Home | News    Thursday 9 August 2012

Sudan ruling party reiterate its demand for security before oil exportation

separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation

August 8, 2012 (KHARTOUM) - Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party reiterated that oil deal with South Sudan cannot be implemented without a comprehensive agreement over the remaining unresolved issues, particularly the security matters.

JPEG - 18.9 kb
A South Sudanese soldier walks past a crude oil reservoir tank at a field processing facility in Unity State on November 10, 2010. (Getty)

The NCP leadership held a meeting chaired by its deputy chairman and presidential assistant Nafie Ali Nafie and attended by First Vice President Ali Osman Taha to discuss the oil deal reached last week with Juba in the African Union mediated talks on the outstanding issues.

Wednesday’s high level meeting was briefed by Sudan’s top negotiator Idris Mohamad Abdel-Gadir, about the details of the oil transportations fees deal and the progress made over the remaining pending matters.

Speaking to the media after the meeting, NCP spokesperson Badr-Eldin Ahmed Ibrahim said foreign pressures forced South Sudanese government to the oil deal. He further said that oil transit through the Sudanese pipelines would start only after an agreement over the implementation of security arrangements.

"If the South Sudanese government is keen to export its oil production though the Sudanese pipelines, the security file should be integrally resolved including the disengagement with the northern sector (SPLM-N), the expulsion of the armed movements, the withdrawal of the ninth and tenth (SPLM) divisions (from South Kordofan and Blue Nile) and the demarcation of the border", he said.

The official did not raise Sudan’s refusal to operationalise a twenty-kilometre demilitarised zone on the common border because the mediation included a territory Khartoum refuses to consider it as disputed area.

South Sudan ruling party, SPLM, denies harbouring or supporting Sudanese rebel groups from Darfur, Blue Nile or South Kordofan. But it admits some sympathy and solidarity with its former members in Sudan. Juba also says it broke its links with the fighters of SPLM-North since its independence, but Khartoum keeps accusing Juba of supporting them.

Badr-Eldin expected that the resolution of security matters will impact positively the political settlement of the conflict in South Kordofan and Blue Nile.

He said that Khartoum always called on Juba to distance itself from the rebel groups but it only responded to international pressures. He added that the "circumstances" forced Juba to reach an agreement on oil issues but this was not "its natural will".
The NCP official was alluding to the different attempts carried by South Sudanese government to build borrow money from foreign investors and countries to fund its expenditures and construction of a new pipeline through Kenya during the past months.

He however pointed out that the reached deal gives some positive signs on the upcoming talks.

"As long as the South Sudan agreed to the continuation of oil (exportation through the Sudan) this implicitly means they acknowledge the error they committed when they decided to stop it", he said.

He went further to say that "their approval of the (oil) agreement means they accept security arrangements and we expect to resolve all the issues and reach a political settlement after the Eid al-Fitr", he pointed out.

Sudan and South Sudan transportation fees deal provides Juba will pay Khartoum $11 per barrel for the crude produced in Unity state and $9.10 for the oil of Upper Nile state. But this exceptional rates will only last for three and a half year.

Another agreement can be reached if Juba intends to continue exporting its production through the Sudanese territory.

Pagan Amum, South Sudan top negotiator, announced last week that Juba "has already decided to construct an alternative pipeline, which will be up and running by then."

The different feasibility studies about the funding of a new pipeline have shown that it would not be profitable for investors. But such decision can be politically motivated, analysts say.

(ST)

Comments on the Sudan Tribune website must abide by the following rules. Contravention of these rules will lead to the user losing their Sudan Tribune account with immediate effect.

- No inciting violence
- No inappropriate or offensive language
- No racism, tribalism or sectarianism
- No inappropriate or derogatory remarks
- No deviation from the topic of the article
- No advertising, spamming or links
- No incomprehensible comments

Due to the unprecedented amount of racist and offensive language on the site, Sudan Tribune tries to vet all comments on the site.

There is now also a limit of 400 words per comment. If you want to express yourself in more detail than this allows, please e-mail your comment as an article to comment@sudantribune.com

Kind regards,

The Sudan Tribune editorial team.
  • 9 August 2012 09:39, by Ayom Dor

    Greedy NCP!! you want more compromises besides the 3.5 billions USD helps that South are providing you..quite shames!!

    repondre message

    • 9 August 2012 09:55, by Gatkuoth

      "As long as the South Sudan agreed to the continuation of oil (exportation through the Sudan) this implicitly means they acknowledge the error they committed when they decided to stop it", he said. Which error, could you please talk like a mature politician.. I am very much concern with the lies of Arab. Precisely we shut down the oil because you passed a alaw that took 32 dollars per barrel

      repondre message

      • 9 August 2012 09:56, by Gatkuoth

        Unilaterally. We have agreed to transport it through Sudan because you have conceded the claim which we rejected. Whom are you cheating, are the Sudanese or the world not aware of the process of shut down... liars neighbour, I don’t know whether it is islam that encourages lies or culture.

        repondre message

        • 9 August 2012 10:28, by zulu

          Gatkwoth,
          Indeed, the NCP should just tell frankly its cadres that south sudan did not voluntarily agree to ship its oil north. It was under extreme dures. That being the case, no security agreement will come easily as they refuse the border line mediated. I think, we are assured today that the SPLA will defend its territory against any agreesion. so is our sympathy with the rebels.

          repondre message

        • 9 August 2012 10:31, by ABDALLA BIN ABDALLA

          Gatkwoth,
          Indeed, the NCP should just tell frankly its cadres that south sudan did not voluntarily agree to ship its oil north. It was under extreme dures. That being the case, no security agreement will come easily as they refuse the border line mediated. I think, we are assured today that the SPLA will defend its territory against any agreesion. so is our sympathy with the rebels

          repondre message

        • 9 August 2012 11:47, by Sudani+

          cont..
          Gat,
          4- the gov of SS has turned a blind eye to these invoices and never respond whether they accept or reject or said any thing about the issue"they are professional thieves".
          5- that means for 6 month SS gov has paid nothing to Sudan
          6- based on that, Sudan informed SS we are going to take the fees in kind "it is our right or you want to transport ss oil for free?"
          7- then...
          con..

          repondre message

        • 9 August 2012 12:09, by Sudani+

          Gat
          .cont.
          11- after SS was defeated in Heglig, and given the immense economic pressure that it faces, they start to regain they consciousness, and start to negotiate genuinely
          12- the international pressure has added to that economic pressure and resulted in the current oil deal
          13- since this oil deal is part of the implementation of the UNSC resolution 2046, it must be part of a comprehensive..

          repondre message

      • 9 August 2012 11:37, by Sudani+

        Gat,
        1- it seems that you are and idiot brain washed! like many blind followers of the SPLM
        2- since the secession of SS in July 2011, our government told SS we are going to charge you 32 USD per barrel as a fee for oil transportation
        3- from July 2011 till December 2012 our government responsible agency has been sending monthly invoice with the value based on the specified rate
        cont...

        repondre message

        • 9 August 2012 12:01, by Chanson

          @Sudani-What did you just call us? Thieves or ..else? Arab of Khartoum have stolen our oil.Everyone knows that.What did South Sudanese people steal from you anyway? I know you are always seek and find fake Arab.Shame on Nomads! Shame on movers Arabs...

          repondre message

      • 9 August 2012 11:55, by Sudani+

        Gat and SS,
        7- then ss said we are going to pay less than 1 USD, and Sudan has made it clear that we will not accept that & will continue to charge ss 32 US$ per barrel till a deal is reached & then any difference between the 32 and the agreed deal sud will pay back to SS
        8- SS gov insisted on the 1 US$ and decided to shut down the oil production "this is the big mistake"
        cont...

        repondre message

      • 9 August 2012 12:03, by Sudani+

        Gat,
        8- although it seems SS gov has shut down the oil production as a result of the 32 charges, but in reality is that "we want to bring down the government of Khartoum"
        9- it is unwise decision based on the SS gov leadership ignorance and evilness "like some one commit suicide to harm someone else"
        10- after 4 month they discovered this is not working and this has led SS to occupy Heglig

        repondre message

      • 9 August 2012 12:13, by Sudani+

        Gat
        cont..
        ...the oil deal must be part of a comprehensive agreement that addressees the root causes of the problem "security issues and the border demarcation"
        12- no it is up to the gov of SS to accept that or reject it "no oil export without agreement on security issues and border" take it or leave it!!!
        13- SS can decide not to accept that and build another pipeline to export its oil!!!

        repondre message

      • 9 August 2012 14:09, by Northern Sudanese

        Gatkuoth
        the new law is $40 p/b when you combine it all together, as caimed by machar yesterday!

        repondre message

        • 9 August 2012 15:36, by South South

          Northern Sudanese,
          Stop laughing before you see what South Sudan will do to you poor people. Also, what happen to you and NCP ? A few days ago you and your likes were saying " No oil deal with South Sudan until security arrangement is made". But you are crying to see our oil flow to your poor country without any secuirity arrangement. Waht the wicked people they are with laundry in their head!

          repondre message

    • 9 August 2012 10:32, by ABDALLA BIN ABDALLA

      "As long as the South Sudan agreed to the continuation of oil (exportation through the Sudan) this implicitly means they acknowledge the error they committed when they decided to stop it", he said. Which error, could you please talk like a mature politician.. I am very much concern with the lies of Arab. Precisely we shut down the oil because you passed a alaw that took 32 dollars per barrel

      repondre message

  • 9 August 2012 09:51, by okucu pa lotinokwan

    The NCP should put this as a remindeer to them division 9 and 10 has their protocals in the CPA 2005 asigned in Kenya,they fail to implement the two protocals for these two divisions by fighting them how come Juba has support on this since they are the one who cause all these in security they are now very worried of,Pls NCP think twice on this matter,otherwise both of us will be the looser.
    OKUC

    repondre message

  • 9 August 2012 10:07, by Mr Equal

    Here you go again. SPLM party still on the hock by NCP. There are tow option lelt for SPLM (one party rule).
    1- to abondent SPLM-N and others rebles who fought NCP with them to get oil plow through north and gain friendship with NCP.
    2-Or to keep friendship with SPLM-N and other rebles and no oil go through nornth Sudam to port Sudan.Who care??????????

    repondre message

    • 9 August 2012 10:30, by ABDALLA BIN ABDALLA

      The NCP should put this as a remindeer to them division 9 and 10 has their protocals in the CPA 2005 asigned in Kenya,they fail to implement the two protocals for these two divisions by fighting them how come Juba has support on this since they are the one who cause all these in security they are now very worried of,Pls NCP think twice on this matter,otherwise both of us will be the looser.
      OKUC

      repondre message

      • 9 August 2012 15:26, by Justin Chicago opiny

        Complete the CPA implimentation to the letter then you will not worry about the security matters.It is khartoum making it difficult as usual.Demarcate the border as per 1-1-1956 and monitor the border.The rebels SPLM-N are loitering in an undemarcated free border.The border was supposed to be marked 6 months into the CPA. khartoum is to blame for all the delays.

        repondre message

    • 9 August 2012 10:36, by ABDALLA BIN ABDALLA

      Mr. Equal
      your english is like a mother tongue. Man, check your spelling before you post your comment or stop writing at all. We do not need stupid comments from stupid guys.

      repondre message

  • 9 August 2012 10:27, by ABDALLA BIN ABDALLA

    Pull out from disputerd regions and permit referendum. Let people decide where they want to go. Even if you use force they will resist your adminstration to the last day of judgement,

    repondre message

  • 9 August 2012 10:29, by ABDALLA BIN ABDALLA

    Pull out from disputerd regions and permit referendum. Let people decide where they want to go. Even if you use force they will resist your adminstration to the last day of judgement,

    repondre message

  • 9 August 2012 11:33, by Pif Paf

    Security is the main concern. GOS has made that clear since day 1. SPLM need to prove that they are serious about peace otherwise the oil will not flow. SPLM need to stop making comments about the oil flowing in september and focus on security. SPLM also need to be quick about it because they are running out of money fast and the international community is not wiling to wait or donate.

    repondre message

    • 9 August 2012 13:54, by valentinoakec@yahoo.com

      I just wonder as to which mentality do the NCP leaders judge things, the SPLM - N. in divsions 9 and 10, are not southerners to be withdrawn back to south Sudan, please be realistic to address your problems without taking south Sudan as the scape goat for your problems, if you are not implementing the Oil deal, then it is up to you, it is eight months now without the oil flow but we are surviving

      repondre message

      • 10 August 2012 02:29, by mohamed mahgoub

        Valentino thanks either the NCP is stupid or this website is writing nonesense we don’t have division 9 or 10th any more the seperation there is only SPLA-N and SRF these fighters are nubain ,blue nilians and Darfurians ,obiviously they are sudanese and they have a case .whatever the name they choose the problem is still there .the GOSS chose keep SPLA name for its army becz it a legacy like

        repondre message

        • 10 August 2012 02:46, by mohamed mahgoub

          the Chinese army still called PLA after 60 yrs of the revlution there is something deeper than just the names (pres. Salva said sympathy) in the yrs 50s to 70s u see a lot of Cubans fighting in almost every revlutionary wars in the planet from Africa to the far east ,these NCP guys don’t realise what they get theirself into by imposing jihad wars and ethnic cleansing their fellow country men now

          repondre message

          • 10 August 2012 03:02, by mohamed mahgoub

            asking SS to take so called div. 9 & 10th to the south we never ask Saudia to take back Alrashaida or Alkababisk! On what statue they move to juba refugees or alien army never happened in mankind history when ur gov. ur suposedly protector diny ur right live in ur ancestrs land .even the olympian who defected seeking asylm in London the gov. said he no sudanese!

            repondre message

  • 9 August 2012 13:57, by Eastern

    Ok. Then let’s resolve the issue of ABYEI BEFORE OIL. If we the Sudanese want to become obstinate, let’s all tow the same line of hardliners. With uprising and rising costs of living in Sudan the jalaba wants to show the world that South Sudan needs the oil more than the Sudan. Let’s CLOSE the OIL TALK AND FOCUS ON ABYEI, period!!!!

    repondre message

    • 9 August 2012 14:14, by Northern Sudanese

      Eastern
      Jalaba want to show the world that south sudan needs the oil more?
      of course it!!! oil is 98% of south sudans economy!!! they need it to feed part of those 4.7milion starving people!!!!

      repondre message

      • 9 August 2012 17:30, by zulu

        northern
        i cant believe after some high school education in the west you still reason like your kins of the desert. supposing south refuses security and sudan refuses to allow oil through, who is the loser? you begged for money everywhere and the west got south to bail you out.
        division 9 and 10 are nuba people you r murdering and you want us to help you in doing so?

        repondre message

  • 9 August 2012 16:12, by Kim Deng

    "If the South Sudanese government is keen to export its oil production though the Sudanese pipelines, the security file should be integrally resolved including the disengagement with the northern sector (SPLM-N), the expulsion of the armed movements, the withdrawal of the ninth and tenth (SPLM) divisions (from South Kordofan and Blue Nile) and the demarcation of the border", Abyei referendum?

    repondre message

  • 9 August 2012 20:14, by panom lualbil

    Suppose JUBA swap Mr. President with somebody else next time, if there an agreement require both khartoum and juba into Ethiopia. Because I really dont appreciate his over confident whenever he heard of positive talks by khartoum and quickly misrepresent himself.

    repondre message

  • 10 August 2012 08:06, by Patriotic-Michael

    Does the Khartoum think we are going to accept resumption of oil transportation before border demarcation?

    repondre message

Comment on this article


 
 

The following ads are provided by Google. SudanTribune has no authority on it.



Sudan Tribune

Promote your Page too

Latest Comments & Analysis


The better approach to reconciliation 2013-05-17 06:07:06 By Zechariah Manyok Biar May 16, 2013 - Some of you who might have read my previous articles know that I promised some weeks ago to write separately on the topic of peace and reconciliation that (...)

OIL: is it a curse or a blessing in South Sudan? 2013-05-17 06:04:54 By Jacob K. Lupai May 16, 2013 - In the late 70s when for the first time oil was discovered in Southern Sudan there was euphoria that poverty would be a thing of the past, replaced by a high (...)

The misapprehension of peace in the context of conflict resolution 2013-05-16 11:40:39 By Ngor Arol Garang May 16, 2013 - Political leaders and citizens with an interest in politics within the Bahr el Ghazal region will come together for a one week conference on Wednesday, where (...)


MORE




VIDEOS



Latest Press Releases


Wau Dialogue W. Bahr el-Ghazal state 13-15 May 2013 2013-05-13 14:41:35 South Sudan Law Society 13th-April-2013 Citizen of Western Bhar el-Ghazal State calls for limitations of President Powers and the Independence of Executive, Legislature and Judiciary and (...)

Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom 2013-05-04 10:53:49 Human Rights Watch Sudan: Stepped-Up Assault on Media Freedom Newspapers, Other Media Censored, Confiscated, Shut Down MAY 3, 2013 (Nairobi) – Sudan should immediately stop censoring (...)

CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom 2013-05-03 03:23:16 Committee to Protect Journalists CPJ calls on African Union to uphold press freedom New York, May 2, 2013 The Committee to Protect Journalists asks Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma, chairperson of the (...)


MORE

Copyright © 2003-2013 SudanTribune - All rights reserved.