Home | News    Friday 24 August 2012

Sudan regrets partial wording of UNSC’s draft presidential statement on unresolved issues

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

August 23, 2012 (KHARTOUM) — Sudan’s Ambassador to the United Nations said he regrets part of the wording of a Security Council draft presidential statement prepared by the United States Mission to the UN on the ongoing talks between Khartoum and Juba over the unresolved issues relating to South Sudan’s independence.

JPEG - 26.2 kb
Sudan’s Permanent Envoy to the UN, Ambassador Dafa’a Allah Alhag Ali Osman, speaks to the media in New York at the U.N. headquarters (file/Reuters)

Ambassador, Daffa-Alla Elhag Ali Osman, Permanent Representative of Sudan to the United Nations was commenting a draft of presidential statements circulated by the US Ambassador Susan Rice since a consultation meeting on the outstanding issues on 9 August.

The draft welcomed the oil transportation fees deal reached on 3 August but condemned Khartoum’s reluctance to accept a map proposed by the mediation team to establish a buffer zone on the border between countries.

It also urges the Sudanese government and the rebel Sudan People’s Liberation Movement – North (SPLM-N) to resume talks without preconditions.

Daffa-Alla said some paragraphs of the draft presidential statement lacks objectivity citing the criticism of Sudan’s rejection to the map of the buffer zone prepared by the mediation. He further underlined in statements released by Sudan’s official news agency SUNA, that the draft at the same time praises South Sudan acceptance of the map.

Sudan continues to reject the operationalisation of the buffer zone because the proposed map includes a territory, Mile 14, which Sudan refuses to consider as disputed area as Juba claims.

Also, the implementation of the oil deal, reached earlier this month, depends on the signing of a deal to implement the security arrangements the two countries sealed since November 2011.

Daffa-Alla said that they contacted different states members of the UN Security Council, like Russia, China, Azerbaijan, India and Pakistan to explain that the American draft statement was unbalanced.

He added that the position of these countries led to a delay in the presidential statement as consultations are still ongoing to improve the language of the draft and to make it balanced.

The Sudanese diplomat said the French ambassador who chairs the Security Council this month told him that there is no need for a presidential statement at this stage preferring to wait for the outcome of talks, which are due to resume within days.

The French ambassador stressed during a meeting held Thursday on the need to encourage the two parties to reach satisfactory agreements, according to Daffa-Allah.

On Tuesday, US special envoy for the two countries, Princeton Lyman, urged Sudan to accept the map stressing that establishment of a demilitarised zone will allow oil exportation for the benefit of the two countries and create a conducive environment to resolve the remaining issues.

The Security Council held Thursday a bimonthly consultation on the talks between Sudan and South Sudan as provided in its resolution 2046.

Edmond Mulet, Assistant-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations, told the meeting that there had been little developments since the suspension of the talks earlier this month. He also said the process would resume on 30 August.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 24 August 2012 08:36, by Anti-traitors!

    Shut up fake arab! Your dirty tactic of feet dragging is known world wide. And your government deserves more than just condemnation from USA and allies. So, stop making unnecessary noises for no reason at all. No peace until we got what rightly belong to us ’Southerners’.

    repondre message

    • 24 August 2012 08:48, by Robot

      I think South Sudan should black list some of the countries who doesn’t want to see the progress of the people of South Sudan.

      repondre message

  • 24 August 2012 08:51, by Gatkuoth

    it is clear that you refused the map, what are you denying about it? The UNSC must apply sanction on Sudan, beacuse they are not abided by the time-frame of the UNSC resolution. Failure of the sanction and subsequent obliteration of the talk will lead us to occupy our land (Abyei and Panthou) and God shall give us the victory over the evil and liar neighbor. South Sudan Oyee, SPLA oyee!!

    repondre message

  • 24 August 2012 09:34, by malieng

    Let us at this time presents our complains of the whole Sudan and Abyei if world knows the truth, and I urge our representive to UNSC to reponse to Daffa Allah’s complain. I also want our government together pple of Abyei to raise complain that the referendum will be conducted by language of the pple in the area not Arabic or English since pple have their own language in that area.

    repondre message

    • 24 August 2012 16:25, by panchol

      Son of beech, your complaint will be heard by your geng of terrorists NCP but not all over the word. please Junubin are not Junubin of that time. See when we captured Panthou, our country was not even organised to have regional Ambassadors that represent us abroad. peace will not prevail unless border between us is demarcation. To whom are you complaining???? Ask your father Bashir to untie it.

      repondre message

  • 24 August 2012 10:09, by North Sudan

    Sudantribune .. why don’t u tell these people how bad their gov is?
    American expelled from South Sudan for anti-corruption work
    Stay Connected
    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/08/20/162893/american-expelled-from-south-sudan.html#storylink=cpy

    repondre message

    • 24 August 2012 10:29, by Nibs

      N.sudan,
      your ignorance is not funny,how good is your gov’t then?in your nitwit reasoning,this is how good it is:it a country lead by int’l criminals(bashit,def minister and SK governor),it has awful record of genocide in darfur and much more felonies.LOL!it is a "good" gov’t.

      repondre message

    • 24 August 2012 15:48, by panchol

      North Sudan
      we’re claiming our land according to 1/1/1956 border, if not we would have claimed the whole Sudan the land of Cush, otherwise you would have gone back to Middle East where you came from as traders.
      Land belongs to us and we deserved that name to be called Sudanese. who are????? just Arab jahalins.

      repondre message

  • 24 August 2012 10:35, by Reuben

    South sudan UN ambassador should also contact those countries who are members of UNSC immediately and explain things to them rather than sit there not doing her work.We must be louder than Khartoum.

    repondre message

  • 24 August 2012 10:36, by thok chuni yok

    North sudan! are you in south sudan or your in North sudan?
    If are in south sudan how do you look the development in the south [JUBA CITY]OR If you are really in the North sudaun please come and see the development in the south.

    repondre message

  • 24 August 2012 10:53, by Tutbol

    Our world will at least be better if there is a reform to 5 UN so-called permanent members. They’re to champion for peace, but rather the agents of neo-colonialism and bullyings. Africans leaders always listen to these devils. Last term, it was the UK the shared club and manage to do their world agenda and now is France to get their share of the pie. Fools from these P5+1 believe they’re gods.

    repondre message

    • 24 August 2012 15:49, by Paul Ongee

      UNSC and International Community need to learn how to say “No” to Sudan. The language of the Security Council’s draft presidential statement is absolutely impartial. The reason why Dafalla Elhag argues that it’s partial is because Sudan “internally” does not recognize South Sudan as a separate entity. Believe me or not.

      repondre message

      • 24 August 2012 15:54, by Paul Ongee

        ..Sudan does not believe in the Mile14 because it will practically translate into North-South border demarcation. Buffer zone means there are two different countries in practical terms. It means the borders between North Sudan and South Sudan are automatically demarcated and which would contradict his promise that the two countries will be shortly reunited after July 9th, 2011. Don’t ask why/how.

        repondre message

        • 24 August 2012 15:54, by Paul Ongee

          ..Omer Bashir often plays his card and reminds his Islamist critics that he can reunite the country militarily or by any means before the end of his term in 2015. He knows how to use delay tactics and how to destabilize south Sudan and get Southerners confused and later turn to Khartoum for unity.

          repondre message

          • 24 August 2012 15:56, by Paul Ongee

            Last year after referendum vote, he asked the Islamist critics in one of NCP’s meetings that did you not realize how I played delay tactics until CPA was signed in 2005 instead of 2003 or early 2004? He keeps saying that it was American pressure that brought CPA which was not and will not be in the interest of Khartoum.

            repondre message

            • 24 August 2012 15:57, by Paul Ongee

              So Sudan is simply asking some key players at the UNSC why would they allow again USA to prepare UNSC’s draft presidential statement.
              This is the reality and the typical thinking of Khartoum. Do you know why UNSC dateline on August 2nd didn’t work?

              repondre message

              • 24 August 2012 15:58, by Paul Ongee

                ..Because Khartoum believes that it can play delay tactics, introduce/add something irrelevant into agenda or set preconditions at its disposal so long as some members of UNSC stand behind him.

                repondre message

                • 24 August 2012 15:59, by Paul Ongee

                  The UNSC and international community need to learn how to say “NO” to Khartoum once and for all if they want things get solved peacefully and timely. Otherwise, South Sudan would not be blamed. The timeframe of CPA was repeatedly studied that however/whatever delay happened, its implementation would be completed on time. But Khartoum said that is yours though.

                  repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


National unity: a project for each and every South Sudanese 2013-05-21 14:23:01 By Jacob K. Lupai May 21, 2013 - South Sudan has just attained independence from an imposed unity that had failed miserably to take into account the objective realities on the ground. In the old (...)

Unity and reconciliation necessary for sustainable peace in Darfur 2013-05-21 14:19:47 By Adeeb Yousif May 20, 2013 -The biggest challenge in the Darfur conflict today is divisions. These divisions have created misunderstanding and mistrust within Darfurian society. Moreover they (...)

The Invasion of Abyei: two years of more agony 2013-05-20 05:39:13 By Luka Biong Deng May 19, 2013 - On 21st May 2013, the people of Abyei have spent two years of more agony and they will remember again the sad memories of how their lives and livelihoods were (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.