is unacceptable to allow irresponsible people in our government to mismanage public funds in such a shameful manner.

      repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 08:35, by Ambago

    Thank you Madina Tonj. You have said it all. Those who read what the US Ambassador to Juba....sister Susan Page expressed about this weird system of mis-governance, they can go on to read between the lines that SPLM as a political tool is finished! Get up ...wake up...wake up for your right,.

    repondre message

    • 26 September 2012 09:37, by zulu

      Amba,
      You are welcome to go to Khartoum for training and military support so that you join Yau Yau and start a war from Uganda through nimule. I gues, the Acholi will anahiliate you before you even advance to torit. Watch out talking nonsense.
      politics is different from patriotism. when your land is being invaded, stop division. it weakens you

      repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 20:29, by Whortti Bor Manza

    Benjamin marial is one of the 75 super thieves and great kings of corruption. He has to sound loud and clear to appease his master. the more he shouts, the more money he steals. Marial owns a luxury house in London. Please crd Marial and crd Aguer, just shoot down the plane without hessitation. No need for complaint. Toyota V8s=Anti aircraft missiles?

    repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 22:15, by Tutbol

    Don’t forget the UN and the enemies of south sudan with vested interests, the Europeans could be behind provocation. I am tired of their ever threat sanctions if no deal is reach. Let them go a head but we don’t want damn Europeans ever in S Sudan. Their class lives is why we have trouble in S africa. They are evil who only think of themselves.

    repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 22:26, by Tutbol

    Don’t forget the UN and the enemies of south sudan with vested interests, the Europeans could be behind provocation. I am tired of their ever threat sanctions if no deal is reach. Let them go a head but we don’t want damn Europeans ever in S Sudan. Their class lives is why we have trouble in S africa. They are evil who only think of themselves.

    repondre message

  • 27 September 2012 07:26, by E. Defense Forces

    Just watch this clowns in Addis Ababa happily chatting with the north Sudan clowns while people are dying every day in both countries
    http://www.southsudanhub.com/media/1917/Stalled_negotiations_between_the_two__Sudan/

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)

The misapprehension of peace in the context of conflict resolution 2013-05-16 11:40:39 By Ngor Arol Garang May 16, 2013 - Political leaders and citizens with an interest in politics within the Bahr el Ghazal region will come together for a one week conference on Wednesday, where (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.