Home | News    Tuesday 25 September 2012

Undemocratic rule will lose S. Sudan US support, envoy says

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

September 24, 2012 (JUBA) – The US government has expressed its deep concern about the governance of South Sudan and has warned that failure to uphold democratic principles will result in the “immediate loss” of US foreign assistance.

JPEG - 9.2 kb
US ambassador to South Sudan, Susan Page (Getty)

The statement comes a week before South Sudan’s president, Salva Kiir flies to the US to attend the annual General Assembly at the UN headquarters in New York. Kiir is expected is to meet with various leaders at the sidelines of the meeting, including president Barrack Obama.

American ambassador to South Sudan Susan Page said in a letter seen by Sudan Tribune on Sunday that “democracy is a hard earned, but lost easily. It is easy to become impatient with the pace of change and imperfect democratic processes, and want to force that change along by undemocratic means.”

She notes forcing this change undemocratically “will not only crush the dream of a young nation, but it will also lose the support of the United States, one of the strongest partners and supporters of South Sudan and its people”.

Page explained that American people and friends of South Sudan were enthused when its independence was gained and started talks on how best to offer their assistance.

Since attaining independence in 2011 South Sudan has been facing difficulties in its governance, including embezzlement scandals and human rights abuses.

Kiir published an amnesty to government officials in June accusing them of taking US$4bn from the nation’s coffers.

The country’s vice president, Riek Machar has called on the international community to the nation to build its institutions and instil effective systems of accountability and transparency to tackle the corruption problem.

In July a publisher agreed a civil recovery order of US$17.7m for securing education contracts in South Sudan by buying off officials

Human Rights Watch’s August report describes the South Sudanese military as “responsible for unlawful killings, torture, and looting of civilian property.” It is also critical of the proliferation of arbitrarily detained prisoners and the suffering of women in forced / early marriages and domestic violence. It also noted that “ South Sudan’s leaders have stated their commitment to ratify major human rights treaties, but have yet to do so.”

Page explained that the US administration provided a total of over US$1bn to South Sudan in 2011- 2013 to support good governance, agriculture, economic development, education, the environment, conflict mitigation and reconciliation, health, rule of law, human rights, security sector reforms, and civil society development. 

However, she noted that the funding “is not a gift; it is an investment in the world’s youngest country and newest democracy’s success following decades of strife”.

Page explained that the US is dedicated to providing support to the new nation’s aims to ensure its commitment to citizen participation and political plurality, equality and tolerance, accountability and transparency, free and fair elections, economic freedom and opportunity, human rights protection and enforcement of the rule of law.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 25 September 2012 08:54, by mohammed ali

    Waw, Americans say so! Is she NCP member or in Khartoum pay-roll?! Certainly they are fed up with the unprecedented mess!They couldn’t keep quite longer than this; it’s beyound any human being capacity.

    repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 09:05, by Michael Angelo

      Mohammed,
      We’re not under nobody direction like your government that has been directed by Arab world since its achieved Independence. We south Sudanese know what is best for us and no one tell us what to do.

      repondre message

      • 25 September 2012 09:14, by mohammed ali

        Angelo, why are you telling me so, I didn’t say that. You are brave enough to put your words in the right direction, not towards me.I said nothing and I didn’t interfer in the way you are ruling your pple. That your own business, not mine!

        repondre message

        • 25 September 2012 11:21, by pabaak

          Guys democratic principle is needed, I don’t say I support US government for everything said here, but we need true democracy where transparency is felt at all level of Government in South Sudan, if until now no official has stand in front of judge to depend him/herself for corruption allegations than definitely that will open windows to blame them at any day or time as they want. I support

          repondre message

          • 25 September 2012 11:27, by pabaak

            true democracy on our own perspective not somebody else perspective.

            repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 09:38, by Dinkawarrior

      "Riek Machar has called on the international community to the nation to build its institutions and instil effective systems of accountability and transparency to tackle the corruption problem"
      Long times traitor is continue betraying his own country while he is in charge of it. What a shameful leader is this? He and his boss are among those 75 thieves?

      repondre message

      • 25 September 2012 09:50, by Mi diit

        Ngundeng predicted that the country will be in mess under the rule of former Nuer slaves until the time comes for true leader to reign and correct the whole mess. How can we prosperous under the greedy and incompetent leadership of the likes of Dinkawarrior (coward) and Dinka Dominated Corruption (DDC). But time is coming!

        repondre message

        • 25 September 2012 10:51, by Peter Marko

          Mid
          How could a leader from nuer community will be able to rule the entire nation of S. Sudan, and you are not capable of rulling yourselves. Look, all traditional leaders who are rulling nuer clans could be trace to the other niletic tribes in S. Sudan. You guys needs to leadershiply mature first, before u talking about nuer rulling the people. Of Course, a patoritic nuer could rule us, not nyga

          repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 10:38, by Peter Marko

      To an Idoitic Supporter of NCP regime: Mohammed Ali
      You, the fake arabs of the north, are the last one to preach us about the meanings of good governance based on the principles of democracy. Did you know that your devilish religious teachings and your ill-informed customary practices reject the call of freedom and equality for men and women alike, and reject the democracy in its totality?.......

      repondre message

      • 25 September 2012 10:39, by Peter Marko

        ....You, Muslims, always naïvely argue that Sharia is a good ultimate source of justice, and Shoura is the best form of governance. Contrary to your beliefs, Islamic teachings and democracy, the best form of governance, are contradictory in their core principles.

        repondre message

        • 25 September 2012 10:39, by Peter Marko

          ...... Unlike you, the fake Arabized people of N. Sudan, we, the people of S. Sudan, are democratic by nature, and we will not settle for something less than a genuine democracy and rule of law. Let me assure you that despite the difficulties that face our nation at present time, the rule of law prevail and the democracy will be up held as the system of governance in S. Sudan, sooner or later. ...

          repondre message

          • 25 September 2012 10:41, by Peter Marko

            ......When did son of Hussien stand with the people of S. Sudan, Darfur, Nuba Mountain and Blue Nile state. If it was not for the support of Mubarek Hussien Osama, Al-Bashiet would have been over thrown by now. Let us just wait and what November election might do to Ab-Bshit, of course if the son of Hussien loses the re-election bid..........

            repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 11:54, by pabaak

      Ali, you don’t know what’s unprecedented and what beyond human capacity about democracy in South Sudan, what’s beyond human capacity is what happen to individuals in Sudan, particularly the case of young man video cliff when he has abused by NCP agents to the extent of rape him(alrakoba.net)

      repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 16:20, by Manyieldit

      I Think Susan Page need to look into her letter and analyze what she said (change can not be enforced) So USA need to not to be impatient too for the democratic change in South Sudan. Change is a gradual process and need not to hurried with. This nation is only 24 months old and it need a time to fulfill what the world need to see. It took USA almost a century to reach where they are now.

      repondre message

  • 25 September 2012 09:09, by mohammed ali

    Timing is very strange! Salva is in Addis Abba, Machar is heading to New Yourk! Is there anyone there planing something " to correct the situation and implement democracy" ? They usually say so , when they do it!Everything is possible! Uncle Sam...Uncle whooo?

    repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 09:29, by Michael Angelo

      Mohammed,
      Our country is a democratic nation whereby everyone is treated equal. SPLM didn’t come to power by force but election just like other democratic nations. I don’t see how we’re undemocratic while the ruling party didn’t come to power by force. To answer your question, both president Kiir and vice president Riak are not out of the country doing business but serving our country, okay!

      repondre message

      • 25 September 2012 09:59, by mohammed ali

        Angelo, did I say that SS is undemocratic? Why are you telling me so? I have nothng to do with that! You can reply to those who said so not to me! I didn’t say Kiir & Salva went for business. I simply said both are outside the country in Addis & NY. I perfectly know that they are on official visit.

        repondre message

  • 25 September 2012 09:24, by Samuel Malual

    It is true that authoritarianism has become our culture in both Sudans. If Juba can’t change their politics of greedy-ness, jealousy toward intellectuals, self centreness rule and above all assessination and illegal detention then South Sudan will soon collapse. This is all the facts we cannot afford to loose more lives because of a simple curable disease called the corruption.

    repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 13:06, by Logic

      Sadly the SPLM proves everyday they have forgotten the ideals for which they fought for.
      America has no moral platform from which to preach democracy as they are an imperialistic nation with the destruction of countless nations ingrained in their history.
      Education is the best hope for the Africans of Sudan (N&S).

      repondre message

  • 25 September 2012 09:44, by Samuel Malual

    Dinkawarrior. I understand your position, being a member of Gogrial chitck cabinet is a big chair to loot public fund in the name of Gogrial and their worshipers alike. But I’m pretty sure that the end will come for Gogrial authoritarianism.

    repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 10:14, by Xeno

      Another American witch trying to show her toughness. What does she knows about American foreign policy? expel this witch for good.....MOHAMMED ALI, go and join your like demonstrating about the molester mohmed.

      repondre message

  • 25 September 2012 10:25, by Jalaby

    South Sudan is hopeless case and this country is the enemy of itself, although the british administration locked the south for around 21 years and expelled out all Arab/Jalaba from it and started heavy program to erase any kind of "Arabiztion" and imposed the Christianity instruction and led the south towards fully African style with no link to Arab in attempt for stopping the

    repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 10:44, by Jalaby

      spread of Islam and Arabization to go deep into Africa and completely separate the south from north, british administration had 3 options for the south:
      1. Make it independent state
      2. Divide it between Sudan, Uganda & Kenya
      3. attach it to Sudan
      Because of the complexity of the south and its inhomogeneous component they cancelled option 1 & 2 and noway to implement them

      repondre message

      • 25 September 2012 11:51, by Jalaby

        They came up with one fact that the south can’t stand on its own legs, they attached it to Sudan not for the benefit of Sudan but for the benefit of the south itself in the first place, Sudan has great resources and bright future and can easily host the south while Uganda & Kenya have nothing and the south will fail them no doubt if attached to them but unexpectedly

        repondre message

        • 25 September 2012 12:00, by Jalaby

          the south failed Sudan too!
          Now it is south turn to fail itself because the south is inhomogeneous body holds the poison in its body exactly like its neighbor Congo or may be even worse than Congo, Congo is big country with huge huge resources that you can imagine, it has everything, very wide and fertile agricultural land, huge water, huge diamonds, gold, cobalt, copper,

          repondre message

          • 25 September 2012 12:13, by Jalaby

            and even oil! do you know that Congo produces around 21,000 bbl/day and only consumes around 13,000 bbl/day and exports the surplus oil? despite all that 71% of Congolese people live below the poverty line, from 2005 till 2011 the country ranked between number 2 to 7 in the top failed country list!! Congo never rest from war because it lacks for solid elements of being state!

            repondre message

            • 25 September 2012 12:22, by Jalaby

              Regarding the south, the situation is even much worse than the Congo, there is nothing really unifies and makes their identity unique and have them live in harmony in one state!
              As long as Dinka & Nuer are living together, the cows theft will continue, oil theft will continue and they will rip off that resources up to last drop, hatred & grudge will soar up,

              repondre message

              • 25 September 2012 12:37, by Jalaby

                the conflict over who will dominate the south is real and not fake!
                I think Obama administration starts to know that ugly fact but I think nothing they can really do other than cutting the money and watch them finishing off each other the same scenario in neighboring Congo as US stays helpless!

                repondre message

                • 25 September 2012 12:42, by Jalaby

                  I think South Sudan will only make the tax payers in the west despite the bad economy and high unemployment rate in their countries to pay more money to UN to restore security and feed hungers people in the south, I don’t really see anything good the south will add to the international community other than causing tax payers in the west to cut more money from their salaries!

                  repondre message

                  • 25 September 2012 15:20, by Rommel

                    Jalaby:
                    You really should be a comedian, if you’re not one already. Your ahistorical drivel on matters you so evidently know absolutely nothing about would elicit howls of laughter if you weren’t so cringingly sincere with regards to such hogwash.

                    repondre message

                    • 25 September 2012 15:38, by Rommel

                      The British [like all other imperial powers] did not create administrative units with the best interest(s) at heart for any of their subject states — they did so out of their own convenience.
                      Your inane attempts at gauging the varied and complex underpinnings of colonial British actions is laughable. You provide no evidence, no sources for what are essentially just congenial presuppositions.

                      repondre message

                      • 25 September 2012 15:43, by Rommel

                        South Sudan has far more tributaries [river channels], is infinitely more fertile, has far more arable land and greater mineral wealth than does Sudan — a Nation blanketed by seemingly endless large deserts, with arable land constituting a derisory 8% of the landmass.

                        repondre message

                        • 25 September 2012 15:52, by Rommel

                          The North benefited infinitely more from colonial British administration than did the petulant and defiant South; whereas the South was neglected, the North received a great deal of investment in infrastructure, in industry and the economy in general. The Gezira scheme for example was a direct result of British investment > for which there was no comparable scheme in the South!

                          repondre message

                          • 25 September 2012 15:57, by Rommel

                            The British did not gain a great deal of commercial profit in its occupation and administration of your Nation... in fact the converse is true. The separate Azande, Dinka and Nuer resistance to British rule lasted years longer than the Mahdiya. The Nuer provided one of the continent’s greatest examples of courage and valor in their resistance against the British!

                            repondre message

                            • 25 September 2012 16:09, by Rommel

                              It took ten British expeditions to subdue and placate the Nuer over a period of two decades. I find your detached, hypocritical and wholly self-unaware, sententious rants on the instability and ethnic-determined violence in South Sudan incredibly hilarious. Allow me to tell you why - and why I think you should be a comedian.

                              repondre message

                              • 25 September 2012 16:15, by Rommel

                                You seem to be entirely oblivious to the unenviable afflictions and realities of your own Nation. You have lost no less than a hundred thousand people in Darfur, and have had millions displaced as a consequence. You have lost more civilians in ethnic-determined violence than any other Nation within the continent and indeed the world.

                                repondre message

      • 25 September 2012 13:09, by Logic

        Abo dirty jalabia
        Are you still a retard? Looooooool, you’re truly a funny character!!!

        repondre message

  • 25 September 2012 10:49, by Deng

    Fuck Obama administration, whether we loose US support or not, South Sudan interest ranks first. Obama is loosing 2012 election to Mit romey anyway.

    repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 10:55, by Xeno

      Deng
      You are right. George Bush was the best president ever. Not coward called Clinton, or the imposter Obama. GB make child molesters listen.

      repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 11:43, by Paul Ongee

      Don’t worry folks, Sudan Page is urging South Sudan to pull up its socks not to behave like Sudan headed by a criminal President. She knows losing US support is like giving a chance for another influential world power penetrating Africa.

      repondre message

      • 25 September 2012 12:34, by Xeno

        Paul Ogee,
        You are paul, but do not underestimate this Chicago south side trashs hand-picked by their Boss in the White house....they are justice imposing what the don’t understand, look how the other one in UN acts. always condemn south sudan for things we are not capable of doing at this stage.

        repondre message

      • 25 September 2012 14:46, by mohammed ali

        Paul, you are expert in self cheating. So , basheer is the only one to compete with and Sudan is the only country you are taking example from! The world is laughing!

        repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 13:08, by lupai moses

      Deng pls use your brain to think logically as mature individual who can add value for a gain.the querries are; what do you know about foreign policy?,intenational relation?,allies?,economy?,good governance & the role of foreign Aid towards economic growth?.conclusively,what America said is correct & its what we need in south sudan otherwise the 2.5million bloodshade is nothing and more blood wil flow so let us accept the truth and live long in peace.

      repondre message

    • 25 September 2012 18:20, by panchol

      Deng.
      Let’s not interfair with the affairs of an other country like America.
      thank you.

      repondre message

  • 25 September 2012 14:25, by 4Justice

    If I were Salva I would resign, I see no use in this man, He is non existent leader who just sits in a furnished office like a lifeless dead body. That’s it! he doesn’t give a damn how many dying and suffering all around him from diseases, starvation, antonov attacks ect, I have never ever in my entire life seen any person this useless!!

    repondre message

  • 25 September 2012 16:16, by solider

    i said it before. america never meet it’s promises. america lied about been genorouse and supportive to the south just to separate it from the north. undemocratic ss is just an excuse to stop wasting it’s cash on the new country.even if ss was democratic the US will find another excuse to cut the support.

    repondre message

  • 25 September 2012 16:18, by solider

    hehehe . you have been PUNKED

    repondre message

  • 25 September 2012 16:30, by solider

    but truly ,are the SPLM are ready to loose power for normal citizens? are they awar that those normal citizens are going to question them about the billions that have been looted, and many ethnic crimes have been committed? are they ready to see the ordinary go up while watching themselves go down???????????????????????????????????????

    repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 02:01, by JAMES KUOI STEPHEN

    Calivation of the field was most success praise to our Southern Sudanese struggled.South Sudan governmetn was in the systemic of SPLM,Oppoistion party should not used USA as the sysmbolism for compaign of democratic.Relation is any interests,if oil production had been block.Ihope governmentof South Sudan should not be submissive to include some wrong foreign policeies as the most objective to rule

    repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 02:13, by JAMES KUOI STEPHEN

    South Sudan should leave whoever want him to go, let them go, SPLM is strong to manage himself, they had fought the war 21 years with out America!

    repondre message

  • 26 September 2012 14:22, by American Missile.

    Dear Readers.
    I thought America could not talk about Democratic principles while Khartoum is still bombing our territorial,refusing to any agreement.
    However,its time to first establish South Sudan into stability,therefore,the Country will uphold the democratic principles.
    SPLM POLITICAL ACTIVIST
    Majok Akotdti.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


National unity: a project for each and every South Sudanese 2013-05-21 14:23:01 By Jacob K. Lupai May 21, 2013 - South Sudan has just attained independence from an imposed unity that had failed miserably to take into account the objective realities on the ground. In the old (...)

Unity and reconciliation necessary for sustainable peace in Darfur 2013-05-21 14:19:47 By Adeeb Yousif May 20, 2013 -The biggest challenge in the Darfur conflict today is divisions. These divisions have created misunderstanding and mistrust within Darfurian society. Moreover they (...)

The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Sudan: Anatomy of a Conflict—New Report from Harvard Humanitarian Initiative 2013-05-22 00:46:46 Harvard Researchers Publish Satellite Imagery-Based History of Conflict in Sudan 2000+ Civilian Structures Appear Intentionally Destroyed; Humanitarian Agencies Targeted May 21, 2013 (...)

Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.