Home | News    Saturday 8 September 2012

Sudan rejects U.S. accusations of impeding establishment of buffer zone

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

September 7, 2012 (KHARTOUM) — Sudan strongly rejected statements by U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations accusing Khartoum of dragging its feet in the talks over establishment of a buffer zone on common border with South Sudan.

JPEG - 56.8 kb
Rahmat-Allah Mohamed Osman (SUNA)

Ambassador Susan Rice on Thursday condemned Sudan’s continued refusal to a map proposed by the African Union mediation to establish a buffer zone adding such attitude "risks the resumption of outright conflict."

Commenting on Rice’s remarks, Undersecretary of the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, Rahmat-Allah Mohamed Osman, said what she had said reflects its bad intentions towards Khartoum.

"It would have been better for her to wait for the outcome of negotiations," he added.

Osman went further to accuse the mediation of backing South Sudanese position on the area Mile 14.

Sudan keeps refusing to make any concession over the issue of Mile 14 which is located on the border between East Darfur and Western Bahr El-Ghazal. Khartoum says Juba has no right to make any claim over this grazing land.

Also President Omer Al-Bashir last June accused "some conspirators" in the African Union of hiding Sudan’s letter of objection to this map in November 2011 and falsifying its will in a report they sent to the UN Security Council.

The issue seemingly would hamper all the process as Khartoum makes an agreement over security issues a perquisite to the implementation of any deal reached with Juba.

International community believes that pressures on Khartoum can push it to change its mind and accept to operationalise the demilitarized zone with the proposed map. But the negotiating team is also under huge pressures in Khartoum from the tribes of disputed areas and the hardliners of the ruling National Congress Party.

Last week, the members of the negotiating team were accused of ignorance and advised by the Arab tribes of consult them before to conclude any deal over the disputed areas with the South Sudan.

Abdella Masar, a leading Rizziggat figure said the South Sudanese negotiators who are from the disputed areas, have fooled their Sudanese counterparts in the past and advised them to not repeat such errors.

South Sudanese delegation to the talks said Bashir suggested to Salva Kiir to during their last meeting on the sidelines of the African Union summit to hold direct talks and to disregard the position of the mediation over this map.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 8 September 2012 09:45, by Mapuor

    Mile 14 is 100% a Dinka land.When Dinka population was displace by Arab nomads in 1979 Arabs considered it as what they took by force from weak Dinkas who did not possess fir arms.Now the owners ofd that land are armed to the teeth and would be impossible for nomads to come there without their cooperation.1956 borders are clear only that Khartoum still think they are powerfull and can loot

    repondre message

    • 8 September 2012 09:51, by zulu

      what is going to change when you shift the goal post to appeace your position? We are revising all the documents line by line and you will be disappointed to realize that we are not fools to be signatories to deceptive agreements. We have expert opinion to analyse the border issue and we cannot accept to be unsympathetic to realities in sudan towards our fellow african kins from darfur and nuba mt

      repondre message

  • 8 September 2012 09:50, by wang

    USA should distance herself from this terrorist State. After dateline, SPLA will deal with them.

    repondre message

    • 8 September 2012 10:14, by master

      splm could’t deal with yau yau how to deal with saf
      spla soldier are hungery and looting their own people to feed them self ahahaha

      repondre message

  • 8 September 2012 10:56, by hellonearth

    THATS WHAT IT MEANS TO HAVE CONCESSIONS UNDERSECRETARY. WE ACCEPTED TO PAY MUCH MORE TO TRANSPORT OUR OIL. YOU SHOULD DO THE SAME NOT DRAG YOUR COLD FEET.

    repondre message

  • 8 September 2012 11:18, by master

    Rice try to solve the plight which ss put it self on it
    this not our problem

    repondre message

    • 8 September 2012 11:56, by Robot

      Morons,
      this shows how misinformed you are nincompoops, sound minded Sudanese would take this statement seriously, first get the point right and its impact later instead of jumping into immature comment.. USA had already warned you that you bare taking unnecessary risk by not accepting the proposed map... where do you think will the risk come from??.

      repondre message

      • 8 September 2012 16:15, by Sudani+

        Robot,
        1-it seems that you are a real robot! ur IQ chip was not up to the level of understanding ss situation and the surrounding environment
        2-what you are saying prooves that u r a big nincompoo and simpleton
        3-I hope soon u will appreciate why SPLM and SS offcials are labled as "punch of idiots" and "rotten to core"
        4-M. ALi has said it: our conditions are clear and simple "secutiry first"

        repondre message

  • 8 September 2012 12:03, by NO PEACE

    To rejects is better to accepts because your are going to see what will happen to you guys.

    repondre message

    • 8 September 2012 15:49, by mohammed ali

      No peace, certainly we do sse and want to see.Vision is very important to humans. Your problem is that : you donnot see! After Heglig I thougt you had have some capabilis to see!

      repondre message

  • 9 September 2012 11:29, by Ayman fadul

    ds whole lot of ordeal is due 2 de stupidity of dos Islamists,these issues of demarcation should had been settled way before referendum, zey were counting on procrastinating the referendum over the issues of demarcation!
    and now everything had gone nasty shit!
    u think they are the one who runs the border negotiations!!
    u r absolutely wrong if u thought so!
    its all in hands of border tribes

    repondre message

  • 9 September 2012 21:58, by ViVa Sudan

    I appreciate comments of Master & Sudani & down to hell Traitor AYman Fadul with ur masters the punch of ideiots insects Salva & Agar , yaser Arman Bagaan.. Dinak were Haramya & still & they will be 14 kilo is not & never will be ur land coz it wasn’t so Idiots & if u think u can deal with SAF u are so welcome cowards we are always ready to kik u any time.

    repondre message

    • 9 September 2012 22:26, by sudani ana

      Viva Sudan
      That’s the spirit bro. That’s what am talking about.

      repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.


Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


Alex de Waal: the rebirth of a principled activist? 2013-06-20 03:33:50 By Monim El-Jak June 19, 2013 - Whenever Alex de Waal publishes analysis or reflections, Sudanese intellectuals and activists, and the concerned international institutions and individuals, give (...)

On Abyei enough is enough 2013-06-18 05:01:47 By Deng Vanang June 17, 2013 - No one whether locally or internationally can still argue there is more hope to resolve Abyei stalemate peacefully. It has been everybody’s wish that dialogue could (...)

The arming of rebels in Sudan and South Sudan: what is the evidence? 2013-06-18 04:57:44 By Eric Reeves 17 June 2013 - News reporting in general, a great deal of analytic writing, and virtually all diplomatic pronouncements about military support for rebel groups—in South Sudan and (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Nuer Youth and Prophet Ngundeng’s Historical Society call for unity in South Sudan 2013-06-14 05:40:43 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Leadership of Nuer Youth and Ngundeng’s Historical Society, Juba, South Sudan June 12, 2013 - Due to the announcement made by President Bashir to abrogate the September, (...)

South Sudanese lawyers call for the respect of the rule of law and human rights 2013-06-14 01:01:36 South Sudan Law Society (SSLS) 7 June 2013 Lawyers in the Republic of South Sudan call for advocacy for the supremacy of the respect of the rule of Law, Human Rights in South Sudan South Sudan (...)

South Sudan civil society alliance ask to meet the president 2013-06-12 05:23:59 South Sudan Civil Society Alliance National Issues Discussed with the Presidential Legal Advisor and Appeal to meet the President June 7, 2013 Ladies and gentlemen of the press, today the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.