Home | News    Monday 27 August 2012

US diplomat criticised for saying "change" in Sudan may improve relations

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

August 27, 2012 (KHARTOUM) — Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party (NCP) strongly reacted to statements by the US chargé d’affaires for saying “political change" would help to improve bilateral relations between Khartoum and Washington.

JPEG - 23.5 kb
Joseph D. Stafford (photo State Department)

Joseph D. Stafford, head of the US embassy in Sudan was engulfed in criticism on Sunday by the ruling National Congress Party for stating that a political change in Khartoum might facilitate the normalisation process of bilateral relations with Khartoum.

The American diplomat was speaking in an interview with the Arabic language Al-Sudani newspaper where he was keen to say that Washington could not impose a certain government on the Sudanese people and respects its decisions taken through the ballot box.

However, NCP spokesperson Badr El-Din Ahmed Ibrahim rejected Stafford’s statements and recalled that bilateral relations between Khartoum and Washington are governed by the UN charter and international laws.

"If (the United States of) America is not interested to establish a dialogue with the Sudanese government until its change, so America should wait and conduct a dialogue with the next government," he emphasised .

The NCP official went further to say that Washington has effectively sought, "as it is proven by reports about its support to different organisations and groups," to raise domestic unrest and disturbances.

"And this means clearly that the U.S. government is against the will of the Sudanese people, who elected this government" he added.

Badr El-Din was alluding to recent reports about the funding of Sudanese civil society groups by a foundation close to the US Department of State.

Sudan witnessed during June and July limited protests but the government accused "foreign hands" and rebel groups of manipulating youth and students to organise protests following the removal of oil subsidies.

Sudan also accuses the United Sates of maintaining unjust sanctions against the country despite the different pledges made in the past.

In his interview the chargé d’affaires was keen to highlight his government’s keenness for dialogue with Khartoum to improve the strained relations.

Strafford also admitted the impact of activists and lobby groups but added that the US administration takes its decision according to the national interests.

Earlier this month US special envoy Princeton Lyman called on the Sudanese government to resume talks on bilateral talks. But Sudanese presidential assistant Nafie Ali Nafie said Washington is only interested to discuss its concerns and dors not pay any attention to Sudan’s interests.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 27 August 2012 14:11, by Jalaby

    I think Mr. Joseph D. Stafford is one of the hawks group that resist any kind of close relation between US and Sudan, I think Mr. Stafford is swimming against the current now and doesn’t like the fact that the distance between Khartoum & Washington is getting closer, President Obama needs to replace him with a person who can contribute positively such as Mr. Scott Gration!

    repondre message

    • 27 August 2012 14:58, by homeboy

      Let me rephrase that Mr Stafford resist any kind of close relation between the US and the NCP.wise man. :)

      repondre message

    • 27 August 2012 18:40, by panchol

      I welcome the decision aired out by Mr. Joseph D. Stafford, that political change in regime khartoum will bring bilateral relation between two Sudan and indeed to all Africa region.

      repondre message

    • 28 August 2012 00:45, by mohamed mahgoub

      He is only excuting his boss’ policy the hawks u scared r in the congress remember I told u the US is only concern about their friends & human right they can’t work in ur criminal govnt side once they done with all the post seperation issues u will done this is the only reasons Albashir in power

      repondre message

  • 27 August 2012 14:31, by Akolde Nhiak Jinub

    Look at this maroon called Jalaby. I don’t think US will bring back ur fake S. Gration. He was such a useless fellow who didn’t see reality of Sudan’s situation. He was threatened to keep off talking of atrocities being committed by NCP of North Sudan. NCP is killing its own pple in Darfur, S. Kordofan, S. Blue Nile, E. Sudan n within Khartoum with oppressive NISS laws. What else would u col this?

    repondre message

    • 27 August 2012 16:21, by Paul Ongee

      Joseph D. Stafford
      The NCP spokesperson Badr El-Din Ahmed Ibrahim says quote “"If U.S is not interested to establish a dialogue with the Sudanese government until its change, so America should wait and conduct a dialogue with the next government,"

      repondre message

      • 27 August 2012 16:22, by Paul Ongee

        In this case, you need to wait until 2015 when NCP will probably be voted out in the next round of general elections. Khartoum believes that the current economic embargo including the loss of 75% of oil revenue to South Sudan supposed to normalize relations between the two countries without demanding political change in Khartoum.

        repondre message

        • 27 August 2012 16:23, by Paul Ongee

          Instead of saying NCP does not accept this demand Badr El Din Ahmed says political change in Khartoum is not in the interest of the Sudanese people whom NCP teargases in Mosques or on streets, arrests, tortures, jails and rapes at its disposal.

          repondre message

          • 27 August 2012 16:24, by Paul Ongee

            Unlike resolving security issue first along the disputed border areas between North and South Sudan, Washington does not deserve to call for political change in Khartoum as a precondition to normalize relationship before 2015.

            repondre message

          • 27 August 2012 16:26, by Paul Ongee

            Unlike resolving security issue first along the disputed border areas between North and South Sudan, Washington does not deserve to call for political change in Khartoum as a precondition to normalize relationship before 2015.

            repondre message

  • 27 August 2012 15:31, by thok chuni yok

    To have relation with, it will be like what we are in.

    repondre message

  • 27 August 2012 22:05, by ViVa Sudan

    With no Respect to Southeners why are u poking ur nose to Sudan Matters. u are not Sudanese & we are free to have any kind of relation with any one but you Ediots its Relation b/t us & America or may be u dreamed you are American hahaha
    DINKA lost in Vain Haramya...

    repondre message

  • 27 August 2012 23:19, by Born-to-Rule

    The US diplomat have the right to criticize the buffoons in Khartoum. Those illiterates leaders of Islamic who are blinded by their stupid religion and by their child molester Mohammed. Ali would have been a better prophet for Islamic religion but they murdered him before he was to become one of the Islamic leader. Mohammed was a bad seed to the core!.

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


National unity: a project for each and every South Sudanese 2013-05-21 14:23:01 By Jacob K. Lupai May 21, 2013 - South Sudan has just attained independence from an imposed unity that had failed miserably to take into account the objective realities on the ground. In the old (...)

Unity and reconciliation necessary for sustainable peace in Darfur 2013-05-21 14:19:47 By Adeeb Yousif May 20, 2013 -The biggest challenge in the Darfur conflict today is divisions. These divisions have created misunderstanding and mistrust within Darfurian society. Moreover they (...)

The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.