Home | News    Sunday 23 September 2012

African Union calls for "comprehensive" deal between Sudan and S. Sudan

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

September 23, 2012 (JUBA) - The African Union Commission and the United Nations on Saturday said both Sudan and South Sudan needed to reach a comprehensive deal, as their leaders meet on Sunday, to resolve all outstanding post-session issues between the two.

JPEG - 10.3 kb

South Sudan President, Salva Kiir and his Sudanese counterpart, Omar al Bashir are due to meet on Sunday in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa at a summit that seeks to wrap up talks on a series of outstanding matters.

Jean Ping, the AU Commission chairperson, in a statement, encouraged both presidents to take advantage of this unique opportunity to reach agreement on their shared border, disputed areas, oil transportation costs, citizenship and other issues pertaining to South Sudan’s independence last year.

The UN Security Council gave 22 September as the final deadline for the two sides to reach a comprehensive agreement and under resolution 2046 could impose sanctions on both sides should today’s meeting fail to deliver a significant outcome.

In October 2009, the African Union’s Peace and Security Council (PSC) established the AU High-Level Implementation Panel (AUHIP), chaired by former South African President Thabo Mbeki and including former Presidents Abdulsalami Abubakar of Nigeria and Pierre Buyoya of Burundi to mediate between Juba and Khartoum.

“This has represented an unprecedented degree of African engagement and assistance at the highest level,” Ping notes in the statement.

JPEG - 27.3 kb

The AU, he said, has always recognized that the crisis affecting Sudan and South Sudan is an “African crisis”, and the continent has an obligation to assist the two states achieve a lasting solution.

Ping, however, noted that throughout its engagement, the AU, notably through the AUHIP, has maintained the view that solutions to the challenges at hand lie with the Sudanese people themselves.

The AU, in the aftermath of intense border fighting between the two countries, issued a strong communiqué and roadmap in April, in a attempt to encotage enabled the two parties to return to the negotiating table and overcome the challenges facing their relationship.

“As the deadline specified by the PSC Roadmap and endorsed by United Nations Security Council resolution 2046 (2012) approaches, the AU is fully aware that difficult decisions must be made by both sides to finalise negotiations on their post secession relations,” Ping’s statement reads in part.

The AU, its commission chairperson added, calls for a strong sense of national leadership, saying decisions made on issues of profound significance to citizens and governments are undoubtedly difficult and can involve “painful” choices.

He however said the AU, recognizing the value of long?term imperative of building two viable states and maintaining the close relationships between the peoples of Sudan and South Sudan, remains confident that the leaders will “rise to the occasion and leave a legacy of peace for generations to come.”

Meanwhile, Ban Ki-Moon, UN Secretary-General said he was encouraged by the significant narrowing of differences between the Governments of Sudan and South Sudan on a range of outstanding issues and strongly urges them to conclude a comprehensive deal during the Presidential summit in Addis Ababa on 23 September.

Ki-Moon, in a statement issued on the eve of today’s summit, also congratulated the negotiating teams of the two parties for what they have achieved so far, but urged presidents of the two countries to take responsibility for the resolution of their remaining differences, so that their summit concludes with a success.

The commitment, he said, will “mark an end to the era of conflict and ushers in a new era of peace, cooperation and mutual development for the two countries and their people.”

The UN Secretary General also the AUHIP for its continued able leadership in facilitating and mediating the talks between the two parties, and thanked the special envoy for his support to that effort.

(ST)

JPEG - 19.6 kb
Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 23 September 2012 14:21, by Mapuor

    South Sudan is ready to take difficult decisions and make painful choice provided that that does not compromise the liv3lihoods of communities at the border.Lets say Panthou(Heglig) is part of Awet clan of Panaru should not be compromised.Mile 14 which is Dinka Malual land should not be compromised as those areas are the only source of livelihoods to those Dinka communities.Abiei is 50/50

    repondre message

    • 23 September 2012 15:08, by panchol

      Mapour.
      South Sudanese will not leave an inch of its land to this Arab.
      NCP will not get peace @ all unless what South Sudanese people want is met.

      repondre message

      • 24 September 2012 08:36, by Paul Ongee

        Omer Hassan Al-Bashir should note that he is given this last chance to recognize “Mile 14” and accept the map drawn by AU is entirely based on historical facts not land grabbing by Khartoum because the area has huge oil reserve or natural resources. Buffer zone has to be operationalized not only for recognition of the two different countries but also for practical demarcation of the border...

        repondre message

        • 24 September 2012 08:37, by Paul Ongee

          ...confirm that the two nations are really separate entities.
          A country without a demarcated border is not a country but a “time bomb” for future conflict. Media should not be biased when reporting security concern of one country leaving the other as if militia groups supported by Khartoum are not threats to South Sudan security. The word SPLM and SPLM-N should not be confused by media reporting.

          repondre message

          • 24 September 2012 08:38, by Paul Ongee

            Had Khartoum not dragged its feet to get CPA implemented fully and timely, we would not have today what is so-called “outstanding issues or SPLM-N”. Sudan would have been transformed democratically during the past six years of interim period without wasting resources today shuttling to Addis Ababa to discuss, negotiate, agree, disagree, and sign agreements over agreements under regional or ...

            repondre message

            • 24 September 2012 08:39, by Paul Ongee

              ..international pressure.
              Why do we want regional or international pressure while the facts or resolutions are evident? Who is fooling who here? Who is really serious about peace and who is playing game here and for what reasons? The world needs to wake up. Peace, justice, freedom, security, development and prosperity cannot be held hostage by one rogue regime in Khartoum who came to power ...

              repondre message

              • 24 September 2012 08:41, by Paul Ongee

                through coup and listen only through coup d’état not conventional wisdom.

                repondre message

                • 24 September 2012 08:42, by Paul Ongee

                  Ya Whortti Bor Manza & Jalaby,
                  It’s Jalaby who is insulting the rightful owners of Abyei. It’s you and your Islamists in Khartoum wasting time. Abyei will never be part of Sudan. Believe me or not. Mark my word and record it for history purpose for the next generation of Sudanese Islamists. When Abyei was transferred to South Kordofan in 1905, did you consult with historians that Messeriya were

                  repondre message

                  • 24 September 2012 08:42, by Paul Ongee

                    living in Abyei or moving to Abyei seasonally to graze their cattle?
                    The AU mediation effort cannot even force Messeriya tribes to be “residents” or “other residents” as stipulated in the CPA when it comes to voting in the Abyei Referendum. Messeriya has already lost the chance of being “other residents” by refusing to live in Abyei permanently since 1905 instead of seasonal migration for pasture

                    repondre message

                    • 24 September 2012 08:43, by Paul Ongee

                      ...This is the area where mediation fails to address despite the granted full rights to graze their cattle.

                      repondre message

Comment on this article



The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


A conspiracy or cover-up for war criminals in Sudan and South Sudan? 2019-10-23 11:15:27 By Roger Alfred Yoron Modi I have to start by alerting the reader that this is my personal story and a story of my father Alfred Yoron Modi (http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?iframe&page=imprimabl

Is lack of ‘political will’ an incurable disease in South Sudan? 2019-10-22 11:53:57 By James Gatdet Dak Lampuar October 21, 2019 – Without political will, commitment and trust among leaders in South Sudan, achieving peace and stability will painfully remain an illusion for a (...)

UNSC, Machar and Lam Akol visits to Juba: Will peace come? 2019-10-21 11:56:29 By James Okuk The coming of the members of UN Security Council to Juba with arrival of Dr Riek Machar and Dr Lam Akolto engage in high-level meetings on evaluation of the status of (...)


MORE






Latest Press Releases


S. Korea supports UN communities building resilience project in Sudan’s Blue Nile 2019-09-09 09:26:41 UNDP Sudan September 5, 2019 (KHARTOUM) - An agreement was signed on 5th of September between the Korean Ambassador, His Excellency. Lee Ki-Seong and Dr. Selva Ramachandran, Resident (...)

Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders back calls for civil rule 2019-04-26 10:22:06 Press statement by 55 Sudanese lawyers and Human rights defenders on Sudan Sit-in and Peaceful Protest Khartoum -24/04/2019 We, the undersigned (55) Sudanese lawyers and human rights defenders, (...)

South Sudan’s Lafon youth condemn killings of civilians by Pari community 2019-04-03 21:54:29 Press Statement on the Fighting between Pari/ Pacidi and Lotuko/Lokiri on 24/3/2019 Release by The Lafon County Youth Union: We, the Lafon County Youth Union hereby condemn the atrocities and (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2019 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.